Judges Ratify The Invasion

[Douglas Mercer]

Douglas Mercer
June 24 2023

The too much vaunted “conservative” Supreme Court just stuck a thumb in our eyes. They see the hordes of millions trespassing on our land just like the rest of us, and from their Georgetown townhouses maybe some of them even have a worried feeling about it. But the law is the law you know, and the constitution is the constitution, it’s words on paper and that’s sacred and sacrosanct. They say the constitution is not a suicide pact but from the looks of it that’s exactly what it is. Sure, those Federal officials take an oath to faithfully execute the law but the immigration laws they don’t like and it’s perfectly legal for them to ignore them. A fiduciary breach of responsibility of orders of magnitude in this matter is the preserve and prerogative of those officials. Indeed, if you believe the reports out of Philadelphia James Madison rarely spoke of anything else.

“The Supreme Court breathed new life into President Biden’s lenient immigration policies Friday (June 23 2023), giving the Department of Homeland Security tacit approval to refuse to arrest and deport illegal immigrants even where the law says it must try. In an 8-1 ruling, the justices said Texas and Louisiana couldn’t sue to force the administration to carry out a law that requires the government to attempt to arrest, detain and deport illegal immigrants with significant criminal records.”

Eight to one! Thanks Trump! We got rid of abortion so negros will breed in their breeding grounds and proliferate like out of control cockroaches. Sure glad we listened to those cautious conservatives who said sure Trump says some nasty things about Mexican rapists but: The Supreme Court! But, really, what have these conservative slobs given us other than kicks in the teeth after kicks in the teeth? Now they tell us that in the name of the law their hands are tied to compel anyone to follow the law. The law says ignoring the law is totally legal. And there’s not one damn thing we can do about it. The law says so.

“At issue in the case is a memo issued by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in 2021 that ordered immigration agents and officers to limit the illegal immigrants they tried to arrest and deport. No longer would being in the country illegally be sufficient grounds for deportation, and even those who did have serious criminal records also had to be considered for leniency. Texas showed in court that because of that policy, Homeland Security was forcing it to release criminals back to the streets.”

They are here illegally? Why, that’s no reason to kick them out. They are too busy giving us those kicks in the teeth. This nasty Jew is in charge of our “homeland security” and as a nasty Jew he is dedicated to making sure the security of our homeland is as shaky as possible. Indeed, unless it refers to the eternal right of the usurping Jews to their eternal homeland in Israel the Jews despise the word Homeland. Whites have a homeland? A place for them to safely propagate their race? No way. No security for them. Indeed, recently in slowly dying Germany the “security services” have stated that even the recognition of a German ethnicity is extremism. So it’s no surprise that the Jew fox in charge of the White henhouse named Mayorkas sent a circular stating for no one to touch one strand of hair on the lice ridden hair of Juan and Maria as they make a mockery of our law and home.

“In sum, the States have brought an extraordinarily unusual lawsuit. They want a federal court to order the Executive Branch to alter its arrest policies so as to make more arrests, wrote Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in the key opinion. Federal courts have not traditionally entertained that kind of lawsuit; indeed, the States cite no precedent for a lawsuit like this.”

Traditionally? Traditionally did we have several million brown squatters pouring over our borders? Traditionally did we give full citizenship to newly minted race aliens who were dropped from the dam of their illegal mother on our sacred soil? Traditionally did we sacrifice our future on the putrid altar of anti-racism? Traditionally did we have swarms of locust like Haitians wading in our river and hijacking buses? If these are traditions they are not hallowed or time tested and are more honored in the breach than the custom. Of course there is no legal precedent for a suit like this because what is happening in the one off abdication of the White race is unprecedented. But this toff-slash-swell Kavanaugh who was trained at Jewish schools will adjust his reading glasses and pore over the not so fine print of legal statutes. And then look up with a resigned look on his face and say sorry sirs, it says right here in subsection HB 502-93 that national suicide cannot be avoided. At least not within the confines of the law.

“Even if Mr. Mayorkas’ memo were vacated, courts can’t compel a change in the department’s behavior, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch said in a concurring opinion joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett. Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge and congressional aide responsible for crafting immigration laws, said the ruling upends immigration law.”

