Commenting on Counter-Currents site

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Tue Feb 18, 2025 1:08 am

Young Jason Kessler doesn't care for me or my criticism of his blustery know-it-all attitude. Go to his latest essay and his comments under it to put this long comment by me in conterxt: https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/is ... the-right/



Will Williams: February 18, 2025
What serious White racial nationalist gives a shit what Nick Fuentes writes on X? Is that all you’ve got?

Jason Kessler: February 17, 2025 at 11:42 pm
The obstinacy on this issue is part of a larger Trump derangement among nationalists who have decided that the Jewish Question trumps all other issues and have a one-dimensional analysis of the political situation boiling down to one word: Israel.


Maybe, if you repeat that one word three times loud enough, often enough, a few of your former alt-right half-wits might follow you wherever you plan to lead them.

You sure do hyperbolize, Mr. Kessler. FYI, In our eternal racial struggle Israel is not a race, Jewry is.

Some racial nationalists who focus on Jewry as the primary enemy of our race — those you criticize as “bullies,” as “pseudo-religious fanatics” who are in your way — will not be leaving the field. You will have to come through us and you, sir, do not have the game.

I don’t use the term ZOG because Zionists include lots of Whites like Trump and the crew of advisors, cabinet members and ambassadors he has gathered around him. Israelis do not control America’s mass mind unless they are dual Israeli-American citizens, like the “American” hostages recently released by Hamas, and if they happen to work for Jewish-controlled mass media or other controlled industries.

You want facts of Jewish media control in America? Read this and weep: https://nationalvanguard.org/books/2010 ... ica-01.pdf There’s the usual changing of the Jews up top, but they’re still up top.

Maybe 80% of Jews voted for Biden, so what? They still control the news and entertainment media that is vigorously opposing Trump, and control half of politicians in Congress, the Democrats, and most Republicans. They control the political process through their control of mass media. Trump is effectively a Shabbos goy. He is in their service. Fact!

It’s not Israel or her boosters that control America, it’s organized Jewry and their collaborators — therefore JOG. Why protest their genocide of fellow Semites in the homeland they stole from them — protesters should instead be exposing Jewish control of mass media.

As for some of the anti-White issues Trump has taken on, great! Keep up the good work, Donald, for as long as you can. Fort Liberty is back to Fort Bragg again. Whoopee!

As for Trump encouraging White South Africans to seek asylum here. Good. It’s about time. For years southern African Whites were denied asylum, including Rhodesians, because they were the wrong color! I take it you were not born in 2000, or were still pooping yellow when Dr. Pierce pointed this out 25 years ago here: Horror in Rhodesia | National Vanguard America’s immigration policy was no different than the UK’s then.

…About 20,000 of the 75,000 Whites remaining in Rhodesia are entitled to claim British citizenship, and thousands of them are rushing now to renew their passports [like you point out Africaners are lining up now to apply for Trump’s refugee status]. The problem is that the British government doesn’t want them. If they move to Britain, they are hardly likely to be supporters of the Blair government. Instead they undoubtedly will be staunch opponents of all of Tony Blair’s very progressive programs for integrating the United Kingdom into the New World Order.

It’s not that Blair and his government don’t want more immigrants. Oh, my goodness, no! They love immigrants! It’s just that the Rhodesian farmers are the wrong color. Some of them, having been exposed for so long to the racial realities of Africa, may even be racists! Therefore, the Blair government is not at all happy about the prospect of their coming to Britain. And as for the 55,000 or so White Rhodesians who are not entitled to British passports, don’t even mention them! There’s no chance at all that they will be allowed into Britain, even as refugees. Where will they go? Well, that’s not Tony Blair’s problem, is it. It’s their problem. Tony Blair doesn’t want to hear about it.

And for the most part the [Jew-]controlled media in Britain are helping him not hear about it by not reporting on events in Zimbabwe any more than they absolutely must. Britain’s mincing, prancing, smirking little prime minister… is absolutely determined to ignore the ethnic cleansing now occurring in Rhodesia…. The little man’s eyes flashed as he announced to the world that ethnic cleansing would not be tolerated.

And it’s just about the same story in the United States… Have you heard Mr. Clinton say anything harsh about Robert Mugabe? Have you heard the little Jewish troll in charge of his State Department, Madeleine Albright, speak out against the ethnic cleansing going on in Zimbabwe? Have you heard her call for Mugabe to be tried as a war criminal?

Of course, not. And it’s quite plain that the refusal of Western governments to criticize him has emboldened Mugabe. He sees the silence of Blair and Clinton as a green light to do whatever he wants to do to the White minority in Zimbabwe. The day after the murder of [White Rhodesian farmer] David Stevens and the beating and torture of his neighbors, Mugabe announced publicly, specifically in response to complaints from other Whites about his government’s failure to take action against the murderers, and I quote: “We warned the White farmers. We cannot protect you if you provoke the war veterans. You must expect the consequences.”

