The Stages of Revolution by Thomas Sewell
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2022 7:53 pm
Posted by Thomas Sewell on 2/1/2022 at https://t.me/ThomasSewellEE
Why the trucker protests must “fail” in achieving their outcome, and why a short-term failure is necessary for long term success:
Proactive vs Reactive.
Protests do not build anything, they don’t build an institution, they don’t build power, they react to an institution of power. Protests help shape the direction that an institution of power moves, they help speed up the direction that “policy” (whether governmental, corporate, education, etc) is already moving in, and if significant enough they can change the direction that said policy is moving in.
Those protesting in Canada and around the world, whether truckers or marches, anti-vaxxers or not, are hoping that enough of a “reaction” from the public will help shift public policy in the desired direction. These protests reenforce the parliamentary system (“the political solution”), because for any proactive change, any actual change to occur, it must be legislated by those who hold power, therefore it is an acknowledge of those in power.
These protests are one of the last opportunities for the parliamentarians, the government, the system, to listen to the public outcry and pass legislation that appeases this very loud and very large demographic of society.
This reactionary strategy is fundamental to the process of engaging in direct democracy, “the left” used protests successfully to further the “civil rights agenda” (read; anti-white agenda).
The conservative right lost decades of ground due to the success of public outcry (manipulated by the Jewish controlled media and foreign subversives within the university), this led to the illusion that we live in a democracy whereby direct action/reactionary protests lead to institutional change.
Western liberal democracy is an illusion.
The real power within a western liberal democracy is the Jewish financial system; the IMF, the WEF, the Federal Reserves, the Jewish private banking and investing corporations.
The civil rights movement was inline with their greater anti-White agenda. So anything within this agenda is smooth sailing and supported by the greater meta-political system (media, academia, finance, judicial), anything against the anti-White agenda will face nothing but roadblocks because its not part of “their plan."
Some might stop reading at this point. So it’s pointless, is that what you are saying? No!
Every protest unheard is more metaphysical energy in a proactive direction. If the government refuses to listen to its people, if it thinks it can ignore, suppress and label its people as enemies, then the government is refusing to play the game by the social rules it pretended existed and followed in the past.
The parliamentarian system is escalating away from direct democracy and into a form of tyranny of oligarchs and securocrats. This will cause an escalation in the means of which the public "protests" in order to get its voice heard, and an escalation in the publics distrust of the parliamentarian system.
If the parliamentarians refuse to listen to such a large and extremely dissatisfied cross section of society, then that large and extremely dissatisfied cross section will look towards a proactive solution, this of course being the opposite of reactive parliamentarianism.
Attempts to change the minds of parliamentarians who represent an agenda to destroy you, is a dead end – a dead end that most need to see for themselves before they realise that - "there is no political solution."
A proactive solution is one that circumvents the current power structure. This strikes fear into the beast system because its power rests in the people’s engagement with a fake democratic process. When people start to realise, they can’t vote their way out of an issue nor convince those in power to represent them, other strategies start being brought to the table.
Not all of these strategies are violent, most are just meta-political (meaning achieving a power/political change without the direct engagement in voting/political parties). Either way, violent or nonviolent, both these methods mean the beginning of the end for the corrupt traitors in power.
The system knows it cannot fight meta-political methods without harsh suppression. The beast system used meta-political methods to take control of the parliamentarian process, it knows that meta-political methods are more powerful than ever because of the internet and the fact that cultural shifts in the West can happen and spread very quickly without state or corporate (the system) being able to directly control it.
The beast system used the money and institutions of power outside of parliamentarianism to control parliamentarians. The public (reluctantly) accepted these strategies as being within the [social and] legal rules of “democracy” but are now confused why they are not allowed to operate in the same manner. (“How come they can offend me, but I can’t offend them?" – [Read] cultural meta-political influence.)
The beast system knows that harsh suppression on meta-political opponents (political entities, community groups, networks, organisations, and businesses that refuse to engage in parliamentarianism) will drive them underground and even some to violence.
They are fully aware that if they deny the people any ability for a peaceful option, they will leave only a violent option or complete submission to the tyranny. But instead of removing suppression and letting people meta-politically organise without the threat of state violence or corporate disenfranchisement, they do the opposite.
