Republican under fire for using "Voltaire" quote

[GhostofCeline]

I debated whether to post this because of the weak attempt to malign Mr. Kevin Strom, someone for whom I have great respect. We can expect no less from jewish press like The Guardian.

“arguably the only true intellectual remaining in the American neo-Nazi movement … a bookish yet dogmatic neo-Nazi”.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/republican-u ... 12825.html

[Jim Mathias]

You did right posting this here, Celine. Their smears indicate that Kevin Strom has struck a nerve with them and the more sensitive Whites out there will pick up on that and check us out....and perhaps come around to seeing what we are doing with the intent of joining us.

[Will Williams]

I debated whether to post this because of the weak attempt to malign Mr. Kevin Strom, someone for whom I have great respect. We can expect no less from jewish press like The Guardian.

“arguably the only true intellectual remaining in the American neo-Nazi movement … a bookish yet dogmatic neo-Nazi”.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/republican-u ... 12825.html

Kevin Strom, is described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as “arguably the only true intellectual remaining in the American neo-Nazi movement … a bookish yet dogmatic neo-Nazi”.

"Bookish" means erudite.
OK.
"dogmatic" means given to or marked by the forceful expression of strongly held opinions.
OK.

On Kevin's behalf, we thank you for the compliment, SPLC Jewboys.

[Thomas S NJ]

The Judenpresse probably thinks they delivered some crushing insult, there; I think anyone here would be delighted to be described in such a manner by them. Well.. I suppose except for this nonsense of sticking "neo" in front of "Nazi". We're National-Socialists, after all, true and through. I've told people straight, "nothing 'neo' about me; I'm a Nazi!".

[Will Williams]

The Judenpresse probably thinks they delivered some crushing insult, there; I think anyone here would be delighted to be described in such a manner by them. Well.. I suppose except for this nonsense of sticking "neo" in front of "Nazi". We're National-Socialists, after all, true and through. I've told people straight, "nothing 'neo' about me; I'm a Nazi!".

That depends on who you're talking to, Thomas. With the few of our people who have gotten beyond the demonization and extreme stigma of the word Nazi (ie. National-Socialism), fine. Most Americans' eyes glaze over and their ears compact when you introduce the "N"-word. They will immediately conjure up images of piles of bodies of gassed Jews and you have lost them.

Tell people you are a member of the National Alliance, then you can explain what that means rather than losing the person you are describing our beliefs to. Or say you are a Cosmotheist if you think they can grasp that. Most folks will want to know more. Then you have to be able to articulate what you want them to understand. Feel the person out first about what his beliefs are. If you find he's not receptive to preservation of his race you can save yur breath and avoid shocking him unnecessarily.

It's best to deal with those who have already shown an interest in our Alliance and direct them toward our material. Imagine yourself a salesman, working with solid leads rather than going door to door on cold sales to folks who likely have no interest in what you're selling. There are lots of tips on who to recruit and who not to recruit here on WB as well as on NV, many written by Dr. Pierce himself.

[Thomas S NJ]

That depends on who you're talking to, Thomas. With the few of our people who have gotten beyond the demonization and extreme stigma of the word Nazi (ie. National-Socialism), fine. Most Americans' eyes glaze over and their ears compact when you introduce the "N"-word. They will immediately conjure up images of piles of bodies of gassed Jews and you have lost them.

Tell people you are a member of the National Alliance, then you can explain what that means rather than losing the person you are describing our beliefs to. Or say you are a Cosmotheist if you think they can grasp that. Most folks will want to know more. Then you have to be able to articulate what you want them to understand. Feel the person out first about what his beliefs are. If you find he's not receptive to preservation of his race you can save yur breath and avoid shocking him unnecessarily.

It's best to deal with those who have already shown an interest in our Alliance and direct them toward our material. Imagine yourself a salesman, working with solid leads rather than going door to door on cold sales to folks who likely have no interest in what you're selling. There are lots of tips on who to recruit and who not to recruit here on WB as well as on NV, many written by Dr. Pierce himself.[/size]

I have noticed that "eyes glaze over" effect more than once. Luckily, those I've seen it with were likely never to be swayed anyway; one was a CBP agent who thought it was just dandy that most of our trash truck crews are illegal Salvadorean imports. I admit in that case I was largely just trolling him since I'd already dismissed him as a traitor over the Salvadoreans and mention of being married to a Jewess. The others were similar (such as a childhood friend who has the Yellow Fever now, and is one of those die-hard Zionist Christians to boot) so I don't think I chased anyone away who would not keep their distance regardless.

Where I've found it successful, however, is among people who already have a high opinion of my intellectual ability and moral character, and who are likely to continue to associate with me (giving further opportunities for laying out convincing arguments): family. Now, I recognize that not everyone has the benefit of a family that will stand by each other no matter what beliefs a member might espouse; I do, though.