Now, if that is not a call to further ethnic cleansing by his followers, I don’t know what is. And so far neither Mr. Blair nor Mr. Clinton has said a word. Mrs. Albright has not waddled in front of the cameras and announced that the civilized world will not tolerate any more ethnic cleansing….

More from Pierce about the merits of ethnic clensing at the link.

You “fully support the Oranians,” but their well-intended redoubt will not last indefinitely — not just because it’s landlocked, surrounded by kaffirs who want to exterminate them, but because they still foolishly embrace the failed Dutch Reformed Church that had betrayed them. A must read, quoting William Pierce 27 years ago about this betrayal is here: Spiritual Man and South Africa | National Vanguard

And the Dutch Reformed Church had sapped the moral strength of the Boers to the point that they just couldn’t bring themselves to do what needed to be done. For at least 11 years before 1993 the Church had been back-pedaling on its racial doctrine. The Church would have made the Boers feel guilty if they had taken the hard measures against the Blacks that were called for to ensure the future of their own people. It was easy for the Blacks to contemplate massacring the Whites — the African National Congress had the slogan “one settler, one bullet” — but the Whites could no longer contemplate massacring the Blacks without feeling guilty.

The Jews, of course, were pumping their own spiritual poison into the White population through the mass media, urging them in a thousand subtle ways to surrender rather than fight. But it was betrayal by the Boer establishment — the Boer politicians and Church leaders and big businessmen — which sealed the fate of South Africa…
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:59 pm

Uh oh! It seems Kessler has thrown down the gauntlet with me. He's not in a very good position to be doing that: https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/is ... the-right/


Will Williams: February 19, 2025
Jason Kessler: February 18, 2025 I don’t need to “go through you” because you’re totally inconsequential.

I see. First allow me to apologize for writing that you were probably not born before 2000, and if you were, you’d be pooping yellow. That was inconsiderate of me. I see now that you are around 42, a grown man.


Also TLDR. No one is going to sit around reading endless copypasta.


I had to look up “copypasta” and TLDR, presumably terms from social media, something I don’t participate in.

Differences between you and me that I deduce from your writings and your comments under them:

I try to use this wonderful new tool, the Internet, to reach and teach our people to become racially responsible, to get involved. The best way I see for me to do this is to sometimes quote mentors, especially Dr. William Pierce, who I had sought out and who taught me. I know who and what motivated me to become active for our cause and know that by posting the teachings of our greatest leaders who came before us, those lessons will resonate with some, not many, certainly not with you, and those few will respond positively to my teachers’ lessons and become committed themselves.

You are unimpressive to me, Jason, not just because you claim to know from the experience from your Unite the Right debacle what the White resistance movement needs to be going forward — your plan is full of holes in my opinion — but that you make this thing of ours all about you.

You are incapable of arguing against the irrefutable facts I point out from William Pierce about Jewish control of mass media and of reasons why White southern Africa fell to Blacks. You’re smart and talented enough, but will not listen to advice — just bluster, hot air, projecting your own shortcomings onto others, and you seem to not get along with practically everyone you meet.

I know you’ve read the following profile piece about you from the Washington Post, even though it’s too long for you to read. Considering the source of that Jewish medium, found at the WikiJew site, stiil, I feel I know you better now: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/in ... 018/08/11/ I post it here for others to read. There are 52 other articles about you, listed as sources by Wikijews, including #52 saying you and a few other Unite the Right knuckleheads were judged liable for $26 million in damages for your actions. That’s a lot: Spencer, Kessler, Cantwell and other white supremacists found liable in deadly Unite the Right rally – The Washington Post

Inside Jason Kessler’s hate-fueled rise
August 11, 2018
By Ian Shapira

CHARLOTTESVILLE — Jason Kessler needed a friendly media outlet to vent and portray himself as a victim. So he dialed Stormfront Action, a white-nationalist online radio show. He wanted to promote Sunday’s “Unite the Right 2” rally across from the White House, the sequel to last year’s deadly demonstration in Charlottesville.

During the hour-long interview last month, he unloaded a litany of hate-fueled grievances: The police in Charlottesville, he said, “screwed” him and other white nationalists last year. The media has turned him into “Damian, the son of Lucifer.” White people are “up against a wall.” Jews, he charged, “control the currency” and are “over-represented in Congress and the Supreme Court.”

“What’s happening to us is unjust right now,” Kessler told Stormfront Action listeners. “That’s why I don’t want to back down.”

In the year since Kessler, 34, organized the rally that flooded his hometown with hundreds of white supremacists and neo-Nazis and ended in bloodshed, the University of Virginia graduate has faced crushing criticism from within and outside his movement.

Prominent racists have broken ties with him. Friends have also parted ways, saying they don’t recognize the man they once knew as an Obama supporter. His father, in his first interview, told The Washington Post that he vehemently disapproves of Kessler’s actions and has tried to persuade him to stop. Many of his private messages planning the rallies have been leaked online. And Charlottesville residents have filed numerous lawsuits against him.

