It is currently Thu Jun 27, 2019 12:30 am


New Zealander strikes in righteous indignation at Muslim pop

Summaries and links to news items
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Jim Mathias

  • Posts: 1180
  • Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:48 pm

Re: New Zealander strikes in righteous indignation at Muslim

PostSun Mar 17, 2019 12:21 am

The video at the link provided below is allegedly what the shooter himself uploaded using his bodycam. Warning! Graphic violence.

https://www.crazyshit.com/cnt/medias/65 ... d-massacre

Video provided for educational and any other 'fair use' purposes, and for no other.

New Zealand has threatened any citizen who simply possesses this video with prison time. Free speech doesn't exist there.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03- ... sts-warned
Offline

PallidaMort

  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2019 2:11 pm
  • Location: Mountain City, TN

Re: New Zealander strikes in righteous indignation at Muslim

PostSun Mar 17, 2019 1:17 am

Why did you carry out the attack? To most of all show th e invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people. To take revenge on the invaders for the hundreds of thou sands of deaths caused by foreign invaders in European lands throughout history. To take revenge for the enslavement of millions of Europeans taken from their lands by the Islamic slavers. To take revenge for the thousands of European lives lost to terro throughout European lands. To take revenge for Ebba Akerlund. r attacks To directly reduce immigration rates to European lands by intimidating and physically removing the invaders themselves.

To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result. To incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the European people and the invaders currently occupying European soil. To avenge those European men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of European history who died for their lands, died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up. To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash. To show the effect of direct action, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow.A path for those that wish to free their ancestors lands from the invaders grasp and to be a beacon for those that wish to create a lasting culture, to tell them they are not alone. To create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic,powerful and revolutionary action can occur. To add momentum to the pendul um swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing Western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of Western thought. To drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO forces, thereby turning NATO once more into a united European army and pushing the Turkey once more back to the true position of a foreign, enemy force.

Finally, to create conflict between nd the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states.This conflict over the 2 amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will u ltimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the “melting pot” pipe dream. Furthermore this balkanization will also reduce the USA’s ability to project power globally, and thereby ensure that never again can such a situation as the US involvement in Kosovo ever occur again(where US/NATO forces fought beside muslims and slaughtered Christian Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe)




What do you want? We must ensure the existence of our people and a future for White children .


I have the pdf version if anyone cannot find a copy online. It seems his intentions and reasoning are quite clear.
Attachments
bq-5c4ca644d7260.png
bq-5c4ca644d7260.png (273.66 KiB) Viewed 430 times
Before we can put the White man in the fight we have to put the fight into the White man.




https://cosmotheistchurch.org/
Offline

PallidaMort

  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2019 2:11 pm
  • Location: Mountain City, TN

Re: New Zealander strikes in righteous indignation at Muslim

PostSun Mar 17, 2019 2:21 am

Before we can put the White man in the fight we have to put the fight into the White man.




https://cosmotheistchurch.org/
Offline

WhiteHealer

  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:52 pm

SIGNS OF A BLACK OPERATION IN CHRISTCHURCH MASS SHOOTING

PostSat Mar 23, 2019 12:37 am

SIGNS OF A BLACK OPERATION IN CHRISTCHURCH MASS SHOOTING

The New Zealand mass shooting at two mosques recently has many of the telltale signs of a government black operation, with coverup and complicity by local governments and the mainstream media. But there were differences also. Unlike most mass shootings where the Deep State uses a mind-controlled or hypnotized patsy under the influence of mood altering drugs, this killer revealed himself on video to be an expert in military weapons—cold, calculating and ruthless. He returned to the scene a second time to place kill shots in most of his victims to make sure they were dead, and taking, almost 15 minutes to do it after his initial shots. Why wasn’t he worried about the police? No one who would take this much time unless he had been assured the police would be delayed in their response—and they were, even though a police station was nearby. Even after shooting people in the street outside the mosque, he casually lingered and methodically went about his business. Naturally only a single person was blamed, even though at least two other men in baseball caps were even caught on camera leaving the gated enclosure with assault rifles.


New Zealand is part of the globalist Deep State, being one of the “5 Eyes” (FVEY) countries which have access to US secret surveillance around the world, including domestic surveillance of each nation. The others are Australia, Canada, the UK and the ringleader, the USA. No country is allowed into this circle without being a party to systematic (and illegal) domestic surveillance and Deep State control of law enforcement.


