Identity, Loyalty, Determination
For any war to be successful the fighting community must have a clear vision of its goals, the right set of priorities; what is most important and what is secondary or even totally irrelevant.
The main problem of the White societies of the past centuries was that they were led by arbitrary set of ideas that didn’t correspond to the real long-term interests of those societies. The idea of “Christendom” is the main folly of the White race in the last Millennium. The alien blood-thirsty insane cult was imposed on Whites as the supreme guiding principle to which all aspects of private and social life had to be subordinated. Little wonder that the end-result of this mental subjugation is the total destruction of the White racial community and it becoming a prey for all savages of the world.
The White race always had its own native religious believes that correspond to its biological essence. It doesn’t need any alien preachers with their bizarre fairy-tales about resurrection, second coming and paradise.
The task of purification of White collective mind is of paramount importance. We can’t hope for any positive development if we allow the seeds of self-destruction to remain inside the future White community.
The main difference of Cosmotheism from any Asiatic “inspirational” religions is that it is based on reason, not someone’s delusions and drug—inspired hallucinations. Cosmotheism is a scientific religion. It means that it bases all its assertions on provable facts. But in contrast to materialistic scientists, who can’t see the bigger picture, Cosmotheism leaves a wide room for yet unknown. It is the religious part of this teaching.
However big the overall knowledge of our civilization becomes, it is always only an infinitesimal part of what yet remains to be discovered and understood. At no stage a man could declare that he knows everything. It is why he must remain deeply religious and in owe before the unbounded depths of Universe with its endless secrets. Inborn deep religiosity was always the hallmark of White men. Other tribes were much more shallow in their believes and adhered more to the ritualistic side than to its essence. The non-White tribes have much less capacity for true religiosity because it requires highly developed imagination and prevalence of high ideals above private interests. Only White people can be truly religious in the highest sense of this word. Only a White man can put an abstract idea above his own material interest.
But this set of ideals must be of his own making. No alien influences should be allowed. We don’t need alien gods and alien moral principles.
The first task of any science is to elaborate its basic principles; to create a foundation on which the whole body of knowledge of this science will be based.
The whole body of physics can be reduced to a page of the primary formulas. Everything else is based on them.
The same approach works in politics and social sciences. There are countless volumes written by all kinds of thinkers throughout centuries but this whole wealth of knowledge could be reduced to a set of short formulas. It could greatly simplify the task of learning social sciences. In order to make sense of any particular writing we must first test it by those primary formulas. In many cases we would rapidly find that a particular venerable writing of a highly respected thinker is nothing more than a piece of toxic trash.
On the contrary, the ideas of some people who were declared to be “villains” by the modern society would fit perfectly in the primary formulas.
Any exact science in its basics is simple. The same is true for history, sociology and philosophy. These are sciences studying human communities and their interactions.
Any knowledge and any idea are subjective because they are born and elaborated by a particular person, whose interests determine the direction of those ideas. Absolute disinterested knowledge is impossible because it would lack the center of gravity; it would have nothing to relate it to. Any god, any religion and any political ideology bears the unmistakable hallmarks of its creators. It is impossible to have some kind of universal set of abstract ideas that would fit all.
What is a theory in its nature? It is an accumulated practical knowledge reduced to simple expressions that define some processes. It is a compression of huge practical experience into a short theoretical law. It allows to accumulate, preserve and to hand over to the future generations the useful experience of ancestors.
Any particular human being can’t exist by himself. He has an identity. He is an embodiment of a lengthy evolutionary process; a vessel of compressed multi-generational experiences. Therefore, the hollow modern idea that a person is a master of his life is grossly false and misleading. This delusion brought countless millions to destruction.
Identity
Identity is the first and the most important factor in life. You can’t equalize rabbit with a frog. It is impossible to provide them with equal amount of rights. Their identities are too incompatible with each other. You can’t even discuss them together because it would be very inconvenient. Separate species have distinct identities; the same applies to separate human societies and social classes. But according to the modern dominant ideology Euclid and a Mexican drug-dealer must have the same set of rights and equal voice in deciding the political system of the society.
Identity matters. More than this; it determines everything else. Identity encompasses all other aspects of individual and social life. It is the primary law that must define all social sciences; if they are to be sciences instead of delusional fairy-tales concocted to justify power of a particular tribe or class.
In describing any event, any community, any individual we must start with describing their identity.
The term “identity” includes many aspects.
The biological identity is the first one. It is the set of inborn immutable qualities that create a framework for everything else. In case of humans the term “biological” identity is interchangeable with the term “racial” identity.
Biological sex is the second important factor. No one can transcend the natural boundaries imposed by these identities. If someone is born a black female no magic of the world could transform this creature into a white male. This seemingly self-evident assertion has very important social implications. The modern society is built in such a way that it tries to deny this fact. It tries to deny all natural boundaries and to impose its insane vision on all aspects of social and private life. It is why it makes sense sometimes to accentuate some simple and self-evident truths. You can declare hens to be equal with ducks but hens, all the same, would not swim. Not because of the inborn bigotry of ducks that scare away hens from a pond but because they don’t need to.
A difference of one aspect almost always means difference in many other aspects. Nothing is equal. The whole diversity of life is based on inequality. You can’t have true diversity and equality in the same place. You have either one or another. The idea of equality is utterly unnatural one and is a product of industrial society that attempts to standardize everything.
In real life nothing is equal and nothing is the same.
An ethnic-cultural identity is the product of social evolution of racial identity. In the process of life of any particular tribe it acquires some distinct habits and collective mental mechanisms that define it. The influence of this identity is the most prominent and all-encompassing in everyday life of any particular person. You can’t replace it with some kind of artificial universal popular culture and false rootless identity. Even if purged away and suppressed, it breaks through like grass through asphalt.
Social class identity is much less predetermined and durable but all the same very influential and hard to change. Social class habits, interests and collective behavior can exert great influence on life of a particular nation. A profligate and immoral life-style of aristocracy can easily ruin any nation. On the other side of the spectrum the unrestricted expansion of an underclass of any kind can destroy society as well. Social class distinctions have very important role and must always be taken into consideration. But any assertion that this identity is the main one is either insanity or intentional provocation in order to destroy a society. Any social disparities can never be more influential than ethnic and racial differences.
Professional and occupational identity plays a role too. To demonstrate its influence, we need to consider a peasant and a banker. It is evident that a peasant life-style is much more amenable to preservation and strengthening of the primary human identities than an urban life-style of an office-worker. It is why Marxists always hated peasants so much. It is very difficult to compel a peasant to discard his primary identities and to transform him into an obedient slave of a globalist system.
There are many other superficial identities that matter in everyday lives of particular individuals but have almost no influence on the overall life of a nation. The anti-national globalist system actively promotes some of those superficial identities in order to divert people from their main identities. All kinds of sports, pop-culture trends, dressing styles, music styles. The modern pop-culture is exceptionally prolific in churning-out all kinds of false identities.
The modern politics could be attributed to the same category of false identities. All establishment political organizations represent the same set of dogmas but create an illusion of political struggle. Their only task is to divert public attention and to preserve the existing power structure. Whether you are a “Republican”, “Democrat”, “Labor” or “Conservative” have not more meaning than whether you prefer rock or rap, football or hockey. It is a false choice that allow the system to dupe the masses into believing that there is a choice in their life. In reality the system doesn’t allow any choice. You are either agree to become its slave or fight it and proclaimed to be an “extremist” or “terrorist”.
So, we have defined the meaning of identity. The racial/biological identity is the foundation of all other identities, therefore, must be considered first and foremost in all aspects of private and social life. It is an immutable truth for all times. Those who assert otherwise are either genuine blockheads or malevolent enemy agents who care for their own identity but try to persuade us that we should have none.
Loyalty
Understanding of your primary identity is a good start. But in order to assert and promote it, you must have loyalty to your own keen. You must accept the value system in which your own private interests are subordinate to the collective interests of your people. It requires a highly developed sense of loyalty. Not many people possess it in great quantity.
The primary task of an average human being is to care for his own well-being. Even if he tends to like his own keen and to acknowledge the significance of his racial and ethnic identity, when choice comes between private and collective interests, he puts his own interests above everything else. It is normal for a common man but it is unacceptable for the racial vanguard. The main distinct feature of a born leader is his prioritizing of collective interests above his individual interests. The well-being of his race and nation stands for him first and foremost.
The highly developed sense of loyalty to his own keen is the main distinct feature of a born leader. The best example is the German leader whose life was entirely dedicated to his nation and to the race as a whole and whose ultimate sacrifice proved the eternal system of values that he represented. It is a true role-model for the best people of our race. It doesn’t mean that everyone must die for his nation but everyone must honor this highest expression of loyalty that we have before us. At least, no one, who pretend to be a White identitarian, should vilify this highest moral beacon.
The original source of loyalty is inside family. The healthy family produces a strong sense of affinity inside it. It is automatically spread to other relatives and to the whole tribe or nation. It is why preservation of high moral standards in society is of paramount importance. In a society ridden with vices and promiscuity the sense of loyalty is diluted both in interpersonal relationships and between an individual and a nation.
People who lack sense of loyalty are less likely to value and preserve their identity.
But this quality could have very negative results if misapplied; if it isn’t guided by precise understanding of your individual and collective identity. The best example of this case are the Christians of all times.
When people went to wars in the name of Christ, when they killed their own brethren only because those professed some other strain of the same delusion, it was a clear example of misapplied loyalty; the noble quality that ran astray.
Yet one example of mistaken loyalty is Soviet patriotism. Being indoctrinated by Bolsheviks, a substantial part of Soviet enslaved population perceived this cannibalistic terror-system as their own; cattle that bravely defended their dear slaughterhouse against those who tried to destroy it.
To somewhat lesser extent the same observation applies to British and American populations of the same period.
Determination
The ability to focus one’s attention on a given target; to overcome obstacles and resistance in pursuit of the stated goal.
Many people have a resolute character and can concentrate their attention on a particular task. In most cases people prefer to achieve their personal ambitious goals. It is normal and laudable but not enough for those striving to be a national vanguard.
There are many of those who can dedicate great efforts and much time in pursuit of their personal goals. For example, in studying and advancing one’s career. But there are very few of those who can with the same obstinate determination push toward some impersonal goals, strive to implement some higher ideals.
All the best human qualities are derivatives of these three. It is like red, yellow and blue in colors. The more these qualities are pronounced in any particular person the more he possesses the spirit of born aristocracy that puts him above common men.
A loyal determined man with high sense of identity by implication possesses such qualities like honesty and courage, which are essential in any struggle.
The best result is achieved when these primary qualities are equally developed. If one of them is lacking, the resultant character is defective and unable to achieve great results. Especially, in service to the collective interests.
For example, there are many of those who have an inborn sense of loyalty. But having no understanding of their own identity, these people tend to apply their dog-like loyalty to any available cult or organization or even pop-culture idols.
There are millions of devoted Christians who sincerely believe in this alien cult. Some of them are literally ready to sacrifice their life defending this cult. But this devotion is senseless and utterly unproductive because it isn’t guided by a sober understanding’ of one’s primary identity.
There are some clever people who understand their primary identity but lack both loyalty and determination. These people will never risk their private well-being for the sake of their identity.
There are some who possess both the sense of identity and loyalty but have not enough determination to work for the sake of their identity. They are constantly distracted by all kinds of external irritants and, as a result, spend their life like all other mainstream people around them.
There are those who have only determination. These are the sort of men who find their realization either in military or in crime. Sometimes in sport and politics. Their inborn ability to achieve something, an inexhaustible drive to overcome obstacles, makes them perfect fighting machines for all kinds of purposes. There are plenty of such people in modern military and police forces. The anti-national globalist system likes them and promotes those who especially lack any sense of identity. These are bipedal dogs who serve those who feeds them.
In a nutshell determination means the ability to do things; to make real changes in life. This quality is crucial in all endeavors. You can’t succeed even having the best theories and the best understanding of the political situation if you lack resolve to do practical steps. Sometimes the ability to make a well-hidden cache is more important than ability to write books.
People with practical mindset and resolute character are indispensable for success of any idea. A man able and ready to wield a rifle, or even a knife, sometimes can trigger much greater social changes than all philosophers of the world combined.
On more prosaic level this quality means the ability to organize practical work of any community or even your individual life. But again, this quality can produce really meaningful results only when guided by strong sense of identity and ardent loyalty to your own keen. Otherwise, it is bound to degenerate into pure criminality or selfish materialism.
So, we can see, that the above-defined qualities produce a great result only when combined and balanced in a particular person.
It doesn’t mean that all those qualities must be equally present in all people. It is impossible. Different people have different combinations of those qualities. Some have more spiritual and theoretic mindset and not well-suited for down-to-earth practical work. Some are better at real-life activities and less care about theoretical intricacies. It is almost impossible to find a perfect mix of those useful qualities in a single person. It is the way Nature works. It never allows accumulation of all best things in one place. It compels people to cooperate and compensate each other for their weak sides. It is the main purpose of a community: productive work for the common good. Only a community of like-minded people can produce the desired mix of the above-defined qualities.
To make changes possible everyone must start with small things. It is useless to entertain empty hopes on some miraculous social change, on some noble billionaire in the White House or a crooked dictator in the Kremlin. Any real change could be started hear and now, the moment you decide to do real things, whatever they are.