[The story behind the searing photo of Charlottesville’s worst day]

Wherever he goes in town, the man who bills himself as a “white civil rights” leader is often shouted at.

“I’ve been turned into an avatar of hate,” Kessler told The Post in a telephone interview. “I’ve made some powerful enemies, and I’ve gotten involved in some things that I didn’t know I was getting involved in. I think the alt-right thinks I am a cuck and not extreme enough and [liberals] think I am a white supremacist. None are true.”

It’s a deceptive statement for someone who touts his ­anti-Semitism on Stormfront ­Action and once told a crowd of white nationalists aligned with Richard Spencer, “I don’t give an g–d— about being called a racist.”

‘Exchange your pride for fame’

Kessler didn’t seem destined for a career in uniting the right.

A decade ago, he worked the phones at night for Secrest Strategic Services, the now-defunct Democratic polling outfit. He voted for Barack Obama in 2008. He spent time at the Occupy Wall Street encampment in Charlottesville in 2011, until he was kicked out for trying to register homeless people, according to Luis Oyola, a fellow Occupy activist. He lived for a time in government-subsidized housing in Charlottesville with a roommate who was African and Muslim, according to a public Facebook post written by a former college friend, Jenny Rebecca.

Although he’d graduated from U-Va. in 2009 with a psychology degree, he struggled to find full-time employment. Kessler couldn’t get or keep a job for a long time “because of his social anxiety and he had trouble getting along with certain people,” Rebecca wrote in her Facebook post.

At one point, Kessler was rejected for a position at a local government agency that provides mental health services. He was upset he lost the job to a woman, explaining in a deposition for one of his lawsuits in June that, “I had been passed over due to protected characteristics.”

“He would write posts on Facebook about how women hated nice guys and asked why women wouldn’t give him a chance,” Rebecca wrote on Facebook. “Then he’d delete his Facebook for a few months, join again, delete it, and join.”

One year ago, racial violence during a white-nationalist rally resulted in the death of a female counterprotester. Police are making an effort, with heightened security, to prevent a repeat of that tragedy.

He started to dabble in creative writing. One of his poems, in a self-published book titled “Midnight Road,” seemed to presage his own future in the limelight: “[S]tupidity is ca-ching, ca-ching!/exchange your pride for fame./ignorance means ratings/they’ll put you on TV and doll you up for viewers’ perversity.”

His novel later that year, “Badland Blues,” is about “a homeless dwarf madly in unrequited love with a local waitress,” according to its Amazon page. The customer reviews are brutal: “I’m putting more effort into this review than the author put into this steaming pile of crap,” wrote one person. “A classic read . . . said no one ever,” wrote another. “Why buy a book from the scum that organized the alt right rally in Charlottesville?” asked someone else.

‘Sir, your time is over’

By the time Donald Trump announced he was running for president in 2016, Kessler’s political conversion was complete.

As he sought to make a name for himself in the alt-right world, Kessler looked for a political foe. He found it in Wes Bellamy, an African American teacher serving as the vice mayor of Charlottesville. In March 2016, Bellamy had angered Kessler when he held a news conference calling for the removal of the Robert E. Lee statue in a downtown park.
Advertisement

So, in late November, two weeks after Trump’s presidential victory, Kessler published an article on his website excavating Bellamy’s old tweets that had mocked white people. Then he went further.

At a Charlottesville City Council hearing the next month, Kessler slow-walked from the back of the room to the speaker’s dais. He blasted Tom Petty’s “I Won’t Back Down.” Before he took his turn to condemn Bellamy as a “black supremacist,” he rotated to face the crowd, lifting his arms. People laughed. Some carried signs that read, “No to White Supremacy” and “White Supremacist Go Home.”

“You’re finished. . . . Sir, sir, your time is over. Your time is over,” then-Mayor Michael Signer kept saying until Kessler took a seat.

Bellamy, who remains on the council, said Kessler whipped up the controversy to promote racism.

“He was mad because there was someone his age who was vice mayor, who was black, while he’s at home without work,” Bellamy said. “He wanted to bring me down all so he could become some national white hero.”

In 2017, Kessler befriended Richard Spencer, a fellow U-Va. graduate well-known for leading followers into chants like “Hail Trump” and declaring, “Let’s party like it’s 1933.”

They teamed up in May 2017 for a demonstration in Charlottesville protesting the council’s vote to remove the Lee statue. At one point, Kessler told the crowd: “I think one thing that I have in common with all of you here today is that I don’t give a g–d— about being called a racist.”

His new friends whooped and clapped.

[Finding the white supremacists who beat a black man in Charlottesville]

Two weeks later, Kessler applied for a permit for his own rally. In the category of “Event Purpose/Brief Description,” all he wrote was: “Free speech rally in support of the Lee Monument.”

‘Get ready for a fight’

A month before the “Unite the Right” rally, about 50 Ku Klux Klan members and supporters came to Charlottesville to protest the removal of the Lee statue.