They do the opposite because they don’t want a “democracy” they want the publics complete submission to their tyranny, and they have so much confidence in their new state and corporate powers (securocrat and oligarch) they are willing to escalate all the way to physical violence.
This is why they are calling anyone who speaks out against the system as an "extremist." Extremist is a propaganda term which they are trying to enforce on us to mean "currently non offending terrorist." They do this in order to normalise future state violence against anyone with a dissenting view.
The formula: “Dissent” = Non-compliance to the new tyranny. Extremist = “Terrorism.”
They are saying you have no option but to conform, it is “comply or death." If you say “I refuse to comply," the beast system hears that as “so you chose death, you must be a terrorist planning to die”.
They have been doing this to us "neo-nazis" for decades, but especially in the last couple years, because we speak out against White replacement. But in the last year they have begun transitioning this suppression of dissidents to include anyone in the broad tent of opposition to the system, including anti-vaxxers and non-aligned (to the anti-White globo-homo) churches.
The system is not only using propaganda to gear up for war but also they are physically preparing for it. They have militarized and politicised the police force, which is now far more focused on policing “thought crimes” (political dissent/racism) than actual crimes. They have politicised the military in preparation for civil war/insurrection. On top of this they are rapidly growing their domestic intelligence and corporate technocratic spying instruments.
There is no difference between antifascist street thugs, counter terrorism police and social media billionaires. They are all in alliance to destroy you.
In summary, the beast system has disenfranchised you, it sees you as a problem to its authority, it wants to replace you with a more submissive and docile coffee coloured race that will do as they are told. The beast system won't listen to your political reactions, your mass protests and even your civil disobedience. It has made up its mind that and is prepared to use mass violence to suppress you, and its goal is to shut down all of your options. Leading up to and including armed resistance.
The beast system is gearing up for war whilst gaslighting you into believing you have political representation. It is gearing up for a war years and perhaps decades before all peaceful options have been exhausted.
The beast system knows there is no legitimacy in a resistance movement if it resorts directly to violence. The beast systems think tanks have studied history as much as the rest of us with full knowledge that violence is always the last resort of an oppressed people who see no other constructive way of achieving the result they require.
1. Parliamentarianism (The system wants you here).
2. Reactive meta-politics I.e protests, civil disobedience (anti-vaxxers are here).
3. Proactive meta-politics i.e active clubs, community building rural and suburban, institution building (White nationalists are here).
4. Underground but peaceful clandestine operations I.e resistance journalism, music, culture, businesses (in countries with mass suppression like Russia and Germany most White nationalists are here).
5. Armed conflict (the system is preparing and waiting for us here).
It takes a long time and/or a lot of suppression to make these transitions. Historically they only move faster when the system reacts too early/overreacts (depending on whether you want to measure political change in terms of time or space). I.e the Tsar's troops opening fire on “moderate” protestors in 1917 (apparently there were church leaders at the front of the crowd holding photos of the Tsar, whether or not this is true or not the result is the same). That speeds up the process and things quickly go from stage 2 to stage 5 very quickly for the mainstream individual.
However, it didn't go from stage 2 to stage 5 in a week, it took decades, the difference is that it was a revolutionary movement that bore the brunt of the system in stages 2, 3 and 4. (For the marxists - stage 3 was workers unions, journalists and book clubs).
The marxists were hovering between stage 1 and 5 for more than 3 decades before the Tsar's troops killed workers (and allegedly clergymen) protesting. The lesson we should learn from this is the "mainstream" individual will never come to the aid, defend the position of, or help the revolutionary while the revolutionary is being persecuted. The mainstream individual does not assist, until he becomes persecuted himself, until he himself realises that his reactionary outcry falls on the deaf ears of compromised parliamentarians who hate him, until he himself becomes a revolutionary.
Revolutionaries only have each other, they are a unique cast of society that is always divided into two types; constructive and destructive, creation and destruction are the forces of life. From a psychological profile these are creative idealists and anti-society rebels. Revolutionaries are often very early to the conflict. They come across as "out of touch" or even "crazy" because they are ahead of everyone else and have taken the systems actions to their logical conclusion.
