A Jewish Twofer

[Douglas Mercer]

Douglas Mercer
June 21 2023

Enlistment is down, there’s a recruiting shortfall, and is it any surprise? The United States Military has gone full on Weimar and has jettisoned lethality though really we have not fought a war truly in our interests since that one in Mexico. But when you showcase your gender queer soldiers and your gay as the day is long inclusive policies, and your color of the rainbow race aliens atop those tanks what’s a White man to think? He’s to think this is no place for him. But the Jews who run this show are never at a loss for bright ideas, are they? Hell no they are not. They’ll just kill two birds with one stone as they kill America in one fell swoop: immigrants! Bring in immigrants as mercenaries and hired soldiers and make them American citizens in the bargain. This won’t be a crisis gone to waste. This will flood us with aliens to ruin our sacred gene pool and our cities and everything else; and they will have enough backsides in the seats to wage war in order to keep the world safe for Israel. What a sweet deal for them! They catch the White man coming and going---that is it’s a Jewish twofer.

“About 7000 people with green cards join the military each year, according to the Department of Defense. The Immigration and Nationality Act even provides a more streamlined path to citizenship for those who enlist. Some see enlistment as the height of belonging: a way to integrate, establish their eligibility for citizenship, and demonstrate their allegiance to a country that sees them as owing it a debt. When you have a diverse group of immigrants, you can say, look, these people are not even Americans yet, and they love America so much. They’re willing to die for the country to protect it. That’s super powerful.”

Now, no one’s kidding anyone here, the Jews would much rather see White blood spilled in the cause of Israel but they got a lot of irons in the fire and are juggling many balls when it comes to decimating the White race. And a Jew will take anything he can get when he can get it; it is very important to them that the American Military get in line and be coordinated with the Jew ethos: Lesbians on the front line, transmen in the mess hall, spic and spooks in fatigues; they want every institution to be so and perhaps the American Military most of all. That’s why they were so head over heels in gaga love with the Commander at the Air Force Academy when he made that big speech against racism after that little black s*** grafitted his own locker with White Supremacy slogans. And so you see the recruitment ads cribbing from the book Heather Has Two Mommies, because they want to make you think this is no longer your grandfather’s army, or your father’s army, and certainly not this man’s army, this army belong to that dude in a dress standing on the captain’s deck saluting Old Glory but really giving allegiance to the rainbow flag.

“There are hundreds upon hundreds of US bases around the world, and lots of people in different countries are really angry about them. If you look at public opinions of the US military across the world, it’s not good. In response, the military can point to how immigrants from all over the world are knocking on our doors to let them serve. There’s even a movement by undocumented youth whose slogans repeat: Let us serve. That’s very powerful. Rhetorically, to be able to point to that—it legitimizes American imperialism."

The Department Of Defense supports dream act of course; they know who butters their bread. And the Jews know that around the world people see America as the long arm of the Jewish state; so they hope that adding Otowumba and Hector and Anala to the roster of the “sailors, soldiers, airmen and marines” will convince the world that it’s a new day and it’s a black and brown and every shade in between army that’s making Israel’s always shaky existence a little less shaky. Add to this that the conservatives eat this stuff up, they swallow it whole for breakfast, the idea that some hovel ridden Indian would let the majestic red, white and blue swell in his heart brings dewy tears to their eyes. Yes, by golly America really is an idea, an idea that all the decent around the world can subscribe to and rally to and die for. It flatters them that some mud hut African, or dirt farm Guatemalan would want to come and be like George Washington crossing the Delaware. And as a bonus it lets them project to the world that they are not racist, something which is never far from their thoughts and is near and dear to their hearts.

“When Esmita Spudes Bidari was a young girl in Nepal, she dreamed of being in the military, but that wasn't a real option in her country. Last week (June 4 2023) she raised her right hand and took the oath to join the U.S. Army Reserves, thanks in part to a recruiter in Dallas who also is Nepalese and reached out to her through an online group. Bidari, who heads to basic training in August, is just the latest in a growing number of legal migrants enlisting in the U.S. military as it more aggressively seeks out immigrants, offering a fast track to citizenship to those who sign up.”