David Caron, a computer and printer technician who has known Kessler since childhood and agreed with him about the statue, urged him to disavow the Klan.

Instead, as Kessler stood before news cameras after the Klan event, he denounced antifa, an anti-fascist group, as a “terrorist organization.” As for the Klan, Kessler gave them the benefit of the doubt.

“No one wanted them here,” Kessler said, “but they at least came and peaceably assembled.”

But Kessler knew there could be clashes at the rally, according to his private messages with other white nationalists on Discord, a group-chat app popular among far-right radicals.

“We should bring picket signs that can be used as sticks to bludgeon our enemies if they get violent,” he wrote in June, according to batches of the messages leaked to the alternative media site, Unicorn Riot — some of which are being used against Kessler and his cohorts in a federal suit accusing them of violating civil rights laws.

[He once defended the poor in court. Now he defends white supremacists]

“Get ready for a real fight,” he wrote the next month.

On Aug. 12, the day of the rally, Charlottesville was transformed overnight into the country’s capital of white supremacy and Kessler into one of the movement’s most prominent leaders. Just as he had anticipated, there was violence.

One counterprotester, Heather Heyer, was killed when a car allegedly driven by a neo-Nazi rammed into a crowd downtown. A black counterprotester, DeAndre Harris, was savagely beaten in a parking garage, and others were pepper-sprayed by white nationalists at a torch-lit march the night before the rally on U-Va.’s campus.

For Kessler’s father, his son’s transformation has been devastating.

“I support him as a son, but not politically,” said Eric Kessler, 58. “The family is dismayed across the board about this situation. We’ve never identified with racial politics.”

He divorced Jason’s mother when Jason was about 10, he said, adding that at one point later, he was married to a black woman.

“I consider myself a Christian person, and I think everyone is equal,” Eric Kessler said. “I’ve always raised my sons that way, and anything that departs from that is something I have never done.”

Since he learned of Jason’s radicalism shortly before the rally, father and son have had little contact. Eric said his son earns money by working for a local contractor whose identity he does not know. He’s been staying, on and off, with his grandmother.

One thing, however, haunts the father. Eric said that when he learned the identity of the woman who had been killed at Jason’s rally, the name instantly clicked. Heyer was in the church youth group he volunteered for 20 years ago.

“It was shocking,” he said. “I felt bad for her and her mother. It was a terrible thing.”
For his son, though, Heyer’s death was an occasion for mockery.

“Heather Heyer was a fat, disgusting Communist,” Kessler tweeted just days after the rally. “Looks like it was payback time.”

‘There will be violence’

As Kessler ramped up to hold a second rally, his friend, Hannah Zarski, a mother of five who lives near Charlottesville and supports white nationalism, kept telling him: Enough was enough.

“[Y]ou’re involved with the wrong people. Just saying,” Zarski, 32, wrote Kessler in private Facebook messages she shared with The Post.

“We’re on the cusp of changing our society and history forever and some people want to run away from that back to the status quo,” Kessler replied.

“Activism should be servicing our people,” she wrote. “We still have men in jail from the first go round . . . ”

Kessler was getting peeved. He told Zarski, who says she opposes violence, that “you might just want to go your own way and do something else.”

“Take a chance to make it something positive like fundraising,” she pleaded. “Jason your inability to have these discussions with the people closest to you is an issue.”

In May, he began courting the attendance of a Virginia man whose Facebook profile page says “Only crew 38 and people met off fb” — a reference to a support group for the Hammerskin Nation, a skinhead organization, according to messages obtained by prominent counterprotester Emily Gorcenski.

On Monday, Gorcenski tweeted images of Kessler’s conversation and of the man’s Facebook page, which is emblazoned with a logo of silhouetted figures brandishing weapons and the words, “Hospitalize Your Local Antifa Scumbag.”

“Mr. Kessler my boys and me will be there. Keep me updated on email,” the man wrote.

“Awesome, man. I’ll add you to the email list,” Kessler replied.
Kessler needed to boost his crowd numbers for Sunday.

One of the movement’s key figures — Christopher Cantwell, better known from Charlottesville as “The Crying Nazi” — wrote a blog post in late June warning, “Follow Kessler At Your Peril.” Spencer also declared he was out. Even Andrew Anglin, founder of the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website, recently told readers to avoid the event, saying that “everyone knows that there will be violence” and that participants will “look like ruffians” and that no matter what “we get blamed for it.” He added: “You need to protect yourselves. You need to lay low.”

But, on Stormfront Action radio, Kessler urged listeners to bring flags on poles. Law enforcement, he said, will keep them safe from counterprotesters.

“Everyone,” he claimed, “is going to be protected.”
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Tue Feb 18, 2025 11:15 pm

Kessler thinks he puts up a good argument. Anyone watching carefully might think differently. He tries to put down another commenter who agreed with me, so I back up the other commenter, pointing out Kessler's projection of his own bad behavior onto others. https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/is ... the-right/



Will Williams: February 19, 2025
Kessler, did I read where you received a college degree in psychology? Do you not recognize in yourself the trait of projection?

