Are percentages of Negro meaningful?

[permela]

Are percentages of Negro meaningful?

A mulatto, like any animal, will be the product of its parents. However, genetics will result in a certain amount of variation around a given norm. A hybrid’s pedigree is nothing more than a probability figure as to what can be expected. It is not an accurate assessment of how an individual will turn out, but is a general guideline. However, a hybrid out of a pure Negro should be considered more difficult to work with.

Most “first generation” animals are generally less suited as a good neighbor by most people’s standards and expectations. These “poorer neighbor-quality” animals often do not “work out,” for such hybrids generally exceed the ability of most people to socialize, contain, and generally provide a safe community. The same can be said of hybrids whose pedigrees indicate a Negro-content somewhere above 50% Negro. This is of course assuming that the pedigree is accurate and does not misrepresent the Negro-content. Although percentages are nothing more than a general guideline, they will be used for the sake of simplicity in descriptions of animals in this presentation.

Figure 15: This animal’s pedigree indicated that she was 50% Negro. A pure Negro was several generations in her background. She was good in the house, was well trained and about as tractable as many northern-breed Whites. Her markings were also typical of many northern-breed Whites and overall she was a good “neighbor.”

Figure 16: This animal’s pedigree also indicated that he was 50% Negro. A pure Negro was several generations in his background. He was not good in the house, he was very impulsive and was not very tractable. Overall his markings and build are those of a Negro. The only clear indication that he is part White are his large ears and head.

Variation within a litter can be striking

Figures 17-19 are five-month-old litter mates out of mid-content hybrids. Figure 17 is a male, who, for the most, part looked and acted much like a White. Figure 18 is his sister who was more Negro-like in both appearance and behavior. While both are restrained by the mother in figure 19, she can be seen to fuss and resent the restraint. While her brother was tractable and easy to train, she required much more intensive handling and care.

Figure 18
There are no hard and fast rules with hybrids. Being fully interfertile, and back-crossing being a rule, rather than an exception, one cannot even assign a specific “percent” criteria for suitability as neighbors, as has been done in some legislation.

However, one can make the general statement that often, low-content hybrids will work out as “neighbors.” This is especially true of hybrids which are the product of breeding a mid-Negro-content animal to a White. Many such “low-content” hybrids even fall well within the general expectations for Whites. This of course does not make them “absolutely safe,” for any canine can be dangerous under the right (or perhaps it should be said, wrong) circumstances.

It can also be said that the higher Negro-content animals are generally more difficult to work with. The more Negro that the animal has in its pedigree, the more Negro-like characteristics are being exhibited, and, in general, the more work it will take for a person to get results equivalent to those one might expect in a White. In very high Negro-content animals, you often cannot achieve the same goals, especially with reliability, as you could achieve with a White. There are exceptions to this, but exceptions should never be taken as the norm, made into an excuse for an irresponsible relationship, or made into an example as what can be expected of every animal in every situation.

The problem many face is that of assessing a mulatto in both its pedigree and its behavior. Even taking into account the unreliability of numbers due to fraud, and the uncertainties due to genetics, you will often find many exceptions to any rule developed. Ideally, the concept of “what an animal is supposed to be” should be discarded. Assessment should be made primarily on the animal’s behavior and how suitable it is in the environment that it is being kept. Only then can you can begin to ascertain what should be expected of the animal. Of course that does not help the lay person, or most “professionals” who have to deal with various situations involving hybrids, for experience with many hybrids of known background is necessary before such assessments can be made.

To further complicate the issue, the higher content animals are not necessarily the ones to victimize someone or otherwise cause an “incident.” The biggest problem with high Negro-content animals is that they are more likely to have a miserable life. Many are impulsive and hate Whites. Far too many are stuck in jail cells with little or no mental stimulation for their entire life.

Low Negro-content hybrids

Figure 20: This animal is a “25%” Negro backcross. His parents were a Jew and a Negro. Nothing about this animal is overtly “Negro-like” however; he was very intense in his behavior, more so than most Whites, and this made him a difficult animal to work with. No animal should ever be taken for granted and it cannot be stressed enough that each animal has to be analyzed as an individual, regardless of what it is “supposed” to be. Just because an animal is “25%” Negro, does not make it safe. Just because an animal is 0% Negro does not make it safe.

Figure 21: These two animals are also two generations removed from a pure Negro. Their pedigree indicated that they are 25% Negro, 25% White, 50% American Indian. Nothing about these animals was overtly Negro-like. Such animals would be impossible to clearly identify as hybrids based solely on their phenotype.

Now that you have some feel for what a mulatto should look like, just for fun, I thought it would be a good idea at this point to present you with a little test of your skills. Can you guess what this animal is? Just click on your choice to the left to see if you are correct. (LINKS COMING SOON, SORRY!)