She raised her right hand? She’s swore allegiance? She’s in! Now she’s just like Andrew Jackson, Robert E. Lee, and George Patton. It’s true that up at West Point they are purging the Confederates and must not be too happy about all that Norman Architecture; and you can be sure that the long gray line is getting shorter all the time. But no matter, the long brown line is just growing. They got a Nepalese lady who loves her some Uncle Sam and probably even read the constitution one time. She learned all about those famous amber waves of grain, and she can reel off the American Creed like it’s nobody’s business. She knows in her heart that America wasn’t found on race, no far from it; America from the beginning was founded on the dedication of an ideal: the ideal that all men and women are created equal. That’s her America, the immigrants story, right from the Mayflower to those Haitians wading in the river, all bound together by the notion that there is only one race, the human race: and America is the best of it.

“The biggest challenges have been identifying geographic pockets of immigrant populations, finding ways to reach them and helping any of those interested navigate the complex military recruiting applications and procedures. Last October, the Army reestablished a program for legal permanent residents to apply for accelerated naturalization once they get to basic training. Recruiters began to reach out on social media, using short videos in various languages to target the top 10 countries that recruits had come from during the previous year.”

An accelerated process, damn the torpedoes and sign right here Paco. We’ll fast track you to be official and have all your papers in order. Of course the fact that those videos targeted those “pockets” of foreigners in their very own dog language doesn’t bode well for the historic White majority. These are people who couldn’t tell Edgar Allan Poe from a sick limerick in a Tijuana toilet if they’re life depended on it; safe to say they won’t be any addition to American culture, they have their own culture and which will stand up proud as one of the many cultures of the current multi-cultural bazaar; you can’t build a White country on a hundreds of shades of brown; but then they don’t want a White country; they want a mixed race army of janissaries who are blinkered and benighted, who think the real America was all about the Emancipation Proclamation and those illegally passed negro amendments; who think that Juneteenth was the real National Founding, that the Fourth Of July was just an afterthought. And of course who will wave the star spangled banner as they rush in to die for a Jewish state and get buried in Arlington where no Confederates are welcome.

“The Air Force effort began this year, and the first group of 14 graduated from basic training and were sworn in as new citizens in April. They included recruits from Cameroon, Jamaica, Kenya, Haiti, Nepal, Nigeria, Ghana, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, and the Philippines. Under the new program, recruits are quickly enrolled in the citizenship system and when they start basic training, an expedited process kicks off, including all required paperwork and testing. By the time Air Force recruits finish their seven weeks of training, the process is complete and they are sworn in as American citizens.”

Now ready for their close up, George Bush will be rushed in to paint them, they’ll go on all the news shows and wave a small American flag, for we have let them serve. It’s the dreamers and the huddled masses, it’s the nation of immigrants writ large. It’s the multiracial American come of age and coming into its own. It’s a hodgepodge and mish mash of a wicked racial stew, it’s a witches cauldron full of voodoo warriors; it’s the raw sewage of the world washed up on our shores and stood up to fight for country and homeland; except it is not their homeland and it is not their home save in the fantasies of bloodthirsty neocons and deracinated boomers. What they are is hired guns dressed up and kitted out as the inheritors of Uncle Sam; what they betoken is nothing except a black and brown and Global Majority army fighting and dying for Israel on behalf of what for some strange reason they still call America; it’s American dying. That is it’s that most pernicious of things: a Jewish twofer. For the parasitical international criminal tribe life has never been so sweet.

[Jim Mathias]

I'm reminded of a survey given to Marines back in the mid-1990s (when Whites were a large part of all armed services) where around 25% of responding Marines said, in effect, that they would shoot Americans who refused to turn in their guns if the American government demanded it.

A military chock full of non-Whites, queers, degenerates, and others whose heads have been filled with vitriolic anti-White propaganda since they were born might comprise a higher percentage of those who would follow orders to kill Whites here in America.