Projection is a psychological defense mechanism that involves attributing one’s undesirable behaviors, feelings, or impulses to other people. For instance, someone who is dishonest might accuse others of being dishonest, thereby shifting attention away from his own dishonesty.

I wouldn’t follow you to a worm wrestle. Nor should others.


Jason Kessler: February 18, 2025 The fact that you people have to make unhinged personal attacks on the messenger instead of calmly and politely explaining your point of view says more than I ever could… [Y]ou persist because it is more about venting your emotions than engaging in constructive debate.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Wed Feb 19, 2025 11:46 am

Adding this NV piece about AS at NV by David Sims. under Wolf Stoner's essay, in which he said everyone should read Gulag Archipeligo: https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/th ... he-nation/ Comments under this article are interesting, including one I posted a little over a year ago.


Will Williams: February 19, 2025
Will Williams, quoting Pierce: February 17, 2025 ...Solzhenitsyn didn’t come right out and say, “The Jews are our deadliest enemies, and we ought to kill them all as soon as we can,” but for the perceptive reader the message was there. For example, in Gulag Archipelago he names some of the communist secret police commissars who set up and ran the murderous system of forced-labor camps which consumed the lives of so many Russians. There are photographs of six of these communist butchers in the book. All six of them are Jews. And this in a country where less than one per cent of the population is Jewish...

I’ve asked a friend to transcribe a short 1978 article from The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard: “Solzhenitsyn’s Message for Our People.”

I've yet to receive that transcription, but can put up this pertinent observation by AS from his Gulag Archipeligo: Solzhenitsyn on Infiltrators in Dissident Groups | National Vanguard
by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

I HAD NOT YET even heard the word “nasedka” — “stool pigeon” — nor learned that there had to be one such “stool pigeon” in each cell. And I had not yet had time to think things over and conclude that I did not like this fellow, Georgi Kramarenko. But a spiritual relay, a sensor relay, had clicked inside me, and it had closed him off from me for good and all. I would not bother to recall this event if it had been the only one of its kind. But soon, with astonishment, and alarm, I became aware of the work of this internal sensor relay as a constant, inborn trait. The years passed and I lay on the same bunks, marched in the same formations, and worked in the same work brigades with hundreds of others. And always that secret sensor relay, for whose creation I deserved not the least bit of credit, worked even before I remembered it was there, worked at the first sight of a human face and eyes, at the first sound of a voice — so that I opened my heart to that person either fully or just the width of a crack, or else shut myself off from him completely.

This was so consistently unfailing that all the efforts of the State Security officers to employ stool pigeons began to seem to me as insignificant as being pestered by gnats: After all, a person who has undertaken to be a traitor always betrays the fact in his face and in his voice, and even though some were more skilled in pretense, there was always something fishy about them. On the other hand, the sensor relay helped me distinguish those to whom I could from the very beginning of our acquaintance completely disclose my most precious depths and secrets — secrets for which heads roll. Thus it was that I got through eight years of imprisonment, three years of exile, and another six years of underground authorship, which were in no wise less dangerous. During all those seventeen years I recklessly revealed myself to dozens of people — and didn’t make a misstep even once. I have never read about this trait anywhere, and I mention it here for those interested in psychology. It seems to me that such spiritual sensors exist in many of us, but because we live in too technological and rational an age, we neglect this miracle and don’t allow it to develop.


Source: The Gulag Archipelago (1973) via David Sims
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:02 pm

An essay about some Jewess slut who has made a name for herself on social media, and who somehow cajoled Elon Musk into creating a child with her. It gives me a chance to explain NA policy on enforcing our policy on applicants for membership being ineligible if they have non-White deendents. Most Whites will disagree with this hard line, but some will agree: https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/ashley-i/


Will Williams: February 19, 2025
Ondrej Mann: February 19, 2025 …I don’t read these articles about e celebrities.
---

I don’t either, Ondrej, so have never heard of this social media Jewess strumpet or those she makes e-news with.
Travis: What else can you say about the news that Ashley St. Clair is the mother of Elon Musk’s child?
---

I would answer that question with another question: Where do we draw the line?

The National Alliance draws the line by making applicants for membership ineligible if they have non-White dependents. It sounds as if horndoggie Elon is ineligible since his latest little mamzer, that is his dependent, is ineligible. She’s eligible for Israeli citizenship, for crying out loud. I explained my position ten years ago, here: Will Williams: Taking the Hard Line | National Vanguard

I want nothing to do with compromisers who appeal to the herd with a watered-down message for the sake of expediency, for a short term gain in numbers…

However, we will leave the door cracked for Elon to become a supporter of NA if he ever gets his head our of his ass on preserving our race.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:24 pm

From a comment on NV I added more about philanderer Elon Musk:  https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/ashley-i/

Will Williams: February 19, 2025
Will Williams: February 19, 2025 …Where do we draw the line? The National Alliance draws the line by making applicants for membership ineligible if they have non-White dependents. It sounds as if horndoggie Elon is ineligible since his latest little mamzer, that is his dependent, is ineligible.
---

In a comment by Damoclesian under this NV essay on 2/17/25, it appears that Mr Musk is even less consciously loyal to the White race than we thought: EM (Elon Musk, Economic Man) | National Vanguard:

Here is some more information regarding Elon Musk’s partners and their offspring:

Jennifer Justine Wilson (6 children) is White

“Grimes” aka Claire Elise Boucher (3 children) admits to being Jewish on X:
My family literally left ukraine cuz it wasn’t a chill vibe to be Jewish – yall.

