Dougls Mercer
October 6 2024
Starting around, say, 1910 there was a big push from countries from China to Japan and every country to our South of us (and of course in the dark continent of Africa) to say that it was unfair, and most likely racist, that we did not have a free open door for their people to immigrate to America. Then in 1924 our rules became even more strict and then the wailing got even louder, that is it went decibel. These grievances about the inability of those people to leave their homelands and head freely to ours happened at that most egregious of institutions: the rolling international conference. It got so bad that at Versailles the Japs took us to task because we would not disfavor racism. This from a country which produced Yoko Ono, a squat ugly nip and talentless hack known for purposeless shrieking banshee wailing and posing avant gardism and being John Rennon’s excrusive gloupie who thought she was High Japanese and thus looked down on the rabble and canaille called White people. But the whole idea of countries complaining that another country won’t take their people in seems rather unseemly and undignified to me. We were not upset that they did not take ours in, hell we didn’t even know if they would or nor not because we did not feel it necessary to check because we did not want to go there in the first place. Had they discovered that they denied us entrance we might have found it odd that they did not want a picked people given to endless inventiveness and tireless work but after a chuckle or two we would have shrugged. You would think that a country that had any self-respect would have answered America: oh yeah? Well, we don’t want to go there anyway, and mean it, have it not be sour grapes. Of course the rub of it is that in their hearts, which they could not express so they could maintain face, they knew that the reason their people wanted to come here was the same reason we wanted to keep them out: their homes were backwaters mired in stagnation if they were not outright malarial swamps. And then of course on our end we had our pie eyed pie in the sky dewy eyed Pollyannish dreamers with their heads in the clouds who had the mostly Hebrew idea that America constituted some kind of ingathering of the peoples, a sort of dog pile at the end of time, which would usher in one of the millenarian fantasies that their grandparents were always having thus leading them to grow rutabagas on farms and look up at the sky at night in the hopes that the time might be now. This was known more formally as the Asylum Of Nations theory and when it coupled with the carping of the world leaders previously described and an outright anti-White viewpoint totally Hebrew in nature it was a recipe for disaster, a hornet’s nest and can of worms rolled into one big witches’ brew. For any laggard in the back who resists my ideas go out on the street and see if the nearest passerby is oriented and knows who the President is. When he looks at you all quizzical with a dopey and docile and goofy grin and says donde you’ll see that I am right.
***
Notes:
The Jew Emmanuel Cellar thundered in Congress in 1924 that he wanted to break the "Nordic Spell" when it came to the issue of immigration. He lay in wait for 41 years before finally ambushing America and sticking a (barely) metaphorical dagger in our hearts.
More people have arrived to live on the North American continent since 1972 than had done so in all the years previous.
Aside from a few Jews the Congress of 1924 had the same racial makeup of as the Continental Congress of 1774.
In the 1920s and 1930s a thinker like Madison Grant was at the head of the New York social scene, had access to write in magazines and newspapers, found himself on boards of museums and cultural institutions, and addressed FDR in letters as "Dear Frank." Some four decades later great men such as George Lincoln Rockwell and William Pierce, who held the same views on race as Grant, quickly found out that as far as currency in the wider society went, their name was mud.