The worst way is to whine about evils of the world but refuse to do any practical work because “the globalists are too powerful to oppose them”. It is the way of weaklings and irresponsible shirkers. Everything is possible as long as you are dead-bent on doing it.
It works the same way as in any study. You can’t master mathematics or any other science in a single mighty effort. But if you have enough patience and exert it constantly and incrementally, the results will exceed all expectations. The same applies to politics. Ideas are like plants need time and favorable environment to grow and gain strength. A tiny acorn can become a mighty oak, if you are patient enough to wait for it.
There are plenty of young eager activists who are deluded by seemingly bright prospects of rapid changes. They gather into street rallies and proclaim all kinds of slogans. But almost all of them lack determination to act long-term in the given direction. When the state applies real pressure on them, they crack and return to the same mainstream herd. These are not the kind of people who can do real change. The problem is that they make much noise and are perceived as real thing by many.
This political phenomenon is seen in all White countries. People lacking deep understanding think that they can achieve rapid positive change, to rectify the catastrophic situation by a few superficial changes. The main symptom of this delusion is an attempt to act through the existing electoral process. These people imagine that the ruling crooks would allow this system to be dismantled through some lawful processes. Predictably, all such silly attempts are consistently and easily shattered by the system. But this lesson is never learnt. The new generation of nationalists starts at the same place where their predecessors lost a few years ago, hoping this time to have better results. Stupidity is a mortal sin; together with cowardice.
The more cowardly and the more stupid these people are the more inclined they are to vilify those few who do real work; who don’t try to play cards with crooks but engage in real long-term struggle against the enemy system.
Lacking courage to act, they prefer vociferous assemblies in order to attract media attention. Having no requisite qualities to be leaders they are happy to vilify our true racial leaders of the past. Having no strong sense of true ethnic identity, they perceive the rotten West of 1980es and 90es as a paradise lost. They are the same mainstream crowd; the only difference being that they noticed approaching collapse of their moribund society.
I devote especial attention to this kind of people because at some point there will be inevitable clash with this crowd of blockheads. They will try to impose their stupidity on us and we will have to explain to them that they are wrong. In a language that excludes any retort…
The monumental changes are coming to this world. Hardly anything that is now taken as granted will remain. The silly political gamblers will vanish in the violent stream of social chaos. The only way to survive and succeed in this turbulent period is to cultivate our best racial qualities. We must achieve yet higher level of our internal radicalization; to adhere yet more to our identity, to be yet more loyal to our keen and to have yet more determination to impose our will on the leaderless masses.
Words of Wolf Stoner
-
Wolf Stoner
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am
Re: Words of Wolf Stoner
The Advent of Great Chaos
The global situation continuous to deteriorate. What is most remarkable is the acceleration of the downslide into chaos in the last months. Trump’s ascent to power is a remarkable token of this process.
Although the war in Europe goes on already for more than three years, the first half of this year had shown substantial change in rhetoric among the western ruling classes.
Back in 2022 the prevalent mood was of initial irritation but complacent assuredness about the West’s ability to handle the crisis. It seemed that a few modern artillery systems and some mild sanctions would do the job and everything returns to business as usual.
This mistaken view was the result of deep misunderstanding of the root causes of the war and its real progenitors. Yes, if the war was only a result of a stupid decision of Kremlin’s blockheads, like it was in 1979 in Brezhnev’s Politburo, then, surely, the western logical approach and gradual pressure would eventually do the job. But now some other factors were in play.
The year 2023 was spent in futile attempts to push the same failing strategy of “cautious containment” when Ukraine was given just enough to hold the line but not enough to achieve any real success.
October 2023 marked a start of the new stage of the war. The Hamas attack had diverted American attention together with weapons’ supplies. Israel was always a priority above everything else for the western liberal block, therefore, Ukraine was put behind in the line.
This opportunity was instantly used by Russia (and its shadow handlers), which initiated a new mighty effort.
Slowly but surely the eastern neo-Bolshevik monster started crawling forward, grinding Ukrainian forces and dwindling western military supplies. This phase continued throughout the whole of 2024 and well into the spring of 2025.
The western political establishment in this period had already started noticing that their strategy fails and that this war has far wider implications than preservation of Ukrainian borders.
At the start of the war the Chinese factor was barely mentioned. Three years later almost everyone speaks about it. For good reason. Most probably the decision to start this war originated not in the Kremlin but in Beijing. Chinese are masters of deception and double-handedness. They have successfully weaponized the Russian latent imperialist mentality and put it to use…for the great Chinese empire.
What happens now is the war of China against the West by means of decadent and dying-out Russia. Russia is hardly more than an obedient powerless puppet in Chinese hands (blustering rhetoric of Russian “patriots” notwithstanding). The widely-advertised mighty Russian bear image is a screen behind which the chief actor prepares the main strike.
Yet a year ago this view was very uncommon among western politicians and analytics. Now it is accepted, in some way or another, as self-evident.
The war in Ukraine is a first strike of the global anti-Western coalition centered in China. It is why any attempt to find a “mutually acceptable peaceful solution” is doomed to failure; because the ultimate goal of this coalition is the total destruction of the West.
The war in Ukraine is the perfect use of Sun-Tzu theories: winning a war without even participating in hostilities.
I suspect that the ultimate idea of the plan is to mutually destroy both West and Russia, thereby, clearing the field for Chinese global empire. Chinese are not squeamish; they will not bulk at the prospect of provoking a nuclear war, if they calculate that there are enough chances for them to survive after it.
The core idea of this supposed plan is to use Russia for the initial nuclear strike, thereby, loading it with the whole opprobrium of this insane action. Knowing East Asians well enough, I suppose that the ideas in Chinese highest military-political circles develop along this line. We must understand the simple fact that East Asians have no morality in the European sense of this word. Their decision-making is the result of cold calculation of risks and advantages. If at some point the Chinese leadership decides that a nuclear war would bring an advantage to them, then, no other consideration would stop them.
China becomes the main factor in everything. It has accumulated too much power to remain simply a regional state. It is bound to aspire to global dominance.
The relationships between China and Russia are shrouded in secrecy. But from what is known, it is possible to suspect that China has brought Russian leadership under its control. How deep and wide this penetration is hard to say; but it is surely not less than in other main Chinese targets, like USA and EU.
I suspect that the most deeply implanted Chinese agents are posed as natives from Eastern Siberia (they look identical with Chinese). Being inserted into Russia yet in their childhood, these people, having immaculate biography and Russian language skill, can go very high in Russian state hierarchy. There are plenty of such faces in Russian ministries. They don’t need to be in the highest positions where they would be too inconveniently odd-looking for the Russian general public. It is enough for them to be on seemingly secondary posts.
There are many middle-level oligarchs with distinct East Asian features as well. Any of them could be a Chinese agent. No one knows how deep this clandestine Chinese operation has advanced its tentacles. But the result speaks for itself: Russia does what China needs on all the most important issues.
Somehow, from being a Jewish-led empire the post-Soviet state was transformed into a Chinese-harnessed fighting beast. Chinese happened to be even more cunning than Jews. They exploited Jewish greed; Jewish oligarchs were happy to sell everything for the highest bidder.
The western Jews sold European and American industries and technologies to China and the Russian Jews as well were happy to put the whole country on an auction. Chinese aptly used this opportunity and now it is too late to do anything about it.
Regardless of the scope of penetration of Chinese influence into Russia, the problem of civilizational incompatibility remains an insolvable obstacle for any further quiet absorption of Russia into China. Whatever the decisions that were secretly taken by Kremlin’s rulers, the bulk of Russian population dislikes Chinese and don’t want to become like them. The anti-Chinese sentiments are growing among mainstream public. The middle-level state officials share these feelings as well. It is the case when a project imposed from above conflicts with socio-biological reality on the ground. Russians, whatever their other faults, will never voluntarily become Chinese subjects.
I suppose that there is a conflict inside Kremlin’s leadership on this question. The minority of those who are under control of China are confronted by a much greater number of those who don’t like this creeping Chinese occupation of Russia.
Probably, this issue is one of many reasons of the ongoing infighting among Russian leadership. This conflict will only increase with the prospect of becoming yet one issue that rips Russia apart.
It must be always taken into account that Russia and its leadership isn’t something homogeneous. It consists of many interest-groups and diasporas, which are hard to mutually reconciliate and bring to consensus. The shaky unity around anti-European hatred (which is artificially whipped up) has its limits. The worse the social situation becomes the more fault-lines will appear.
***
A few remarks about Jews and their lauded global empire. For centuries the focus of their hatred was concentrated on Europe and White people. Their modern identity is defined by this hatred. If this hatred removed, there is little left of the very idea of Jewishness.
But they failed to notice that their real final solution will come from the East. Chinese, if successful, will never tolerate any “chosen tribe” above themselves or any social group with special elevated status of bankers and traders. Chinese are not less cunning than Jews but they are more concentrated and hard-working than Jews, more capable of creating real things and establishing working social order. Jews were not able to establish any social system anywhere. They have exceptional knack for destroying social organisms but not to create and improve them. Therefore, in this mortal struggle of the two opposing systems (the Chinese coalition versus Jewish-dominated West) China has a sharp advantage, which it will put to good use.
Yes, for about 80 years Jews were the most influential diaspora both in Russia and the West. Partly because of this critical influence on both sides the Cold War was easily manageable. At the critical points the high-ranking Jews simply phoned each other and found mutually acceptable compromises. They didn’t need a nuclear war; it would be bad for them. They had too comfortable life both in Russia and America. They skillfully played with a simmering cauldron of the Cold War but never allowing it to go out of control.
Now everything is different. Jews are not the most influential tribe of the world anymore. They missed their opportunity to gain an ultimate power back in 1990es. Now it is too late for them. The non-white global alliance is too powerful and too radical to find any accommodation with it; and this alliance sees Jews as whites, impugning to them the same guilt for all the evils that ever befell non-white tribes.
What is remarkable in this situation is the inability of Jews to understand the situation. They continue to entertain their age-long dreams of global power; they continue to see themselves as the most important power-brokers of the planet. And they continue to play dirty games on both sides of the conflict (both in politics and economy, exploiting shadow trade to enrich themselves). Russian Jews inflame anti-European hatred; Ukrainian Jews proclaim Russians to be subhumans that must be annihilated; American Jews are all over the field, depending on whose money they receive. Jews continue to see the world from the position of money-making. This worldview will be the main cause of their ultimate downfall.
Clawing the ever-increasing profits, they are happily aiding all enemies of the West. In the last 30 years they played the main role in transferring western industry and technologies to China and other non-white countries. Even now, when the folly of those decisions is obvious, they continue to rock the sinking boat and call for continuation of the globalist project. The Jewish incitement of migrant violence is a sure sign of their inability to understand the gravity of the situation. They think that they, after all, will again be the ultimate winners of any possible war as it was the case on previous occasions in the last century. They didn’t notice that the situation is very different now. Yes, there are some Jews who started to understand it but it doesn’t change the collective behavior of the whole tribe.
On the contrary, the Jewish elite, even now, continues to tear apart the remaining European social order. Even now the American Jews incite anti-white hatred among black and brown mobs. Yes, Jews possess exceptional abilities in some areas (banking, entertainment, media, practical application of IT) but what concerns the foundational civilizational qualities they are profoundly short-sighted and shallow. They failed to see that the downfall of the European civilization will bring Jewish downfall as well, together with real Holocaust; because non-white mobs are not keen on listening Jewish nonsense about “human rights” and “liberal values”. They will shoot, burn and hack everyone in their way.
When USA and Europe finally lose their ability to influence global events, the local power centers will abandon all vestiges of “democracy” and adherence to “international law”; everything that was forced on them by European civilization. Their true nature will be liberated and their old ways reestablished. The one lengthy day of a curved sword will come. The world will have to learn the hard way that the inner nature of people is immutable, be it in Mohammed’s time or under Genghis Khan or now. The mortal struggle dictated by natural selection is the main law for all living creatures for all times.
When confronted with this new reality, Israel will use its nuclear weapons, thereby finally sealing the fate of their tribe worldwide. This act will finally tear down the false veil of victimhood that was used by this tribe for so long.
But even before it Jews already now successfully dismantle their holy status. Their way of war in Gaza makes laughable all their tearful stories about Nazi atrocious fighting methods against Warsaw ghetto. What is the difference? This question will be asked ever more frequently and the Jewish special status will become ever more nebulous and shaky.
The non-white crowds are not eager to take at face value all those tearful Holocaust stories. The non-whites are generally less emotionally impressionable than Europeans; they are less prone to be psychologically manipulated; they have much less ability to feel guilty about anything.
The modern Jews have evolved mostly among European societies. They learnt how to operate there, how to exploit the weak points of those particular nations. They try to use the same methods with non-whites and they miserably fail. When they actively promoted mass immigration into Europe, they imagined that those non-white crowds will become obedient sidekicks for Jewish agenda; instead, those savage hordes have become a breeding ground for the most militant hate of Jews. The pet-viper has bitten its own benefactor. More is to come.
