It is currently Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:08 pm


Power of Truth CD sseries

  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2220
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Power of Truth CD sseries

PostTue Aug 20, 2019 11:43 am

Image

Image
Image

We can read the text of one of Dr. Pierce's talks, like this one https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/03/th ... -invasion/

But reading text does not have the same effect that listening to him give that talk has. I was listening to that particular talk of his yesterday in my truck as I always do when driving: CD #5 in the Power of Truth series, track #6:

1. Shocking Differences
2. Shuffling Toward the Slaughter
3. Survival Essentials
4. The Big Lie
5. The Case of Hendrik Möbus
6. The Chinese Invasion
7. The Fayetteville Murders
8. The Feminization of America
9. The Giant Gold Robbery
10. The Tragedy of Chautauqua
11. There Will Be Hell to Pay
12. To Be, or Not to Be
13. Toward a Healthy Society
14. Waco: Criminals With Badges
15. What Terrifies America’s Enemies
16. What’s Important
17. Why Do They Do It?
18. Why Revolution is Necessary
19. Why They Hate Buchanan
20. Zimbabwe: Liberal Consequences

Perhaps someone will be so kind as to reduce the ridiculous size of the image for POT 8. :|
Offline
User avatar

Wade Hampton III

  • Posts: 2002
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Power of Truth CD sseries

PostTue Aug 20, 2019 1:33 pm

Will Williams wrote:Perhaps someone will be so kind as to reduce the ridiculous size of the image for POT 8.


Consider it done:

63642.jpeg
Resized WLP
63642.jpeg (70.42 KiB) Viewed 350 times
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2220
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Power of Truth CD sseries

PostTue Aug 20, 2019 4:15 pm

Thanks, Wade. One of these days I'll get you to show me how to do that.

It was 19 years ago that Dr. Pierce laid out his hypothetical "Chinese Invasion" scenario for us, but with tensions between the U.S. and China running increasingly higher all the time today, especially with the tariffs we've exchanged leading to talk of a "trade war" between us, this talk does't seem so hypothetical as it did in 2000.

---

...Imagine this hypothetical situation: an enemy nation — Red China, say — launches a surprise attack on the United States. With precision nuclear missile strikes the enemy forces take out our centers of command and control all across the United States. At the same time Chinese immigrants in America execute a plan which has been carefully prepared in conjunction with Blacks, Asians, Mexican mestizos, homosexual groups, and feminist and leftist leaders to begin rioting in every American city, tying up local police forces and paralyzing local traffic and communications.

Just a few hours after the missile strike and at the height of the confusion and disorder 100,000 trained and armed Chinese cadres cross the border into Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California from dozens of concealed bases in Mexico and began fanning out toward America’s urban centers in fast-moving motorized columns. All that was required for that operation was a few million dollars in bribes for corrupt Mexican officials to let the Chinese assemble in their camps south of the border and wait quietly for the signal to move. As a thousand or so of the Chinese cadres, all of whom speak English, arrive in each urban center they quickly occupy all police and government buildings.

In some areas — California, for example — the Chinese Reds are welcomed with open arms and handed the keys to the cities by the local politicians. In other places the element of surprise, combined with their ruthless use of firepower and the cooperation of Chinese agents already in place, quickly gives the upper hand to the Chinese. Within 36 hours they have established a network of control across the whole country. Hundreds of thousands of other Chinese cadres then begin disembarking from transport ships whose arrival at U.S. ports has been timed carefully.

Orders go out from the Chinese to the leaders of the rioters in the cities to stop the looting and burning immediately. Acting on instructions from the Chinese, the politicians go on television and tell the American people that they can go back to work, that an international operation had been necessary to restore order, that the temporary unpleasantness is over, and that there have been fewer than a million casualties.

Within the next few days the American people are reassured repeatedly on television by well known sports figures and Hollywood celebrities that everything is back to normal. The shopping malls are open, the welfare checks are being mailed out, all of the ball games and soap operas and other entertainment shows are being broadcast on their regular schedules, and people can go anywhere they want and do anything just as before — with a couple of minor exceptions: citizens in possession of firearms or ammunition have 72 hours to turn them in at the nearest police station, no questions asked; and “hate speech” is henceforth prohibited. Citizens in possession of any books or other printed or electronically recorded materials which might be considered to be “hateful” should take them to their nearest police station immediately. Specific guidelines will be published later, but for now “hate speech” is anything which is sexist, homophobic, or racist — especially anything which may be construed as anti-Chinese. An “800” telephone number is displayed continuously at the bottom of television screens which viewers can call at any time to report persons they suspect of having firearms or “hate speech” materials.

Now, this imaginary scenario I have described is greatly oversimplified. Even with the advanced missile technology the Israelis recently sold to the Chinese after stealing it from us, crippling the ability of the United States to respond to a Chinese attack would not be so easy, nor should we believe that America’s various anti-White minorities can be so easily organized and coordinated as I have described. Anyway, unrealistic or not, I just want you to imagine this scenario for a moment and then ask yourself the question: How should a patriot respond to such a situation? How should you respond?

