Canadian Thought Police Confiscate Books

Post Reply
User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Canadian Thought Police Confiscate Books

Post by Will Williams » Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:29 am

From Paul Fromm:

Detained for “Wrong-Think”:
Canadian Border Guards Seize Books from Monika Schaefer


26 Friday Apr 2019

Upon returning from the United States of America on 24 April 2019, I was detained by the Canadian Border Guards in the Calgary airport for three hours.

Three Border Guards spent those hours perusing through my possessions, especially the books that I was carrying in my small suitcase. They were looking for “hate propaganda”.

The five books which they seized from me for further inspection are the following:

Government by Deception by Jan Lamprecht
Mystery Babylon: New World Unveiled Vol 1 by Eli James & Clay Douglas
The Great Inpersonation – The Mask of Edom by Pastor Eli James
The Commission by Richard Barrett
Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust” by Germar Rudolf

Jan Lamprecht’s book was published in 2002 and has never had any complaints against it nor any bans on sales, whether in South Africa or America or any other place where it has been sold. Government by Deception is a critique of the black South African government, yet no black person, nor anybody else, has ever complained to the author. It was sold in several branches of the Exclusive Books chain in S. Africa, as well as through the online book distributor Amazon for a number of years. It was not taken down by any distributors.

The Commission I know very little about, it was given to me by acquaintances, and I was intending to do my own research by reading it.

Germar Rudolf’s Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust” is a book I had taken with me from home to read on the airplane. I had read 2/3 by the time of seizure. It is a scholarly analysis and critique of Debra Lipstadt’s book “Denying the Holocaust”, nothing more, nothing less. Rudolf points out statements made by Lipstadt and discusses her sources or lack thereof.

The two books by Pastor Eli James are about religion and religious views. Will the Bible be next on a “danger” list?

I happened to be carrying the Quran in my suitcase – it was given to me by a street preacher in Union Square New York City a few days earlier. I intended to check for myself some of the allegations about the Quran and learn first hand what all the fuss was about. This book they did not touch, though it clearly does have sections which incite hatred and preach violence. Many examples can be found online, and now that I have the physical book in hand, I can verify. Here is just one example:

5:33 Those that make war against God and His Messenger and spread disorder in the land shall be put to death or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the country. They shall be disgraced in this world, and then severely punished in the Hereafter..

These Border Guards were looking for “hate propaganda”. Setting aside for the moment the meaninglessness of that term, how is it that single copies of books in my personal possession are deemed harmful or dangerous to anyone? What I choose to read is my business and no one else’s. It is not as though I were importing commercial quantities of books. We seem to have reached the stage where we are being dictated what to think, let alone what to say. This is Wrong-Think in George Orwell’s world of 1984.

Contrast this harassment of those of us who question the “politically correct” version of history to the mainstream teaching about Karl Marx (birth-name Moses Mordecai Marx Levy). Considered to be the “father of Communism”, Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto in 1848. I do not recall having learnt at school or university that Communism was an evil system which resulted in the murder of countless millions of people, nor did I learn that it was a Jewish endeavour. I recall having been left with a generally benign impression of Communism from my mainstream education. Would these Border Guards have passed over the Communist Manifesto, were it to be found in my suitcase?

Is there a list of forbidden books that has been issued by the Canadian Government? It is doubtful. These three guards were having a terribly difficult time determining whether my books met their “hate propaganda” threshold. They leafed through them over and over, hummed and hawed uselessly. They decided to send them to Ottawa for someone else to make the determination. I suggested to them that they would receive a good education by reading the books themselves. However I also informed them that I did not consent to their actions.

Image
The authorities seem to be in a panic about Truth being revealed and the general Awakening that is coming. The fact that they are so afraid of a few books that Monika Schaefer carries in her suitcase, shows how far down the road of total tyranny we have gone. Communism seems to be upon us. In Bolshevik Russia people were shot for having the wrong books. Let us pray that our present trajectory change course quickly, or we could end up at that point in the not-too-distant future.