***
What does it all mean for the White people? Nothing especially good in the immediate future. All negative factors of the last decades will continue their work. Not much should be expected from the electoral successes of the "right-wing" political parties. This theater has very little bearing on the real events.
Europe is compelled to militarize in the face of imminent war. But the anti-national self-destructive political traditions prevent it from mobilizing all its latent might. Even now, when the whole liberal project has failed in all its promises, the ruling rogues continue to laud Churchill, Roosevelt and their “great victory against Nazis”; even now, when the approaching destruction of Europe shows perfectly well what the Second World War was all about; even now, when the new incarnation of the Bolshevik empire, yet again, spews hatred and threatens to incinerate all Europeans, the western ruling scoundrels try to argue that, somehow, this Bolshevik entity, is something similar with Nazi Germany, defying the most obvious fact that Nazi Germany by its very nature was the antidote to this same evil from the East and that it was the decadent West who prevented Germany from finishing this job back then; and it is why now the same evil invades Europe. These simple facts are too obvious to ignore. But the ruling sophists continue to invent yet more epicycles in order to explain events somewhat differently, in order to conceal the obvious truth.
Surely, this house of cards will fall. Nothing is able to endure for long on a foundation made of lies. We are entering into the phase of final destruction of the western civilization. The impending catastrophe becomes ever more obvious even for mainstream crowd. The rulers of the western countries try urgently to rectify this situation but without appreciable results.
The decision to raise the level of military spending up to 5% GDP is a sure sign of their great concern. At last they have understood that the war is inevitable. They try their best to preserve their grip on power.
It is problematic now for them to explain to their subjects, who for decades were inculcated with pacifist and anti-militarist ideas, that they must defend their countries.
They try to use their hackneyed ideological clichés about “democracy” and “our way of life” that “needs to be defended” from “autocracies”. But it all sounds cheap and empty. It is hardly possible to inspire people for war by speaking about “diversity” and “liberal values”. It is why the only real motivation that remains is money; to pay much more than it is possible to earn in civil jobs. In this regard the situation of the western rulers is the same as in Putin’s Russia. Russians are eager to express false patriotic feelings and loyalty to the system but the only two ways to put them at the frontline is either by attracting with huge sums of money or through forced mobilization. Both, the West and Putin’s Russia are equally anti-national and hostile to the real interests of their respective native populations.
The main task of the national vanguard of all White nations is to oppose any initiatives of their respective governments; to undermine all their efforts in any area. This global crisis must be used in order to bring down the whole post-WW2 anti-white system. There are plenty of ways to do it, depending on local circumstances.
We must not allow to be dragged into service for any system. We would not gain anything out of it. It is why we must refrain from joining any military forces of any country and to undertake all necessary measures in order to evade any possible compulsory mobilization. Let them “fight it out” between themselves. Our entry will be afterward.
Anything that goes on and that will unfold in the immediate future is only overture to the main events. The real business will start only after all the major existing power structures have collapsed (NATO and the neo-Bolshevik entity first of all). Only then we must take part in the war. This clear understanding must permeate the whole White racial community.
All people who are able to see the essence of the events and the nature of our enemies, must understand that preservation and continuation of any of the existing political structures tantamount to our racial destruction. Therefore, the task number one is to arrange the speediest break down of all parts of this anti-white global system.
This task is greatly facilitated by stupidity, greed, cowardice and malice of the rulers who themselves lead their systems to destruction. We don’t even need to do anything in this regard. Our only task at present is to keep as far as possible from the events and to accumulate strength for the future actions.
This stance doesn’t mean that I advocate passivity. Far from it. Remember, that Sicilian Mafia and other ethnic militant groups in USA were totally against their members joining American military in WW2. They clearly understood that it wasn’t their war; the interests of the state were absolutely alien to them. But it doesn’t mean that they were passive. On the contrary, having evaded mobilization, they were very active in their real business, defending and advancing their real ethnic interests. I don’t call to copy their way of life but there is, definitely, much to learn from.
The White people must at last cease to associate their ethnic identity with the state (be it rotten American “democracy” or Kremlin’s murderous cleptocracy). These systems are not only alien to our interests but constitute the main danger for our long-term survival. In some sense they are even more dangerous to us than any obvious external enemy.
The great folly of many politically active Whites is to imagine that in order to gain political power they must participate in public politics: take part in elections, organize mass rallies, write political programs, discuss political issues with media men. All of it was tried many times and it always failed to bring any appreciable results. The system has learnt the lesson of 1933; they will never allow any electoral victory for the party with fundamentally different worldview. More than this: they will never allow such a party to grow beyond a small circle of likeminded people. Any attempt by such a group to go into public politics will be effectively blocked and its members neutralized in some way or another.
People in the West continue to pride themselves with the idea that they live in a “free society”. The hard reality is that the modern West is not less totalitarian than Putin’s Russia. In some sense even more so (Remember harsh implementation of Pandemic restrictions). For simple reason that Putin’s Russia, despite of its severe laws and brutal practices, is much less efficient in implementing those laws and governmental decisions than such countries as Germany, Sweden and Britain. It is why Russia in many respects is more free from centralized ideological dictatorship than the western societies.
The majority of Russians simply don’t care; the attitude of indifference permeates the whole Russian society from high state officials down to factory workers. They all understand that the state always lies, always takes away and never gives anything good in return. Any Russian knows that the only way to have a good life is to be obedient to the authorities, but never trust the state. Russians always conceal their incomes from the state; pay bare minimum in taxes, seek clandestine ways of doing business, keep huge food stocks in case of famine, acquire all kinds of documents that allow to avoid compulsory military service. It is the only way to survive in Russia. To be honest and transparent in Russia is a sure death sentence. Such people are long extinct here.
There are at least three faces that a Russian has: the one for public use before the state; the one for business dealings and the real one for his family. Needless to say, that these faces are very different from one another. Any man in Russia is eager to express his ardent patriotism before the authorities, his uncompromising honesty and readiness to work for the state, his zeal to fight if the “party” orders. But in everyday practice the same man is exceptionally apt at engaging in all kinds of semi-clandestine economic activities outside of state supervision. In private life any good father teaches his children: “never trust the state”, “leaders always lie and steal”, “let fools go to war, we have nothing to do with it”. This attitude is mostly the product of hard Soviet experience when people learnt the hard way how to survive under totalitarian cannibalistic state system. But we can trace this attitude even to tsarist times. Some historians mention this kind of cynicism being widely present among general population in Russia yet back in 1812. Peasants were not eager to fight for the system that considered them as chattel. There were multiple examples of peasants assembling in gangs, kicking-out state authorities who tried to mobilize them and waiting for the French to come. Even back then, having no Internet, the illiterate Russian peasants had gained a rumor that the invading European army under Napoleon abolished serfdom and established more just social relationships. All later fairy-tales about supposed universal patriotic drive among Russians in their fight against Napoleon are the product of state propaganda.
The bulk of Russian population was traditionally indifferent; they were accustomed to serve to any master, be it a Pole, a German, a faceless state official from Moscow or even a Jew. They were accustomed to be deprived of substantial part of their products and to being looked down. They didn’t expect anything better but they have learnt how to survive in this social environment, how to seem something different to different people. This unique Russian experience is very valuable and can teach a good lesson for other White people how to survive in the most hostile circumstances.
The Russian mentality in the nutshell: never trust the state; never say whole truth to anyone but always appear to be truthful and transparent; always seek alternative ways in everything; never rely on anyone; always be suspicious; you could be betrayed even by your close relatives; always keep an abundant stock of necessities because it is a sure bet that some kind of economic collapse or requisition happens; spy on all around you because it is the only way to preempt their hostile actions against you; be ruthless and unforgivable because if you spare your enemy today, he will annihilate you tomorrow.
This mentality has both positive and negative implications. On the one side people with such worldview are not pleasant to be around with but on the other hand it helps to survive in emergencies. Germans learnt the hard way what this mentality means. An average German had greater intellectual abilities but the most backward Russian was more cunning and adroit than the most highly-educated German officer. It is why Russians were apt to dupe Germans most of the time. German straightforward honesty and open-mindedness was like a Mercedes car in a swamp; it was simply useless in this environment.
Ukrainians are very similar in this respect to Russians; maybe, even more cunning and adroit and even less forgiving; definitely, they are more politically restive and economically entrepreneurial.
These qualities could be of great use in the overall struggle for European identity.
The most important task for now is to understand who the main enemy is; to establish correct hierarchy of priorities; to avoid being used by any outsiders.
The situation is very different from everything that was before. We have enemies both inside and outside. Both, the globalist western system inside and Chinese aggressive empire outside are the mortal enemies of European identity. It is the new operational environment to which we must adapt. There are neither definite frontline, nor friendly states, nor regular military force that would defend our interests. We are for themselves in this fight. We must become really self-reliant in everything, to operate in conditions of uncertainty; nothing is assured or given; all outcomes are possible. Our success depends entirely on our abilities, perseverance and uncompromising push for our vital interests.
In this situation of impending chaos White people need to free their minds of the illusion of state. They must become truly independent. The state-myth is the most dangerous delusion that could destroy real identity, if misused. It is the most unforgivable mistake to clutch for the dead corpse of a state, imagining it to be the embodiment of national identity. Any state only a vessel that helps to preserve a nation and advance its interests. If this vessel, for some reason, stops to accomplish its functions, it must be discarded and mercilessly scrapped, freeing the space for a new better state. State is never a thing in itself; its role is always a subordinate one. It is a tool in the hands of a nation, not an idol to worship and make sacrifices to. Now comes the most important exam on this subject, which the White race must pass. Those who are not able to learn this truth, must perish together with the rotten hulks of their states.
We owe nothing to any of the existing states. They are either our enemies or alien entities with which we have nothing in common. Our racial state needs to be created. Now it is the most elevated spiritual project. This White state must be born in our minds first, only afterward, gradually, it will materialize and take its place in real world. We don’t need to ask anyone’s permission for this state; and we don’t need to gain public approval of the decadent society for this state. It already exists because we exist. It is an expression of our spiritual and biological essence. Each of us is a germ of this state; each of us can and must decisively stand on this path of self-determination and separation.
This separation is a far-deeper and all-encompassing civilizational project that has ever taken place on Earth. It is spiritual, intellectual, cultural and political separation that eventually will lead to a biological separation from the rest of beastly bipedal mass that infests and destroys this planet.
The time of great separation and great cleansing comes. It isn’t something that people could arrange and implement of their free will. It is something that Nature demands and orders to do. The only choice that each of us faces now is whether to become a tool of Nature or an obstacle to be disposed of.
The global situation continuous to deteriorate. What is most remarkable is the acceleration of the downslide into chaos in the last months. Trump’s ascent to power is a remarkable token of this process.
Although the war in Europe goes on already for more than three years, the first half of this year had shown substantial change in rhetoric among the western ruling classes.
Back in 2022 the prevalent mood was of initial irritation but complacent assuredness about the West’s ability to handle the crisis. It seemed that a few modern artillery systems and some mild sanctions would do the job and everything returns to business as usual.
This mistaken view was the result of deep misunderstanding of the root causes of the war and its real progenitors. Yes, if the war was only a result of a stupid decision of Kremlin’s blockheads, like it was in 1979 in Brezhnev’s Politburo, then, surely, the western logical approach and gradual pressure would eventually do the job. But now some other factors were in play.
The year 2023 was spent in futile attempts to push the same failing strategy of “cautious containment” when Ukraine was given just enough to hold the line but not enough to achieve any real success.
October 2023 marked a start of the new stage of the war. The Hamas attack had diverted American attention together with weapons’ supplies. Israel was always a priority above everything else for the western liberal block, therefore, Ukraine was put behind in the line.
This opportunity was instantly used by Russia (and its shadow handlers), which initiated a new mighty effort.
Slowly but surely the eastern neo-Bolshevik monster started crawling forward, grinding Ukrainian forces and dwindling western military supplies. This phase continued throughout the whole of 2024 and well into the spring of 2025.
The western political establishment in this period had already started noticing that their strategy fails and that this war has far wider implications than preservation of Ukrainian borders.
At the start of the war the Chinese factor was barely mentioned. Three years later almost everyone speaks about it. For good reason. Most probably the decision to start this war originated not in the Kremlin but in Beijing. Chinese are masters of deception and double-handedness. They have successfully weaponized the Russian latent imperialist mentality and put it to use…for the great Chinese empire.
What happens now is the war of China against the West by means of decadent and dying-out Russia. Russia is hardly more than an obedient powerless puppet in Chinese hands (blustering rhetoric of Russian “patriots” notwithstanding). The widely-advertised mighty Russian bear image is a screen behind which the chief actor prepares the main strike.
Yet a year ago this view was very uncommon among western politicians and analytics. Now it is accepted, in some way or another, as self-evident.
The war in Ukraine is a first strike of the global anti-Western coalition centered in China. It is why any attempt to find a “mutually acceptable peaceful solution” is doomed to failure; because the ultimate goal of this coalition is the total destruction of the West.
The war in Ukraine is the perfect use of Sun-Tzu theories: winning a war without even participating in hostilities.
I suspect that the ultimate idea of the plan is to mutually destroy both West and Russia, thereby, clearing the field for Chinese global empire. Chinese are not squeamish; they will not bulk at the prospect of provoking a nuclear war, if they calculate that there are enough chances for them to survive after it.
