Commenting on Counter-Currents site

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Fri Oct 18, 2024 5:19 pm

Coming to the defense again of NV writer John Massaro, promoting his latest article put up on NV today and promoting his book that we carry. This is the sort of activism others on WB can do because we all have computers. https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/th ... ngue-bath/

Will Williams: October 18, 2024
Kim: October 18, 2024 Regarding John Massaro’s Sheryl Crow comment – (I’ve been listening to much 80s & 90s country music of late.) Rock guitarist/vocalist Sheryl Crow has done some ballads with country music singers. Nice voice, nice acoustic guitar, & catchy songs, but the low-key gal is far from “fairly normal”. She, like all the rest, is owned by her show-biz industry handlers & does *exactly* what she’s told. THEY decide on whose show she’ll appear, as well as which apologetically white, pro-liberal commie remarks she’ll publicly speak. She tows [sic] the line in her small talk. Everything is 100% loyal to ”’the Tribe”’ first & foremost…
---

Thanks, Kim. Though I’ve listened to music programming on Jew-controlled radio all my life, mostly when driving, I never purchased even one record until working with Dr. Pierce when I bought some Classical audiotapes. Some performers have appealed to me; most have not.

I agree with you that Sheryl Crow is talented and agree with John that she likely appears “normal” to most, compared to other popular singers. It could not have made her appear normal to have crudely chatted about sex with the sack o′ shit Stern. If you read what John has written about Jews**, you and he would likely agree on how Miss Crow is controlled in the Jew-dominated music/entertainment industry.

Billboard magazine and its exclusive music charts, not to mention record labels and radio stations that play “popular” music, were always or eventually became Jew-owned and controlled. Read a little about that here: “(180) Oliver Anthony Accused of Promoting Antisemitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories” on whitebiocentrism.com

This article from Instauration magazine 45 years ago is an eye-opener: “The Music Monopoly” at nationalvanguard.org

** A sampling of Mr. Massaro’s delving into the JQ — this latest one put up just today on National Vanguard: “Peter Hotez — One Sick Bastard” at nationalvanguard.org
,,,Now while Gates and Fauci are Gentiles, it becomes my somber duty to point out once again, as I’ve done in my book Will Vaccines Be the End of Us?, that Jews are exceedingly over-represented in the vaccine racket, as they are in every destructive human endeavor you can name. Enter Dr. Peter Hotez, not a household name, but known all too well to those of us who stay on top of vaccine news. Like aging Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, whose life story is as ugly as his face, and who came right out with it four years ago as an advocate for vaccination at gunpoint for those who resist, Hotez makes no attempt to hide his true colors…
John’s definitive work on vaccines available here for just $20: “Will Vaccines Be The End Of Us by John Massaro – Cosmotheism” at cosmotheistchurch.org
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Fri Oct 18, 2024 7:53 pm

Two quick posts here under a couple of Dr. Greg Johnson's comments he made under his own article, encouraging his followers at C-C to vote for Trump: https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/wh ... nce-trump/ Apparently, he had a change of heart and reversed his earlier stupid advice to people to vote for Kalama Emhoff for some reason (Worse is better?).


Will Williams: October 19, 2024
Greg Johnson: October 18, 2024 ... I have had very limited interactions with Indians, and I am fully willing to accept that they might be wild outliers.
---

Your interaction with them aside is it not enough that they cannot make White babies?

I agree with Mr. Dobbs about those racial aliens he calls Pajeets.
* * * * *
Will Williams: [/b]October 19, 2024
Greg Johnson: October 18, 2024 Please do follow through with voting. Do it early if you can. And then help others you know to vote as well.
---

Although I oppose the entire current electoral process of mass democracy, especially at the national level, I held my nose and voted early yesterday — for Rabbi Trump, despite conclusively learning that he is the most Jewish non-Jew extant, here: “Let’s Talk About Donald Trump” at nationalvanguard.org.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Fri Oct 18, 2024 8:54 pm

This Jayeryan character is not a race-thinker at all. I don't mind telling him so in front of those he's trying to influence, here: https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/th ... ngue-bath/ There are plenty of Whites with great senses of humor but will never be offered an HBO comedy special on the electronic Jew. If offered, they would decline.


Will Williams: October 19, 2024
JayeryanOD: October 18, 2024 The best comedians and court jesters in the USA… tended to be Jewish and Black Americans…
---

This statement shows that there is absolutely no accounting for tastes.

