My Name Defines Me...

[A White Nationalist]

I wish to introduce myself as "a white nationalist". I believe in the preservation and advancement of white Americans, as well as all Euro-ethnic people worldwide. As a white nationalist, this does not mean that I am a member of the "National Socialist" or "Klan" subsets of white nationalism, as I am not. Nor am I member of the "Southron" branch of white nationalism, such as one may find in The League of the South. Though I agree with many of the beliefs of all three of these subsets, there are a number of points that I do not.

That said, I enjoy exchanging ideas here, provided that falls within the parameters of this forum.

I trust that others do as well.

Thank you,

AWN

[Will Williams]

I wish to introduce myself as "a white nationalist". I believe in the preservation and advancement of white Americans, as well as all Euro-ethnic people worldwide. As a white nationalist, this does not mean that I am a member of the "National Socialist" or "Klan" subsets of white nationalism, as I am not. Nor am I member of the "Southron" branch of white nationalism, such as one may find in The League of the South. Though I agree with many of the beliefs of all three of these subsets, there are a number of points that I do not.

That said, I enjoy exchanging ideas here, provided that falls within the parameters of this forum.

I trust that others do as well.

Thank you,

AWN

You sound like you'll fit in fine with others at WB, AWN. Our National Alliance is apart from the "Movement" that you describe you are not a part of.

Relax. 28 posts in your first week is a lot. Spend a little time getting to know us before you question everything.

[A White Nationalist]

Thank you, Mr. Williams.

I hope none of my posts have misled you or anyone else, but I'm not a "newbie" to white nationalism. In fact, I've been an advocate for about twenty years running, and am familiar with all the major (and many minor) players. If there was a Jeopardy Game for white nationalists, I would do well as a contestant, as I'm certain you would. And that's one of the problems with white nationalism in general: the belief that a "new member" on a forum is, by definition, new to white nationalism itself. It's one of the biggest errors all WN forums make, be they VNN, Stormfront, the old Resistance Forum, or a host of others. Stormfront is the worst offender, however.

Signing up there, it generally works like this:

1 - A bonafied WN registers at Stormfront, has twenty years dedicated involvement. He may well have been a member before, but vendettas between forum mods and members is rife, especially on Don Black's cash cow milking machine. But what typically happens?

2 - On your ninth or tenth post you disagree with someone, and another member, some 17 or 18 year old with six months in the WN movement but 300 posts thinks that YOU are the "newbie", when in fact he is.

3 - This scenario occurs over and over and over again, year after year after year. Has no one ever figured this out, that's it's actually harmful to the overall weltanschauung of the movement? Apparently not.

But anyway, I believe that if the WN Cause is to progress then I believe some major shift in both tactics and philosophy need be at least discussed, to see if some new strategies might be beneficial.

Thank you for your time, as I know you must be busy.

AWN

[Will Williams]

Thank you, Mr. Williams.

I hope none of my posts have misled you or anyone else, but I'm not a "newbie" to white nationalism. In fact, I've been an advocate for about twenty years running, and am familiar with all the major (and many minor) players. If there was a Jeopardy Game for white nationalists, I would do well as a contestant, as I'm certain you would. And that's one of the problems with white nationalism in general: the belief that a "new member" on a forum is, by definition, new to white nationalism itself. It's one of the biggest errors all WN forums make, be they VNN, Stormfront, the old Resistance Forum, or a host of others. Stormfront is the worst offender, however.

Signing up there, it generally works like this:

1 - A bonafied WN registers at Stormfront, has twenty years dedicated involvement. He may well have been a member before, but vendettas between forum mods and members is rife, especially on Don Black's cash cow milking machine. But what typically happens?

2 - On your ninth or tenth post you disagree with someone, and another member, some 17 or 18 year old with six months in the WN movement but 300 posts thinks that YOU are the "newbie", when in fact he is.

3 - This scenario occurs over and over and over again, year after year after year. Has no one ever figured this out, that's it's actually harmful to the overall weltanschauung of the movement? Apparently not.

But anyway, I believe that if the WN Cause is to progress then I believe some major shift in both tactics and philosophy need be at least discussed, to see if some new strategies might be beneficial.