Should you behave in the way I have urged you to behave under the actual circumstances which prevail in America today, and abstain from any violent or illegal activity? Should you obey the orders issued by the Chinese occupation authorities, on the grounds that they have you outgunned? You would understand the seriousness of the situation, of course. You would understand that having abolished the First and Second Amendments, the Chinese occupiers eventually would eliminate any other vestiges of American freedom which might get in their way.

In discussing the situation with your neighbors, you certainly would hear the argument that Americans really hadn’t lost anything and that it was a good thing the Chinese had come. You would be told that the First Amendment was never intended to protect “hate speech” and that the recent riots by minorities were proof that we needed to be more careful not to let people say or write “offensive” things that just made it harder for all of us to live together peacefully in a multicultural society. As for the Second Amendment, just look at all the people who had been shot while attempting to protect their property from looters during the rioting. If no one had been allowed to have a gun, those people would still be alive — robbed and raped, perhaps, but still alive. Yes, it was a good thing the Chinese had come and rounded up the guns and outlawed “hate speech.” Now we would all be safer, and life would be more pleasant.

And of course, that is exactly the line everyone is hearing from the media. The TV celebrities and sports stars and politicians are saying just what most of your neighbors are saying — which, with the exception of the occasional references to the Chinese, is pretty much what they were saying before the Chinese came: namely, that the First Amendment really doesn’t give anyone the right to say things that might hurt the feelings of other people or cause social friction; and that the Second Amendment is just about government-regulated militias — it doesn’t really give private citizens the right to have firearms.

One new thing on television is the reports of people arrested for “hate speech” — namely, for saying “hateful” things against the Chinese occupation authorities. The media commentators talk about these “hate criminals” with the same disapproving tone of voice and facial expressions one might expect them to use when talking about serial killers or child molesters. Judges are setting bail at more than a million dollars and are telling the media that they intend to deal in the harshest possible way with people charged with “hate speech.”

So, again, what should you do? If you obey the laws, what can you do? As a normally peaceful, non-violent sort of person, your natural inclination is to try to rouse people against the Chinese takeover of America. You feel an urge to stand on the street corner and shout, “Hey, folks! Wake up! We’ve been invaded! Our liberty is being taken away from us! Let’s organize and chase the Chinese out of our country!” But if you try that you’ll be arrested. The media will denounce you as a “hater.” Most of your neighbors will say it serves you right, that they want no “haters” in their community. Some local Christian minister will form a “committee of reconciliation” to undo the damage your “hate” has done to Chinese-American relations, and the local church ladies will hold a candlelight vigil for the same purpose. And you will have accomplished nothing.

For guidance you turn to historical precedents of resistance to an occupation government. You think about the French underground, the so-called “Resistance” during the Second World War. They assassinated some German soldiers and carried out some sabotage of German military equipment, but much more than that they terrorized their own countrymen in order to make them afraid to collaborate with the Germans. If a French judge ordered the punishment of a Frenchman for an offense against the Germans, then that judge might be assassinated by the Resistance. Of course, it was after the German forces had left France at the end of the war that the Resistance really went to work, murdering thousands of Frenchmen who had been accused of collaboration.

Certainly, when you see some judge on the TV news announcing that he intends to be especially hard on anyone committing a “hate crime” against the Chinese occupation, you feel an overwhelming conviction that he deserves to be assassinated: that he deserves to be shot down by a sniper as he leaves his home in the morning; that he deserves to have his legs blown off by a bomb when he turns on his automobile ignition, that he deserves to have someone in a crowded shopping mall brush by him and shove a knife into one of his kidneys. And you feel the same way about the media commentators and the sports stars and the Hollywood celebrities and the politicians who also are telling the public that it is right to punish people for “hate speech” against the Chinese. You are absolutely certain that killing any and all of these collaborators is morally justified. You are convinced that if they are not killed and others who might be inclined to collaborate are not made afraid of collaborating, America will be lost forever.

But what do you actually do? Certainly some other patriots will fight beside you, but you are still outgunned by the Chinese and their collaborators, because it is clear that most of your fellow Americans are simply lemmings in the grip of the television propaganda, and that whoever controls the propaganda will control the lemmings. Do you begin assassinating judges and politicians and preachers anyway, because it is the right thing to do from a moral and patriotic standpoint? Or do you fight in some other way?

Okay, back to the real world now: no Chinese takeover, just America as we know it today. But you know, the questions we just asked are not academic. The Chinese invasion was imaginary, but the decisions faced by patriots in that scenario will be all too real very soon...
Offline

Jim Mathias

  • Posts: 1385
  • Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:48 pm

Re: Power of Truth CD sseries

PostFri Aug 23, 2019 1:23 am

Alliance members who participate in online outreach activities that want to help the Cosmotheist Bookstore make sales of CD's could bring them up whenever quoting Dr. Pierce, commenting about a topic that was addressed in one of the ADV broadcasts found in one of the volumes, and so on. Get all 8 yourself and make yourself familiar with them, it's a great way to gain a Cosmotheist perspective on many things and will strengthen your ties to the Alliance and make you a more effective member/supporter.

To increase National Office staffing, programs, and a whole myriad of other organizational needs, I believe it's important that we all help raise funds in this manner.

Return to Dr. William Pierce

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests