What a warm, trustworthy smile.
Luckily, there is a voice of sanity. The Campaign Life Coalition has spoken out about the ramifications this change will have. They've also taken some key points from the 244 page Sex-Ed document and condensed it for the sake of brevity:
EXCERPTS FROM THE 2015 SEX-EDUCATION CURRICULUM
Grade 1 (age 6) - Genitalia & consent: Graphic lesson on sexual body parts including "penis", "testicles", "vagina" and "vulva":
Grade 3 (age 8) - Gender as a changeable social construct; Homosexuality:
Grade 7 (age 13) - Anal intercourse & Oral Sex, Sexual Pleasure:
The new curriculum document also has a much stronger undertone of sex as a purely recreational activity whose purpose is pleasure. In fact, the words "love" and "marriage" never appear once in the sex-education strand of the curriculum.Grade 1 (age 6) - Genitalia & consent: Graphic lesson on sexual body parts including "penis", "testicles", "vagina" and "vulva":
- Kathleen Wynne and Minister Liz Sandals have also promised that teaching of "enthusiastic sexual consent" will be weaved throughout the sex-ed curriculum, beginning in grade 1. It appears that it will become progressively more explicit in each grade so that children can "see what consent looks like", although the government has not provided details on how this will be presented to 6 year olds.
Grade 3 (age 8) - Gender as a changeable social construct; Homosexuality:
- Will teach the disputed theory of "gender identity" as if it were fact. This is the notion that whether you're a boy or a girl does not necessarily relate to your physical anatomy. It is merely a "social construct". Gender is "fluid" according to this theory, and any little boy can decide that he is actually a girl, if that's the way he feels in his mind, or vice-versa.
- The potential for causing serious sexual confusion in the minds of children is very real with this teaching.
- Gender Identity theory is not science-based teaching, but rather a dangerous socio-political philosophy that seeks to normalize a mental disorder. Gender identity confusion is still recognized by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic & Statistics Manual as a "gender dysphoria" disorder. This ideology being foisted on school children by the Wynne government aims to indoctrinate the next generation into believing that transgenderism/transsexualism is an innate, genetic characteristic just like skin colour or race.
- Will normalize homosexual family structures and homosexual "marriage" in the minds of 8-year-olds, without regard for the religious/moral beliefs of families.
- The rough outline below will no doubt be supplemented with additional teacher resources and Ministry training that will more aggressively undermine the beliefs of traditionally-principled families. For example, here is a children's story book approved by the Ministry of Education, which pushes a world view that is clearly on one-side of this divisive moral issue.
- It would be one thing to teach the fact that such alternative family structures exist, if the plan were to teach it at older ages, and if it were done in a way that respected the deeply held religious and moral beliefs of traditionally-principled families. However, the Kathleen Wynne government will certainly take an activist approach to these lessons and show no respect nor tolerance for traditionally-principled families.
Grade 7 (age 13) - Anal intercourse & Oral Sex, Sexual Pleasure:
- Under the pretext of encouraging abstinence from behaviours associated with high risk for STDs, the curriculum uses a sleight of hand to sneakily introduce to children the concepts of "anal intercourse" and "oral-genital contact". Those are ideas that many of these 12-13 year old kids might not be aware of, or at least, have never seriously considered as an act they could be taking part in now. In another sleight of hand, "anal intercourse" is lumped in as a sexual act of the same kind as vaginal intercourse, with no differentiation between the two types of sexual acts, either morally or with respect to risk for sexually transmitted disease, for which the former carries dramatically higher risk.
- Was the goal in this sneaky introduction of graphic sex acts to avoid the accusation that the Premier was promoting a gay agenda, seeking to normalize gay sex in the minds of kids? By claiming that this curriculum is about encouraging kids to "delay" these high risk sexual activities, many casual readers won't notice that what has actually occurred is that the teacher has planted ideas in the minds of children that might not otherwise be present, regarding "anal intercourse", "oral-genital contact", etc.
- Teacher may help 12-yr-olds to appreciate an “understanding of your own body, including what gives you pleasure”.
- To a lot of parents, reading a curriculum suggestion for grade 8's in which the teacher is to help students make a sexual plan for themselves sounds a little perverse. Is it age-appropriate to suggest to grade 8's that they should make a plan in which they decide how far they're willing to go with sexual activity, and then "stick to what I had planned".
- Many parents feel this has an undertone that is too sexually permissive and is giving license to promiscuity. Keep in mind that at this age, children cannot legally give consent. It may actually be illegal for adults to instruct underage children to have sex.
- Is there a risk this will put pressure on kids to become sexually active? Or on others who are curious, especially boys, the encouragement to go ahead and do so? Well, a 2014 poll of UK teens conducted by the Institute of Public Policy Research suggests that the answers may be YES. Researchers found that a large majority of both boys & girls complained that sex education often presents promiscuity as normal, putting additional pressure on them to become sexually active before they might otherwise do so.
The Minister of Education and Premier Wynne have made it clear that the Catholic school system, like the secular public system, must implement this curriculum without exception. It is unclear how Catholic schools can implement teaching on birth control, abortion, the idea that being male or female is a social construct, gender expression, and the 6-gender theory, even if retrofitted with a "Catholic lens". Catholic moral teaching forbids abortion and the use of artificial contraception as grave evils. The theory of gender identity, gender expression and the idea that there are more genders than just male and female directly contradict Christian anthropology of the human person.
Again, you can look through the new curriculum yourself here. But it's too late for us here in Ontario. While we are more or less a lost cause, it's a valuable case study for everyone else. We should examine, dissect and discuss how this happened and how to prevent it.
The embedded video below is yet another caustic piece of propaganda against us. In case you'd rather not give its creators the additional income, I'll briefly describe it. There are two videos of homosexuals (two men and two women, respectively) who propose to each other in public, and various kids react to it. Let's just take a minute and think about the fact that these guys make more money than you can shake a stick at just by recording kids and their reactions to popular videos. What's interesting to note is that the teenagers reacted by applause and overall support. Only the young kids had a natural reaction to the homosexuals proposing and kissing.
- The only kid who still disagreed with gay marriage even after the hosts "explained it" to them.
- Hitler Youth.png (173.79 KiB) Viewed 2015 times
