Commenting on Counter-Currents site

[Will Williams]

I noticed that comments had not been closed on this review of Dr. Dalton's book The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, so it got a bump: https://counter-currents.com/2024/04/th ... s-to-wars/


Will Williams: August 7, 2024
Gibson caused a furor when he drunkenly said, “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.”
---

Drunkenly or not, Mel was on to a truth. Dalton soberly examines Mel’s statement.

[Will Williams]

Update: After comments below the 30 April review of Dr. Dalton's book The Jewish Hand in the World Wars had still been open for more than nine weeks, with no comments made under it since 1 May, I bumped it yesterday, quoting Mel Gibson's infamous quote, and comments under that article have now been closed.

* * * * *

Popular C-C writer Beau Albrecht put up a good article today describing widespread and mighty influence Jews exercise over America today: https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/th ... -industry/ I honed in on his part about WikiJews, promoting Andrew Hamilton's piece at NV two years ago and WikiJews' distorted entry about Dr. Pierce and our National Alliance.


Will Williams: August 9, 2024
Very good report, Beau, however not much we didn’t already know about the Jew stranglehold on America’s news and entertainment media, education, etc. I like seeing anything that further exposes the treachery of WikiJews, so thanks for more about their “No Nazi policy.”

—
Simply wanting white [sic] countries to remain white [sic] makes one a Nazi [or neo-Nazi] by Wikipedia’s special definition.
—

One of my all-time favorite writers, Andrew Hamilton, wrote the definitive essay on WikiJews a couple of years ago, here: “Wikipedia (and Britannica” at nationalvanguard.org. He wrote:

Wikipedia is a key component of the tightly centralized racial, economic, ideological, and mental and behavioral control apparatus the Internet has developed, or perhaps better put, been molded into, bringing into view the long-held despotic dream of a unified global dictatorship and surveillance system… Wikipedia is a monopoly, since it dwarfs [Jew-owned] Britannica and is “free.”

The comments under Hamilton’s piece are interesting, like this by him that further sums the situation up nicely:

[T]he fact that Jews have a monopoly on the ever-shrinking and more tightly controlled internet poses a big problem… Jews are in the enviable position (for them) of running an electronic Ministry of Truth in real-time for everyone on the planet.

It’s surprising to see WikiJews quote William Pierce accurately, but they did for once, here: William Luther Pierce – Wikipedia

Pierce was frequently described as a neo-Nazi,[2][3][4][26][5][31][6] although he personally rejected this label.[32] When confronted with the issue by Mike Wallace on 60 minutes, Pierce described the term as a slander:

“I admire many things that Hitler wrote, many of the programs and policies that he instituted in Germany, but we [in the National Alliance] do not blindly copy anyone else’s policies or programs. We’ve formulated our own program in view of the situation that we face here in America today.”[32]

Perusing sources below WikiJews’ entry for Pierce one notices many from SPLC, ADL and other Jew-approved media.

[Will Williams]

More results of the poll that was sponsored by C-C earlier this year -- a must read that shows what we are up against when the 540 respondents supposedly represent pro-White activism: https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/red-pill-report/


Will Williams: August 9, 2024
Interesting for sure, but where in the world did you find these 540 respondents? It’s difficult for me to believe that very many of them are actual members of a serious real-world pro-White cause.

I don’t use the term “red pill” (or any of the other colored pills) but have assumed that it is a euphemism for a White person suddenly becoming racially responsible.

In circles I’ve travelled for almost four decades nearly everyone is familiar with the name William Pierce — everyone — yet none of these 540 respondents appear to be familiar with either his name or his body of work for our race. That seems more dubious than current polling of likely voters for presumptive presidential candidates where Emhoff/Walz are running neck-and-neck with Trump/Vance. 50% of those polled prefer Emhoff/Walz. Who believes that? White America needs a lot more red pills — a lot more!

My takeaway is that the majority of respondents need some serious radicalizing. Believing that Our Cause must have a non-Semitic spiritual foundation, it was edifying to see that 0% of poll respondents are Christian Scientists, Unitarians, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Congregationalists, Disciples of Christ, Seventh Day Adventists; no Muslims — either Sunni or Shia, and only a couple of Jews. It’s surprising to see 0% Christian Identists among all of those other belief systems when so many identify as such.

Since I’ve been a Cosmotheist, the philosophy/ideology, or religion, if you prefer, that William Pierce founded, I suppose I got lumped in with “other.” I see I have much work to do.

[Will Williams]

C-C owner, Dr. Johnson, reminds me that I participated in the poll, like maybe that could mean I shouldn't criticize it: https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/red-pill-report/


Will Williams: August 9, 2024

Greg Johnson: August 9, 2024 I think you are one of the people who filled out the poll, Will.
---

I did. The results of the poll said I was the “Commander” type.

OK. Being that type may qualify me to lead the National Alliance, a difficult undertaking that from what I can observe after ten years in the job other personality types might find crushing.

The results of this poll tell me that among the respondents there isn’t much prospect of consensus for strict racial separation — a primary interest of mine since that is a necessary requirement for preservation of our unique gene pool.

The wide range of religious beliefs claimed by respondents reveal to me the problem we face. Our people do need to be radicalized and like Robert Mathews said, “ten men, one beat; one hundred men, one beat’ then thousand men, one beat.” Was he wrong? I think not.

I appreciate Counter-Currents allowing my somewhat radical voice to be counted.

[Will Williams]

A follow-up response to Beau Albrecht's article that I had commented under yesterday. https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/th ... -industry/ He thought I should check out Morris Dees' divorce papers. I was way ahead of him on that one.

Will Williams: August 10, 2024

Beau Albrecht: August 9, 2024 Speaking of the $PLC, you should check out the Morris Dees divorce papers one of these days.
---

I’ve been dealing with that sleazebag up close and personal since 1986, Beau, and checked out his divorce papers with Maureene Bass Dees at least 30 years ago.

When he hiked up at my alma mater, NCSU, to give his spiel about fighting “hate,” I showed up and faced him down with a half dozen well-dressed National Alliance members.

I’d made a hundred or so two-sided leaflets. On one side was an unflattering caricature of him and the words, DO YOU WANT THIS MAN TEACHING TOLERANCE TO YOUR KIDS? “Teaching Tolerance” BTW, was a program the SPLC had placed in thousands of American elementary schools. On the other side of the flier was a quote by his ex-to-be Maureene from the divorce papers, “Morris kissed Charlie Springman (the Jew queer) on his penis.”

He tried to have me arrested but failed. I asked a female reporter who interviewed me earlier and then had been sitting beside him up front, to take a flier back down to him and have him autograph it for me. He blew up, crumpled it and turned around to glare at me while a couple of Sheriff’s deputies were keeping me in my seat.

He did not take questions from the audience because I had our members spread around (wearing NCSU’s school colors to blend in). I confronted him at the reception afterward and he blew up and yelled in a very high-pitched voice, “I’m not afraid of this cocksucker.” Fun was had by all and Mo never showed up again on our turf, especially giving a week’s notice ahead of time.

[Will Williams]

A follow-up with Beau, giving me a chance to take another poke at our Jewish watchdogs, even using a description of SPLC's Jewishness from a well-known C-C commenter: https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/th ... -industry/


Will Williams: August 10, 2024

Beau Albrecht: August 10, 2024 Well done! It’s a wonder that e[Morris Dees] ever had the audacity to crawl out from under a rock and show his face in public.
---

Thanks, Beau. As a service to Our Cause the National Alliance has kept up for years with troubles within the Jews’ so-called “law center” that vowed for decades that it would “destroy” our organization, here: “SPLC is Hate Group” at whitebiocentrism.com

C-C commenter Franklin Ryckaert’s revealing piece on the Jewishness of the “law center” made it into my book.

There are two sides to the SPLC vs. NA story — theirs, which, for example, is here from 3 February 2016, by SPLC’s “Hatewatch staff,” and ours, that will not defend SPLC’s lying smears with all of its weaselly qualifiers like “allegedly,” “if true,” “reportedly,” “it is said,” “may have,” etc. that are seen throughout, from beginning to end. The Alliance’s defense is in my book, Pocahontas Show Trial, that features the SPLC and its sorry cast of collaborators, with gobs of documentation, including three trial transcripts in its appendices, and even a Website for documents that wouldn’t fit in the book.

The fact is that our “embattled” organization has weathered the storms and prevailed over all of those who tried to take us down, including the crooked Jewish** so-called “law center.” What is it doing now that all of its top Jews and queers were either fired or “retired.?”

**Franklin Ryckaert wrote (in Show Trial):

Of the twenty-two (22) SPLC senior program staff members, fifteen (15) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 68%. Of the thirteen (13) SPLC directors, eight (8) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 62%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, Jews are over-represented among the SPLC senior program staff members by a factor of 34 times (3,400 percent) and over-represented on the SPLC board of directors by a factor of 31 times (3,100 percent).