I could not have imagined this when I was growing up in a seemingly utopian world in which they told us we had total freedom of speech and freedom of the press in our perfect democracy.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Wade Hampton III
Posts: 2339
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Canadian Thought Police Confiscate Books

Post by Wade Hampton III » Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:15 pm

They've got something up there called CHRC (Canadian Human Rights Commission).
It is the step-n-fetch-it for their Jews. Back in 2012, there was (and is) a Toronto
Jew named Brian Lambsky who actually called FBI down here in SC trying to have me
prosecuted for "hate." Homosexual Jews such as Lambsky are usually un-endowed
in the brains department - this Jew sexual deviant actually thought he could get my
anti-homosexual rants on Usenet prosecuted across the International border and
nullify the USofA First Amendment!
chrc electric chair.jpg
chrc electric chair.jpg (52.83 KiB) Viewed 11177 times
Banning books critical of Jews is just another function of CHRC. When the time comes
to roast these critters alive, they will be at the top of the list!

Colin

Re: Canadian Thought Police Confiscate Books

Post by Colin » Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:20 pm

The CHRC is worse than even you know. They have people who work in the post offices and look for things ordered from banned addresses. I had a friend up there who used to have to order stuff have it sent to my house. I would then repackage it and send it like care packages. He used to order a bunch of stuff from NVB which was on their list.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Canadian Thought Police Confiscate Books

Post by Will Williams » Tue Apr 30, 2019 7:22 pm

Consider this:
---
Implications of the Jewish Theft of the McCorkill Fortune

by William White Williams (pictured)
Chairman, National Alliance
JULY, 2016
Image

AT JEWISH BEHEST, Canadian Courts recently declared the National Alliance’s educational and organizing program to be “against Canadian public policy,” effectively finding us guilty of thought crimes — even though the Alliance has never been charged in Canada with any crime whatsoever, nor has evidence ever been presented, defenses mounted, or arguments heard. That judge then proceeded to overturn former Alliance member Dr. Robert McCorkill’s will, and canceled his bequest to our organization, valued at several hundred thousand dollars. The Jews who engineered this theft may end up regretting their dishonorable deeds.

“This case is crucial for freedom of speech and freedom of beliefs and for property rights in Canada,” said Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), speaking on behalf of the National Alliance.

John Hughes of Moncton, lawyer for the Trustee of the Estate, Fred Streed, weighed in to support CAFE: “The International Boundary separates the U.S. from Canada,” he explained. “The McCorkill will makes a bequest in New Brunswick but the proceeds go to a beneficiary in the United States… The beneficiaries are in the U.S. and this raises the question of ‘public policy.’ Whose public policy? There is no evidence that the National Alliance was ever charged or convicted in either Canada or the U.S. The National Alliance in the U.S. is protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution.” And, Mr. Hughes added, “How can a Canadian Court deny a bequest to a U.S. citizen or group? This is extraterritoriality.”

Mr. Hughes then turned his guns on the mischievous organization behind this raid on the estate: “The outrage of minorities to this bequest is irrelevant. This estate is being sent to the United States. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is the puppet master behind this case. The League for Human Rights of B’nai B’rith in its submissions made clear references to the SPLC’s Web site.”

Arguing for the Jewish groups in opposition to the bequest, Marc-Antoine Chiasson insisted: “Promoting the White Race if it is the majority, is detrimental to minorities.”

When the SPLC moved to block the bequest to our Alliance they quoted our Membership Handbook as justification: “We must have White work spaces, White farms, White schools.… We want an environment where our own nature can express itself. We must root out Semitic and non-Aryan influences.” And this: “The Aryan Race has the right to ensure its own survival and it must have a White living space including Europe, North America, and the southern tip of Africa.”

Such “hate”! One thing the anti-White Jewish advocacy groups don’t seem to grasp is that the Alliance’s loss of this fight in Canada sets a most dangerous legal precedent for property rights for everyone in Canada — including even Jews. The hatred against goyim found in the Jew’s Torah and Talmud, for example, could be trotted out in court — just as our Handbook was — to judge the character of Jewish beneficiaries and to prove that B’nai B’rith, for but one example, is a “hate group,” and thus unworthy, according to Canadian public policy, to receive bequests from testators.

Consider this passage from the Jews’ spiritual leader Moses to his people in the seventh chapter of Deuteronomy on how to deal with non-Jews:

And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them. Neither shalt thou make marriages unto them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire… thine eye shall have no pity upon them. But the Lord thy God shall deliver them unto thee and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed.


Parenthetically, this passage reminds us that, as Polydorus is reputed to have said, “If you worship your enemy, you are defeated. If you adopt your enemy’s religion, you are enslaved. If you breed with your enemy, you are destroyed.”

Despite the unjust outcome of this case, we will continue our Alliance-building.
* * *


Source: National Alliance BULLETIN -- https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/07/im ... l-fortune/
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Post Reply