Letters, We Write Letters 06/28/25

[White Man 1]

Letter 1:

DEAR PARENTING.ORG:

I saw your advertisement recently on a large billboard near a main interchange in Cambria County, Pennsylvania. It’s rather large and impossible to miss. If we have to stop at the traffic light there, your billboard is in our face for up to two minutes straight. Everyone in the car is basically forced to look at it, including my young children.

And I object to that. Your billboard is offensive.

Now the message conveyed by the words on your billboard isn’t offensive. You’re telling viewers to stop staring at their screens and get outside and into Nature with their families. And that’s something our family does regularly.

What is offensive, though, is the image you chose to use on the billboard, and which you basically are forcing my entire family to see, several times a week at least. It shows a racially mixed couple — Black on White — and their mixed offspring, which as far as I can see has almost nothing to do with your ostensible message of getting outside. It certainly is not a demographic that constitutes even a single-digit percentage of people you’re likely to find on Nature trails or at campsites, and it also constitutes a vanishingly small percentage of the couples in this area. Like most stock photos used in advertising, everyone in the picture has a fake smile plastered on his or her face, and we are obviously supposed to get the idea that having a mixed-race sexual relationship is just fine and everyone should approve of it.

Well, in my family, we don’t approve of it. Regardless of the intent of the perpetrators, racial mixing is a kind of genocide in the popular understanding of that term. It is very detrimental to the continued existence — the very survival — of any race engaging in it.

The major human races have been evolving apart, becoming more different from each other, for hundreds of thousands of years. Mixing wipes out the unique characteristics of each, and lowers the abilities of the higher race in whatever quality you care to measure. Mixing wipes out a hundred thousand years of human evolution in a single thoughtless moment.

It is against Nature: All of Nature tends toward divergent evolution, toward the races becoming more different over time — the total opposite of mixing. And therefore, for those who see the world in religious terms, racial mixing is against all that is divine and spiritual too. Why would Divine Providence have set into motion a hundred-thousand-year natural process to bring into being separate and unique races, if the intent was only to destroy that uniqueness? It would certainly be a crime against Nature to force all species of bears to live in the same territory and encourage them to mix away all their unique adaptations and characteristics, making their natural varieties go extinct. How much greater a crime it is to do that to the human races!

Murder is rightly a capital crime. It is homicide. It is the killing of a single man or woman. Racial mixing should also be a crime. It is genocide. On a large enough scale, it is the killing of an entire people. It is quite reasonable to conclude that racial mixing is worse than murder.

If a racially-mixed union produces children, they are of mixed race and their existence further blurs the lines of distinction between the races, making more racial mixing increasingly likely in the future.

If a racially-mixed union does not produce children, it still constitutes a horrible example for the young people who witness it, and by that example it also makes mixing more likely in the future.

If children see it, and it is not condemned by their parents and by society, they will assimilate the unspoken message that it is acceptable, approved, and morally right.

Even though racial mixing is pretty rare in our county, your billboard constitutes the equivalent of thousands upon thousands of mixed-race unions being forced right into the faces of all the families and all the young children in our area, with the tacit approval implicit in having a huge ten-times-larger-than-life portrayal of such high above our freeway for weeks or perhaps months on end.

I believe this is causing serious harm to our community, especially to our children. I think you should stop promoting the immoral act of racial mixing.

If you’d like to read more about this issue, I suggest you read the works of physicist and philosopher Dr. William Luther Pierce, many of which can be found at cosmotheistchurch.org.

* * *

Letter 2:

Dear Family Dollar Stores:

Clearly, your stores are troubled. You have three stores in my area of western Pennsylvania, and I’ve also seen more of your stores when I’ve traveled through nearby states. I see a lack of adequate cleaning. I see massive potholes, approaching the size of ponds, in some of the parking lots. I see a lack of maintenance to your facilities, much of which look like they were installed before the Internet was invented. I see disorganization. But I suppose all of that is somewhat understandable, considering how your company has been struggling to compete with much larger discount chains, and has been changing hands so often in recent years, from Levine to Icahn to Sasser to who knows who.

What I can’t understand, though, is why you chose to put up huge posters promoting transgenderism in your windows recently. I suppose they cover up some of the dirt, but wouldn’t a picture of one of your food items do just as well?

Putting up a pro-transgenderism poster isn’t “being inclusive.” It isn’t “supporting human rights.” It is promoting grievous and permanent harm — real psychological and physical harm — to our young people, and ultimately threatening our entire existence as a people. It is promoting the literal destruction of a significant part of future generations.

Young people are impressionable. Young people want approval. Your pro-transgenderism poster promotes the idea that people can be transformed into the opposite sex by chemicals and surgery — and that they ought to be so transformed if they “feel” a certain way. And your poster also offers a kind of social approval to those who would go down that path.

Now, of course, changing your sex is impossible. “Sex change” doesn’t exist — there are 30 trillion cells in our bodies, 300 times more than there are stars in the Milky Way. And each one of those cells carries the genetic code for our sex. Even if you could alter each cell at a rate of one per second (and you can’t), it would take you 57 million years to “change the sex” of one person.

But it is possible to sell impressionable young people, especially at an age when they are unsure of themselves and their sexuality, on the fraudulent idea that if you ingest horrific chemicals that prevent your body from developing normally, and that if you follow that up with horrific “surgery” that involves, among other things, cutting off or grossly disfiguring their genitals and other parts of their bodies, that they can “become” the opposite sex. This has resulted in a new “industry” that sells these so-called “treatments” and mutilating surgeries — and vends high-priced advice from “counselors” who go out of their way to recommend it.

These monsters, many of whom seem to be of the same Tribe as your own company’s Levine and Icahn, etc., are denying all these children a normal love life, and family life. They are denying them their birthright of naturally turning into the young men and women they were born to be. They are denying them the right to love and be loved as Nature intended. They are denying them the most important and basic natural right of all — the right to have descendants. For they are sterilizing them for life through imposture and trickery of the most evil kind imaginable.

Neither I nor my family will countenance your support of such evil. We will not be spending a single dollar in your wildly-misnamed “Family” Dollar stores. And we will encourage all in our circles to do the same.

If I hear that you have reversed this policy of promoting transgenderism, and take large and public steps to make amends for your misdeed, I will take that into consideration. For further references on this important topic, I suggest that you enter the word “transgender” into the search box at nationalvanguard.org.

* * *

Letter 3:

Dear WTAJ:

Some weeks ago you featured a news report about a Black man who once lived in a nearby area, one William Nesbitt. You described his accomplishments in glowing terms, explicitly saying that he was “working for the good of his race.”

I had no objection to that description, but it did make me think. I wonder if your station has ever described a White man, at any time at all, in positive terms because he was “working for the good of his race.”

I can’t claim to have watched every broadcast from your station, but I have watched hundreds of them, and I have never heard you say anything remotely similar about a White man or woman. I have, though, seen innumerable broadcasts praising people who were, in some way or other, working for the good of Black people, working for the good of Brown people of various types, working for the good of homosexuals, etc. etc. But never is anyone praised who is working for the good of White people. Considering that our counties around here are around 90-plus percent White, this is really remarkable.

I wonder also if you folks at WTAJ have a definite policy which states — or perhaps just an unstated moral framework in which — it is inherently bad for any White person to “work for the good of his race.” If so, that is a horribly prejudicial and anti-White attitude to take.

I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts on this. For further references on the matter, I suggest you enter the word “anti-White” in the search box on nationalvanguard.org.

* * *