Rittenhouse Trial

Law and disorder.
Old Aardvark
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:23 am

Re: Rittenhouse Trial

Post by Old Aardvark » Mon Nov 22, 2021 9:10 pm


Old Aardvark
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:23 am

Re: Rittenhouse Trial

Post by Old Aardvark » Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:37 pm

Large piece by Daily Mail with lots of photos that captures Rittenhouse, reaction to it, plus Waukesha killings and rapper background.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... i=10232881

User avatar
PhuBai68
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:23 pm
Location: South Carolina upstate

Re: Rittenhouse Trial

Post by PhuBai68 » Sat Nov 27, 2021 4:37 pm

That is quite a hypothetical, PB, thinking you might someday shoot a non-White, even in self defense, and that the prosecution would trot out inadmissable evidence to prejudice a jury of your alleged "peers" that you have been a <horrror! :o> SF moderator.
Well Will,
I wasn't "thinking I might someday shoot a non-white" as more of a "what if" one of us moderators ever happened to be involved in having to defend ourselves and shot a non-white.
After the horse crap YOU went through up in Pocahontas County with a jury of your peers I'd imagine you could see a railroad job for sure.
Now imagine how "fair" a trial it'd be if the "peers" happened to be non-white?
The prosecutor trots out "inadmissible evidence" and of course it gets "struck from the record" however those "peers" still heard it.
The point I tried to make is the odds of a fair trial probably wouldn't be all that great.
It's not diversity, it's displacement.

User avatar
Jim Mathias
Posts: 2375
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:48 pm

Re: Rittenhouse Trial

Post by Jim Mathias » Sun Nov 28, 2021 12:02 am

PhuBai68 wrote:
Sat Nov 27, 2021 4:37 pm
That is quite a hypothetical, PB, thinking you might someday shoot a non-White, even in self defense, and that the prosecution would trot out inadmissable evidence to prejudice a jury of your alleged "peers" that you have been a <horrror! :o> SF moderator.
Well Will,
I wasn't "thinking I might someday shoot a non-white" as more of a "what if" one of us moderators ever happened to be involved in having to defend ourselves and shot a non-white.
After the horse crap YOU went through up in Pocahontas County with a jury of your peers I'd imagine you could see a railroad job for sure.
Now imagine how "fair" a trial it'd be if the "peers" happened to be non-white?
The prosecutor trots out "inadmissible evidence" and of course it gets "struck from the record" however those "peers" still heard it.
The point I tried to make is the odds of a fair trial probably wouldn't be all that great.
The Alliance's policy regarding interactions with any non-Whites being kept "polite and minimal" comes to mind here. And if that can't be done because push came to shove, well, "run away to fight another day" ought to be the next order of business. The courts and prosecutors see us pro-Whites as an opportunity to advance their careers and the jewed media is only more than happy to assist, the facts be damned. We are literally the Great White Defendant (to borrow from one of Tom Wolfe's novels) for these sick people to harpoon. Avoid in any way possible.
Activism materials available! ===> Contact me via PM to obtain quantities of the "Send Them Back", "NA Health Warning #1 +#2+#3" stickers, and any fliers listed in the Alliance website's flier webpage.

Post Reply