No, We Do Not Need Another "New Approach"

[Mike Sullivan]

James Harting

With depressing regularity, some newcomer shows up and makes the suggestion that we need a "new approach." The National-Socialism of Adolf Hitler was fine in its day, the newbie informs us, but only up to a point, and in any event, history has moved on and now we need a "new approach" if the movement for White survival is to be successful.

As the saying goes, if I had a nickel for every time that I have heard that suggestion over the last 47 years, I would be a rich man today!

White Man Newbie tells us that Adolf Hitler, the Nazis and the Swastika are so hated by White people that using or invoking them dooms the movement to political failure. Instead, he says, we should try a more clever appoach. We should camouflage our real beliefs and intents so as not to alarm the people we hope to recruit and to mislead our enemies.

We should wear gray shirts instead of brown shirts, and devise some Swastika substitute instead of using the real thing. Or alternately, we should wear suits and ties and replace Mein Kampf with Imperium (or whatever the last book it is that Newbie has read). Instead of calling ourselves "National-Socialists," we should use the designation "National Conservatives" or something similar.

Believe me, this kind of simplisitic subtrefuge certainly does not fool the Jews, nor the news media, nor the government, nor the other enemies of White survival. It is does not fool people who are already in the movement. It does, however, mislead the people whom we are trying to recruit. In other words, it deceives the very people we are seeking to educate.

In the end, the "new approach" gives up all of the considerable natural advantages of open National-Socialism, in exchange for nothing.

I speak from experience. From 1969 through 1971 I was a member and activist of the National Renaisance Party. The NRP was esssentially an NS group that was trying its own "new approach." A lot of money was spent, a lot of blood was spilled, I and some other good men saw the inside of a jail cell on occasion--AND NOTHING SUBSTANTIAL OR LASTING WAS ACHIEVED.

Certainly the best attempt at a "new approach" was that of Dr. William Pierce and the National Alliance. Through the dogged determination and intellectual brilliance of Dr. Pierce, the NA flourished briefly, a bright flame for our Race in a darkening situation. But the "new approach" organization that he founded quickly sputtered to a halt upon his death. Without Pierce, the approach he championed went nowhere.

As Lincoln Rockwell noted, our Race is not dying from a dearth of new ideas, but from a lack of fighting spirit. We do not require a "new approach" or some new ideology. Rather, what is needed is for every National-Socialst and NS sympathizer to pull together to make the "old approach" work. And by "old approach" I mean pure, Hitlerian National-Socialism.

National-Socialism--which is nothing other than the application of the laws of Nature to human affairs--is PERFECT the way it is. It does not need updating, revising or altering. What is needed are not cosmetic changes to make it more appealing to the general public, but rather the faith and courage on the part of its adherents to make it work in the face of powerful and entrenched opposition

WE NEED NATIONAL-SOCIALISM AND NOT SOMETHING ELSE!

Got it?

The future of our Race is inextricably linked to National-Socialism. Indeed, how can it be otherwise? Aryan humanity will either once again live in harmony with the natural order, or it will cease to live at all. The present state of affairs, in which our people live in open rebellion to Nature's laws, must be viewed in terms of great historical perspective as a temporary dislocation, for no people can flout forever the biological prerequisites which form the basis for its existence.

Our sickness will not be a permanent condition: either the patient will recover or die.

Those White Nationalists and NS sympathizers who propose some other cure for the ills now afflicting our folk are offering a false panacea, however well intentioned their suggestions may be.

No political ideology, no economic reorganization, no social uplift or cultural renaissance, none of the various forms of Christianity nor any appeal to the heathen past of our ancestors--no nothing at all, except as as an organic component of a self-identified National-Socialist movement--offers any true hope for our people in this New Dark Age of racial disintegration and spiritual decay.

It will be National-Socialism, or nothing at all.

Let me repeat myself: we do NOT need a "new approach," but rather we need all hands on deck working in a disciplined, organized, and energetic manner to make the "old approach" work.

There is ONLY ONE WAY forward for our Race at this crucial historical juncture: pure, Hitlerian NATIONAL-SOCIALISM. Anything else is just an illusion and a dead end for our folk.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/blogs/u224711-e3384/

[Will Williams]

James Harting
Certainly the best attempt at a "new approach" was that of Dr. William Pierce and the National Alliance. Through the dogged determination and intellectual brilliance of Dr. Pierce, the NA flourished briefly, a bright flame for our Race in a darkening situation. But the "new approach" organization that he founded quickly sputtered to a halt upon his death. Without Pierce, the approach he championed went nowhere.
[...]
It will be National-Socialism, or nothing at all.

Let me repeat myself: we do NOT need a "new approach," but rather we need all hands on deck working in a disciplined, organized, and energetic manner to make the "old approach" work.

There is ONLY ONE WAY forward for our Race at this crucial historical juncture: pure, Hitlerian NATIONAL-SOCIALISM. Anything else is just an illusion and a dead end for our folk.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/blogs/u224711-e3384/

Hit the Stormfront link, then read comments below this article there:

Old Comments by Toe Joe:

I am torn
Adolph Hitler was a great man. He struck a great blow on behalf of Caucasian humanity. But in the end he was felled by Jewish guile.