The core idea of this supposed plan is to use Russia for the initial nuclear strike, thereby, loading it with the whole opprobrium of this insane action. Knowing East Asians well enough, I suppose that the ideas in Chinese highest military-political circles develop along this line. We must understand the simple fact that East Asians have no morality in the European sense of this word. Their decision-making is the result of cold calculation of risks and advantages. If at some point the Chinese leadership decides that a nuclear war would bring an advantage to them, then, no other consideration would stop them.
China becomes the main factor in everything. It has accumulated too much power to remain simply a regional state. It is bound to aspire to global dominance.
The relationships between China and Russia are shrouded in secrecy. But from what is known, it is possible to suspect that China has brought Russian leadership under its control. How deep and wide this penetration is hard to say; but it is surely not less than in other main Chinese targets, like USA and EU.
I suspect that the most deeply implanted Chinese agents are posed as natives from Eastern Siberia (they look identical with Chinese). Being inserted into Russia yet in their childhood, these people, having immaculate biography and Russian language skill, can go very high in Russian state hierarchy. There are plenty of such faces in Russian ministries. They don’t need to be in the highest positions where they would be too inconveniently odd-looking for the Russian general public. It is enough for them to be on seemingly secondary posts.
There are many middle-level oligarchs with distinct East Asian features as well. Any of them could be a Chinese agent. No one knows how deep this clandestine Chinese operation has advanced its tentacles. But the result speaks for itself: Russia does what China needs on all the most important issues.
Somehow, from being a Jewish-led empire the post-Soviet state was transformed into a Chinese-harnessed fighting beast. Chinese happened to be even more cunning than Jews. They exploited Jewish greed; Jewish oligarchs were happy to sell everything for the highest bidder.
The western Jews sold European and American industries and technologies to China and the Russian Jews as well were happy to put the whole country on an auction. Chinese aptly used this opportunity and now it is too late to do anything about it.
Regardless of the scope of penetration of Chinese influence into Russia, the problem of civilizational incompatibility remains an insolvable obstacle for any further quiet absorption of Russia into China. Whatever the decisions that were secretly taken by Kremlin’s rulers, the bulk of Russian population dislikes Chinese and don’t want to become like them. The anti-Chinese sentiments are growing among mainstream public. The middle-level state officials share these feelings as well. It is the case when a project imposed from above conflicts with socio-biological reality on the ground. Russians, whatever their other faults, will never voluntarily become Chinese subjects.
I suppose that there is a conflict inside Kremlin’s leadership on this question. The minority of those who are under control of China are confronted by a much greater number of those who don’t like this creeping Chinese occupation of Russia.
Probably, this issue is one of many reasons of the ongoing infighting among Russian leadership. This conflict will only increase with the prospect of becoming yet one issue that rips Russia apart.
It must be always taken into account that Russia and its leadership isn’t something homogeneous. It consists of many interest-groups and diasporas, which are hard to mutually reconciliate and bring to consensus. The shaky unity around anti-European hatred (which is artificially whipped up) has its limits. The worse the social situation becomes the more fault-lines will appear.
***
A few remarks about Jews and their lauded global empire. For centuries the focus of their hatred was concentrated on Europe and White people. Their modern identity is defined by this hatred. If this hatred removed, there is little left of the very idea of Jewishness.
But they failed to notice that their real final solution will come from the East. Chinese, if successful, will never tolerate any “chosen tribe” above themselves or any social group with special elevated status of bankers and traders. Chinese are not less cunning than Jews but they are more concentrated and hard-working than Jews, more capable of creating real things and establishing working social order. Jews were not able to establish any social system anywhere. They have exceptional knack for destroying social organisms but not to create and improve them. Therefore, in this mortal struggle of the two opposing systems (the Chinese coalition versus Jewish-dominated West) China has a sharp advantage, which it will put to good use.
Yes, for about 80 years Jews were the most influential diaspora both in Russia and the West. Partly because of this critical influence on both sides the Cold War was easily manageable. At the critical points the high-ranking Jews simply phoned each other and found mutually acceptable compromises. They didn’t need a nuclear war; it would be bad for them. They had too comfortable life both in Russia and America. They skillfully played with a simmering cauldron of the Cold War but never allowing it to go out of control.
Now everything is different. Jews are not the most influential tribe of the world anymore. They missed their opportunity to gain an ultimate power back in 1990es. Now it is too late for them. The non-white global alliance is too powerful and too radical to find any accommodation with it; and this alliance sees Jews as whites, impugning to them the same guilt for all the evils that ever befell non-white tribes.
What is remarkable in this situation is the inability of Jews to understand the situation. They continue to entertain their age-long dreams of global power; they continue to see themselves as the most important power-brokers of the planet. And they continue to play dirty games on both sides of the conflict (both in politics and economy, exploiting shadow trade to enrich themselves). Russian Jews inflame anti-European hatred; Ukrainian Jews proclaim Russians to be subhumans that must be annihilated; American Jews are all over the field, depending on whose money they receive. Jews continue to see the world from the position of money-making. This worldview will be the main cause of their ultimate downfall.
Clawing the ever-increasing profits, they are happily aiding all enemies of the West. In the last 30 years they played the main role in transferring western industry and technologies to China and other non-white countries. Even now, when the folly of those decisions is obvious, they continue to rock the sinking boat and call for continuation of the globalist project. The Jewish incitement of migrant violence is a sure sign of their inability to understand the gravity of the situation. They think that they, after all, will again be the ultimate winners of any possible war as it was the case on previous occasions in the last century. They didn’t notice that the situation is very different now. Yes, there are some Jews who started to understand it but it doesn’t change the collective behavior of the whole tribe.
On the contrary, the Jewish elite, even now, continues to tear apart the remaining European social order. Even now the American Jews incite anti-white hatred among black and brown mobs. Yes, Jews possess exceptional abilities in some areas (banking, entertainment, media, practical application of IT) but what concerns the foundational civilizational qualities they are profoundly short-sighted and shallow. They failed to see that the downfall of the European civilization will bring Jewish downfall as well, together with real Holocaust; because non-white mobs are not keen on listening Jewish nonsense about “human rights” and “liberal values”. They will shoot, burn and hack everyone in their way.
When USA and Europe finally lose their ability to influence global events, the local power centers will abandon all vestiges of “democracy” and adherence to “international law”; everything that was forced on them by European civilization. Their true nature will be liberated and their old ways reestablished. The one lengthy day of a curved sword will come. The world will have to learn the hard way that the inner nature of people is immutable, be it in Mohammed’s time or under Genghis Khan or now. The mortal struggle dictated by natural selection is the main law for all living creatures for all times.
When confronted with this new reality, Israel will use its nuclear weapons, thereby finally sealing the fate of their tribe worldwide. This act will finally tear down the false veil of victimhood that was used by this tribe for so long.
But even before it Jews already now successfully dismantle their holy status. Their way of war in Gaza makes laughable all their tearful stories about Nazi atrocious fighting methods against Warsaw ghetto. What is the difference? This question will be asked ever more frequently and the Jewish special status will become ever more nebulous and shaky.
The non-white crowds are not eager to take at face value all those tearful Holocaust stories. The non-whites are generally less emotionally impressionable than Europeans; they are less prone to be psychologically manipulated; they have much less ability to feel guilty about anything.
The modern Jews have evolved mostly among European societies. They learnt how to operate there, how to exploit the weak points of those particular nations. They try to use the same methods with non-whites and they miserably fail. When they actively promoted mass immigration into Europe, they imagined that those non-white crowds will become obedient sidekicks for Jewish agenda; instead, those savage hordes have become a breeding ground for the most militant hate of Jews. The pet-viper has bitten its own benefactor. More is to come.
***
What does it all mean for the White people? Nothing especially good in the immediate future. All negative factors of the last decades will continue their work. Not much should be expected from the electoral successes of the "right-wing" political parties. This theater has very little bearing on the real events.
Europe is compelled to militarize in the face of imminent war. But the anti-national self-destructive political traditions prevent it from mobilizing all its latent might. Even now, when the whole liberal project has failed in all its promises, the ruling rogues continue to laud Churchill, Roosevelt and their “great victory against Nazis”; even now, when the approaching destruction of Europe shows perfectly well what the Second World War was all about; even now, when the new incarnation of the Bolshevik empire, yet again, spews hatred and threatens to incinerate all Europeans, the western ruling scoundrels try to argue that, somehow, this Bolshevik entity, is something similar with Nazi Germany, defying the most obvious fact that Nazi Germany by its very nature was the antidote to this same evil from the East and that it was the decadent West who prevented Germany from finishing this job back then; and it is why now the same evil invades Europe. These simple facts are too obvious to ignore. But the ruling sophists continue to invent yet more epicycles in order to explain events somewhat differently, in order to conceal the obvious truth.
Surely, this house of cards will fall. Nothing is able to endure for long on a foundation made of lies. We are entering into the phase of final destruction of the western civilization. The impending catastrophe becomes ever more obvious even for mainstream crowd. The rulers of the western countries try urgently to rectify this situation but without appreciable results.
The decision to raise the level of military spending up to 5% GDP is a sure sign of their great concern. At last they have understood that the war is inevitable. They try their best to preserve their grip on power.
It is problematic now for them to explain to their subjects, who for decades were inculcated with pacifist and anti-militarist ideas, that they must defend their countries.
They try to use their hackneyed ideological clichés about “democracy” and “our way of life” that “needs to be defended” from “autocracies”. But it all sounds cheap and empty. It is hardly possible to inspire people for war by speaking about “diversity” and “liberal values”. It is why the only real motivation that remains is money; to pay much more than it is possible to earn in civil jobs. In this regard the situation of the western rulers is the same as in Putin’s Russia. Russians are eager to express false patriotic feelings and loyalty to the system but the only two ways to put them at the frontline is either by attracting with huge sums of money or through forced mobilization. Both, the West and Putin’s Russia are equally anti-national and hostile to the real interests of their respective native populations.
The main task of the national vanguard of all White nations is to oppose any initiatives of their respective governments; to undermine all their efforts in any area. This global crisis must be used in order to bring down the whole post-WW2 anti-white system. There are plenty of ways to do it, depending on local circumstances.
We must not allow to be dragged into service for any system. We would not gain anything out of it. It is why we must refrain from joining any military forces of any country and to undertake all necessary measures in order to evade any possible compulsory mobilization. Let them “fight it out” between themselves. Our entry will be afterward.
Anything that goes on and that will unfold in the immediate future is only overture to the main events. The real business will start only after all the major existing power structures have collapsed (NATO and the neo-Bolshevik entity first of all). Only then we must take part in the war. This clear understanding must permeate the whole White racial community.
All people who are able to see the essence of the events and the nature of our enemies, must understand that preservation and continuation of any of the existing political structures tantamount to our racial destruction. Therefore, the task number one is to arrange the speediest break down of all parts of this anti-white global system.
This task is greatly facilitated by stupidity, greed, cowardice and malice of the rulers who themselves lead their systems to destruction. We don’t even need to do anything in this regard. Our only task at present is to keep as far as possible from the events and to accumulate strength for the future actions.
This stance doesn’t mean that I advocate passivity. Far from it. Remember, that Sicilian Mafia and other ethnic militant groups in USA were totally against their members joining American military in WW2. They clearly understood that it wasn’t their war; the interests of the state were absolutely alien to them. But it doesn’t mean that they were passive. On the contrary, having evaded mobilization, they were very active in their real business, defending and advancing their real ethnic interests. I don’t call to copy their way of life but there is, definitely, much to learn from.
The White people must at last cease to associate their ethnic identity with the state (be it rotten American “democracy” or Kremlin’s murderous cleptocracy). These systems are not only alien to our interests but constitute the main danger for our long-term survival. In some sense they are even more dangerous to us than any obvious external enemy.
The great folly of many politically active Whites is to imagine that in order to gain political power they must participate in public politics: take part in elections, organize mass rallies, write political programs, discuss political issues with media men. All of it was tried many times and it always failed to bring any appreciable results. The system has learnt the lesson of 1933; they will never allow any electoral victory for the party with fundamentally different worldview. More than this: they will never allow such a party to grow beyond a small circle of likeminded people. Any attempt by such a group to go into public politics will be effectively blocked and its members neutralized in some way or another.
People in the West continue to pride themselves with the idea that they live in a “free society”. The hard reality is that the modern West is not less totalitarian than Putin’s Russia. In some sense even more so (Remember harsh implementation of Pandemic restrictions). For simple reason that Putin’s Russia, despite of its severe laws and brutal practices, is much less efficient in implementing those laws and governmental decisions than such countries as Germany, Sweden and Britain. It is why Russia in many respects is more free from centralized ideological dictatorship than the western societies.
The majority of Russians simply don’t care; the attitude of indifference permeates the whole Russian society from high state officials down to factory workers. They all understand that the state always lies, always takes away and never gives anything good in return. Any Russian knows that the only way to have a good life is to be obedient to the authorities, but never trust the state. Russians always conceal their incomes from the state; pay bare minimum in taxes, seek clandestine ways of doing business, keep huge food stocks in case of famine, acquire all kinds of documents that allow to avoid compulsory military service. It is the only way to survive in Russia. To be honest and transparent in Russia is a sure death sentence. Such people are long extinct here.