If you are White, your tastes are sick. Who needs Black and Jew funnymen when we’ve had George Carlin and W.C. Fields to make us laugh?
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sat Oct 19, 2024 10:11 am

Further exchange with Dr. Johnson about the new word I've learned: Pajeets (dothead Indians). https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/wh ... nce-trump/

In his essay he says: "Frankly, the tsunami of “Pajeet” hate offends even me, since I tend to find South Asians to be interesting and agreeable people." Call me a "hater." I don't care. Racial outliers, whether "wild" or tame, "interesting and agreeable," or not, they are still racial outliers and have their own living and breeding space and must lie outside of exclusive White communities. I looked up his word:

outlier - noun, uk /ˈaʊtˌlaɪ.ər/ us /ˈaʊtˌlaɪ.ɚ/ a person, thing, or fact that is very different from other people, things, or facts...

Very different persons (from Whites). They may be interesting, they may even be agreeable, but they are unable to make White babies.




Will Williams: October 19, 2024
Greg Johnson: October 18, 2024 I have had very limited interactions with Indians, and I am fully willing to accept that they might be wild outliers.


Your interaction with them aside is it not enough that they cannot make White babies?

I agree with Mr. Dobbs about those racial aliens he calls Pajeets.
* * * * *


Will Williams: October 19, 2024
Greg Johnson: October 19, 2024 I wasn’t considering them as wives!


I did not expect you were. Just a reminder of the biological fact that Pajeets cannot make White babies.

As racial outliers, “wild” or tame, they must lie outside of exclusive White living spaces. Allowed in, it is likely that they might marry and breed with one of our own.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sat Oct 19, 2024 10:39 am

More with Dr. Johnson about the possibility of his debating the nutty "movement" personality, young know-it-all, Mr. Fuentes, who has claimed that when his army of goofballs takes over they will exterminate all non-Christians. https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/why-will-we-win/


Will Williams: October 19, 2024
MarcDF: October 19, 2024 You should debate Nick Fuentes himself. He’s the chief neo-wignat or bad faith fed promoting the non vote and helping the most genocidally anti-white option.
---

Greg Johnson: October 19, 2024 I’m willing.
---

“Wignat” is a new one on me, but from the little I’ve seen of the arrogant upstart, Mr. Fuentes, I hope you will debate him, Greg, if only to ask how he and his silly groyper troops plan to exterminate all non-Christians when they take over.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sat Oct 19, 2024 3:26 pm

It might be worthwhile for those here at WB to check out our Russian Alliance member, Mr. Stoner's, entire devastating response to the die-hard Putinist, "Victor's" attack on him yesterday, here: https://counter-currents.com/2024/09/ru ... morphosis/ C-C's moderator doesn't seem to be able to tell which Russian is truthful, Wolf or "Victor." I do not have that problem and "Victor" would have been banned here or at NV as soon as he showed his true colors. Wolf's firsthand view of things in his home country ring true, here: https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/05/victory-frenzy/
and here:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/12/an ... o-way-out/



Will Williams: October 19, 2024
Wolf Stoner: October 18, 2024 The Putinist/Stalinist under alias “Victor” that for some reason roams western sites, had provided plenty of information in order to form a conclusive opinion about him…
---

I don’t know about others here on Counter-Currents, but I accept your opinion of “Victor” conclusively. He requests that I ask your opinion on the books he has mentioned. That will not be necessary, and I will not be responding to “Victor” again.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sat Oct 19, 2024 11:38 pm

Regular C-C writer Travis LeBlanc beats his drum, trying to get readers to donate more to C-C with this article: https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/co ... than-ever/ That's OK. That's what he does. But the part of that article that I quote below didn't sit well with me, nor did Scott's comment below that after commenter Cotard listed Kevin MacDonald's remarkable comparisons between Jewry's group-think and the National Socialist's group-think.


Will Williams: October 20, 2024
Travis says: Our ideas are everywhere now, but a lot of the new people doing white [sic] advocacy are doing it wrong. There are people claiming to be pro-white [sic] while also claiming Jews are white [sic]. Or maybe they will talk about the Jewish problem but insist that it can be solved by having them convert to Christianity. There are people calling out Israel but doing it by comparing Israelis to Nazis… It’s up to us old heads who remember the bad ol’ days to mentor this new generation of pro-whites [sic] that are coming through.