Revolutionaries have taken the system's actions to their logical conclusion.
Revolutions don't gain traction until a cross section of society begins to suffer the same way the revolutionaries suffer. Until 1 or 3 or 5 or 10% of the population is treated as criminals or terrorists "who deserve to be locked up or shot."
So to my fellow revolutionaries who are early to the party, keep working, keep watching, the clock is ticking and we have a limited amount of time to get all of our networking and preparation done before the state transitions us from stage 3 to stage 4 via further harassment, suppression and state mandated violence.
Enjoy the show, these "mainstream" people have quickly learned since Trump that stage 1 is no longer an option, and now they are about to quickly learn that stage 2 is no longer an option.
The tens of thousands of truckers in Canada and everyone watching closely will begin transitioning to stage 3 as soon as their protest fails to achieve anything, and the only way that are going to go boomer waffen is if the Canadian security forces are stupid enough to open fire on them - which is extremely unlikely because the system strategy to deal with these protests is to simply ignore them.
When the trucker protest fails to change any parliamentarian process, do not see this as a political failure, it is not. This is a huge revolutionary political success. It's not so much an overton window as it is a revolutionary pipeline, and every time the beast system ignores [normal people], it forces more and more good honest White folk with nothing left to lose down the pipeline and when there is enough weight down the other end, the scales will tip.
This is why conservativism (read: Appeasement) is the most dangerous force to any hopes for real political change. Strategically the system’s best hope of buying itself more time would be to empower conservatives and slow the public down from reaching stage 3, as this stage is the meta-politically the most powerful. It doesn’t want the public in stage 3 until it has the legislative powers (like the occupied government of post 1945 Germany) [it] has to outlaw stage 3 forcing it into stage 4.
Small appeasements and half measures from parliamentarians would not only catch the dissenting public in the net of reactionary protests but ensure that parallel political power is not worked towards by any large number of the public.
However, the fact that the parliamentarians aren’t even bothering to recognise the political position of those engaging in democratic protests, the fact that the system isn’t even trying to appease this very angry and very large section of society means only one thing…
They don't’ have a choice.
Tick tock tick tock, the system is running out of time.
White revolution is the only solution.
Why the trucker protests must “fail” in achieving their outcome, and why a short-term failure is necessary for long term success:
Proactive vs Reactive.
Protests do not build anything, they don’t build an institution, they don’t build power, they react to an institution of power. Protests help shape the direction that an institution of power moves, they help speed up the direction that “policy” (whether governmental, corporate, education, etc) is already moving in, and if significant enough they can change the direction that said policy is moving in.
Those protesting in Canada and around the world, whether truckers or marches, anti-vaxxers or not, are hoping that enough of a “reaction” from the public will help shift public policy in the desired direction. These protests reenforce the parliamentary system (“the political solution”), because for any proactive change, any actual change to occur, it must be legislated by those who hold power, therefore it is an acknowledge of those in power.
These protests are one of the last opportunities for the parliamentarians, the government, the system, to listen to the public outcry and pass legislation that appeases this very loud and very large demographic of society.
This reactionary strategy is fundamental to the process of engaging in direct democracy, “the left” used protests successfully to further the “civil rights agenda” (read; anti-white agenda).
The conservative right lost decades of ground due to the success of public outcry (manipulated by the Jewish controlled media and foreign subversives within the university), this led to the illusion that we live in a democracy whereby direct action/reactionary protests lead to institutional change.
Western liberal democracy is an illusion.
The real power within a western liberal democracy is the Jewish financial system; the IMF, the WEF, the Federal Reserves, the Jewish private banking and investing corporations.
The civil rights movement was inline with their greater anti-White agenda. So anything within this agenda is smooth sailing and supported by the greater meta-political system (media, academia, finance, judicial), anything against the anti-White agenda will face nothing but roadblocks because its not part of “their plan."
Some might stop reading at this point. So it’s pointless, is that what you are saying? No!
Every protest unheard is more metaphysical energy in a proactive direction. If the government refuses to listen to its people, if it thinks it can ignore, suppress and label its people as enemies, then the government is refusing to play the game by the social rules it pretended existed and followed in the past.
