Commenting on Counter-Currents site

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sat Jul 05, 2025 4:38 pm

Though C-C chose to not republish Wolf Stoner's latest excellent essay on its front page, I mention it here in a comment.https://counter-currents.com/2025/06/th ... eadership/ Am I the only person at C-C who takes a dim view of the Negro Lipman Matthews writing on C-C's front page? He must be popular with someone?



Will Williams: July 5, 2025
Negro Lipman Matthews tells us: Politics should be about ideas, not identity. 
---

Ideas are important, yes, but should this Negro be telling White racial nationalists what politics to believe? Seriously.

Image
The Lpman

I'll risk being known as a maverick dissident for saying we do not need to be provided counsel from Negroes about identity politics. I prefer wisdom from our own about the primacy of race, thanks.

WikiJews define identity politics for us as: politics based on a particular identity, such as ethnicity, race, nationality, religion, denomination, gender, sexual orientation, social background, political affiliation, caste, age, education, disability, opinion, intelligence, and social class.

Nothing about ideas in WikiJews' 16 categories of identty politics, Lipman. Race is but 1/16th.

I prefer the brilliant White racial nationalist Wolf Stoner's latest essay, published last month at nationalvanguard.org "Identity, Loyalty, Determination"

An individual cannot exist by himself... He has an identity. Identity is the first and the most important factor in life... Identity matters. More than this; it determines everything else. Identity encompasses all other aspects of individual and social life. It is the primary law that must define all social sciences, if they are to be sciences instead of nonsense concocted to justify the power of a particular tribe or...  [or of their "ideas"].

In describing any event, any community, any individual, we must begin by correctly defining its identity. The term “identity” encompasses many aspects. Biological identity is the first. It is the set of inborn immutable qualities that create a framework for everything else. In the case of humans, the term biological identity is interchangeable with the term racial identity.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sun Jul 06, 2025 8:54 pm

The reader may detect my frustration in this response to Kathryn S when I tried to link to WRA? at nationalvanguard.org only to find it is not on NV. :shock: We'll get it put there eventually, as well as find a volunteer or a team to update and revise WRA?, arguably the most important document the National Alliance has ever produced: https://counter-currents.com/2025/06/my ... ry-ballet/

I bumped a two-year-old WB topic today that deals with this WRA? subject: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=6092&start=10 (“Who Rules America” report on media ownership and control). I cannot expect to get a volunteer from C-C to do this project, You never know from where help will appear -- but I do expect to motivate an Alliance member or supporter to step up, though very few of them have registered or participate here at WB.

Oh, well, we'll persevere!





Kathryn S: July 4, 2025 Thank you for the encouragement, Mr. Williams!

Most people are either constitutionally wired to accept whatever the social norm of the day is, or they simply don’t want trouble; I don’t mean that in an ugly or condescending way — it just seems to be a fact.



You are quite welcome.

It is a fact. Most people want to leave well enough alone; don’t want to rock the boat; instead, toe the line: don’t cause trouble conform!

You may have noticed that I promote the wise, timeless teachings of William Pierce. Besides the term “lemming-like” that he practically coined to describe this behavior he spoke more about that here: “Fear of the Smear” at nationalvanguard.org.

…[J]ust two of the racially destructive programs [organized Jews] already have in place are, one, keeping our borders open to immigrants from the non-White areas of the world and, two, doing everything they can to encourage miscegenation. Their immigration program, aimed at flooding White areas with non-Whites, is backed primarily through the government. Their miscegenation program, aimed at increasing the degree of racial mongrelization, is backed primarily by their mass media — although they also use their influence among the Christian clergy and in the educational establishment to enlist the aid of the churches and the schools in pushing the acceptance of miscegenation among their White victims.

A majority of the people they intend to destroy are kept hypnotized by the mass media and offer no resistance. An independent-minded minority, however, are not entirely happy about our enemies’ plans and insist on speaking out and sometimes taking other measures against the programs intended to destroy them. These dissidents who speak against our enemies and their plans are described by the media as “haters,” as “extremists.” Or, if talk turns to action, the dissidents are denounced as “terrorists.” In most cases fear of these labels, fear of being called a “hater,” is sufficient to keep the dissidents quiet. After all, most independent-minded people, just like the lemmings, are social creatures. They desire the goodwill of their neighbors. They don’t want to be hated or reviled or even feared. They have families and jobs. They don’t want their colleagues or coworkers to consider them odd or dangerous. They don’t want their friends and acquaintances among the lemmings to shun them.

There’s that word again — lemmings. He continues:

The media bosses, who are foremost among the enemies of our people, thus have a very powerful weapon in their ability to label arbitrarily as “haters” any dissidents bold enough to speak out against them or their policies or even against the consequences of their policies…


Until Whites get serious and effectively organize to resist our replacement, building our own multi-media to reach our people — available all day, every day — to circumvent the stranglehold that powerful organized Jewry has on America’s mass mind through control of the news and entertainment industry, we may as well give up and go fishing.

Many Whites think that’s exaggerating, that Jewry does not have that power, but it is a fact, as documented in this Alliance booklet that Pierce updated yearly: http://nationalvanguard.org/books/2010- ... ica-01.pdf. I do not know if that link I just transcribed will work because I am a computer idiot. I’ll eventually see that WRA? will appear at at nationalvanguard.org as “Who Rules America?” but for some reason it is not there currently (I suspect because that site’s admin considers it outdated). Outdated, or not, it is too important a document to languish at some difficult-to-find Web page.
* * * * *
So, please pardon this appeal by me, Kathryn:

If any capable person reading this is interested in revising and updating Who Rules America?, contact me. I’ll see that whoever does this project is paid for his work. “John Q. Publius,” whoever he is, practically updated WRA? 5 and 1/2 years ago at theoccidentalobserver.net with his essay, “Ways of Seeing: Who Determines Your Reality?” posted there 20 January 2019.

JQP did a “Jim Goad” and disappeared from TOO soon after writing this, but his entire essay was republished here by me two years ago, along with a similar call for volunteers to update WRA?: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=6092&start=10 (“Who Rules America” report on media ownership and control)

No takers then, but perhaps we’ll find one or two now.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Post Reply