Shivon Alice Zilis (3 children) is rumored to be Jewish per the Jerusalem Post, but real evidence is lacking.

Ashley St. Clair admits to being Jewish on X (1 child) I’m Jewish. I support Israel’s right to defend itself. However, I reject empathetically the bloodthirsty warmongers I have seen the past few days…

This means of Musk’s 13 offspring, only 5 are capable of reproducing White children (1 of the White children is transgender).
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Thu Feb 20, 2025 3:14 pm

Today folks at Counter-Currents are interested discussing the merits of a Jew movie, The Big Lebowski. I have no interest whatsoever in discussing that or other Hollywood trash, perhaps because I don't consider myself in their North American New Right (NANR), or much of a part of C-C's intellectual network and metapolitical/intellectual movement. I do enjoy it, however, when my favorite topics, race and religion, come up, like here: https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/re ... -paganism/ I was fortunate to discover that C-C had featured Pierce's 1982 piece, "On Christianity," way back in 2010, praising it, but with a qualifier since C-C is not a membership organization like NA.

Will Williams: February 20, 2025
Bumped to keep Cosmotheism in the conversation about "Religion on the Right," though Cosmotheism is far removed from any definition of the so-called right-wing, even the NANR. There’s no question that John is right to say christianity is anti-White and that our people need something to replace it. Among serious racial nationalists that is settled.

But Paganism? Talking about its futility, it’s important that we study pre-Christian European spiritual roots that fit our people’s character: heroic, conforming to Nature’s laws rather than slave-like, worshipping the Jewish god, -- but how did Paganism stand up to Christianity, much less will it stand up to powerful organized Jewry? About like the chance a fart has in a whirlwind, as my daddy used to say.

Though the Cosmotheist Bible, linked to below, is selling well, I do not expect those at C-C to pay $35 for it. Instead, I offer the 1982 piece by Dr. Pierce from five years ago, here: https://nationalvanguard.org/2010/10/on-christianity/. We’ve advanced from 43 years ago with “On Christianity,” as conditions have greatly worsened for our race. It is in a comment below the piece by Wolf Stoner when I was first introduced to him. His comment is worth revisiting. His final sentence in that comment:

Doctor Pierce had found the best approach to this topic. We should be religious but not Christian. We should worship Our God, not their Jehovah.


A definition of neo-Paganism I’d found and posted in my own comment under that same piece by Dr. Pierce. I don’t recall where I got it:

Neo-Pagans are a community of faiths bringing ancient Pagan and magickal traditions to the modern age–including mostly Wicca but also Druidism, Asatru, Shamanism, neo-Native American, and more. Neo-Pagan is an umbrella term for various and diverse beliefs with many elements in common. Some Neo-Pagans find no incongruence practicing Neo-Paganism along with adherence to another faith, such as Christianity or Judaism.


Oddly enough, Counter-Currents posted Dr. Pierce’s “On Christianity” 15 years ago, here: https://counter-currents.com/2010/10/on-christianity/ introduced thusly:

Editor’s Note:
In this 1982 article, William Pierce gives a beautiful demonstration of intellectual leadership on the Christian Question. The North American New Right, of course, is not a membership organization but an intellectual network/movement, so questions of membership criteria do not arise. Naturally, in the political realm, we are willing to cooperate with white people of all faiths to attain our common aims. But as a metapolitical and intellectual movement, it is the duty of the NANR to address all questions of vital importance to the survival of our race, including the role of Christianity in our racial decline and what role, if any, it might play in our revival.

---
Will Williams: February 14, 2025
John: February 13, 2025 Yes, you are correct – christianity is anti-White. We need something else to replace it. An idea to ensure our survival in perpetuity: …


Yes, John. We already have it: https://cosmotheistchurch.org/product/c ... am-pierce/
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Thu Feb 20, 2025 4:00 pm

Let us switch back to the crucially important topic of naming the Jew, perhaps introducing new people to Dr. Dalton: https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/name-the-jew/



Will Williams: February 20, 2025
Since I have no interest in The Big Lebowski, I’ll revisit this topic which does interest me before comments are closed.
Scott: February 3, 2025 Excellent article. The Jewish Question is crucially important but it isn’t the only thing of importance.

