Commenting on Counter-Currents site

[Will Williams]

Dave Chambers writes this excellent essay about some academic twit named Roosevelt who supposedly "purifys" the history of the War of Northern /aggression: https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/pu ... history-2/


Will Williams: August 2, 2025 at 4:31 pm
[Kermit] Roosevelt admits that, as far as the Declaration and the Constitution were concerned, Southern secession was legitimate…

Of course the C.S.A.’s secession was legitimate. This Kermit jerk is as big a flip-flopper as was his relative Franklin who campaigned for president with the promise that he would keep Americans out of the European war. How did his promise work out?

Excellent, well-researched essay, Dave. Your Southern sympathies are not concealed. I, too, have Confederate ancestors, lots of them, and was an enthusiastic follower of our history, beginning in the eighth grade,1961, with the 100th anniversary of what we knew as the War of Northern Aggression, since it was not a civil war at all.

I painted a series of Confederate leaders’ portraits back in the 1980s and gave most of them away to my Southern friends. A favorite was of Confederate cavalry hero John Singleton Mosby, who, after that catastrophic brothers’ war on American soil, practiced law in Bristol, VA, not 30 miles from our National Alliance headquarters. That portrait I painted of Col. Mosby is treasured by my first wife and hangs in her bedroom where she admires it daily.

I just added a new title to our online bookstore this month and have been reading it: “Mosby and His Men: A Record of the Adventures of the Renowned Partisan Ranger” at CosmotheistChurch.org — 1868, by Col. J.M. Crawford, C.S.A. This 375-page, illustrated volume can be enjoyed by young and old alike with its large print. $22. I just finished Chapter VII when Mosby and 20 of his men strode into a Union camp behind enemy lines and captured the Yankee General, Stoughton, two captains, 38 other prisoners, their arms, equipment, and 58 horses. Incredibly bold military feat!

[Will Williams]

Eric Orwell has been in the news a lot lately, some good, but mostly Jew-orchestrated hit pieces. Greg Johnson interviewed him positively in July: https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/co ... -the-land/



Will Williams: August 3, 2025

ArminiusMaximus: July 8, 2025 My favorite part of the hit piece in the Daily Mail, which I heard was taken down, was the description of Mr. Orwoll... He is a handsome and charming lad after all… Godspeed to the RTTL movement and to all such movements.
—

“All such” intentional Whites-only communities are not the same, Arminius.

I listened to Greg’s interview with Mr. Orwoll aka Aulwoll and my comment on 12 July, above, was mixed. That was just my opinion as one who has had years of experience with similar communities. I never saw the earlier Daily Mail hit piece on Eric you refer to, but received this DM smear of him, published yesterday:

Leader of whites-only enclave Eric Orwoll starred in
series of livestreamed porn videos with his wife for cash
By SUSAN GREENE and JOSH BOSWELL 1 August 2025

Leader of whites-only enclave Eric Orwoll starred in series of livestreamed porn videos with his wife for cash | Daily Mail Online

Maybe this one will be taken down, too, but read for yourselves while it’s up. It’s out there and is not good. The saying, “You cannot unring a bell” comes to mind. Erik is going to need more than real estate lawyers to defend or go on offense against the ADL and friends, with their billion$ and sympathetic media kinsmen and goy collaborators.

Defamation lawsuits can be very expensive, time-consuming and difficult to win. Morris Dees, co-founder of the SPLC hate group once bragged, “the way to defeat ‘white supremacist’ groups is to tie them up in court.”

My two takeaways from the DM article:
1.) How did he manage to raise $50K in a crowdfunding scheme? I’d like to know.
2.) His big tent effort, posing as a Christian conservative, cannot take him far, as most Christians will organize with Jews to oppose him.

I don’t know details, but was told that the Arkansas Attorney General has said that what Jews (ADL) have said about Eric’s Return to the Land movement does not violate the 1968 Fair Housing Act** Hopefully, a precedent can be set for White separatists, perhaps with Donald Trump coming in on the side of majority rights and freedom of association. Who knows?

**The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. The act has two main purposes—prevent discrimination and reverse housing segregation. The part of the law that calls for the reversal of segregation is necessary because decades of unjust government practices have led to the presence of housing segregation today… Jurisdictions enforcing desegregation is one way to work towards a more integrated society where everyone has equal access to opportunity. Since the passage of the Fair Housing Act, people have brought many cases of housing discrimination to court and have won those legal battles.

[Will Williams]

Christian Zionism. What a lovely topic! https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/th ... n-zionisAI and especiallym/ This is an essay and the comments under it that should be read by all to see that AI, but especially Christianity have lost favor with many at Counter-Currents.The site is being radicalized in the right direction.



Will Williams: August 3, 2025
John: August 3, 2025 https://nationalvanguard.org/2025/08/ch ... -of-races/ “Christianity Restraint & the Worth of Races.”
Christianity is antithetical to our survival.
---



Excellent, informative essay; excellent comments and excellent conclusion, John.

Kevin Strom’s featuring David Sims’ Q&A with the “Christ is King” Gab AI robot in yesterday’s ADV shows us that common sense, logic and reality defeat the ARTIFICIALITY of AI.

Kevin, as NA Media Director, enjoys playing around with AI, and who has become quite accomplished at it, says :

Now GAB AI is not fully truth-enabled. But, having engaged in a few extensive dialogues with AI myself, I can tell you that you can sometimes successfully argue it into a corner and get it to admit that its Politically Correct programming is preposterous and wrong. And this is what David Sims has done with GAB AI, extracting a lot of very good and valuable information from the LLM in the process.