I first abandoned Libertarianism entirely around Trump's first campaign as I had realized that the side of the truth is with the Racialists, I finally got around to reading Mein Kampf and found it to be nothing like what I'd always been told. M.K. is one of those books, I discovered, that everyone loves to express very strong opinions on yet based on those opinions, very few had actually read. I very quickly became a National-Socialist, and full of new-convert zeal I went with my discoveries to those people whose opinions mattered the most to me: my family.

At the time, my brother was a Feudalism-fixated paleoconservative, my mother and father classic GOP conservatives with Libertarian leanings, and all quite proud of the fact that my late grandfather and his brother fought the Nazis. I laid everything on the table, I was straightforward and honest about the truth, accepted criticism of the things I'd found that turned out to be incorrect (we should be very cautious when bringing out our revisionist arguments; some are false - such as the lack of "Prussian blue" staining at Auschwitz and Dachau being absolute proof no gassings occurred there; my chemistry-major father set me straight on that one! - as even the slightest misstep will set our entire argument back far more than is objectively warranted) but also determined and relentless.

Today, my brother is a National-Socialist. My mother, who had always loved "The Fiddler on the Roof" and thought anyone who questioned the Holohoax should be jailed, now knows who our enemy is, even if she hasn't quite bought fully into biological Racialism and longs for a return to constitutional America. My father, however, was my greatest victory. He's an Army vet, well-educated, highly intelligent, and an avid student of history - and therefore the history that has prevailed. To make matters worse, in his case I had to argue against ghosts; my aforementioned grandfather was an Army engineer and one of his post-war assignments was Dachau clean-up. My dad had been brought up on tails of tens of thousands of emaciated bodies which must have added up to hundreds of thousands across all the camps, in my grandfather's estimation. Unfortunately, my grandfather died before I was born; I cannot ask probing and clarifying questions like "what did you, personally, actually see?" or "how can you be sure as to the identities and causes of death?" and such. I had only the ghosts of the past and "they could have, history says they did, so they did" logic from my father. However, I stood firm, and not long ago my father delighted me with the statement that he now believes "a certain German dictator seems to have been correct all along."

It's not a perfect win, but I'll take it!

So I think there is a time to stick to laying things flat-out and open, in plain language. But I think you're absolutely right; outside of those people whose respect I'd already spent decades earning and won, I've never had any success with stating outright "I'm a Nazi!". I've used it to disarm liberal trolls who think "Nazi!" and "Racist!" are automatic buttons to shut up any one they disagree with, but that did nothing to convince them, only redirect them away from the position they'd been attacking. I suppose that could be useful in some circumstances but you're right: I've never been able to sway anyone else by being so shockingly blunt.

I'm not much of a salesman, so it will take me time, I think, to really learn to apply these techniques and make some headway with anyone else. I'm hopefully moving to a new place this spring, a nice White, safe neighborhood where I might be able to actually get some folk thinking. I'll be sure to avoid saying anything shocking or inflammatory - though, the Jews are making that harder as this entire thread illustrates, even Strom's quote about who rule's over us is being exposed as "neo-Nazi rhetoric". The time may come sooner or later when telling any degree of our Truth becomes shocking.

Thanks for your time, Will! Especial thanks for your guidance! I really have no idea what I'm doing with all this, I'm too new and, as you may've noted here, a bit clumsy.

[Will Williams]

That depends on who you're talking to, Thomas. With the few of our people who have gotten beyond the demonization and extreme stigma of the word Nazi (ie. National-Socialism), fine. Most Americans' eyes glaze over and their ears compact when you introduce the "N"-word. They will immediately conjure up images of piles of bodies of gassed Jews and you have lost them.

Tell people you are a member of the National Alliance, then you can explain what that means rather than losing the person you are describing our beliefs to. Or say you are a Cosmotheist if you think they can grasp that. Most folks will want to know more. Then you have to be able to articulate what you want them to understand. Feel the person out first about what his beliefs are. If you find he's not receptive to preservation of his race you can save yur breath and avoid shocking him unnecessarily.

It's best to deal with those who have already shown an interest in our Alliance and direct them toward our material. Imagine yourself a salesman, working with solid leads rather than going door to door on cold sales to folks who likely have no interest in what you're selling. There are lots of tips on who to recruit and who not to recruit here on WB as well as on NV, many written by Dr. Pierce himself.[/size]

I have noticed that "eyes glaze over" effect more than once. Luckily, those I've seen it with were likely never to be swayed anyway; one was a CBP agent who thought it was just dandy that most of our trash truck crews are illegal Salvadorean imports. I admit in that case I was largely just trolling him since I'd already dismissed him as a traitor over the Salvadoreans and mention of being married to a Jewess. The others were similar (such as a childhood friend who has the Yellow Fever now, and is one of those die-hard Zionist Christians to boot) so I don't think I chased anyone away who would not keep their distance regardless.