Most of these countries have adopted near total gun control after a defining mass shooting that has galvanized the population against guns.


The UK had the Dunblane school shooting on 13 March 1996, when Thomas Hamilton shot 16 children and one teacher dead before killing himself. Trouble is, the gun in his hand didn’t match the caliber of the round in his head. He was “suicided” by his handler—always present to make sure the suicide program works, and take “alternative means” if it doesn’t.


Australia had its Port Arthur massacre in 1996 when a gunman opened fire on shop owners and tourists with two semi-automatic rifles that left 35 people dead and 23 wounded. Predictably, this one act opened the door for strict gun restrictions including a ban on all semi-automatic rifles and all semi-automatic and pump-action shotguns. All other weapons are restricted under a system of licensing and ownership controls. Australia even went so far as to demand all banned weapons be given up in a buyback scheme that saw over 1 million rifles destroyed.


It didn’t help that the Aussie’s Prime Minister at the time was John Howard, a virulent advocate of gun control who said in the aftermath of Port Arthur:



“We will find any means we can to further restrict them because I hate guns. I don’t think people should have guns, unless they are police, or in the military or security industry. Ordinary citizens should not have weapons. We do not want the American disease imported into Australia.”


Disease? They only disease we are plagued with in America is the Deep State conspiracy to use false flag attacks to take away liberty and national sovereignty—the same disease that undermines all of the “5 Eyes” nations.


The USA has had multiple mass shootings designed and carried out by the Deep State, but none have succeeded in getting total gun control as intended—due to the power of the Second Amendment as an individual “right to bear arms.”


But the murderous onslaught by government-induced mass shootings is slowly chipping away at those rights even in America. Most recently even by Republican President Donald Trump who was swayed into issuing a bump-stock ban in a late response to the Las Vegas shooting that was brought on by multiple black ops shooters. Now “Red Flag” legislation is pending to give government the power to confiscate a person’s weapons if reported as dangerous by a family member. I will present details of this proposal and its legal ramifications below.


Canada has not had a mass shooting—probably because the Deep State didn’t need one to goad Canadian politicians into gun control. They have been steadily increasing the screws on private gun ownership over the past century until all military weapons are now banned and center-fire rifles are limited to five rounds. All weapons must be registered and you have to have a license to even buy ammunition in Canada—which is almost impossible now unless you have “grandfathered permission” before the restrictions were passed. Not only is it very difficult to gain a license to own any firearm, but the anti-gunners in Canada are still pushing for more gun control and they won’t stop until all guns are banned.


New Zealand reacted to this latest mass shooting atrocity with a swift ban on possessing an assault weapon, even while tromping on free speech as it blocked websites and banned video sharing. As Reuters detailed,



New Zealand will ban military-style semi-automatic and assault rifles under tough new gun laws following the killing of 50 people in its worst mass shooting, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said on Thursday. In the immediate aftermath of last Friday’s shootings at two mosques in the city of Christchurch, Ardern labeled the attack as terrorism and said New Zealand’s gun laws would change.



Notice how the PM used the killings to change the law: “On 15 March our history changed forever. Now, our laws will too. We are announcing action today on behalf of all New Zealanders to strengthen our gun laws and make our country a safer place”


It will only appear a safer place because the Deep State will stop engineering mass shootings once all the guns are gone. But some time in the future, when NZ and Australia are occupied by the Red Chinese during WWIII, they’ll rue the day they no longer had any military style assault rifles to defend themselves with.


And, don’t believe all the internet hype about “billionaires” moving to NZ for safety with the inference that wealthy people are all insiders who “know what’s coming.” That’s rarely true, and the few that are moving there and building bunkers don’t know about Chinese plans to occupy Australia and NZ.



Ardern told the news conference. “All semi-automatic weapons used during the terrorist attack on Friday 15 March will be banned.” Ardern said she expected the new laws to be in place by April 11 and a buy-back scheme costing up to NZ$200 million ($138 million) would be established for banned weapons.



All military style semi-automatics (MSSA) and assault rifles would be banned, along with parts used to convert weapons into MSSAs and all high-capacity magazines.