Since, among other issues the JQ is important, let’s look at it by my favorite writer on the subject currently, Dr. Thomas Dalton: https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/05/jesus-the-jew/
IT’S HARD TO BELIEVE in the present day, but yes, it’s true, there are still a lot of Christians out there in the world. According to some estimates, they number around 2.4 billion or about 30% of humanity. In terms of sheer numbers, the US technically has the most: about 245 million, representing around 75% of the country — although many of these undoubtedly are so weakly religious (“Christmas and Easter Christians”) that they would barely pass any theological litmus test. The next three largest Christian populations are hardly an honor roll (Brazil, Mexico, and Russia), and the countries that, percentage-wise, are the most Christian, are mostly laughable: East Timor, Armenia, New Guinea, Haiti, and Paraguay, among the Top Ten…

…The gospel writers are formally anonymous; we know nothing about who they are, their motives, or the circumstances. The names attached (Mark, Matthew, Luke, John) mean nothing; it would be like saying “Bob’s Novel” or “Joe’s Cookbook.” But based on textual evidence, scholars can roughly date the Gospel of Mark to around the year 70; Matthew and Luke to 85; and John to 95. We can only imagine how much veracity they contain, given that they claim to quote Jesus precisely and cite details of his life, 40, 50, or 60 or more years after his death. The obvious answer is: not much!

The likeliest conclusion to this mess is that the Jew Paul and the anonymous Jewish gospel writers made it all up: that there was no miracle-working Son of God, no virgin birth, and no resurrection. They did so, not for fame or money, but because they believed that promulgating a pro-Jewish, anti-Roman theology would aid the Jewish cause. (Pro-Jewish, because the Christians are to worship the Jewish God, the Jewish rabbi Jesus, and the Jewish ‘virgin’ Mary; anti-Roman, because “the worldly powers” of Rome are a manifestation of Satan and must be defeated.[1]) And in the end, it did. Judeo-Christianity flourished, ideologically defeated Rome, and then took up residence in Rome itself. “Without doubt, Rome has been conquered,” as Nietzsche said.[2]…
Read more at the link.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:44 pm

I hadn't seen C-C's "Rules For Writers" until someone there suggested it: https://counter-currents.com/2018/03/rules-for-writers/



Will Williams: February 21, 2025
…The bane of today’s writers is the Internet, especially social media, which are designed to be distracting, addictive, and to deliver superficial rewards…
If you wish to be a productive writer, you must banish the Internet, your smart phone, and social media from your creative hours. Simply switch them off.

---

I’ve always considered myself more a fighter than a writer, but have been forced into the latter role by my current position. These are excellent tips to consider from Greg for that role.

Though a computer idiot, I can’t banish the Internet. It’s our primary tool now. Have people around you who are proficient in ‘Net technology.

I have no problems with smart phones, except with others’ whose calls often “drop,” or they screen calls and their voicemail boxes are either full or not set up. I do not own a cell phone. Email and my landlines serve well enough for communication.

I do not participate in social media so am never distracted by that, mostly nonsense.

A bit of advice I will offer as a fighter is to pick one’s fights very carefully: use triage, a medical term I learned in the military. Only engage in fights in which you’ve calculated that you can win, let the others go, or settle. This can also apply to writing. It is a virtue to be self-critical, to recognize when you may be wrong, and self correct.

Also, part 2 is valuable: Rules for Writers, Part 2 Recognize burnout. Don’t quit as so many others have done. When it hits take a break to re-energize. Gut it out, despite difficulties, opposition, or discouragement.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5182
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Fri Feb 21, 2025 1:46 pm

Intellectual C-C commentaters seem to be more interested in discussing the Hollywood movie "The Big Lebowski" than with the much more important issue of truth in our cause, expressed so well by Solzhenitsyn in 1978 in this piece, just transcribed and available to share on the 'Net for the first time: I will try to keep this topic allive there before comments are closed, even if I must bump my own comments: https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/th ... he-nation/


Will Williams: February 21, 2025
Will Williams: February 17, 2025
Wolf Stoner: February 16, 2025 Thank you, Chairman Williams, for expanding on Solzhenitsyn. His criticism of the West was amazingly precise and timely but very few cared back then. The mainstream crowd simply enjoyed comfortable life, thinking that this materialistic paradise would last forever. Everyone who wants to know Russia well must read “Gulag Archipelago”…



It’s my pleasure, Wolf. Dr. Pierce wrote about Solzhenitsyn several times, including this, mentioning Gulag Archipeligo: Books and Freedom | National Vanguard…

I’ve asked a friend to transcribe a short 1978 article from The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard: “Solzhenitsyn’s Message for Our People.”…



So, here is that transcribed article: https://nationalvanguard.org/2025/02/so ... ur-people/

FEW SPEECHES in recent years have generated as much critical comment as has Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s June commencement address at Harvard University.