There are at least three faces that a Russian has: the one for public use before the state; the one for business dealings and the real one for his family. Needless to say, that these faces are very different from one another. Any man in Russia is eager to express his ardent patriotism before the authorities, his uncompromising honesty and readiness to work for the state, his zeal to fight if the “party” orders. But in everyday practice the same man is exceptionally apt at engaging in all kinds of semi-clandestine economic activities outside of state supervision. In private life any good father teaches his children: “never trust the state”, “leaders always lie and steal”, “let fools go to war, we have nothing to do with it”. This attitude is mostly the product of hard Soviet experience when people learnt the hard way how to survive under totalitarian cannibalistic state system. But we can trace this attitude even to tsarist times. Some historians mention this kind of cynicism being widely present among general population in Russia yet back in 1812. Peasants were not eager to fight for the system that considered them as chattel. There were multiple examples of peasants assembling in gangs, kicking-out state authorities who tried to mobilize them and waiting for the French to come. Even back then, having no Internet, the illiterate Russian peasants had gained a rumor that the invading European army under Napoleon abolished serfdom and established more just social relationships. All later fairy-tales about supposed universal patriotic drive among Russians in their fight against Napoleon are the product of state propaganda.
The bulk of Russian population was traditionally indifferent; they were accustomed to serve to any master, be it a Pole, a German, a faceless state official from Moscow or even a Jew. They were accustomed to be deprived of substantial part of their products and to being looked down. They didn’t expect anything better but they have learnt how to survive in this social environment, how to seem something different to different people. This unique Russian experience is very valuable and can teach a good lesson for other White people how to survive in the most hostile circumstances.
The Russian mentality in the nutshell: never trust the state; never say whole truth to anyone but always appear to be truthful and transparent; always seek alternative ways in everything; never rely on anyone; always be suspicious; you could be betrayed even by your close relatives; always keep an abundant stock of necessities because it is a sure bet that some kind of economic collapse or requisition happens; spy on all around you because it is the only way to preempt their hostile actions against you; be ruthless and unforgivable because if you spare your enemy today, he will annihilate you tomorrow.
This mentality has both positive and negative implications. On the one side people with such worldview are not pleasant to be around with but on the other hand it helps to survive in emergencies. Germans learnt the hard way what this mentality means. An average German had greater intellectual abilities but the most backward Russian was more cunning and adroit than the most highly-educated German officer. It is why Russians were apt to dupe Germans most of the time. German straightforward honesty and open-mindedness was like a Mercedes car in a swamp; it was simply useless in this environment.
Ukrainians are very similar in this respect to Russians; maybe, even more cunning and adroit and even less forgiving; definitely, they are more politically restive and economically entrepreneurial.
These qualities could be of great use in the overall struggle for European identity.
The most important task for now is to understand who the main enemy is; to establish correct hierarchy of priorities; to avoid being used by any outsiders.
The situation is very different from everything that was before. We have enemies both inside and outside. Both, the globalist western system inside and Chinese aggressive empire outside are the mortal enemies of European identity. It is the new operational environment to which we must adapt. There are neither definite frontline, nor friendly states, nor regular military force that would defend our interests. We are for themselves in this fight. We must become really self-reliant in everything, to operate in conditions of uncertainty; nothing is assured or given; all outcomes are possible. Our success depends entirely on our abilities, perseverance and uncompromising push for our vital interests.
In this situation of impending chaos White people need to free their minds of the illusion of state. They must become truly independent. The state-myth is the most dangerous delusion that could destroy real identity, if misused. It is the most unforgivable mistake to clutch for the dead corpse of a state, imagining it to be the embodiment of national identity. Any state only a vessel that helps to preserve a nation and advance its interests. If this vessel, for some reason, stops to accomplish its functions, it must be discarded and mercilessly scrapped, freeing the space for a new better state. State is never a thing in itself; its role is always a subordinate one. It is a tool in the hands of a nation, not an idol to worship and make sacrifices to. Now comes the most important exam on this subject, which the White race must pass. Those who are not able to learn this truth, must perish together with the rotten hulks of their states.
We owe nothing to any of the existing states. They are either our enemies or alien entities with which we have nothing in common. Our racial state needs to be created. Now it is the most elevated spiritual project. This White state must be born in our minds first, only afterward, gradually, it will materialize and take its place in real world. We don’t need to ask anyone’s permission for this state; and we don’t need to gain public approval of the decadent society for this state. It already exists because we exist. It is an expression of our spiritual and biological essence. Each of us is a germ of this state; each of us can and must decisively stand on this path of self-determination and separation.
This separation is a far-deeper and all-encompassing civilizational project that has ever taken place on Earth. It is spiritual, intellectual, cultural and political separation that eventually will lead to a biological separation from the rest of beastly bipedal mass that infests and destroys this planet.
The time of great separation and great cleansing comes. It isn’t something that people could arrange and implement of their free will. It is something that Nature demands and orders to do. The only choice that each of us faces now is whether to become a tool of Nature or an obstacle to be disposed of.
-
Wolf Stoner
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am
Re: Words of Wolf Stoner
The Hierarchy of Nations
People of conservative views and nationalists generally agree with the idea of natural hierarchy. They accept the obvious fact that all living creatures are different and that any attempt to equalize their differences brings only harm.
The problem is that the mental illness of equality has spread far and wide in the last centuries; and even those people, who seemingly disagree with Marxism, in some peculiar way, are afflicted by it as well.
The obvious statement that all people are different could hardly evoke any disagreement. The fact that different people have different sets of abilities and characters is widely accepted as well. But at some point, when we start to discuss various groups of people and their characteristics, the detrimental consequences of Marxist infection come to the fore. The more detailed and precise this discussion becomes the more opposition it evokes. When we transfer the same natural principle of inequality into international relations and especially into interracial differences, the whole hell goes loose with screams about “Nazism” and calls to ban everything and jail everyone who dared to raise the issue.
The mainstream public that for many decades was nurtured on Marxist ideas is programmed for such a reaction; it is obliged to profess race-blindness and rejection of ethnic identity. The public mentality isn’t much different of what it was in Middle Ages Christian Europe. Those who disagree with official holy dogmas are designated as heretics and marked for annihilation (the only difference is that at present the annihilation happens primarily in informational and economic fields).
But even the people with nationalist views are not fully immune from the pernicious effects of equality-mania.
The laws of Nature are universal and immutable. Nothing and no one could be exempt from their application. The inequality principle permeates everything. Nothing is the same and nothing is equal. This axiom entails multiple practical applications in social relationships.
We can’t designate any kind of artificial limits to this principle of inequality. But precisely this transgression is frequently committed by people of nationalist views. They fully understand that European nations are more capable than other nations. It is hard to claim that the population of Congo has contributed equally with Englishmen to the human civilization. Only the Marxist freaks continue to persist in this direction, explaining different levels of mental abilities by different social conditions. Any normal man can see the falsehood of Marxist assertions. Thera are plenty of wealthy Africans who continue to be Africans with all attributable qualities. And vice versa, there are multitude of examples of poor White people who, despite their destitution, eventually, have shown exceptional abilities and contributed greatly to society and overall advance of civilization. It is all well-known and self-evident.
The blindness to reality starts to show when we come to the discussion of relations between European nations. Yes, the White race is superior in intelligence and moral character to all other population groups on Earth. The historical record is the best confirmation of this fact. It doesn’t mean that the White race is perfect. It is not. But all others are worse; much worse. The White man is the evolutionary product of Nature; the result of a lengthy arduous process of selection. The biological superiority of the White man isn’t a “social construct” but the main civilizational factor that impacts all aspects of life. Any attempt to reject this fact is bound to bring civilizational collapse.
But here I want to touch on a more subtle aspect of this issue.
In the same way as the European population evolved into something different from the rest of bipedal mass, some groups of people in Europe acquired qualities that far exceed the rest of European population. This idea taken in abstraction seems innocent enough. But the moment we start to apply it to real world, the hostile responses erupt.
There is an erroneous concept that among racially-aware people that ascribes equal value to all White people. Here comes the main contradiction to the original principle of natural inequality. This latent Marxism of designating a boundary behind which “everyone is equal” has a potential of bringing harm not less than the original Marxism.
Serbs and Germans are White; but it would be an insult to logic to claim that their contributions to civilization are equal.
The nationalism of White nations could be considered as a positive factor only if it is based on rational racial foundation. Any kind of old-fashioned blind reality-denying nationalism that pushes only the narrow interests of their own nation is a disruptive factor and could be easily used by the enemies of our race against us.
Polish and Czech nationalisms are conditionally good, when concerned with well-being of their respective nations. But in WW2 these nationalisms were successfully used by the mortal enemies of our race.
Considering this historical precedence, we must address this issue in depth and define our approach to the problem of ethnic hierarchy among the White race itself.
The axiom number one: The White nations are not equal. Some of them are better, some of them are worse. Not according to our prejudiced views but according to the objective historical record.
Nationalism of any particular nation could be “good” and could be “bad”. It all depends on circumstances.
The Serbian nationalism was a good factor when it struggled for centuries against Ottoman presence in Europe. But when this very nationalism switched its focus on undermining Germanic dominance in Europe, it has become a force of senseless destruction. Starting from assassination of Habsburg heir that unleashed the Great War and continuing into the Second World War when Serbs, once again, were used by anti-White globalist forces in order to undermine independent Europe.
Today, when Serb nationalists oppose Muslim Albanian expansion, they are a positive force. But when they start to regenerate the same old anti-German sentiments and seek allies among Kremlin Bolsheviks, they must be designated as a dangerous factor. Serbian nationalism suffers of this dichotomy in relation to the rest of Europe. The Croatian nationalism is much more coherent and European-friendly.
The European nations are different and their value to the White race is different as well. It is an utterly unproductive approach to postulate some kind of “equality” among all European nations. This creeping Marxism must be banished from our midst.
This topic is bound to be controversial; those who contributed less tend to demand an equal share at the counter. But those who achieved the most are afraid to assert their natural right.
Let’s have a frank discussion of this issue. The White race is the pinnacle of human evolution. But its constituent parts are not the same and not of the same value and importance for the whole.
A simple mental experiment could help to understand this issue. Let’s imagine the situation if Serbs have never existed. Would it mean a fatal loss to the White race? Would it entail substantial worsening of the overall position of White people? Hardly so. Certainly, Serbian historic experience adds up to the overall wealth of the White race but without it the White identity would not lose too much.
Poles and Czechs contributed much more to the overall European identity but their relatively high level of mental development is almost entirely due to centuries of Germanic influence. The most prominent Polish geniuses were steeped in German culture. Copernicus was educated by Germans, used German as his main language and was an inseparable part of the overall Germanic scientific tradition. His Slavic identity played a minor role in his mental development.
The great composer and pianist Chopin had a strong sense of his Polish ethnic identity. But his musical greatness was based on the overall European musical tradition. There is much more of German and French spirit in Chopin’s music than anything from Polish cultural legacy.
Ancient Greeks had laid the foundation for the modern European science. But the contemporary Greeks have very little in common with them. Centuries of Christian Orthodox suppression of creative spirit and later Ottoman dominance have transformed Greeks into something very different. The modern Greeks are closer to Near Eastern peoples than to Europeans. Yes, there is a noticeable desire of some part of Greeks to regain and preserve their European identity but it is outweighed by the Asian-leaning component of this nation.
Italians can’t be considered as a united nation. From the very beginning back in 1860es-70es the idea of a unified Italian nation was a problematic one. Everything that is of value in Italy was centered in its northern part. The southern Italy is most prominent, chiefly, by its organized crime and deeply-ingrained corruption of state officials. In this regard it is similar to Russian North Caucasus republics: the constant source of trouble with very little on the positive side of the balance. Certainly, good olive oil and vegetables but little else.
Spaniards and Portuguese were the pioneers of the Age of Discoveries. They were once the symbol of White global dominance. They had shown the superiority of spirit above any numerical superiority. Spanish crews numbering hundreds had routed armies hundred times greater and conquered American Indian states. But since then these nations receded into obscurity. Their inability to guard and preserve their racial purity led to eventual loss of all conquered possessions and slide into third-rate status among other European states.
There are some European nations which have no noticeable impact due to their numerical and territorial insignificance. Lithuanians who were once the major geopolitical factor in Eastern Europe now are merely a small state with very limited ability to influence the events.
So, we can see that for some reasons many European nations can hardly be regarded as indispensable and equal. They all matter to our true White diversity and multifaceted experience but they must not claim any kind of “equality” with truly great nations.
The Russian question, the most painful one, must be discussed especially carefully. Even before Bolshevik conquest of Russia, Russian ethnic identity was a problematic one. For centuries being under heavy Asian influence and being a product of Eastern Christian indoctrination, Russian nation considered itself as something exclusive and different from the overall European identity. The idea of “unique Russian way” was propagated by many Russian intellectuals yet back in 18th and 19th centuries (Dostoevsky is the best known of them).
This idea promised much but brought only suffering and collapse of the Russian empire; ruin to the Russian ethnicity. Russian anti-German hysteria has driven this country into the First World War with ensuing military defeat and social collapse. This fact alone is enough to condemn any ideas of this kind. But despite of this, there are plenty of those in Russia who continue to entertain the same delusions, driving the remnants of Russian population to utter extinction.