Under existing gun laws, a standard A-category gun license allows semi-automatics limited to seven shots. Live-streamed video of a gunman in one of the mosques showed a semi-automatic weapon modified with a large magazine.


Notice that NZ already had a 7 shot limit, which was easily bypassed by buying 30 round magazines over the internet. The point is, people with criminal intent will always find ways around the law. What will they do when someone shows up with an already banned semi-auto weapons that doesn’t get turned in? They will use that as an excuse to ban all weapons and send the SWAT teams around to collect them. That’s why a national gun registration is on every gun grabber’s wish list—so the police will know who to track down.


The Kiwi Gun blog was outraged at how suddenly NZ guns rights disappeared—virtually overnight, and they pointed the finger directly at the police commissioner, police union leaders and the feminist and pro-gay woman Prime Minister:



The Police Commissioner Mike Bush has expressed his delight at talk of gun law changes. Police Association President Chris Cahill has welcomed the Prime Minister’s early commitment to changing New Zealand’s gun laws.



“Jacinda Ardern has said emphatically that New Zealand’s gun laws will change and that now is the time for that change. I absolutely agree with her and I believe many New Zealanders will be aghast that in our country someone can amass a cache of weapons like that discovered in this Christchurch tragedy,” Mr Cahill said. “However we cannot ignore the role of guns in this event.”



Mr Cahill says the debate that New Zealand is about to have on access to certain firearms should be short and swift. “There is no place in the upcoming debate for the radical gun lobby which has made its presence felt in previous attempts to make our country safer. That input undoubtedly contributed to the rejection of most of the select committee recommendations on tightening our gun laws. We have seen what happens in the United States when gun radicals are involved. Nothing. That is not good enough for New Zealand.”


-Nothing, meaning no action on gun control. But that's because Americans save thousands of lives per year thwarting crimes with a gun.


So dramatic has been the political shift in NZ to a gun-grabbing, Orwellian state, that it easily justifies my long-held recommendation Americans NOT to relocate there for long-term safety. The same goes for Australia and even Canada. Even though America harbors the core of the dark side government beast, these other liberal nations take away liberty faster because their citizens have little resistant to their government’s mandates, not having proper constitutions to bolster their rights.


R. E. McMaster, who used to live in NZ, wrote this about Kiwi’s ignorance of their Anglo-British legal heritage:



“But Kiwis, unlike the Swiss and some Americans, do not understand that freedom is based in individual responsibility at all levels. For example, I asked 62 NZ women if they knew what the “Magna Carta” is ("The Great Charter of the Liberties" of English freedom). Not a single one of them had a clue. What are they teaching in the NZ schools?”


In America, the Deep State still fears its armed populace and the sizeable minority with knowledge of basic constitutional rights.


McMaster emailed me that NZ has gone crazy in support of Muslims over this crisis:



“You would not believe the thousands and thousands of Kiwis that are out at the Muslim mosques all over NZ now, right now, today, expressing their unity with the Muslim community... All the TV news since last Friday has been about the loss the Muslims in NZ suffered. You would not believe the TV coverage, on and on and on You would think a head of state was assassinated and all of his family, and all of Parliament. I have NEVER seen anything like this!



“The PM of NZ is wearing a head scarf, and simultaneously having a baby out of wedlock? Where is the consistency? All these non-Muslim Kiwi feminists and females have their head's covered. Everywhere in NZ, everyone is stopping for a minute of mourning, all over the nation. Flowers everywhere, not just in Christchurch but all over NZ. Kids out of school in unity with the Muslims nationwide. Christian and Asian women with their heads covered, Muslim style. It is like, "Hey, let's invite Muslims into NZ from all over the world" All the female TV commentators have their heads covered.”


The Shooter: Brenton Harrison Tarrant, is a 28-year-old Australian who was armed with 2 semi-automatic assault style rifles, 2 pump action shot guns, and a lever action rifle, all legally purchased—except for his 30 round magazines. The attacker was a licensed gun owner who reportedly acquired his firearms legally. He held an "A category" firearms license, which allowed him to buy assault style weapons. He was a member of a South Otago gun club and practiced shooting at its range on numerous occasions and was considered an expert marksman.


He bought various enhancements for his weapons including the large capacity magazines and combat red-dot sights for quick and precision aiming. He was obviously familiar with military quick change loading as his magazines were linked together with the second magazine offset to the right.