The exiled Russian author was denounced by liberals and conservatives alike. The New York Times called him “dangerous,” because he questioned “the rationality of humankind.” A Boston Globe columnist said that “a mad Russian” had pulled “a fancy con-job” on the American people. Conservative editor William Buckley scolded the Nobel Prize winner in two consecutive issues of his National Review.

Liberal writer Arthur Schlesinger Jr. denounced Solzhenitsyn and his “irrelevance” to democratic society in a lengthy Washington Post article. And during Solzhenitsyn’s address, a Harvard protester held a sign reading “You Can’t Fight Stalinism With Fascism.”

Criticism of Solzhenitsyn was generally superficial (“undemocratic,” “a man of the past”) or self-serving (“in Russia they’d lock him up; but not here”).

Rosalynn Carter’s public reply to Solzhenitsyn showed that she didn’t even understand what the Russian author meant when he talked of “evil,” “courage,” and “freedom.” The President’s wife told the National Press Club that we live in a “good” society, because Americans are “caring people” who lead “useful lives.”

Naturally, Mrs. Carter does not sense the evil in the liberal-democratic way of life. Her stress on the importance of human happiness and her husband’s hypocritical cant about “human rights” are themselves expressions of the spiritually corrupt worldview which Solzhenitsyn damns.

The author of Gulag Archipelago means something quite different when he speaks of evil than do humanists. For example, Solzhenitsyn rejects the Soviet system, he wrote in 1973, “not because it is undemocratic, authoritarian, based on physical constraint — a man can live in such conditions without harm to his spiritual essence.” His objection is that “over and above its physical constraints, it demands of us total surrender of our souls.”

Any system based upon the idea of material comfort and human happiness as the highest good is evil, because it denies man’s place in the natural order. One consequence of living under such a system is that few Americans will actively defend or even acknowledge their own racial-cultural heritage. Most of them readily capitulate to outrageous minority blackmail with feelings of shame and guilt.

These are examples of the lack of civil courage in our people which Solzhenitsyn decries. Not many Americans even have the courage to speak openly and frankly about racial realities.

Solzhenitsyn vehemently rejects the liberal notion of freedom as an end in itself. The idea of freedom for its own sake is a sign of decadence. Historically an emphasis on “rights” above duties grows in an age of social and cultural decline.

For Solzhenitsyn, as for other great men of the West, true freedom is the freedom of self-restraint. Any fool can exercise the “freedom” to do whatever comes into his head, but the wise man shows freedom in being able to say “no.” Real freedom is the freedom to do what is right.

Solzhenitsyn’s awesome moral authority comes not only from years of suffering in communist labor camps and persecution by Soviet authorities, but far more from a sincere love of his Russian nation, a deep loyalty to the Western cultural heritage, and a passionate devotion to truth.

What a contrast between Solzhenitsyn’s quiet dignity, lofty moral bearing, and unshakeable national loyalty, and the strident demand for “rights” by Soviet “dissidents” like Scharansky, Ginzburg, Orlov, Slepak, and Begun — all Jews!

Solzhenitsyn’s ideas cannot simply be denounced as “Russian” or “old-fashioned.” His views are part of a long and rich Western spiritual heritage. He echoes Plato’s affirmation of social hierarchy and authority, Burke’s stress on tradition, and Hegel’s idea of the organic nation-state.

He strengthens the American intellectual legacy of James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Henry Adams, Theodore Roosevelt, and the other builders of our nation. Solzhenitsyn is an infinitely better guardian of our racial-cultural heritage than the fashionable writers of the American press who have been busy pointing out the “dangers” in his ideas.

His compelling call to spiritual revolution recalls the European revolt against liberal-democratic materialism before the Second World War.

For years, the National Alliance has been making many of the same points Solzhenitsyn stressed in his Harvard speech, including the fraud of American “freedom of the press” and the shortsightedness of US foreign policy.

More significantly, the National Alliance has consistently emphasized that our social, economic, and racial problems are not merely the result of bad politicians, the Blacks, or a minority conspiracy, but stem from the corrupt and alien values which have insidiously crept into the thinking of our people.

Solzhenitsyn is right when he stresses that only a revolution of fundamental values can reverse the tide of evil. That is a bitter truth, for it means that there are no quick or easy solutions to our people’s dilemma.

To have any meaning, the new spirituality and sense of duty of which Solzhenitsyn speaks must have an organizational expression. In America, that expression is given by the National Alliance.

In an interview with Encounter magazine (April 1976) Solzhenitsyn said that our greatest task now is to tell the truth:

Never has the future of this planet depended upon such a handful of men. I think the first universal rule, with you as well as us, is not to accept lies. To speak the truth is to ensure the rebirth of liberty — regardless of pressure, interests, and fashions — to say what one knows, to be truthful, to keep repeating it. And if some people shrug their shoulders, repeat it again.
* * *

Source: by M.W.; from Issue No. 62, National Vanguard tabloid, 1978; transcribed by Ray Wolbert: The Best of Attack and National Vanguard compiled by Kevin Alfred Strom – Cosmotheism
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Post Reply