Where I've found it successful, however, is among people who already have a high opinion of my intellectual ability and moral character, and who are likely to continue to associate with me (giving further opportunities for laying out convincing arguments): family. Now, I recognize that not everyone has the benefit of a family that will stand by each other no matter what beliefs a member might espouse; I do, though.

I first abandoned Libertarianism entirely around Trump's first campaign as I had realized that the side of the truth is with the Racialists, I finally got around to reading Mein Kampf and found it to be nothing like what I'd always been told. M.K. is one of those books, I discovered, that everyone loves to express very strong opinions on yet based on those opinions, very few had actually read. I very quickly became a National-Socialist, and full of new-convert zeal I went with my discoveries to those people whose opinions mattered the most to me: my family.

At the time, my brother was a Feudalism-fixated paleoconservative, my mother and father classic GOP conservatives with Libertarian leanings, and all quite proud of the fact that my late grandfather and his brother fought the Nazis. I laid everything on the table, I was straightforward and honest about the truth, accepted criticism of the things I'd found that turned out to be incorrect (we should be very cautious when bringing out our revisionist arguments; some are false - such as the lack of "Prussian blue" staining at Auschwitz and Dachau being absolute proof no gassings occurred there; my chemistry-major father set me straight on that one! - as even the slightest misstep will set our entire argument back far more than is objectively warranted) but also determined and relentless.

Today, my brother is a National-Socialist. My mother, who had always loved "The Fiddler on the Roof" and thought anyone who questioned the Holohoax should be jailed, now knows who our enemy is, even if she hasn't quite bought fully into biological Racialism and longs for a return to constitutional America. My father, however, was my greatest victory. He's an Army vet, well-educated, highly intelligent, and an avid student of history - and therefore the history that has prevailed. To make matters worse, in his case I had to argue against ghosts; my aforementioned grandfather was an Army engineer and one of his post-war assignments was Dachau clean-up. My dad had been brought up on tails of tens of thousands of emaciated bodies which must have added up to hundreds of thousands across all the camps, in my grandfather's estimation. Unfortunately, my grandfather died before I was born; I cannot ask probing and clarifying questions like "what did you, personally, actually see?" or "how can you be sure as to the identities and causes of death?" and such. I had only the ghosts of the past and "they could have, history says they did, so they did" logic from my father. However, I stood firm, and not long ago my father delighted me with the statement that he now believes "a certain German dictator seems to have been correct all along."

It's not a perfect win, but I'll take it!

So I think there is a time to stick to laying things flat-out and open, in plain language. But I think you're absolutely right; outside of those people whose respect I'd already spent decades earning and won, I've never had any success with stating outright "I'm a Nazi!". I've used it to disarm liberal trolls who think "Nazi!" and "Racist!" are automatic buttons to shut up any one they disagree with, but that did nothing to convince them, only redirect them away from the position they'd been attacking. I suppose that could be useful in some circumstances but you're right: I've never been able to sway anyone else by being so shockingly blunt.

I'm not much of a salesman, so it will take me time, I think, to really learn to apply these techniques and make some headway with anyone else. I'm hopefully moving to a new place this spring, a nice White, safe neighborhood where I might be able to actually get some folk thinking. I'll be sure to avoid saying anything shocking or inflammatory - though, the Jews are making that harder as this entire thread illustrates, even Strom's quote about who rule's over us is being exposed as "neo-Nazi rhetoric". The time may come sooner or later when telling any degree of our Truth becomes shocking.

Thanks for your time, Will! Especial thanks for your guidance! I really have no idea what I'm doing with all this, I'm too new and, as you may've noted here, a bit clumsy.

You are bright and motivated and will be an excellent actist. You've already influenced those close to you (no small feat). Perhaps some will join NA. That's what Alliance-building is all about after all.

And this discussion is what WB is intended to be for. I'll check back later. Too busy now. Juggling a dozen things, including trying to put the January BULLETIN to bed past its deadline.

[Will Williams]

...At the time, my brother was a Feudalism-fixated paleoconservative, my mother and father classic GOP conservatives with Libertarian leanings, and all quite proud of the fact that my late grandfather and his brother fought the Nazis. I laid everything on the table, I was straightforward and honest about the truth, accepted criticism of the things I'd found that turned out to be incorrect (we should be very cautious when bringing out our revisionist arguments; some are false - such as the lack of "Prussian blue" staining at Auschwitz and Dachau being absolute proof no gassings occurred there; my chemistry-major father set me straight on that one! - as even the slightest misstep will set our entire argument back far more than is objectively warranted) but also determined and relentless.