Background: Tarrant’s background is normal up through 2011 in New South Wales, Australia where he worked as a personal trainer. But then in 2012, he started visiting many countries in Asia and Eastern Europe which starts to show signs of Deep State control.


Like the 9/11 terrorist setup by the Deep State, where the FBI had all kinds of information on the claimed hijackers within hours of the attack, police seemed to have way too much detail on Tarrant and his world travels at their fingertips to pass on to the media. According to a Turkish Daily,



He traveled to Bulgaria, the Balkans, and Turkey multiple times, including Tarrant traveled to Ağrı, Ankara, Edirne, Sivas, Mersin, Tokat, Istanbul, İzmir and Konya during his visits to Turkey on March 17-20 and Sept. 13-25, 2016... This has raised questions about his intentions, because those destinations are not very popular among tourists.


It takes more money than a personal trainer would have saved up to be able to travel constantly in foreign countries, especially to such out-of-the-way places. Some sources claim he got an inheritance from his father, but where did he get his extensive Turkish contacts, with no prior experience in Turkey, nor knowledge of the language? How did he get a VISA to some of these places? He also visited,



Portugal, Spain, France, Bulgaria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, China and North Korea are among other countries he visited, according to Yenişafak's report


North Korea isn’t easy to get into safely, especially as an American and some of the countries on this list, like Afghanistan, Pakistan and NK will trigger scrutiny by various intelligence services—unless you are working for them.


The official mainstream narrative being promoted on virtually every media source is that he visited sites associated with the Ottoman empire and became obsessed with the great conflict of civilization between Europeans and Muslims, and the “heroes” and terrorists who fought against Islam, going clear back to the crusades.


But this doesn’t match his post after visiting Muslim Pakistan with his supposed hatred of Muslims. His post on Facebook referred to Pakistan as, "an incredible place filled with the most earnest, kind hearted and hospitable people in the world".


The Anomalies:

1) The police seem to know too much about this guy too soon, including the claim that he planned this attack two years ago and picked this mosque 3 months ago. If he is making these kinds of statements online, then social media isn’t censoring terror as they claim.


2) The “other suspects.” As in Sandy Hook and the Parkland High School shooting, other armed persons and suspects are suspiciously let go without explanation. The Intellectual Observer detailed what we know about others involved in NZ:



The local authorities announced that less than an hour after the attack, the main suspect, a 28-year-old Australian, was arrested while three others were also put under investigation. One suspect was released from custody after the end of primary investigations.



It remains unclear if the attackers of the two mosques were the same or there were five attackers involved. One of the terrorists managed to escape the country hours after Friday noon. The fifth attacker has defected to Israel with the help of unknown aides. No official reaction has been made by Tel Aviv or local authorities on the issue yet.



While the main suspect has confronted the court a day after the terrorist attack, the local authorities has made no remark about his partner(s) in the brutal act.



The distance between the two mosques seems to show that the terrorist would have no chance to get to the second mosque if he were alone. Besides, considering the fact that the attack was terroristic in nature, as the New Zealand Prime Minister asserted, the involvement of other individuals, or other countries, seems probable.


These are significant claims of multiple shooters, as in this video showing two other armed people with assault rifles leaving the scene. Watch this 8chan short video clearly showing at least 2 more armed NZ shooters. Other witnesses report seeing 6 -9 other persons.


3) The Shooter’s Video Recording: There are lots of anomalies in the shooter’s helmet cam video, which was quickly banned across the world. New Zealand authorities were threatening everyone with a 10 year prison term for possessing or sharing the video, and even demanding that social media sites track the computer signatures of anyone downloading or watching the video. Fortunately for truth’s sake, the video continues to be available (barely) despite this egregious censorship. Think of it: you can still see the video of JFK being shot, so one has to question why the extraordinary means to shut down free speech.


But in the ultimate hypocrisy, Twitter failed to ban Tarrant’s hate-filled rants and his live streaming of the killings. Many social media sites are even banning people from discussing the mass shooting. Natural News reports that,



Brighteon.com video platform under extreme threat from internet infrastructure providers, [was] forced to delete all New Zealand shooting videos, essentially “at gunpoint” by the globalist controllers of the ‘net’


Also banned is his 76 page “Great Replacement Manifesto” of ethnic defense of white civilization, (which is clearly not his writing). All of this smacks of a government troll trying too hard to point the finger at “white supremacy,” Trump supporters, the Alt-right, and anyone else the mainstream media wants to demonize. Even the always-establishment-biased Wikipedia article on the shooting admitted this was a possibility:



“Some journalists who analyzed the manifesto and the attacker's actions believed that aspects of the manifesto were a front, and that it was designed to troll and create discourse about certain groups and people [on the Right].”