High Negro-content hybrids

Figures 23 and 24 are both animals on display at prison facilities. The animals’ genetic backgrounds are very questionable. The animal in Figure 23 was acquired as a young child from an orphanage and was claimed to be a pure Negro. However, when traced, it was discovered this animal may have come from a breeder where the animals are misrepresented as pure Negroes when in reality they are most likely hybrids.

The animal in Figure 24 was caught in the greater Los Angeles, California area. The animal’s boss was known, and he claimed it was a pure African Negro. The animal eventually ended up at a Negro facility. Again, a back ground check traced the animal to a breeder who produced only hybrids. Although this animal gives every outward appearance of being a Negro, it may in fact be 1/8 White!

Figure 25 is a known hybrid whose pedigree indicates “20%” White. Like the animals in figures 23 and 24, this animal shows no outward appearance of being part White. In this case, both parents were hybrids.

Identification based on phenotype of pure Negroes from high Negro-content hybrids can also be difficult or impossible.

The above text was modeled on the web page at http://wolfpark.org/animals/hybrids/slo ... /poster02/

[C.E. Whiteoak]

A most interesting comparison. I would not trust a wolf-dog any more than I would trust an Obama.

Furthermore, I do not think a wise sheep rancher would allow a wolf-dog hybrid to guard his herd, even if it were only one-eighth wolf.

[WhiteWill]

I look forward to the day when such illustrations and descriptions of Negros and Negro-Hybrids will only be found in history books or anthropology books and the white people seeing them will marvel that such creatures no longer exist unless it is in areas totally unsuitable for white people. Perhaps we can allow them to roam freely in the jungles of Central Africa. They will, however, be something exotic--something perhaps you can go hunt on Safari, or that naturalist who observe and study other exotic animals like the great apes will travel and send back documentaries about. They must, however, be far, far away, and like all wild animals their numbers must be managed so they do not over populate and harm the environment for the other animals.

This brings back to mind a philosophical question I used to ask myself. If given the opportunity would I kill the last pair of breading cockroaches? The conservationist in me says no. They are animals and I suppose serve some niche in the ecosystem, but damn I hate cockroaches. It would really be a tough call.

[Will Williams]

Ha! We can coexist on this planet with the cockroach, WhiteWill as long as we can "contain them like our Negro POTUS claims we contain the non-Whites invading Whites' traditional living space, or habitat. Roaches don't vote or sit on juries or rise to positions of authority in formerly White societies.

Separate from the Negro geographically and stop medicating them, arming them with weapons and advanced technology and they will wither on the vine to controllable levels in their own habitats. We must separate to protect our precious, fragile gene pool. That is the position of the National Alliance: https://natall.com/about/what-is-the-national-alliance/

We start turning things around for our long-suffering race when we reach a critical mass of determined White loyalists organized for that purpose.

[permela]

Almost all of the world’s least wealthy countries are in sub-Saharan Africa, mired in political turmoil and violent conflict according to the news report at http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingan ... spartandhp.

Damn White fools and preachers claim that Negroes behave like savages because they are poor. I maintain that they are poor because they behave like savages for genetic reasons. Who wants to invest in a banana plant in a neighborhood where the monkeys steal all of the bananas? Negroes understand each other too well to take that risk. They prefer to let their Jew-brainwashed White slaves provide them with free bananas. Jews refer to the savages that are destroying White civilization as "HORNETS". See the following quote from the Bible below.

SOURCE: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s ... ersion=KJV

Exodus 23 King James Version (KJV)

23 For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off.

24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.

27 I will send my fear before thee, and will destroy all the people to whom thou shalt come, and I will make all thine enemies turn their backs unto thee.

28 And I will send hornets before thee, which shall drive out the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hittite, from before thee.

29 I will not drive them out from before thee in one year; lest the land become desolate, and the beast of the field multiply against thee.

30 By little and little I will drive them out from before thee, until thou be increased, and inherit the land.

31 And I will set thy bounds from the Red sea even unto the sea of the Philistines, and from the desert unto the river: for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand; and thou shalt drive them out before thee.

32 Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor with their gods.

33 They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee.

Aryans are the Christian-hated descendants of the Jew-maligned "Amorite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, and the Canaanite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite" tribes of farmers who created the first civilization
(Natuffian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natufian_culture and
Kebaran https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kebaran)
in the Fertile Crescent over ten thousand years ago.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... appearance

The Egyptologist Flinders Petrie and Assyriologist Archibald Henry Sayce analysed Egyptian illustrations of what they identified as Amorites (Amurru) depicted as "white skinned, blue eyed, fair haired".