Immigration law? We have that? Really? I can see no evidence of it and I’ve been looking. Indeed immigration law as it practiced now is an abrogation of the law, the law when it comes to illegals is there is no law and the illegals are legal. It says so right there on that fading parchment. We are a nation of immigrants, and the huddled masses yearning to gouge the White man are the heroes of our time. And certainly no mere state or no mere court can compel anything different. Their hands are tied. So we are consigned to standing aloof (in the name of the law) as we helplessly watch our once proud White nation be flushed down the sewage drain and circle the bowl.

“Friday’s ruling produced a complicated set of opinions. Five justices, led by Justice Kavanaugh, said Mr. Mayorkas’s decision-making could not be questioned by Texas or the courts. In light of inevitable resource constraints and regularly changing public-safety and public-welfare needs, the Executive Branch must balance many factors when devising arrest and prosecution policies, Justice Kavanaugh wrote. That complicated balancing process in turn leaves courts without meaningful standards for assessing those policies.”

Some states have got it in their heads to enforce immigration law. They say if the Federal government won’t do it they will. But the nefarious nine (minus one) said sorry pal, you’re s*** out luck on that one. Keep your head in the noose, keep your neck on the chopping block, a man’s home may be his castle, and a man’s home may be his homeland, but when the alien marauders cruise by just shut and shutter your windows and hope for the best. Self defense may be an old American custom but the old ways of thinking have been consigned and relegated to the distant and “ugly” past. And the law now mandates that illegal aliens be allowed to continue their marauding. You want to do something about on the local level, you want to engage in some seat of your pants do it yourself self help protection? Perish the thought. And perish your race.

“Justice Gorsuch said there’s no way to draw that line based on the Constitution, which doesn’t include a specific prosecution power but rather charges the president with an executive power and a duty to make sure the laws are faithfully executed. These provisions give the President a measure of discretion over the enforcement of all federal laws, not just those that can lead to arrest and prosecution,” Justice Gorsuch said. So if the Court means what it says about Article II, can it mean what it says about the narrowness of its holding?”

This is ginormous gibbering gobbledygook and gibberish that could only be gleaned in the Jew academy. They have their Hebrew holdings and it’s dressed up in high flown and high sounding jargon and niche argot laced mendacious prose. But here’s the long and the short of it: the White race is the cancer of human history and cancer has no rights. So suck it up White man and suck on it good and hard: your day in the sun is good and gone. It’s a Jew world now, and a border is an antiquated notion probably dreamed up by Heydich as he tooled around in the general government as his shining Mercedes glinted beautifully in the summer sun.

“Among them was Heriberto Fuerte-Padilla, an immigrant in the country illegally who was driving drunk in 2020 when he smashed into the car driven by a Texas teenager, killing her. He fled, but police caught up with him. Homeland Security said under Mr. Mayorkas’ policy that Fuerte-Padilla wasn’t a priority for deportation, so Texas should release him into the community when he’d served his time on the state charge.”

All things now conspire to the benefit of the Fuerte-Paddillas of the world. He’s the shiny star of the contemporary age, and sure he’s an illegal and a squatter and with a penchant to dip into the cerveza and drive in a deranged way and kill people but that doesn’t mean he’s not a hero. Hell no it doesn’t. He’s a migrant with asylum rights granted him by the UN and signed by Uncle Sam. He’s a brown refugee jus like that Jesus fellow was and the world is his oyster and double chimichanga plate, and he can walk around it striding like a colossus, and do anything he damn well pleases. He’s a standing member fo the global majority after all and he has his sacrosanct rights.

“Immigrant rights advocates hailed the decision, saying it frees Mr. Biden to pursue a gentler policy. This is a victory for common sense over chaos and a blow against Republicans’ reliance on the anti-immigrant judicial pipeline, said David Leopold, a former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. He suggested the ruling could also be used against GOP state challenges to the DACA program for illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as youths.”

Hitler had the right idea. Once the war was won nations, international relations, alliances, treaties would all go by the board. There would be no law and no police, the only law would be race and one must follow it. No locks, no lawyers, no courts, no judges. It would be a new racial order based on blood and land and after all in the community of the people who’s going to steal a German granny’s purse? No one that’s who. It was to have been the royal road to White paradise. But we have our picayune subclauses and our redressable addendums, and an ill wind never blew more ill. The lone dissenter in this case was Alito likened the decision to an absolutist English king ignoring a law passed by parliament — something he said even the English ceased after the Glorious Revolution in the late 1600s. But here’s the sorry thing: on the law he is wrong. And that’s why law is wrong. And to claim the sacred and immemorial rights of an Englishman whose home is his castle and whose home is his homeland is at this late date is to raise Jewish hackles. Perish the thought they say in unison: and perish the race with it.