Our philosophy here is pretty much Dr. Pierce's Cosmotheism. We won't be doing much shifting of that sound belief system. Mr. Strom and I know what we're doing in that regard, as do others here and in our Alliance.

Tactic, yes -- we'll always be adapting tactics to our situational fortunes and misfortunes. We work with what we've got and set achievable goals, but never sift our eyes from our long term goals. Dr. Pierce was the best at doing that of any man I ever worked with. His focus was intense. We won't be discussing our tactics much here on this public board.

Your description of the newbies (especially know-it-all "html jockeys") vs veterans who've proven themselves is spot on. I won't name names and we don't want to use WB to criticize Stormfront or VNN or those other Big Tent forums. They'll be criticizing us, but not here they won't! I'll send the disruptors packing. You are obviously not one of them and can bring experience to the forum. Let's keep any personal disagreements in PMs.

Thank you for your time, as I know you must be busy.

AWN

I'm busier than I've been in a long time, but knew what I was getting into. Attracting, then organizing high quality, independent-minded, White "human material" to preserve and advance our race is about the most daunting job on earth. But it CAN be done. It MUST be done. I know our Alliance can do it better than any other group out there presently. If a better group comes along, I'll join our Alliance strength with it. Until then, like I said above, we'll do the best we can with what we've got to work with.

We had a slogan on our team house wall in RVN that I'll never forget: "We've done so much for so long with so little that now we can do practically anything with nothing."

I'd enjoy playing WN Jeopardy with you and swapping war lies. We've probably got lots of mutual acquaintances.

[A White Nationalist]

I wholeheartedly agree that you and KAS should follow whatever course you deem best, since it is primarily you two who will have to live with the results. I earnestly hope you and your organization can accomplish something of lasting importance, since everywhere else along the WN spectrum there is unrelenting failure.

Take, for example, your old nemesis from North Carolina. He adheres to precisely what I have observed: that "his way is the best way", maintaining that his "Northwest Imperative" is the one and only salvation for white Americans. Billy Roper, once in the running for NA Chairman himself, later went on to found "White Revolution". What was his view regarding it? That it was "the ONLY solution". Not just white revolution in general, but specifically in regard to his group. Well, after struggling along for several years, White Revolution simply fizzled. Now Roper's a reborn Christian of the Klan variety, practicing a new game.

Few, if any, seem to ask: how is it that pro-white advocates cannot come to agreement, at least regarding some fundamental principles? The usual lament is this: "Gee, if only we all stopped criticizing each other, we'd be unbeatable." But I don't agree with that philosophy, nor did Dr. Pierce. As most WN's are aware, Pierce had no qualms about criticizing "the movement" as basically a rag-tag collection of losers. Unfortunately, I can't disagree with that.

Now, according to what I've read, in just 35 years America will be 50% non-white. Some WN's (I've heard their comments) have already conceded that we have lost the war. Their consolation prize? Running to the hills and playing guerrilla warfare and posing as "freedom fighters". It is these persistent fantasies that have, in my opinion, greatly hobbled the WN Cause.

Even among the "big shot" pro-white advocates, from yourself to David Duke to Jared Taylor to (fill in the blank) there is no consensus about fundamental principles. At least, little beyond "white power" of one sort or another. For intelligent individuals like myself, I have two pro-active choices: either start my own "organization" or simply remain on the sidelines, waiting for someone else to create something so powerful in both its execution and its message that it virtualy sweeps all others away. So far, I've never seen it.

But I don't mind observing, and even hoping, that some group of individuals might succeed. Miracles happen, I know.



WW: "Relax. 28 posts in your first week is a lot."

PS: I really didn't think that 28 posts was a lot, since there's another member here who joined only two days before me. Yet that member already has over 300 POSTS. That's approximately TWELVE TIMES as many posts as I have generated.

[Michael Olanich]

WW: "Relax. 28 posts in your first week is a lot."

PS: I really didn't think that 28 posts was a lot, since there's another member here who joined only two days before me. Yet that member already has over 300 POSTS. That's approximately TWELVE TIMES as many posts as I have generated.

Hi AWN,

You joined January 15, 2014, true, but you recently just started posting frequently the past couple of weeks, so I think there was some confusion for some that you just recently joined. Just wanted to clear that up.

I enjoy reading your posts and I hope you will continue to add to the intelligence of this forum above all others.