The parliamentarian system is escalating away from direct democracy and into a form of tyranny of oligarchs and securocrats. This will cause an escalation in the means of which the public "protests" in order to get its voice heard, and an escalation in the publics distrust of the parliamentarian system.
If the parliamentarians refuse to listen to such a large and extremely dissatisfied cross section of society, then that large and extremely dissatisfied cross section will look towards a proactive solution, this of course being the opposite of reactive parliamentarianism.
Attempts to change the minds of parliamentarians who represent an agenda to destroy you, is a dead end – a dead end that most need to see for themselves before they realise that - "there is no political solution."
A proactive solution is one that circumvents the current power structure. This strikes fear into the beast system because its power rests in the people’s engagement with a fake democratic process. When people start to realise, they can’t vote their way out of an issue nor convince those in power to represent them, other strategies start being brought to the table.
Not all of these strategies are violent, most are just meta-political (meaning achieving a power/political change without the direct engagement in voting/political parties). Either way, violent or nonviolent, both these methods mean the beginning of the end for the corrupt traitors in power.
The system knows it cannot fight meta-political methods without harsh suppression. The beast system used meta-political methods to take control of the parliamentarian process, it knows that meta-political methods are more powerful than ever because of the internet and the fact that cultural shifts in the West can happen and spread very quickly without state or corporate (the system) being able to directly control it.
The beast system used the money and institutions of power outside of parliamentarianism to control parliamentarians. The public (reluctantly) accepted these strategies as being within the [social and] legal rules of “democracy” but are now confused why they are not allowed to operate in the same manner. (“How come they can offend me, but I can’t offend them?" – [Read] cultural meta-political influence.)
The beast system knows that harsh suppression on meta-political opponents (political entities, community groups, networks, organisations, and businesses that refuse to engage in parliamentarianism) will drive them underground and even some to violence.
They are fully aware that if they deny the people any ability for a peaceful option, they will leave only a violent option or complete submission to the tyranny. But instead of removing suppression and letting people meta-politically organise without the threat of state violence or corporate disenfranchisement, they do the opposite.
They do the opposite because they don’t want a “democracy” they want the publics complete submission to their tyranny, and they have so much confidence in their new state and corporate powers (securocrat and oligarch) they are willing to escalate all the way to physical violence.
This is why they are calling anyone who speaks out against the system as an "extremist." Extremist is a propaganda term which they are trying to enforce on us to mean "currently non offending terrorist." They do this in order to normalise future state violence against anyone with a dissenting view.
The formula: “Dissent” = Non-compliance to the new tyranny. Extremist = “Terrorism.”
They are saying you have no option but to conform, it is “comply or death." If you say “I refuse to comply," the beast system hears that as “so you chose death, you must be a terrorist planning to die”.
They have been doing this to us "neo-nazis" for decades, but especially in the last couple years, because we speak out against White replacement. But in the last year they have begun transitioning this suppression of dissidents to include anyone in the broad tent of opposition to the system, including anti-vaxxers and non-aligned (to the anti-White globo-homo) churches.
The system is not only using propaganda to gear up for war but also they are physically preparing for it. They have militarized and politicised the police force, which is now far more focused on policing “thought crimes” (political dissent/racism) than actual crimes. They have politicised the military in preparation for civil war/insurrection. On top of this they are rapidly growing their domestic intelligence and corporate technocratic spying instruments.
There is no difference between antifascist street thugs, counter terrorism police and social media billionaires. They are all in alliance to destroy you.
In summary, the beast system has disenfranchised you, it sees you as a problem to its authority, it wants to replace you with a more submissive and docile coffee coloured race that will do as they are told. The beast system won't listen to your political reactions, your mass protests and even your civil disobedience. It has made up its mind that and is prepared to use mass violence to suppress you, and its goal is to shut down all of your options. Leading up to and including armed resistance.
The beast system is gearing up for war whilst gaslighting you into believing you have political representation. It is gearing up for a war years and perhaps decades before all peaceful options have been exhausted.
The beast system knows there is no legitimacy in a resistance movement if it resorts directly to violence. The beast systems think tanks have studied history as much as the rest of us with full knowledge that violence is always the last resort of an oppressed people who see no other constructive way of achieving the result they require.