Russians share the same identity problems with Serbs. In contrast to Serbs Russians could substantiate their claims for special place in Europe by their control of huge land mass and possession of great military force; but little else, especially in the field of culture and science. Since their emergence in 5-8th centuries Russians were a peripheral European nation with all attributes of a frontier society. It is neither bad nor good; it must be accepted as it is.
Russians were always riven by two opposite tendencies of dislike of Europe and attraction to it. These both tendencies could be present in the same person. Many Russians profess contradictory ideas without even noticing it.
Here I don’t want to analyze the whole Russian society with its plenty of psychological problems. My focus group are those Russians who claim to be race realists, national-socialists or Europe-oriented conservatives.
These people have overcome a substantial collective Russian hurdle and were able to accept a system of views that puts race and ethnic identity in their proper place (the majority of Russians are not even close to it; and will hardly be in their present social form). This fact alone seems to be an insurance against all kinds of residual Marxism.
But it is not. Instead of coming to the full realization of the biological truth and accepting their own place in the overall human hierarchy, these people start to vociferously claim some kind of “equality” among other European nations. “We are White too; maybe even more pure-blooded than other European nations”. This nonsense is a mainstay of many Russian nationalist publications and ideological books. Instead of doing honest analysis of Russian history, these people engage in wishful thinking; they try to concoct some kind of idealized non-existent Russia that was always better than the rest of Europe and that Europe always wanted to harm it. In the same time these “thinkers” proclaim their adherence to the White idea. But they want to reframe it into some kind of Russo-centric ideology with all other White nations being a sort of useful retinue paying obeisance to “Mother Russia”. Sounds very stupid but there are plenty of people who believe this nonsense and want to put it into an ideological foundation of some future political system.
My task is to warn Western audience about such impostors and outright blockheads. They try to spread their nonsensical message but in the same time they seek recognition among worldwide White movement. This license of approval must never be given. I need to do this warning because the Western nationalist auditory proved to be too gullible and too susceptible to influence of all kinds of impostors (Dugin is the most notable example but there are plenty of other West-traveling scoundrels that actively promote their mental excrements).
Even if some people claim to be “national-socialist” or “race realists” or adherents of European unity it doesn’t mean that they truly accept those ideas in the way we do. In many cases those banners are used only to smuggle the same stale Kremlin imperialism; to promote it among yet another target auditory, to multiply its propagandistic message.
It doesn’t mean that all those people are paid Kremlin agents; not at all. There are enough useful idiots who do it for free. They have imbibed the Soviet/Orthodox imperialist message from their infancy and now try to repackage it into something more attractive.
The Russian quandary will be hard to solve. Its solution is bound to be painful and bloody, even if taken singly without additional complications in the form of Muslim and Chinese influence among Russian society.
The question of cooperation between Russian nationalist movements and the White community worldwide is a problematic one. In most cases single members of Russian origin inside any other nationalist movements (be it in Britain, USA or Germany) would not constitute a problem; they could become useful members like other White people. The problems arise when Russians start to act like an ethnic community; start to put forward special claims in all kinds of areas; from “we are Whites too” to “Russians must be the first among other White nations”.
To understand this phenomenon I advise everyone to read Joachim Hoffmann’s “History of Vlasov army” (Die Geschichte der Wlassow-Armee). It perfectly depicts the practical difficulties of cooperation with a large Russian ethnic formation. All major cultural differences start to surface and conflicts erupt. Russians, despite being of predominantly European genetics, for many centuries lived separate from the overall European cultural space and closely interacted with Asians. The result was the formation of a hybrid mentality, which is incompatible with the European way of life.
The treachery of Bunyachenko’s division of ROA (Russian Liberation Army) in the last days of the Second World War is a significant event that exposed the way the Russian collective mentality works.
Russians as a society tend to defy the notion of honor and duty as these understood among Europeans. Russians are inclined to engage in Asian-style realpolitik, constantly seeking more advantageous alliances and betraying those actors who lost influence. It is the same among Russians in peaceful life. They constantly realign themselves in order to be closer to those who are wealthier and more influential.
These facts need to be carefully considered before engaging in any dealings with Russians as a society.
Any proposition of incorporation of Russians into the overall European community is doomed from the outset. The collective differences are too unbridgeable.
By the way, Hitler understood it well. It is why initially he didn’t want to engage in any suggested projects of restoration of Russian national sovereignty. He knew Slavs well enough; he could foresee the inevitable difficulties any such projects would face; especially, he understood the mortal danger for the Germanic society in case such a Russian/East Slavic project goes out of hand.
When Ernst Zundel had travelled into Russia back in 1994, he wanted to promote the idea of common European unity. He wanted to see Russians not as enemies but as brothers. His lengthy documentary about this travel is very revealing in many regards. It is even more revealing now, when we can see the result of the Russian imperialist mindset expressed by many of those nationalist politicians he spoke with. I suppose that Zundel was gripped with wishful thinking. He tried to find what he wanted to see and he failed to notice what Russia really is. On his part it was a noble delusion. Ernst Zundel, a German man, whose nation suffered so much from Russians, abandoned all those grievances and tried to establish new relationships based on racial and civilizational similarity. I fully accept this idea. But its practical implementation will be impossible yet for a long time. Russians need to go through the crucible of de-imperialisation and de-communization before they would be ready to genuinely accept the concept of European unity and to take their proper place inside the overall European family of nations.
Now we come to the crucial question of different value of different groups.
Judging by objective criteria, we can come to the following conclusion: the most indispensable European nation are Germans (Deutsch). They are the backbone, brains and spirit of White race. The German society was a vanguard of White race. It was ahead of other nations in all most relevant directions. It was second to none.
Englishmen are indispensable to the White race as well. Their contribution to the overall European civilization is enormous. But their major role in destroying Europe in two world wars places on them a heavy burden of guilt for generations to come. Britain now suffers what it deserves; it reaps the bitter fruits of its own making.
Whatever the problems of Englishmen and whatever rudimentary imperialist delusions they have, they don’t suffer of mental incompatibility with other Europeans, therefore, could be easily integrated into a new White society.
French are a bit more problematic because of their historic dislike and unhealthy rivalry with Germans but, otherwise, they are well-suited to be an integral part of the European community (certainly, I mean only White people, not half-Vietnamese and half-Arab mongrels amply produced by French whores in the last decades).
The small northern European nations would be happy to be incorporated into a bigger Germanic society. They were always a part of this Germanic cultural space. Norway, Sweden, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark, Finland are the parts of what I would call a greater Germany. There are no problems with them.
Southern Europe is a problematic place. It is not as hostile to the idea of common European civilization as Russians, but they have too different mentality with northern Europeans. Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece are the countries that must be a part of the wider union but not a unified society with other European nations.
Hungary has a special place in European civilization. First of all, the original Hungarians are Asians. But the process of genetic assimilation that lasted for more than a millennium has transformed them into a European nation. I suppose that genetically, they are now predominantly White.
Czechs and Poles are the integral parts of the common White civilizational and genetic space. The only problem that must be dealt with are the remnants of their anti-German attitudes. It is still present (and actively promoted by media and false historical research) and harms our common interests. Both Czechs and Poles need to accept their honorary position just behind Germans. Germans never sought to do any harm to them but only to elevate them to a higher civilizational level. The mistakes of the Second World War must be understood, divisions overcome, right lessons learned. There are no productive ways for pure Polish or Czech nationalisms if they don’t understand the proper place of their nations inside the overall racial community. By the way, there are plenty of blockheads among western Slavs like among Russians, who totally miss the point, continue to push their narrow local agenda and vilify Germans. These fools must be rejected outright; they have nothing to do with our racial ideas.
Any narrowly-defined nationalism is counterproductive for the wider racial agenda. No nation must place their local interests above or in contradiction to the common racial interests. Therefore, all nationalists of White nations must readjust their views, especially their evaluation of historical events. For example, the dispute about Alsace-Lorraine is totally irrelevant now. The same is with all other local inter-European historical conflicts. All those trifles must be laid aside and give way to the common European agenda. Our common genetics and culture are the factors that matter most; much more than any other issue. These main factors must be put above everything else and become the foundation on which the new European Constitution will be written. Any abstract notions of “national interests”, “historical legacy”, “religious traditions” without close link to genetics must be considered as useless or even counterproductive in some circumstances. It must be remembered that such scoundrels like Churchill and even communist Stalin had successfully appealed to these vague notions, when they needed to muster a wide public support for their genocidal anti-European policy. It is why racial considerations must be put first and above all other factors. This fundamental transformation of politics will allow to put it on the logical evolutionary track.
So far, the White Man has followed his natural inclinations instinctively, groping in intellectual darkness, stumbling on all kinds of obstacles, delusions and hostile traps, being led astray in all kinds of dead ends; losing time and vital forces in various unproductive deviations, like Christianity, “humanism”, “liberalism”, “communism” and innumerable other false unnatural concepts.
Thanks to the national-socialist experiment in Germany, the White Man, for the first time in history, was able to test the scientific concept of purposeful human evolution. Despite of the short time of this experiment, it has successfully proved the viability and exceptionally high potential of this natural political concept. It has shown the way for generations to come. It is why the enemies of the White race hate this ideology so much. This fact alone is enough to confirm the validity of this political doctrine.
The weapon of choice of the enemy against White race are the usual set of universalist ideologies: Christianity, liberalism, communism. But these unproductive dogmas have discredited themselves so much that the enemy needs to find something else. It is why we can see all those modern “populist movements” emerging in all western countries. No doubts they are closely monitored, curated and controlled by the same anti-White enemies. These movements are needed in order to attract White mainstream masses to the seemingly “traditional” and even “nationalist” ideas that were appropriated by the same ruling scoundrels. The system needs to deflect popular anger and to employ this great potential for its own purposes. But even this clever trick has its limitations.
At some point the enemy will have to adopt even more radical ideas, to appeal to ethnic feelings even more openly. Most probably, the tentative steps in this direction are already taken.
There is nothing new in essence. The same Churchillian pigswill: ardent patriotism and calls to “fight to the end” but without precise definitions. This scum always incites ardent emotions in order to evade strict analysis.
All kinds of seemingly “grass-roots” nationalist organizations will emerge; from the mild “civic” ones to the most radical “neo-fascist” ones. Their purpose will be to mislead the public and divert its focus into unproductive channels.
But the primary task of these organizations will be to incite different White nations against each other; to provoke internecine massacres and wars. French will be told that their main enemies are Germans, Russians will be incited against Ukrainians and Poles, Irish against English and vice versa. If this chaos is created, the main enemy, once again, will be able to evade just punishment.
In Russia this process is already in full swing. The Kremlin-engineered “neo-Nazi” and “patriotic” groups not only call for action but are engaged in fighting, committing all kinds of despicable crimes against Ukrainian POW and civil population. I am sure, something similar is in store for other European nations. The narrow-minded local nationalisms will be used in order to harm the overall interests of the White race.
To avoid this trap, all true nationalists must readjust their views according to the all-encompassing racial thinking; not to make only a lip-service to it (as it is currently the case) but to put it above all other considerations.
But in order to build a durable foundation of the racial ideology the constituent parts of the race must be arranged according to their natural value and status. We can’t hope to build anything of value if we allow all kinds of peripheral players to be put on par with the precious core of our race. It is why we must address this somewhat painful question of hierarchy among European nations. We can’t avoid dealing with this task; otherwise, we risk allowing the above-mentioned scoundrels to take the whole business in their paws.
The only true nationalism is the racial one. Everything else is a dangerous unproductive substitute. Those who engage in hate-mongering among European peoples must be ostracized from among our community and not allowed to pose themselves as representatives of the nationalist movement of a particular nation.
Such scum like Dugin (and multiple others of the same ilk) must never be accepted at any respectable meeting. The haters of White race who lurk under the false cover of local “nationalism” must be identified and exposed. Those who seek to cause harm to our race under pretext of “fighting for the national interests” are even worse enemies than the non-white invaders. They cause division and incite old enmities instead of working for the common racial interests. Whether they are the paid agents of our main enemy or the genuine blockheads, doesn’t matter. The damage being done by both of them is equally great.
The racial hierarchy requires us to put everything in its proper place. The undeniable historical evidence shows us that Germans were the uncontestable winners of the process of natural selection among the European nations. They were the best in all areas. Second to none. Both, in material aspects of civilization and in the most elevated spiritual matters. Leibniz, Gauss, Kepler and many other scientific luminaries were Germans. Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schopenhauer were Germans as well. The Germanic society had become the breeding ground for all great achievements of the White race. Therefore, any claim by anyone else of being “equal” is tantamount to clandestine Bolshevism and subversion of the Natural law.
Everyone must occupy his natural position and be satisfied with it. The only viable way of enhancing your stance is to work hard for your own spiritual development. You can’t become equal with the best people by vociferously demanding observation of your supposed rights for equal share. It is the surest way to destroy the existing hierarchy but it will never bring any backward community even a step forward in terms of natural evolution. All those who were engaged in such unproductive struggles always ended up in a worse condition than the initial one.