Here's the article regarding that survey:

http://thenewamerican.com/tna/1995/v...o20_survey.htm

Vol. 11, No. 20 October 2, 1995

Twenty-Nine Palms Survey:
What Really Motivated Its Author?
by John F. McManus

Veteran readers of THE NEW AMERICAN are vibrantly aware of the May 10, 1994 "Combat Arms Survey" administered to 300 active-duty Marines at the USMC's Air-Ground Combat Center, Twenty-Nine Palms, California.

Among its 46 questions, the Marines were asked if they would be willing to swear to a United Nations code of conduct and if they would fire on Americans who refused to turn over their privately owned weapons to the government. Other questions sought their approval or disapproval about their involvement in an assortment of operations far removed from proper military assignments, some of which would even place them under formal UN command.

One of the Marines who participated in this exercise became so disturbed by the questions that he obtained an extra copy and sent it to THE NEW AMERICAN. No sooner had our published report about this survey reached readers than several congressmen fired off inquiries to the Marine Corps and Navy. Spokesmen for both branches of the service issued statements claiming there was really nothing to be concerned about, that the survey was merely part of its author's research for a master's degree thesis.

But that explanation neatly sidesteps a far more important consideration: The aura of official acceptance of these subversive attitudes would certainly lead some of the Marines toward believing that they should hold them as well. It is our contention that no one wearing a uniform of the U.S. Armed Forces should ever allow troops under his command to be subjected to such totally unconstitutional thinking.

Author's Defense

We have talked at length with the author of this survey, Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham, and about his motivation in creating it. He provided us with a copy of the 197-page thesis he wrote after analyzing the responses given by the Marines. His thesis helped him to earn a master of science degree in the area of manpower, personnel, and training analysis from the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California.

Anxious to defend himself from charges he is pro-UN, Cunningham repeatedly contended in his interview with THE NEW AMERICAN that he is no enemy of America and no participant in any plan to demoralize U.S. troops. He maintained emphatically that he wanted only to confirm and then pass on to higher authorities his fears about "the lack of knowledge among the soldiers about the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and their heritage as Americans." He added: "I'm a life member of the National Rifle Association, an ardent constitutionalist, and I'm even disappointed with the NRA spokesmen who don't do a very good job defending their position."

To each of the questions or scenarios presented in the Cunningham survey, the Marines were asked if they strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree, or have no opinion. The first part of the survey dealt with non-traditional missions (termed "operations other than war" by Cunningham) under the command and control of U.S. military personnel, first inside the United States, and then outside the United States. Additional questions dealt with those same type missions conducted outside the U.S. under United Nations command and control.

The Marines indicated overwhelming acquiescence to being assigned under U.S. control within the U.S. for such non-traditional missions as drug enforcement, disaster relief, environmental clean-up, substitute teaching in public schools, guarding prisons, national emergency policing, or assisting federal law enforcement officials. For example, one of the questions asked the Marines if they would be willing to be assigned to a "national emergency police force" within the U.S. under U.S. command. The survey showed that 6.0 percent strongly disagreed, 6.3 percent disagreed, 42.3 percent agreed, 43.0 percent strongly agreed, and 2.3 percent had no opinion.

"Do you realize," Cunningham stated during our telephone interview, "that 85.3 percent agreed with assigning troops to a mission that violates the Posse Comitatus Act?" This Act states that "it shall not be lawful to employ any part of the Army of the United States, as a posse comitatus [power of the county], or otherwise, for the purpose of executing the laws, except [when] authorized by the Constitution or by act of Congress."

Additional results published in Cunningham's thesis demonstrate a high degree of willingness on the part of these U.S. troops to carry out non-traditional missions under U.S. command: 48 percent agreement for drug enforcement; 39 percent for disaster relief; 67 percent for peacekeeping; and 52 percent for humanitarian relief. However, when questions were asked about similar missions involving U.S. troops under UN command, the approval rate dropped off markedly: 17 percent for drug enforcement; 13 percent for disaster relief; 25 percent for peacekeeping; 21 percent for humanitarian relief; and only 11 percent for Korean or Vietnam police action.