1. Parliamentarianism (The system wants you here).
2. Reactive meta-politics I.e protests, civil disobedience (anti-vaxxers are here).
3. Proactive meta-politics i.e active clubs, community building rural and suburban, institution building (White nationalists are here).
4. Underground but peaceful clandestine operations I.e resistance journalism, music, culture, businesses (in countries with mass suppression like Russia and Germany most White nationalists are here).
5. Armed conflict (the system is preparing and waiting for us here).
It takes a long time and/or a lot of suppression to make these transitions. Historically they only move faster when the system reacts too early/overreacts (depending on whether you want to measure political change in terms of time or space). I.e the Tsar's troops opening fire on “moderate” protestors in 1917 (apparently there were church leaders at the front of the crowd holding photos of the Tsar, whether or not this is true or not the result is the same). That speeds up the process and things quickly go from stage 2 to stage 5 very quickly for the mainstream individual.
However, it didn't go from stage 2 to stage 5 in a week, it took decades, the difference is that it was a revolutionary movement that bore the brunt of the system in stages 2, 3 and 4. (For the marxists - stage 3 was workers unions, journalists and book clubs).
The marxists were hovering between stage 1 and 5 for more than 3 decades before the Tsar's troops killed workers (and allegedly clergymen) protesting. The lesson we should learn from this is the "mainstream" individual will never come to the aid, defend the position of, or help the revolutionary while the revolutionary is being persecuted. The mainstream individual does not assist, until he becomes persecuted himself, until he himself realises that his reactionary outcry falls on the deaf ears of compromised parliamentarians who hate him, until he himself becomes a revolutionary.
Revolutionaries only have each other, they are a unique cast of society that is always divided into two types; constructive and destructive, creation and destruction are the forces of life. From a psychological profile these are creative idealists and anti-society rebels. Revolutionaries are often very early to the conflict. They come across as "out of touch" or even "crazy" because they are ahead of everyone else and have taken the systems actions to their logical conclusion.
Revolutionaries have taken the system's actions to their logical conclusion.
Revolutions don't gain traction until a cross section of society begins to suffer the same way the revolutionaries suffer. Until 1 or 3 or 5 or 10% of the population is treated as criminals or terrorists "who deserve to be locked up or shot."
So to my fellow revolutionaries who are early to the party, keep working, keep watching, the clock is ticking and we have a limited amount of time to get all of our networking and preparation done before the state transitions us from stage 3 to stage 4 via further harassment, suppression and state mandated violence.
Enjoy the show, these "mainstream" people have quickly learned since Trump that stage 1 is no longer an option, and now they are about to quickly learn that stage 2 is no longer an option.
The tens of thousands of truckers in Canada and everyone watching closely will begin transitioning to stage 3 as soon as their protest fails to achieve anything, and the only way that are going to go boomer waffen is if the Canadian security forces are stupid enough to open fire on them - which is extremely unlikely because the system strategy to deal with these protests is to simply ignore them.
When the trucker protest fails to change any parliamentarian process, do not see this as a political failure, it is not. This is a huge revolutionary political success. It's not so much an overton window as it is a revolutionary pipeline, and every time the beast system ignores [normal people], it forces more and more good honest White folk with nothing left to lose down the pipeline and when there is enough weight down the other end, the scales will tip.
This is why conservativism (read: Appeasement) is the most dangerous force to any hopes for real political change. Strategically the system’s best hope of buying itself more time would be to empower conservatives and slow the public down from reaching stage 3, as this stage is the meta-politically the most powerful. It doesn’t want the public in stage 3 until it has the legislative powers (like the occupied government of post 1945 Germany) [it] has to outlaw stage 3 forcing it into stage 4.
Small appeasements and half measures from parliamentarians would not only catch the dissenting public in the net of reactionary protests but ensure that parallel political power is not worked towards by any large number of the public.
However, the fact that the parliamentarians aren’t even bothering to recognise the political position of those engaging in democratic protests, the fact that the system isn’t even trying to appease this very angry and very large section of society means only one thing…
They don't’ have a choice.
Tick tock tick tock, the system is running out of time.
White revolution is the only solution.