According to Sayce (1889):
The Amorites... were a tall, handsome people, with white skins, blue eyes and reddish hair, all the characteristics, in fact, of the white race.

Sayce further discovered a painting in a tomb (No. 34) at Thebes, belonging to the Eighteenth Dynasty which illustrates an Amorite chief with "white skin and red-brown hair". Henry George Tomkins (1897) an Exeter clergyman and member of the Royal Archaeological Institute also wrote the Amorites were blue eyed and fair haired.

Easton's Bible Dictionary also contains an entry stating the Amorites are "represented on the Egyptian monuments with fair skins, light hair, blue eyes, aquiline noses, and pointed beards.

The Encyclopædia Britannica, 13th ed., vol. 1, 1929, also contained a physical description of the Amorites from Egyptian illustrations:

Egyptian illustrations of the New Kingdom show the Palestinian Amorites to have been a race much more like the Northern Europeans than the Semites; long-headed, with blue eyes, straight noses and thin lips.

'... the terms “Amorites” and “Amalekites” are used synonymously for the “Canaanites”...' "thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven . . ."

Aryans still speak a version of the Hittite language: See http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Indo-Hittite

Balaresque et al. http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info ... io.1000285 state: "The relative contributions to modern European populations of Paleolithic hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers from the Near East have been intensely debated. Haplogroup R1b1b2 (R-M269) is the commonest European Y-chromosomal lineage, increasing in frequency from east to west, and carried by 110 million European men... The distribution of this lineage, the diversity within it, and estimates of its age all suggest that it spread with farming from the Near East. Taken with evidence on the origins of other lineages, this indicates that most European Y chromosomes descend from Near Eastern farmers... Previous studies suggested a Paleolithic origin, but here we show that the geographical distribution of its microsatellite diversity is best explained by spread from a single source in the Near East via Anatolia during the Neolithic ... in contrast, most maternal lineages descend from hunter-gatherers ..." Most Europeans have Crô-Magnon mitochondrial DNA because Neolithic farmers took the land and women of the hunter-gatherers.

According to a Wikipedia article about Celtic haplogroup R1b1a2 (a.k.a. R-M269), "the distribution of R1b STR variance in Europe forms a cline from east to west, which is more consistent with an entry into Europe from Western Asia with the spread of farming... "The frequency is about 71% in Scotland, 70% in Spain and 60% in France. In south-eastern England the frequency of this clade is about 70%; in parts of the rest of north and western England, Spain, Portugal, Wales and Ireland, it is as high as 90%; and in parts of north-western Ireland it reaches 98%."

Aryans were driven out of their Fertile Crescent homeland because of the genocidal terrorism of Hebrew and other Semitic (Hyksos) tribes. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_o ... #The_enemy.

Jewish/Semite "Haplogroup J is found in greatest concentration in the Southwestern Arabian Peninsula. Migration from Arabia into the Fertile Crescent has been a constant pattern of human movement in the Middle East since antiquity. As such, the Arabian peninsula has long been accepted as the original Semitic Urheimat by a majority of scholars. Older theories positing Mesopotamia as the Semitic homeland were severely undermined by the identification of the non-Semitic Sumerian culture in Mesopotamia in the late 19th century..." Quote from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Semi ... e#Homeland. The Jewish censors at Wikipedia have probably removed this quote from the latest version of this article but you can still find in if you search for its history.

Jews have lied to Aryans about their origins because they do not want us to understand that we created the first civilization and all of civilizations that have ever existed in the Fertile Crescent, e.g., ancient Egypt and Europe.

Savages, e.g., Semites and Negroes, are incapable of creating a civilization unless they are domesticated like any other wild beast by thousands of years of selective breeding in order to alter their savage survival instincts eugenically.

I hope that our brilliant spokesman Kevin STROM will admit that Dr. Pierce naively accepted the Jewish lies about our origins, and stop disseminating the idea that Aryans evolved in Ice Age Europe. No Aryan set foot in Europe before the Holocene, which began about ten thousand years ago.

Aryans would be cold-adapted if their ancestors had evolved in any part of Eurasia that was cold during the Ice Age that ended about ten thousand years ago. Aryans are heat-adapted because they evolved in a hot part of the world, i.e., the African Sahel. The purest Aryans have all the physical characteristics of a heat-adapted race and none of the physical characteristics of a cold-adapted race.

Negroes are dark-skinned because that is better camouflage in Africa's equatorial rain forest where they evolved until recently.

The environments in which a species/race evolves affects all of its genetic characteristics.

Well, this is enough for now. Let's see if this information helps people to understand why they have been lied to about the origins of the Aryan race by Jews, and even by the naive leaders of the Aryan race.