The highlighted portion of your statement about the evidence of Prussian Blue caught my eye, Thomas, but I didn't have time to respond until now. We were finally able to mail our monthly Members BULLETIN yesterday which takes a lot of my time at the end of each month. I'm quite interested in the source of your dad's refutation of the Jews' Auschwitz lies. There is so much evidence out there now by our revisionist historians, and to my knowledge none of it has been retracted by them. 
This, for example:  https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/01/au ... e-lives/Dr. Pierce's classic from 33 years ago: https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/09/th ... sian-blue/ That piece by him convinced me conclusively, once and for all, that the Holocaust is a Big Lie.Order expert Germar Rudolf's book from our bookstore and discuss with your dad: https://cosmotheistchurch.org/product/a ... cyrus-cox/ It's just $12.

Thanks for your time, Will! Especial thanks for your guidance! I really have no idea what I'm doing with all this, I'm too new and, as you may've noted here, a bit clumsy.

Like you say, you're new. Your dad thinks he has been right all his life because his dad and uncle "fought the Nazis." That is a textbook non sequitur: Because Americans fought the Nazis, therefore there must have been forensic evidence of Zyklon-B cyanide (Prussian Blue) on the walls of Auschwitz crematoria. Even a chemistry major in America whose dad and uncle believed the Holocaust story will have trouble believing there isno evidence of Prussian Blue at Auschwitz. Discuss with your brother who you say is NS. He'll probably be more apt to believe men like Fred Leuchter, William Pierce, Germar Rudolf and Cyrus Cox.

[Grimork]

I think what your dad was referring to was Prussian Blue being at the sites of the delousing chambers where the Germans were trying to rid the prisoners of lice and other vermin as to stop the spread inside the facilities.

Revisionists are not saying PB did not exist, only that PB did not exist at the sites of the "gas chambers" where the Jews were allegedly murdered in mass.
Source: https://inconvenienthistory.com/12/1/7200

Leuchter took forensic samples from the masonry of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at the visited sites and a control sample from the delousing facility at Birkenau. The samples were analyzed by an independent laboratory in the United States. The laboratory found no significant ferrocyanide compound traces in the samples taken from the alleged homicidal gas chambers, but the samples from the walls of the disinfection chamber had heavy concentrations of the ferrocyanide compounds. Leuchter concluded that this result would be impossible if the alleged homicidal gas chambers had been repeatedly exposed to hydrogen-cyanide gas.

Leuchter also observed that the delousing chambers were airtight, well-made and designed for safety in their use with Zyklon B. By comparison the alleged homicidal gas chambers were not airtight, were poorly constructed, and would have been dangerous for the operators. Why would gas chambers designed to kill lice be properly constructed and engineered, while gas chambers designed and used to kill millions of people be improperly constructed and engineered and dangerous for the operators? Leuchter concludes: “After a thorough examination of the alleged execution facilities in Poland and their associated crematories, the only conclusion that can be arrived at by a rational, responsible person is the absurdity of the notion that any of these facilities were ever capable of, or were utilized as, execution gas chambers.”[7]

Germar Rudolf, a degreed chemist, expanded on Leuchter’s work by producing the Rudolf Report in the spring of 1992. The Rudolf Report, which has been updated and revised several times, focused on engineering and chemical aspects of the alleged homicidal gas operations at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Rudolf observed in his on-site examinations that all of the delousing facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek have one thing in common: their walls are permeated with Prussian Blue. Not only the inner surfaces, but even the outside walls (through soakage) and the mortar between the bricks of the delousing chambers have Prussian Blue staining. Nothing of this sort can be observed in or around any of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.

Rudolf also took samples from the alleged homicidal gas chambers and the delousing facilities at Auschwitz and Birkenau. Similar to Leuchter’s samples, the alleged homicidal gas chambers exhibit only insignificant traces of ferrocyanide residue on the same order of magnitude found in any other building. The samples from the delousing chambers, however, all showed very high ferrocyanide residues. Rudolf determined that if mass execution gassings with hydrocyanic acid had taken place in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, the rooms in the alleged homicidal gas chambers would exhibit similar ferrocyanide residue as the delousing chambers. Therefore, Rudolf concluded that mass gassings with Zyklon B could not have occurred in the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and Birkenau.[8]

[Will Williams]

I think what your dad was referring to was Prussian Blue being at the sites of the delousing chambers where the Germans were trying to rid the prisoners of lice and other vermin as to stop the spread inside the facilities.

Revisionists are not saying PB did not exist, only that PB did not exist at the sites of the "gas chambers" where the Jews were allegedly murdered in mass.
Source: https://inconvenienthistory.com/12/1/7200

Thanks for that further clarification, Grimork. A correspondent sent me this link for helping Fred Leuchter hold on to his home:
https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/ ... SSFP5.html