Russians with their perverted sense of equality had already plunged themselves onto the depth of social decadence. The idea of “we are Whites too, therefore, deserve to be treated equally with all other European nations” is sure to aggravate this condition even further. The same observation applies to other European nations with similar unhealthy tendencies. The only way for them to survive and gain some place in the future White society is to understand their situation, reconsider their old ways and to accept the Natural Law as the supreme arbiter for anyone’s position. The only alternative for this is to engage in constant debilitating internecine wars and to be extinct at some point; and to be cursed for eternity by the more worthy White people who will remember those extinct rogues only as disruptors who caused immeasurable sufferings and slowed the overall pace of evolution.
The purpose of this article was not to unconditionally laud Germans and to vilify backward European nations. Far from it. Germans have and always had their own problems. Any greatness comes at a price. The spiritual heights achieved by the best Germans were contrasted by profound depths of moral decadence of some parts of German society. It is enough to remember the moral collapse of 1920es and today’s “gay pride parades” regularly held in German cities. The highly developed civilization creates a breeding ground for all kinds of social illnesses. But it is another topic that must be dealt with separately.
By praising German nation, I didn’t mean to accept all Germans as representatives of the Germanic higher culture. Far from it. The scum that attends gay parades must be dealt with even more ruthlessly than any alien invaders.
In the same time, by ascribing to Russians, southern and eastern Slavs a lesser natural status than this of Germans, I didn’t mean to claim that all Slavs are inferior to all Germans. Certainly, Tchaikovsky’s genius was on par with the German geniuses; no doubts about it. No one in his senses would try to diminish the best Russians or to elevate scoundrels who happen to speak German. It is all self-evident.
All people who have natural racial view of history and politics, must accept these simple conclusions because they are not the product of any “epiphany” but the result of historical analysis. The record of events is the best testimony for everything. Any assertions are hollow if not buttressed by hard factual evidence. Any claims for greatness must be accompanied by great achievements in all areas of human activity. If the claim for greatness is based almost entirely on the ability to incinerate the whole world, it isn’t worth much. The only result of such “greatness” is an eventual self-destruction of the society that engages in such games. The spiritual greatness is a much more potent factor than nuclear bombs or tons of gold.
Lack of hard force and material possessions could be compensated by spiritual development. But no amount of money or weapons would ever compensate the spiritual emptiness. It is why both consumerist America and neo-Bolshevik Russia are doomed but the Germanic Europe will rise again.
People of conservative views and nationalists generally agree with the idea of natural hierarchy. They accept the obvious fact that all living creatures are different and that any attempt to equalize their differences brings only harm.
The problem is that the mental illness of equality has spread far and wide in the last centuries; and even those people, who seemingly disagree with Marxism, in some peculiar way, are afflicted by it as well.
The obvious statement that all people are different could hardly evoke any disagreement. The fact that different people have different sets of abilities and characters is widely accepted as well. But at some point, when we start to discuss various groups of people and their characteristics, the detrimental consequences of Marxist infection come to the fore. The more detailed and precise this discussion becomes the more opposition it evokes. When we transfer the same natural principle of inequality into international relations and especially into interracial differences, the whole hell goes loose with screams about “Nazism” and calls to ban everything and jail everyone who dared to raise the issue.
The mainstream public that for many decades was nurtured on Marxist ideas is programmed for such a reaction; it is obliged to profess race-blindness and rejection of ethnic identity. The public mentality isn’t much different of what it was in Middle Ages Christian Europe. Those who disagree with official holy dogmas are designated as heretics and marked for annihilation (the only difference is that at present the annihilation happens primarily in informational and economic fields).
But even the people with nationalist views are not fully immune from the pernicious effects of equality-mania.
The laws of Nature are universal and immutable. Nothing and no one could be exempt from their application. The inequality principle permeates everything. Nothing is the same and nothing is equal. This axiom entails multiple practical applications in social relationships.
We can’t designate any kind of artificial limits to this principle of inequality. But precisely this transgression is frequently committed by people of nationalist views. They fully understand that European nations are more capable than other nations. It is hard to claim that the population of Congo has contributed equally with Englishmen to the human civilization. Only the Marxist freaks continue to persist in this direction, explaining different levels of mental abilities by different social conditions. Any normal man can see the falsehood of Marxist assertions. Thera are plenty of wealthy Africans who continue to be Africans with all attributable qualities. And vice versa, there are multitude of examples of poor White people who, despite their destitution, eventually, have shown exceptional abilities and contributed greatly to society and overall advance of civilization. It is all well-known and self-evident.
The blindness to reality starts to show when we come to the discussion of relations between European nations. Yes, the White race is superior in intelligence and moral character to all other population groups on Earth. The historical record is the best confirmation of this fact. It doesn’t mean that the White race is perfect. It is not. But all others are worse; much worse. The White man is the evolutionary product of Nature; the result of a lengthy arduous process of selection. The biological superiority of the White man isn’t a “social construct” but the main civilizational factor that impacts all aspects of life. Any attempt to reject this fact is bound to bring civilizational collapse.
But here I want to touch on a more subtle aspect of this issue.
In the same way as the European population evolved into something different from the rest of bipedal mass, some groups of people in Europe acquired qualities that far exceed the rest of European population. This idea taken in abstraction seems innocent enough. But the moment we start to apply it to real world, the hostile responses erupt.
There is an erroneous concept that among racially-aware people that ascribes equal value to all White people. Here comes the main contradiction to the original principle of natural inequality. This latent Marxism of designating a boundary behind which “everyone is equal” has a potential of bringing harm not less than the original Marxism.
Serbs and Germans are White; but it would be an insult to logic to claim that their contributions to civilization are equal.
The nationalism of White nations could be considered as a positive factor only if it is based on rational racial foundation. Any kind of old-fashioned blind reality-denying nationalism that pushes only the narrow interests of their own nation is a disruptive factor and could be easily used by the enemies of our race against us.
Polish and Czech nationalisms are conditionally good, when concerned with well-being of their respective nations. But in WW2 these nationalisms were successfully used by the mortal enemies of our race.
Considering this historical precedence, we must address this issue in depth and define our approach to the problem of ethnic hierarchy among the White race itself.
The axiom number one: The White nations are not equal. Some of them are better, some of them are worse. Not according to our prejudiced views but according to the objective historical record.
Nationalism of any particular nation could be “good” and could be “bad”. It all depends on circumstances.
The Serbian nationalism was a good factor when it struggled for centuries against Ottoman presence in Europe. But when this very nationalism switched its focus on undermining Germanic dominance in Europe, it has become a force of senseless destruction. Starting from assassination of Habsburg heir that unleashed the Great War and continuing into the Second World War when Serbs, once again, were used by anti-White globalist forces in order to undermine independent Europe.
Today, when Serb nationalists oppose Muslim Albanian expansion, they are a positive force. But when they start to regenerate the same old anti-German sentiments and seek allies among Kremlin Bolsheviks, they must be designated as a dangerous factor. Serbian nationalism suffers of this dichotomy in relation to the rest of Europe. The Croatian nationalism is much more coherent and European-friendly.
The European nations are different and their value to the White race is different as well. It is an utterly unproductive approach to postulate some kind of “equality” among all European nations. This creeping Marxism must be banished from our midst.
This topic is bound to be controversial; those who contributed less tend to demand an equal share at the counter. But those who achieved the most are afraid to assert their natural right.
Let’s have a frank discussion of this issue. The White race is the pinnacle of human evolution. But its constituent parts are not the same and not of the same value and importance for the whole.
A simple mental experiment could help to understand this issue. Let’s imagine the situation if Serbs have never existed. Would it mean a fatal loss to the White race? Would it entail substantial worsening of the overall position of White people? Hardly so. Certainly, Serbian historic experience adds up to the overall wealth of the White race but without it the White identity would not lose too much.
Poles and Czechs contributed much more to the overall European identity but their relatively high level of mental development is almost entirely due to centuries of Germanic influence. The most prominent Polish geniuses were steeped in German culture. Copernicus was educated by Germans, used German as his main language and was an inseparable part of the overall Germanic scientific tradition. His Slavic identity played a minor role in his mental development.
The great composer and pianist Chopin had a strong sense of his Polish ethnic identity. But his musical greatness was based on the overall European musical tradition. There is much more of German and French spirit in Chopin’s music than anything from Polish cultural legacy.
Ancient Greeks had laid the foundation for the modern European science. But the contemporary Greeks have very little in common with them. Centuries of Christian Orthodox suppression of creative spirit and later Ottoman dominance have transformed Greeks into something very different. The modern Greeks are closer to Near Eastern peoples than to Europeans. Yes, there is a noticeable desire of some part of Greeks to regain and preserve their European identity but it is outweighed by the Asian-leaning component of this nation.
Italians can’t be considered as a united nation. From the very beginning back in 1860es-70es the idea of a unified Italian nation was a problematic one. Everything that is of value in Italy was centered in its northern part. The southern Italy is most prominent, chiefly, by its organized crime and deeply-ingrained corruption of state officials. In this regard it is similar to Russian North Caucasus republics: the constant source of trouble with very little on the positive side of the balance. Certainly, good olive oil and vegetables but little else.
Spaniards and Portuguese were the pioneers of the Age of Discoveries. They were once the symbol of White global dominance. They had shown the superiority of spirit above any numerical superiority. Spanish crews numbering hundreds had routed armies hundred times greater and conquered American Indian states. But since then these nations receded into obscurity. Their inability to guard and preserve their racial purity led to eventual loss of all conquered possessions and slide into third-rate status among other European states.
There are some European nations which have no noticeable impact due to their numerical and territorial insignificance. Lithuanians who were once the major geopolitical factor in Eastern Europe now are merely a small state with very limited ability to influence the events.
So, we can see that for some reasons many European nations can hardly be regarded as indispensable and equal. They all matter to our true White diversity and multifaceted experience but they must not claim any kind of “equality” with truly great nations.
The Russian question, the most painful one, must be discussed especially carefully. Even before Bolshevik conquest of Russia, Russian ethnic identity was a problematic one. For centuries being under heavy Asian influence and being a product of Eastern Christian indoctrination, Russian nation considered itself as something exclusive and different from the overall European identity. The idea of “unique Russian way” was propagated by many Russian intellectuals yet back in 18th and 19th centuries (Dostoevsky is the best known of them).
This idea promised much but brought only suffering and collapse of the Russian empire; ruin to the Russian ethnicity. Russian anti-German hysteria has driven this country into the First World War with ensuing military defeat and social collapse. This fact alone is enough to condemn any ideas of this kind. But despite of this, there are plenty of those in Russia who continue to entertain the same delusions, driving the remnants of Russian population to utter extinction.
Russians share the same identity problems with Serbs. In contrast to Serbs Russians could substantiate their claims for special place in Europe by their control of huge land mass and possession of great military force; but little else, especially in the field of culture and science. Since their emergence in 5-8th centuries Russians were a peripheral European nation with all attributes of a frontier society. It is neither bad nor good; it must be accepted as it is.
Russians were always riven by two opposite tendencies of dislike of Europe and attraction to it. These both tendencies could be present in the same person. Many Russians profess contradictory ideas without even noticing it.
Here I don’t want to analyze the whole Russian society with its plenty of psychological problems. My focus group are those Russians who claim to be race realists, national-socialists or Europe-oriented conservatives.
These people have overcome a substantial collective Russian hurdle and were able to accept a system of views that puts race and ethnic identity in their proper place (the majority of Russians are not even close to it; and will hardly be in their present social form). This fact alone seems to be an insurance against all kinds of residual Marxism.
But it is not. Instead of coming to the full realization of the biological truth and accepting their own place in the overall human hierarchy, these people start to vociferously claim some kind of “equality” among other European nations. “We are White too; maybe even more pure-blooded than other European nations”. This nonsense is a mainstay of many Russian nationalist publications and ideological books. Instead of doing honest analysis of Russian history, these people engage in wishful thinking; they try to concoct some kind of idealized non-existent Russia that was always better than the rest of Europe and that Europe always wanted to harm it. In the same time these “thinkers” proclaim their adherence to the White idea. But they want to reframe it into some kind of Russo-centric ideology with all other White nations being a sort of useful retinue paying obeisance to “Mother Russia”. Sounds very stupid but there are plenty of people who believe this nonsense and want to put it into an ideological foundation of some future political system.
My task is to warn Western audience about such impostors and outright blockheads. They try to spread their nonsensical message but in the same time they seek recognition among worldwide White movement. This license of approval must never be given. I need to do this warning because the Western nationalist auditory proved to be too gullible and too susceptible to influence of all kinds of impostors (Dugin is the most notable example but there are plenty of other West-traveling scoundrels that actively promote their mental excrements).
Even if some people claim to be “national-socialist” or “race realists” or adherents of European unity it doesn’t mean that they truly accept those ideas in the way we do. In many cases those banners are used only to smuggle the same stale Kremlin imperialism; to promote it among yet another target auditory, to multiply its propagandistic message.
It doesn’t mean that all those people are paid Kremlin agents; not at all. There are enough useful idiots who do it for free. They have imbibed the Soviet/Orthodox imperialist message from their infancy and now try to repackage it into something more attractive.
The Russian quandary will be hard to solve. Its solution is bound to be painful and bloody, even if taken singly without additional complications in the form of Muslim and Chinese influence among Russian society.