I, as NA Chairman, otoh, concentrate on Alliance-building — racial separation and preservation of our race — and couldn’t care less about debating a Christian robot. I prefer to keep things real and simple. Searching for what in the world LLM is I found it’s an acronym for Large Language Model, but still am in the dark with all its alien-to-me computer jargon:

…If you need to boil down an email or chat thread into a concise summary, a chatbot such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Google’s Bard can do that. If you need to spruce up your resume with more eloquent language and impressive bullet points, AI can help. Want some ideas for a new marketing or ad campaign? Generative AI to the rescue.

ChatGPT stands for chatbot generative pre-trained transformer. The chatbot’s foundation is the GPT large language model (LLM), a computer algorithm that processes natural language inputs and predicts the next word based on what it’s already seen. Then it predicts the next word, and the next word, and so on until its answer is complete.

Boil it all down and the conclusion of Mr. Sims’ probative Q&A with the GAB robot is simply as you conclude, John: Christianity is antithetical to our survival.

Compare the plain, reality-grounded words of William Pierce to Artificial Intelligence in his pre-Internet talk nearly 50 years ago in “Our Cause” at nationalvanguard.org. This is the one speech by Pierce that Greg Johnson has recommended, if you only choose one. Pierce and the National Alliance were never in the right-wing — Old, New or Alt. Fact!

We are not, as many people tend to assume at first, either a conservative or a right-wing [or a Christian] group…

[Will Williams]

Eric Orwell has been in the news a lot lately, some good, but mostly Jew-orchestrated hit pieces. Greg Johnson interviewed him positively in July: https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/co ... -the-land/

Will Williams: August 3, 2025
[...]
My two takeaways from the DM article:
1.) How did he manage to raise $50K in a crowdfunding scheme? I’d like to know.
2.) His big tent effort, posing as a Christian conservative, cannot take him far, as most Christians will organize with Jews to oppose him.

I don’t know details, but was told that the Arkansas Attorney General has said that what Jews (ADL) have said about Eric’s Return to the Land movement does not violate the 1968 Fair Housing Act** Hopefully, a precedent can be set for White separatists, perhaps with Donald Trump coming in on the side of majority rights and freedom of association. Who knows?

I won't continue commenting on Mr. Orwoll's Return to the Land community at C-C where his is popular, but here at WB where I raised a couple of questions about him yesterday, I have received some new information that throws some light on those issues. MSN is no friend of Whites, but brought this up a week ago, here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/society-cultu ... r-AA1JeM9A

Arkansas Man Crowdfunds $50K to Defend ‘Whites‑Only
Fortress’ as Donors Push for Genetic Screening
Story by Frank Yemi • 1w

Arkansas resident Eric Orwoll, founder of the Return to the Land Association, has raised more than $50,000 online to cover legal expenses for what he describes as a whites-only settlement in the Ozarks.

The Arkansas attorney general’s office has confirmed it is reviewing the group’s activities, though no formal action has been announced.

So, as of a week ago the Arkansas AG was reviewing Orwoll's RTTL project but had not ruled on it.
The word "Crowdfunding" doesn't tell exactly how $50K was raised, when those Internet fundraising schemes are mostly closed to anything pro-White
The part below about how the SPLC destroyed Aryan Nations also known as the Church of Jesus Christ Christian, was not protected by being Christian.

The community remains small, but watchdog groups say it exemplifies how online extremist movements are translating their ideology into real-world enclaves. With tens of thousands of dollars raised and supporters advocating increasingly extreme screening measures, civil rights experts warn that groups like the Return to the Land Association pose a growing challenge to anti-discrimination law and social cohesion in rural America.

A similar situation unfolded in the 1980s with the white separatist compound known as the Aryan Nations in northern Idaho, which operated under a private‑property model and enforced strict membership rules.

After years of civil lawsuits and federal scrutiny, the group was ultimately dismantled when a successful lawsuit by the Southern Poverty Law Center resulted in a multimillion-dollar judgment that forced the sale of its land and buildings. Legal experts point to that case as evidence that even groups claiming private status can be held accountable when their policies and actions violate anti‑discrimination and civil rights laws.

Anyone wanting to know the true story behind the so-called "law Center's" abuse of the judicial system using barratry, should read this by Dr. Pierce: "William Pierce on Lawyers and the SPLC" at nationalvanguard.org:

...The judicial system in America has become one of the most destructive weapons in the hands of our enemies….

A similar misuse of the courts… is that engaged in most notoriously by a lawyer named Morris Dees and the so-called Southern Poverty Law Center. Morris Dees uses the courts as a prop to assist him in raising money from a large mailing list of feminists, Jews, leftists, and other supporters of the Clinton agenda. He looks for a group which is unpopular with his supporters — a group of anti-abortionists, for example, or a religious group with a doctrine his Jewish supporters consider anti-Semitic — then he looks for a plaintiff he can use as a straw man for filing a lawsuit against the target group. Then he sends out fund appeals to his list of feminists, Jews, and leftists, in which he says: “I am suing such-and-such a group, and I intend to bankrupt them and put them out of business, but I need your help. This lawsuit is very expensive. Send me your largest possible donation today, and I will shut this group down for you.”