We old heads cannot fix stupid, Travis. If these young new Whites think Jews are White or that Jews converting to Christianity (Conversos, dampened Jews, Jews for Jesus, or Episcopalians) is the answer to the Jewish Question, let them figure out how to do that on Twitter and other social media. I’ll stick with the teachings of older, wiser heads like Drs. William Pierce and Revilo Oliver who never fell for such nonsense.

Cotard does a good job of quoting Dr. MacDonald’s drawing parallels of Judaism’s racial ideology to that of the National Socialists. So what? If group-think had worked to preserve the Jewish race for so many centuries, what’s wrong with the National Socialists adopting a similar group-think that had worked to preserve the German people? That is until Jewry and her stupid allies vanquished the racially responsible National Socialists. Again, see “The Measure of Greatness” at nationalvanguard.org
Scott: October 20, 2024 As an evolutionary psychologist Prof. Kevin MacDonald probably believes that the Nazis were social darwinians. If so, I disagree with that view.


Whatever. That’s your prerogative. I like that KMac consistently used the term National Socialist when making his comparisons rather than “Nazi,” the dismissive, derogatory word used by enemies of Germany and of NS, like you do.

I like to capitalize the word White when referring to our race. That’s my prerogative. Maybe that simple standard of respect for our people will catch on, even with a few White numbskulls who believe Jews are White or that somehow having Jews embrace Christianity (as Conversos, Jews for Jesus, dampened Jews, or as Episcopalians) — to worship their same imaginary tribal deity — is what is needed for our kinsmen to prevail against theirs in the eternal struggle of Aryan vs. Jew.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sun Oct 20, 2024 11:00 am

I don't mean to get too far off the topic of Travis LeBlanc's essay, but felt it necessary to respond to Scott's reply, here: https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/co ... than-ever/. Hadding Scott had once written about the use of the term Nazi vs. National-Socialist -- the latter correct term which he always hyphenates -- but couldn't find that, so provided a link to his article at NV.


Scott: October 20, 2024 I never said that Jews were “White.”
---

True. But Travis said “There are people claiming to be pro-white [sic] while also claiming Jews are white [sic].”
That is a bad trend, if true. Where would they get that notion, Jared Taylor?


Also, when I write “White,” I always capitalize it if I mean something other than a color, i.e., if I mean a racial classification.
---

You are setting a good example. But why the scare quotes?


Like Dr. Goebbels, I am still going to use the term “Nazi” whenever it strikes my fancy… I can supply Goebbels quotes from his journals in the original German if that would help.
---

No need for that, Scott. However, I’d be interested if you can supply examples of his boss’s ever using what you say is mere shorthand for National Socialism.

In this translation of Joseph Goebbels’ 1934 speech Wesen und Gestalt des Nationalsozialismus a word search turns up zero (0) use of the derogatory term “Nazi” by Mr. Goebbels: “National-Socialism According to Joseph Goebbels” at nationalvanguard.org
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:24 pm

The capable intellectual Kremlin mouthpiece, Dr. Karaganov, was interviewed earlier this year and Mr. Stoner provides the English translation: https://counter-currents.com/2024/09/ru ... morphosis/

Wolf destroyed the Putinist "Victor" under this topic, and showed his sense of humor while doing so, telling him that his pro-Kremlin arguments look like "a saddle on a cow" at an American pro-White discussion board. :lol: Hopefully, C-C readers will read the entire piece I linked to at NV. It's obvious that many of them were not alive in 1992 when the "infamous [Jewish] voucher privatization" scheme" was hatched in Russia.


Will Williams: October 20, 2024
Wolf Stoner: October 20, 2024 The English translation of this interview is available on the same site (I have found it just now): https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/a ... a-disease/


Thanks. It’s good you didn’t have to translate that rather long interview into English yourself. I’m not competent to comment much on Mr. Karaganov’s interview, but one statement he made stood out as weaselly.

The second goal [of the SMO] is destroying the comprador class that emerged in the 1990s because of our extremely unsuccessful reforms. A system was created that allowed and even pushed people to take their money to the West, thus forming a class that serviced Western capital.


He does not mention the word Jew even once, or oligarchs, when referring to those “extremely unsuccessful reforms,” Perhaps his use of the term “comprador class” is a euphemism for Jewish middlemen? And by “Western capital” he means ill-gotten Jewish lucre?

A must read to clarify Karaganov’s obfuscation on the issue is Justin Cowgill’s excellent piece, “The Silent Coup: Putin vs. the Oligarchs” at nationalvanguard.org.