The question of cooperation between Russian nationalist movements and the White community worldwide is a problematic one. In most cases single members of Russian origin inside any other nationalist movements (be it in Britain, USA or Germany) would not constitute a problem; they could become useful members like other White people. The problems arise when Russians start to act like an ethnic community; start to put forward special claims in all kinds of areas; from “we are Whites too” to “Russians must be the first among other White nations”.
To understand this phenomenon I advise everyone to read Joachim Hoffmann’s “History of Vlasov army” (Die Geschichte der Wlassow-Armee). It perfectly depicts the practical difficulties of cooperation with a large Russian ethnic formation. All major cultural differences start to surface and conflicts erupt. Russians, despite being of predominantly European genetics, for many centuries lived separate from the overall European cultural space and closely interacted with Asians. The result was the formation of a hybrid mentality, which is incompatible with the European way of life.
The treachery of Bunyachenko’s division of ROA (Russian Liberation Army) in the last days of the Second World War is a significant event that exposed the way the Russian collective mentality works.
Russians as a society tend to defy the notion of honor and duty as these understood among Europeans. Russians are inclined to engage in Asian-style realpolitik, constantly seeking more advantageous alliances and betraying those actors who lost influence. It is the same among Russians in peaceful life. They constantly realign themselves in order to be closer to those who are wealthier and more influential.
These facts need to be carefully considered before engaging in any dealings with Russians as a society.
Any proposition of incorporation of Russians into the overall European community is doomed from the outset. The collective differences are too unbridgeable.
By the way, Hitler understood it well. It is why initially he didn’t want to engage in any suggested projects of restoration of Russian national sovereignty. He knew Slavs well enough; he could foresee the inevitable difficulties any such projects would face; especially, he understood the mortal danger for the Germanic society in case such a Russian/East Slavic project goes out of hand.
When Ernst Zundel had travelled into Russia back in 1994, he wanted to promote the idea of common European unity. He wanted to see Russians not as enemies but as brothers. His lengthy documentary about this travel is very revealing in many regards. It is even more revealing now, when we can see the result of the Russian imperialist mindset expressed by many of those nationalist politicians he spoke with. I suppose that Zundel was gripped with wishful thinking. He tried to find what he wanted to see and he failed to notice what Russia really is. On his part it was a noble delusion. Ernst Zundel, a German man, whose nation suffered so much from Russians, abandoned all those grievances and tried to establish new relationships based on racial and civilizational similarity. I fully accept this idea. But its practical implementation will be impossible yet for a long time. Russians need to go through the crucible of de-imperialisation and de-communization before they would be ready to genuinely accept the concept of European unity and to take their proper place inside the overall European family of nations.
Now we come to the crucial question of different value of different groups.
Judging by objective criteria, we can come to the following conclusion: the most indispensable European nation are Germans (Deutsch). They are the backbone, brains and spirit of White race. The German society was a vanguard of White race. It was ahead of other nations in all most relevant directions. It was second to none.
Englishmen are indispensable to the White race as well. Their contribution to the overall European civilization is enormous. But their major role in destroying Europe in two world wars places on them a heavy burden of guilt for generations to come. Britain now suffers what it deserves; it reaps the bitter fruits of its own making.
Whatever the problems of Englishmen and whatever rudimentary imperialist delusions they have, they don’t suffer of mental incompatibility with other Europeans, therefore, could be easily integrated into a new White society.
French are a bit more problematic because of their historic dislike and unhealthy rivalry with Germans but, otherwise, they are well-suited to be an integral part of the European community (certainly, I mean only White people, not half-Vietnamese and half-Arab mongrels amply produced by French whores in the last decades).
The small northern European nations would be happy to be incorporated into a bigger Germanic society. They were always a part of this Germanic cultural space. Norway, Sweden, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark, Finland are the parts of what I would call a greater Germany. There are no problems with them.
Southern Europe is a problematic place. It is not as hostile to the idea of common European civilization as Russians, but they have too different mentality with northern Europeans. Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece are the countries that must be a part of the wider union but not a unified society with other European nations.
Hungary has a special place in European civilization. First of all, the original Hungarians are Asians. But the process of genetic assimilation that lasted for more than a millennium has transformed them into a European nation. I suppose that genetically, they are now predominantly White.
Czechs and Poles are the integral parts of the common White civilizational and genetic space. The only problem that must be dealt with are the remnants of their anti-German attitudes. It is still present (and actively promoted by media and false historical research) and harms our common interests. Both Czechs and Poles need to accept their honorary position just behind Germans. Germans never sought to do any harm to them but only to elevate them to a higher civilizational level. The mistakes of the Second World War must be understood, divisions overcome, right lessons learned. There are no productive ways for pure Polish or Czech nationalisms if they don’t understand the proper place of their nations inside the overall racial community. By the way, there are plenty of blockheads among western Slavs like among Russians, who totally miss the point, continue to push their narrow local agenda and vilify Germans. These fools must be rejected outright; they have nothing to do with our racial ideas.
Any narrowly-defined nationalism is counterproductive for the wider racial agenda. No nation must place their local interests above or in contradiction to the common racial interests. Therefore, all nationalists of White nations must readjust their views, especially their evaluation of historical events. For example, the dispute about Alsace-Lorraine is totally irrelevant now. The same is with all other local inter-European historical conflicts. All those trifles must be laid aside and give way to the common European agenda. Our common genetics and culture are the factors that matter most; much more than any other issue. These main factors must be put above everything else and become the foundation on which the new European Constitution will be written. Any abstract notions of “national interests”, “historical legacy”, “religious traditions” without close link to genetics must be considered as useless or even counterproductive in some circumstances. It must be remembered that such scoundrels like Churchill and even communist Stalin had successfully appealed to these vague notions, when they needed to muster a wide public support for their genocidal anti-European policy. It is why racial considerations must be put first and above all other factors. This fundamental transformation of politics will allow to put it on the logical evolutionary track.
So far, the White Man has followed his natural inclinations instinctively, groping in intellectual darkness, stumbling on all kinds of obstacles, delusions and hostile traps, being led astray in all kinds of dead ends; losing time and vital forces in various unproductive deviations, like Christianity, “humanism”, “liberalism”, “communism” and innumerable other false unnatural concepts.
Thanks to the national-socialist experiment in Germany, the White Man, for the first time in history, was able to test the scientific concept of purposeful human evolution. Despite of the short time of this experiment, it has successfully proved the viability and exceptionally high potential of this natural political concept. It has shown the way for generations to come. It is why the enemies of the White race hate this ideology so much. This fact alone is enough to confirm the validity of this political doctrine.
The weapon of choice of the enemy against White race are the usual set of universalist ideologies: Christianity, liberalism, communism. But these unproductive dogmas have discredited themselves so much that the enemy needs to find something else. It is why we can see all those modern “populist movements” emerging in all western countries. No doubts they are closely monitored, curated and controlled by the same anti-White enemies. These movements are needed in order to attract White mainstream masses to the seemingly “traditional” and even “nationalist” ideas that were appropriated by the same ruling scoundrels. The system needs to deflect popular anger and to employ this great potential for its own purposes. But even this clever trick has its limitations.
At some point the enemy will have to adopt even more radical ideas, to appeal to ethnic feelings even more openly. Most probably, the tentative steps in this direction are already taken.
There is nothing new in essence. The same Churchillian pigswill: ardent patriotism and calls to “fight to the end” but without precise definitions. This scum always incites ardent emotions in order to evade strict analysis.
All kinds of seemingly “grass-roots” nationalist organizations will emerge; from the mild “civic” ones to the most radical “neo-fascist” ones. Their purpose will be to mislead the public and divert its focus into unproductive channels.
But the primary task of these organizations will be to incite different White nations against each other; to provoke internecine massacres and wars. French will be told that their main enemies are Germans, Russians will be incited against Ukrainians and Poles, Irish against English and vice versa. If this chaos is created, the main enemy, once again, will be able to evade just punishment.
In Russia this process is already in full swing. The Kremlin-engineered “neo-Nazi” and “patriotic” groups not only call for action but are engaged in fighting, committing all kinds of despicable crimes against Ukrainian POW and civil population. I am sure, something similar is in store for other European nations. The narrow-minded local nationalisms will be used in order to harm the overall interests of the White race.
To avoid this trap, all true nationalists must readjust their views according to the all-encompassing racial thinking; not to make only a lip-service to it (as it is currently the case) but to put it above all other considerations.
But in order to build a durable foundation of the racial ideology the constituent parts of the race must be arranged according to their natural value and status. We can’t hope to build anything of value if we allow all kinds of peripheral players to be put on par with the precious core of our race. It is why we must address this somewhat painful question of hierarchy among European nations. We can’t avoid dealing with this task; otherwise, we risk allowing the above-mentioned scoundrels to take the whole business in their paws.
The only true nationalism is the racial one. Everything else is a dangerous unproductive substitute. Those who engage in hate-mongering among European peoples must be ostracized from among our community and not allowed to pose themselves as representatives of the nationalist movement of a particular nation.
Such scum like Dugin (and multiple others of the same ilk) must never be accepted at any respectable meeting. The haters of White race who lurk under the false cover of local “nationalism” must be identified and exposed. Those who seek to cause harm to our race under pretext of “fighting for the national interests” are even worse enemies than the non-white invaders. They cause division and incite old enmities instead of working for the common racial interests. Whether they are the paid agents of our main enemy or the genuine blockheads, doesn’t matter. The damage being done by both of them is equally great.
The racial hierarchy requires us to put everything in its proper place. The undeniable historical evidence shows us that Germans were the uncontestable winners of the process of natural selection among the European nations. They were the best in all areas. Second to none. Both, in material aspects of civilization and in the most elevated spiritual matters. Leibniz, Gauss, Kepler and many other scientific luminaries were Germans. Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schopenhauer were Germans as well. The Germanic society had become the breeding ground for all great achievements of the White race. Therefore, any claim by anyone else of being “equal” is tantamount to clandestine Bolshevism and subversion of the Natural law.
Everyone must occupy his natural position and be satisfied with it. The only viable way of enhancing your stance is to work hard for your own spiritual development. You can’t become equal with the best people by vociferously demanding observation of your supposed rights for equal share. It is the surest way to destroy the existing hierarchy but it will never bring any backward community even a step forward in terms of natural evolution. All those who were engaged in such unproductive struggles always ended up in a worse condition than the initial one.
Russians with their perverted sense of equality had already plunged themselves onto the depth of social decadence. The idea of “we are Whites too, therefore, deserve to be treated equally with all other European nations” is sure to aggravate this condition even further. The same observation applies to other European nations with similar unhealthy tendencies. The only way for them to survive and gain some place in the future White society is to understand their situation, reconsider their old ways and to accept the Natural Law as the supreme arbiter for anyone’s position. The only alternative for this is to engage in constant debilitating internecine wars and to be extinct at some point; and to be cursed for eternity by the more worthy White people who will remember those extinct rogues only as disruptors who caused immeasurable sufferings and slowed the overall pace of evolution.
The purpose of this article was not to unconditionally laud Germans and to vilify backward European nations. Far from it. Germans have and always had their own problems. Any greatness comes at a price. The spiritual heights achieved by the best Germans were contrasted by profound depths of moral decadence of some parts of German society. It is enough to remember the moral collapse of 1920es and today’s “gay pride parades” regularly held in German cities. The highly developed civilization creates a breeding ground for all kinds of social illnesses. But it is another topic that must be dealt with separately.
By praising German nation, I didn’t mean to accept all Germans as representatives of the Germanic higher culture. Far from it. The scum that attends gay parades must be dealt with even more ruthlessly than any alien invaders.
In the same time, by ascribing to Russians, southern and eastern Slavs a lesser natural status than this of Germans, I didn’t mean to claim that all Slavs are inferior to all Germans. Certainly, Tchaikovsky’s genius was on par with the German geniuses; no doubts about it. No one in his senses would try to diminish the best Russians or to elevate scoundrels who happen to speak German. It is all self-evident.
All people who have natural racial view of history and politics, must accept these simple conclusions because they are not the product of any “epiphany” but the result of historical analysis. The record of events is the best testimony for everything. Any assertions are hollow if not buttressed by hard factual evidence. Any claims for greatness must be accompanied by great achievements in all areas of human activity. If the claim for greatness is based almost entirely on the ability to incinerate the whole world, it isn’t worth much. The only result of such “greatness” is an eventual self-destruction of the society that engages in such games. The spiritual greatness is a much more potent factor than nuclear bombs or tons of gold.
Lack of hard force and material possessions could be compensated by spiritual development. But no amount of money or weapons would ever compensate the spiritual emptiness. It is why both consumerist America and neo-Bolshevik Russia are doomed but the Germanic Europe will rise again.
-
Will Williams
- Posts: 5527
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am
Re: Words of Wolf Stoner
Wolf, you are a modern, 21st century racial nationalist thinker. Some will disagree with you and oppose you but if William Pierce was around today, he would agree with what you have written here.
With minor edits of this for readers of English, this essay will be featured on National Vanguard and beyond. Thank you.
With minor edits of this for readers of English, this essay will be featured on National Vanguard and beyond. Thank you.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