Regards,

Michael

[Will Williams]

IWW: "Relax. 28 posts in your first week is a lot."

PS: I really didn't think that 28 posts was a lot, since there's another member here who joined only two days before me. Yet that member already has over 300 POSTS. That's approximately TWELVE TIMES as many posts as I have generated.

Huh? You must mean Benjamin Brice. He joined One year and two days before you did. He's been here a year, since 14 January, 2014, averaging less than one post per day.

I try to average at least one post per day here. Lately my average is up to 1.11 per. You can find your average daily posts in your profile by clicking on your name. Your average is 3.33 currently. Adding many at once tends to scroll thoughtful posts off the front page before others can see them to read and respond if they wish. One sentence posts are discouraged. I'm not saying your posts haven't been thoughtful, because they are.

One fellow came on here soon after we opened WB and posted 17 posts in one day which at that time was 1/3 of all posts. I removed all but one of them because they were nothing but music videos of some of his favorite tunes, having nothing to do with what we were trying to accomplish here.

[Benjamin Bice]

IWW: "Relax. 28 posts in your first week is a lot."

PS: I really didn't think that 28 posts was a lot, since there's another member here who joined only two days before me. Yet that member already has over 300 POSTS. That's approximately TWELVE TIMES as many posts as I have generated.

Huh? You must mean Benjamin Brice. He joined One year and two days before you did. He's been here a year, since 14 January, 2014, averaging less than one post per day.

I try to average at least one post per day here. Lately my average is up to 1.11 per. You can find your average daily posts in your profile by clicking on your name. Your average is 3.33 currently. Adding many at once tends to scroll thoughtful posts off the front page before others can see them to read and respond if they wish. One sentence posts are discouraged. I'm not saying your posts haven't been thoughtful, because they are.

One fellow came on here soon after we opened WB and posted 17 posts in one day which at that time was 1/3 of all posts. I removed all but one of them because they were nothing but music videos of some of his favorite tunes, having nothing to do with what we were trying to accomplish here.

Indeed. Me thinks, Mr. AWN, you may want to invest in a new pair of spectacles.

[Cosmotheist]

IWW: "Relax. 28 posts in your first week is a lot."

PS: I really didn't think that 28 posts was a lot, since there's another member here who joined only two days before me. Yet that member already has over 300 POSTS. That's approximately TWELVE TIMES as many posts as I have generated.

Huh? You must mean Benjamin Brice. He joined One year and two days before you did. He's been here a year, since 14 January, 2014, averaging less than one post per day.

I try to average at least one post per day here. Lately my average is up to 1.11 per. You can find your average daily posts in your profile by clicking on your name. Your average is 3.33 currently. Adding many at once tends to scroll thoughtful posts off the front page before others can see them to read and respond if they wish. One sentence posts are discouraged. I'm not saying your posts haven't been thoughtful, because they are.

One fellow came on here soon after we opened WB and posted 17 posts in one day which at that time was 1/3 of all posts. I removed all but one of them because they were nothing but music videos of some of his favorite tunes, having nothing to do with what we were trying to accomplish here.

Indeed. Me thinks, Mr. AWN, you may want to invest in a new pair of spectacles.

Perhaps so.
Then "AWN" should actually read these two subjects here at the following link:
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewforum.php?f=1

And also all of the posted comments from here:
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.p ... 4780#p4780

We here at WB are not interested in the "movement" and are serious only
about building back up the "NA" and in "Our Cause" and reaching those of
high quality and of personal integrity and some strength to add to our own.

Best regards,
Cosmotheist

[Michael Olanich]

If Mr. White Nationalist can ignore all the shenanigans of the "movement" and not mention them so much, he is welcome to continue posting here at WB. Also, he has some different ideas on how to utilize tactics in carrying out pro-White activism. Those tactics are counter to NA ideology and tactics that have been tried and true, and which we wish to implement once again. So, going forward, I agree AWN should familiarize himself with NA literature a little bit more and keep those tactics he has mentioned before to himself.

Also please note, you won't be banned with a rubberstamp like other forums tend to do. It's rather simple, this forum is for those who already agree with Dr. Pierce's vision and Cosmotheist ideology he has built the NA with to avoid any arguments between users here at WB forum.

Thanks,

Michael