[Will Williams]

A question I have after finishing the excellent book, The Myth of German Villainy, and finding a quote therein that may contradict that he was a Lieutenant General: https://counter-currents.com/2024/07/a- ... ng-part-2/

Will Williams: August 10, 2024
Moseley wrote on April 21, 1939 to Brigadier General Walter A. DeLamater :

Initially I never mentioned the word, ‘Jew’, in any statement, except once in New York City, (actually in Indianapolis, Indiana) when I made an appeal to the Jews to help us lick Communism. From that moment they have attacked me at every turn in the road. In their publications they call me a Fascist, something I am not; and as far as I know, I have never seen a Fascist. I belong to no organization. The Jews ‘have forced’ me to discuss the problem of the Jew in self-defense. They are doing everything in their power in an effort to intimidate me and force me into the camp of their enemies.

* * * *

“The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” -Major General George Van Horn Moseley, U.S. Army (Ret.), speech at the National Defense Meeting (March 29, 1939)

This second quote by Moseley, reportedly made a month earlier, is found in the 2023 updated, revised edition of The Myth of German Villainy (page 431) that I just finished reading. Available here: cosmotheistchurch.org

If Moseley was already retired in October 1938 as a Major General (2 stars), I’m not sure when he could have been promoted to Lieutenant General (3 stars), unless his permanent rank was reduced to Major General after retirement?

[Will Williams]

Wimpy assumes to know something about radicalizing Whites: https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/red-pill-report/ I link to today's ADV.


Hamburger Today to WW: August 10, 2024 I sort of assumed that you would advocate for ‘radicalizing’ Concerned Whites rather than accepting that militancy is off-putting to many Concerned Whites and causes them to ‘bounce off’ the movement rather than ‘look further’.
---

You assume correctly, HT.  "Concerned Whites," as you describe them, constitute a minority of our people. That percentage is sure to increase as the situation worsens. I can overlook those who are offput by militancy. I'll leave them to you to radicalize. Good luck with that.

But for now, the sub-group within that minority of Concerned Whites who will truly become racially responsible and commit to becoming determined activists for Our Cause is a small minority within that minority -- perhaps just 2% of our people, at most.

I wouldn't know the percentage of respondents to the poll who are already sufficiently radicalized, but I'm guessing it's not very high. Still, most are probably already Concerned Whites and more subject to radicalizing that are the majority of Whites who are basically still sleepwalking through life.

Militancy won't be so off-putting to Concerned Whites as racial tensions continue to heighten, Witness the riots by White Brits recently over the 17-year-old Rwandan monster in their midst who stabbed to death three sub-teen White girls. The so-called "melting pot" in the UK has boiled over despite Draconian "race/hate" laws calculated to keep Whitey down under threat of prison. See: "Pressure Cooker Britain: Turning Up the Heat" at nationalvanguard.org 

[Will Williams]

I discover at C-C a fellow NCSU alumnus who shares our dim view of the SPLC: https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/th ... -industry/


ncleapyear to WW: August 10, 2024 Interesting. When I lived in Bragaw dormitory my freshman year at NCSU, the SPLC bombarded us with their crap… Academic freedom being somewhat freer in those days…
---

SPLC wasn’t founded until 1971. I was a freshman at State in 1970 after four years in the military. It was still practically a cow college. Never lived on campus since Raleigh was my hometown. Studied Architecture in the elite School of Design.

Campus life there was like on so many other American campuses in 1970, engulfed in much Jew-led counterculture. I was a hawk among doves and saw academia beyond the insulated Architecture school as unchallenging and a waste of my time.

[Will Williams]

Roger Devlin reviews a book that is not worth reading: https://counter-currents.com/2024/08/ma ... gene-pool/ I get the opportunity to use something I wrote in Lexicon on WB years ago:


Will Williams: August 11, 2024
The progressive left—social justice warriors, the “woke,” or whatever one wishes to call them—imagine that they are creating a new world free of racism and oppression…
---

How about anti-White?

There was a recent C-C essay that suggested that we humans are controlled by words. I’ll stipulate to that. So, why uses words coined by our racial enemies?

I refuse to use the Ebonic term “woke” or even to acknowledge its use, thanks. “Politically Correct” is a term that serves the same purpose and is understood by our people (no matter that demi-Jew funnyman Bill Maher butchered its meaning).

Seems I’m right. Found this:

Despite the recent spike in its usage, ‘woke’ is not a new word. It was first used in the 1940s and was created as a political term by black Americans. It means to be awake to issues of social justice and racial justice.

I axe you, what self-respecting White person would talk like a street nigger?