Firing on U.S. Citizens?

While all of the questions in this survey should have stimulated concern, the survey's final question has generated an enormous amount of attention:
The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement: I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government.
The survey results: 42.3 percent strongly disagreed with this statement; 19.3 percent disagreed; 18.6 percent agreed; 7.6 percent strongly agreed; and 12.0 percent had no opinion. In one of the footnotes appearing in his thesis, Cunningham quotes comments placed by some of the Marines next to their answers to this question: "What about the damn Second Amendment? .... I feel this is a first in communism! .... Read the book None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen." "I would not even consider it. The reason we have guns is so that the people can overthrow the gov't when or if the people think the gov't is too powerful." "Freedom to bear arms is our Second Amendment. If you take our Amendments away then you can take this job and stick it where the sun don't shine! .... It is a right to own firearms for defense (2nd Amendment); I would fight for that right!"

Based on the disagreement expressed by 61 percent of the Marines, Cunningham concluded that "a complete unit breakdown would occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission."

Cunningham's Deficiencies

In his interview with THE NEW AMERICAN, Cunningham claimed to be appalled that so many Marines would be willing to serve in non-traditional roles that conflict with the purpose of our military or to serve under UN command. He even volunteered that he "didn't agree personally with any portion of the survey" even though he is "its sole author, originator, and creator." Yet the thesis he submitted gave no indication of any such sentiments. Just the opposite, in fact.

In his thesis, Cunningham states that "The legitimacy of operations other than war is rooted in the constitutional powers of the Executive," and that such operations and the placement of "U.S. forces under operational control of United Nations personnel are legitimate." [Emphasis added.] Not so, according to our reading of the Constitution and the thinking of those who wrote it. The military is not the President's to use as he wishes; his designation as "Commander in Chief" is an occasional assignment of responsibility, not a wholesale grant of power.

Betraying a poor understanding of the proper role of the military, Cunningham claims: "But the Framers also granted the Executive the latitude to use the Federal troops under his command as a tool of diplomacy when he deemed it appropriate. This was the case in both Korea and Vietnam." That kind of thinking has gotten this nation into undeclared wars, led to casualties in the hundreds of thousands, and entangled our nation ever more deeply in the United Nations and its subsidiary organizations.

Cunningham's claims that he is a defender of the U.S. Constitution have to be questioned when he writes: "Future U.S. missions may require the inclusion of international soldiers in U.S. units and, in some cases, when national security interests dictate, the President of the United States may appoint a competent United Nations officer to exercise operational control over U.S. contingents."

But what about the fact that most U.S. military personnel apparently don't want to serve in "peacekeeping" missions? "Some may argue that the military need only incorporate the necessary indoctrination and training," Cunningham notes in his thesis. "But doing so would require establishing formal training and indoctrination programs ... thus, in effect, building a completely new program from the ground up. Another possibility may be more realistic. Realizing the conflict and incongruity peacekeeping represents in a combat organizational model, it may be necessary to bifurcate the military. Such a change could promote specialization and provide an opportunity to those who desire peacekeeping duty. Perhaps it is time to designate separate fighting forces and peacekeeping forces."

Cunningham's own survey results demonstrate that there is solid opposition to converting the U.S. military into an adjunct of a New World Army. Yet his outrageous suggestion provides the globalists with an opportunity for circumventing that opposition. If implemented, it would undoubtedly be, not an end in itself, but another ominous step toward the abandonment of the traditional role of the U.S. military. Yet there is good reason to believe that these subversive plans will never be accomplished -- as the heroic stand of Army Specialist Michael New amply demonstrates.

© Copyright 1994-2000 American Opinion Publishing Incorporated

[White Man 1]

I'm glad you archived that article here. The link at the header of the text is dead, presumably a now-defunct website.

[Douglas Mercer]

[Douglas Mercer]

[Douglas Mercer]

[Douglas Mercer]