How did all this come to be? How did a small clique gain so much power and control over the Russian government in such a short period of time? Of course, the Jewish public position is that under the Soviet regime, Jews were ‘discriminated against’ and had to form networks to survive. Yeveny Satanovsky, a lesser Jewish oligarch, explained it the following way: “This sort of thing happens any time you have repression and then revolution. When you have a group of people who are repressed and then those restrictions are suddenly removed, all the extra efforts they have traditionally made in order to succeed propel them ahead much faster than the general population. It’s a natural phenomenon.”9

(footnote 9. Forward, April 4, 1997)

One theory, the one given by Soviet Jews, is that, because of Communist state-sponsored anti-Semitism, many Jews were involved in the black market during the Soviet era. These unofficial brokers would corner items in short supply, arrange to find gifted surgeons for clients able to pay high fees, and set up behind-the-scenes deals with factory managers. When perestroika came in 1987, these businessmen used their contacts to form cooperatives, which later developed into corporations. Gusinsky bought copper wire on the black market to make bracelets, while Berezovsky traded in German cars and Italian computers. Future banker Khodorkovsky used his connections in the Communist Youth League to secure software contracts.10 When privatization came after the fall of the Soviet Union, these people had an overwhelming advantage over ordinary Russians because they already had networks in place. In addition, because they thought of themselves as a distinct ethnic group/caste, Russians who thought of themselves simply as individuals could not compete on the same level.

(footnote 10. Ibid.)

With 1992 came the infamous voucher privatization scheme. Anatoly Chubais, Yeltsin’s prime minister, privatized one-third of Russia’s economy. His idea was to push privatization at any price, as the effects would supposedly be irreversible, paving the way to a capitalist economy. He claimed that the voucher plan “signifies the death of the command economy and the political system that was built on the basis of total state property ownership.”11 Each Russian citizen was given a voucher good for one share. In theory, the voucher plan made each Russian citizen a shareholder, and millions of Russians became property holders, on paper, overnight. In total, 148 million vouchers were given away, which were to be traded at auctions for shares of companies.12 When pushing his voucher scheme, Chubais claimed that one voucher would be worth enough to buy two Volga automobiles.13 Having the necessary capital beforehand, the oligarchs were able to buy up thousands of vouchers and redeem them for entire industries, which would later be stripped and sold. Unregulated voucher investment funds walked away with their clients’ vouchers and then resold them to domestic criminals, Western investment banks, and international money launderers. Some of these ‘funds’ were simply companies buying up their own shares.14 Nearly six hundred voucher funds obtained 45 million vouchers. The largest, First Voucher, collected 4 million vouchers.15 This left many Russian citizens feeling cheated, and their first experience with privatization was a bad one.


I’ve drastically cut Justin Cowgill’s piece to make the point. Photos of the three Jewish Oligarchs whose names are in bold above are featured in the piece along with some of the others like the infamous Roman Abramovich.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5388
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sun Oct 20, 2024 5:44 pm

Mr. LeBlanc is upset because his piece soliciting donations to Counter-Currents veered off in the comments under it into a discussion of National Socialism, a subject he somehow equates to fans of Star Trek: https://counter-currents.com/2024/10/co ... than-ever/


Will Williams: October 20, 2024
Travis LeBlanc: October 20, 2024 I made one passing reference to Nazis in the piece and the comments section becomes entirely a discussion about Nazis.
---

Cotard responded reasonably to your one passing reference. Then Scott responded, saying he likes using the word “Nazi.” I doubt from their comments that either is obnoxiously obsessed with National Socialism. If you want to avoid what you call “Nazi shit,” you should not use the word Nazi, even in passing, in your appeals for donations to C-C.


[T]his is why I avoid Nazi shit. I avoid Nazi shit for the same reason I avoid Star Trek: because the people who are into it can never seem to shut up about it and I don’t want to become that guy.


You won’t. I’ve never watched a single episode of the Jewish TV show Star Trek, nor Star Wars, and never will.

My obsession, if you want to call it that, is preservation of the White race. My primary vehicle for achieving that is by promoting the teachings of William Pierce, his National Alliance and Cosmotheism. You probably tire of my doing that here on C-C and may even call that “William Pierce shit.” Get used to it.


I don’t know why and I don’t want to know but for whatever reason, people can’t get into that shit without becoming obnoxiously obsessed with it and I have enough obsessions as it is.


National Socialism, for what it’s worth, is an important field of study for anyone interested in preservation of our unique Aryan race. You’d do well not to label it “Nazi shit” just because you are disinterested in its ideology and history.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Post Reply