And we, the collective non-Germanic Caucasian we, were tricked into taking the side of the Jews.

No, I must disagree with you. That page of history has been turned. And we were on the wrong side.

The course that we would chart must start in the here and now. It must be cognizant of the current reality.

Dr Pierce was a great man. His failure was that he failed to craft his organization in such a way that it could and would sustain itself after him.

I think that his own mortality sneaked up on him.

Point of fact. National socialism was much a personality cult
It revolved around Adolph Hitler. And it fell to the guile of the Jews.

At the risk of being tarred and feathered and rode out of town on a rail, may I suggest that only the Jews have successfully breached that hurdle.

Built an organization that transcends personality. That sustains and maintains itself over the long haul and through a succession of leadership.

Perhaps we should study how it is that they accomplish that.

Comment & quotes by James Harting:

No National-Socialism without Adolf Hitler
You have it backwards, Toe Joe. There is no National-Socialism without Adolf Hitler, anymore than there would be a Christianity without Jesus Christ, or an Islam without the Prophet Mohammed, or a Marxism without Karl Marx.

Adolf Hitler is not the one to be "transcended." Rather, it is he who transcends.

As Matt Koehl has said:
"No Hitler, no hope--
Know Hitler, know hope!"

Or Bruno Luedtke:
"Hitler is the future!"
("Hitler ist die Zukunft!")

[/center]

An interesting and perhaps productive conversation can be had about this article today, more than three years after it was written by Mr. Harting. Matt Koehl and Dr. William Pierce were, of course, arguably the two top lieutenants of Commander George Lincoln Rockwell's National Socialist White People's Party

Matt Koehl has died since this was posted back in 2013, yet leadership of his New Order is in excellent hands and moves forward, perhaps stronger than ever. Dr. Pierce's National Alliance -- "certainly the best attempt at a 'new approach'" [based on NS principles] -- is also again in determined, ideologically sound hands and moving forward by reverting to and following Dr. Pierce's ideology and NA program, after they had been abandoned for more than a decade by his successor as Chairman back in 2002.

The explicitly NS New Order and the implicitly NS National Alliance get along well and each wishes for the success of the other because either way we each face the problems our race faces similarly, very similarly, compared with almost all other groups that advocate for the interests of the race. Here Dr. Pierce, 40 years ago, answers the question, "Why don't all the pro-White organizations unite?" http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1256

We must do whatever is necessary for us to win—including the joining of forces with other groups, when that can advance our cause—but we must not make the mistake of sacrificing our true strength—which is the correctness of our ideas—for the illusory advantage of a more rapid gain in numbers.

[Wade Hampton III]

National Socialism worked great in a Caucasian country like Germany. However, there
is no Caucasian country in North America. Time to think creatively!

[Jim Mathias]

National Socialism worked great in a Caucasian country like Germany. However, there
is no Caucasian country in North America. Time to think creatively!

One such "creative" choice would be to start or join your own micro community where you are located. Since Rome wasn't built in a day, neither will our national/global aspirations be also built. The hard work is in the recruiting, but hanging out alone means being hung alone.

[adolf512]

We have to ask ourself why almost nobody wants national socialism, is it the ideology itself or the stigma that is the problem?

I personally hate all forms of socialism including national socialism. We do not need a state for anything https://mises.org/library/medieval-icel ... government the state violent control over everyone else, it does not make sense for Aryans(noble whites) to violently control other Aryans, extorting them(taxes), etc. The typocal white person might not deserve freedom but it would not make sense for me to threaten Bill Rhyes, Alex Linder, Will Williams or David Duke with violence unless they do what i want.

Central planning fails even harder when trying to take down the system http://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm it will also be impossible for us to violently control the population, we might be able to crush the current state but it will take a lot of time(longer is better) before a new one emerges.

[Will Williams]

We have to ask ourself why almost nobody wants national socialism, is it the ideology itself or the stigma that is the problem?

I personally hate all forms of socialism including national socialism. We do not need a state for anything https://mises.org/library/medieval-icel ... government the state violent control over everyone else, it does not make sense for Aryans(noble whites) to violently control other Aryans, extorting them(taxes), etc. The typocal white person might not deserve freedom but it would not make sense for me to threaten Bill Rhyes, Alex Linder, Will Williams or David Duke with violence unless they do what i want.

Central planning fails even harder when trying to take down the system http://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm it will also be impossible for us to violently control the population, we might be able to crush the current state but it will take a lot of time(longer is better) before a new one emerges.

What exactly is your solution, adolf512? Bitcoins?

You don't seem to care much for the National Alliance approach.

[adolf512]

What exactly is your solution, adolf512? Bitcoins?

You don't seem to care much for the National Alliance approach.

Bitcoin is not autonomous enough but there is several good bitcoin alternatives, i am mostly referring to the cryptonote coins. There is plenty of stuff that can be done, legal and illegal.

As for the NA approach, well i don't really know how it will turn out. The propaganda work you do is very important and i like the ideology of the NA better than the ideology of any other organisation i know about, time will tell us which approach that wins.

I do not agree with the current cosmotheism completely, i am creating [link removed to inappropriate site featuring pornography -WWW] my own religion instead. I am actually not that interesting in what ideology that will become popular among the masses, i am more interested in the Truth and shaping the world according to my preferences.