[Will Williams]

Douglas Mercer
June 24 2023

The too much vaunted “conservative” Supreme Court just stuck a thumb in our eyes...

“The Supreme Court breathed new life into President Biden’s lenient immigration policies Friday (June 23 2023), giving the Department of Homeland Security tacit approval to refuse to arrest and deport illegal immigrants even where the law says it must try. In an 8-1 ruling, the justices said Texas and Louisiana couldn’t sue to force the administration to carry out a law that requires the government to attempt to arrest, detain and deport illegal immigrants with significant criminal records.”

Eight to one! Thanks Trump!...

Excellent report, Douglas! Trump's three "conservative" nominees voted with the majority, making one wonder what they want to conserve. I was curious who the one dissenting Justice was and found this:

Supreme Court allows Biden administration to limit
immigration arrests
Camilo Montoya-Galvez
Yesterday 7:13 AM

Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for the Biden administration to reinstate rules that instruct Immigration and Customs Enforcement to focus its deportation efforts in the U.S. interior on immigrants with serious criminal convictions and those deemed to threaten national security.

The court found that Texas and Louisiana, the two states that challenged the administration's guidelines, lacked standing to bring the suit, formally known as United States v. Texas.

The ruling was 8-1, with only Justice Samuel Alito dissenting. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the opinion for the majority, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Justices Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett concurred in the judgment, with Gorsuch and Barrett contributing opinions of their own.

The decision in the case marks a major victory for the Biden administration and a vindication of the executive branch's broad powers to dictate — and in this case, narrow — the enforcement of federal immigration laws without interference from lawsuits.

At the center of the dispute is a memo issued in 2021 by the Biden administration that directed ICE agents to prioritize the arrest of immigrants with serious criminal records, national security threats and migrants who recently entered the U.S. illegally. The policy generally shielded unauthorized immigrants who have been living in the U.S. for years from being arrested by ICE if they did not commit serious crimes.

The Biden administration has argued the memo, signed by Homeland Security Secretary (((Alejandro Mayorkas))), allows ICE to concentrate its limited resources — and 6,000 deportation agents — on apprehending and deporting immigrants who pose the greatest threats to public safety, national security and border security. The policy, administration officials have argued, relies on the recognition that the government can't deport the millions of people living in the country unlawfully.
[...]
But Republican officials in Texas and Louisiana challenged the memo in federal court, saying it restrained ICE agents from fully enforcing immigration laws that govern the detention of certain migrants. After the states convinced lower court judges to block the policy, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case last year.

In his majority opinion, Kavanaugh called the bid by Texas and Louisiana "an extraordinarily unusual lawsuit."

"They want a federal court to order the Executive Branch to alter its arrest policies so as to make more arrests," Kavanaugh wrote. "Federal courts have traditionally not entertained that kind of lawsuit; indeed, the States cite no precent for a lawsuit like this."

Kavanaugh said the judiciary was "not the proper forum" to resolve a dispute about immigration arrests, saying such policies could be altered through congressional appropriations and oversight, changes to the law and federal elections. Had the high court accepted Texas and Louisiana's arguments, Kavanaugh warned, such a ruling could have allowed states to interfere in federal law enforcement beyond immigration matters.

"If the Court green-lighted this suit, we could anticipate complaints in future years about alleged Executive Branch under-enforcement of any similarly worded laws—whether they be drug laws, gun laws, obstruction of justice laws, or the like," he wrote. "We decline to start the Federal Judiciary down that uncharted path."

In a scathing dissent, Alito said the court's majority had incorrectly granted the executive branch "sweeping" powers, arguing that the states did have standing to sue over the ICE arrest policy.

"To put the point simply, Congress enacted a law that requires the apprehension and detention of certain illegal aliens whose release, it thought, would endanger public safety," Alito wrote. "The Secretary of DHS does not agree with that categorical requirement. He prefers a more flexible policy."

The case over the ICE arrest memo is part of a broader legal feud between the Biden administration and Republican-led states that have challenged — and oftentimes, halted — most of its major immigration policy changes...
More, here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supre ... r-AA1cWv5f

[Douglas Mercer]

[Douglas Mercer]