Rush Limbaugh had this to say on the NZ killing and the manifesto:

Tarrant, who was in Pakistan just five months ago - amid what he wrote was two years of planning for Thursday's massacre, posted a lengthy manifesto before the shooting in which he declared his desire to exploit racial, cultural and political divisions in the United States.



At three points in his manifesto, the shooter also states his intention to spark a civil war in the United States by triggering crackdowns on the Second Amendment. In his laundry list of motivations, the shooter spends the most amount of time discussing this goal, which he believes will ultimately lead to a “fracturing” of the U.S. along “cultural and racial lines.” -Breitbart



"With enough pressure the left wing within the United States will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the U.S. will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty," reads the manifesto.



The shooter expresses both white supremacist sentiments, while also describing himself as a socialist "depending on the definition," and an "Eco-fascist" - declaring his support for "environmentalism," "worker's rights," and "responsible markets." The manifesto goes on to describe Antifa, communists and Marxists as "anti-white scum." He also identifies black conservative Candace Owens as the "person that has influenced me above all,"


Tarrant was not a good thinker if he thought this mass shooting in far off NZ would spark civil war in the US. Once again, I think the evidence is strong he and the Deep State were simply trying to taunt and denigrate gun owners in America, but the real target was NZ gun laws.


There are several things that stand out in the video: 1) his cold, calm, calculating military precision. Driving along, he makes casual comments, listens to music, and shows no nervousness. He’s clearly not insane. He takes his time. This is a sign he knows he’s part of a protected action and will not be intercepted. 2) He goes back to shoot people multiple times to make sure they are dead. Why? If you are going to make a statement warning off “invaders” why take the time to go back twice and shoot everyone again? Why isn’t wounding sufficient, especially if you should be worried about police arriving? I think it is because this entire false flag was meant to be horrifying and graphic to make a bigger impression on people, who have been accustomed to just reading about other shootings through newspaper commentary.


He covered all of his rifles in white graffiti naming terrorists from ages past, that revealed a bizarre side to him that was out of character the cold, calculating killer in his video. He cast aside two of his expensive weapons during the shooting which was also uncharacteristic of a military style assassin. He was one, of course, but it’s obvious to me that he was trying to portray himself as something extreme, so it would implicate his intended scapegoat—gun owners who value Western culture.


4.) Why did police take so long to respond? This is a serious question because the nearest police station was only 5 minutes away. The continual gunfire would have had people calling police within seconds. The shooter also shot at people down the street as he exited, which would have alerted others farther away. William Craddick writes,



...But witness statements say that police took over 20 minutes to arrive at the scene (the police response time was actually an even longer 36 minutes). Ambulance services took over half an hour to arrive at the scene despite the fact that hospitals were in even closer proximity to the attack locations than police stations.



The failure of police to deploy with greater haste or intercept the attackers while they moved from their first target to the second raises serious questions about the reasons for inadequate law enforcement reactions. Normally an incident on such a scale would trigger an immediate lockdown of the affected city and a total isolation of the affected area.”


There is no way the place wouldn’t have been surrounded by police within 10 minutes. Even if an attacker didn’t know when to expect police, you would think he would hurry in, do his shooting and then escape as quickly as possible.


Instead, he doesn’t rush as he goes back to his car, he takes his time getting another weapon and then walks back in, via a fairly circuitous route (going past the walled entrance as he takes time to shoot at someone in the parking lot before re-entering and shooting all his victims again to make sure they are dead).


As an important aside, what happened here points out the flaw in police advice that people should NOT fight except as a last resort, but to lie down and play dead. That may work in some instances, when the shooter is forced to move on, but not here with a dedicated killer. As the Market-Ticker cogently wrote,



The reason the authorities do not want you to conclude the only sane option is fight and for everyone to have that engraved in their head is simple: The next question after you conclude the correct option is "fight" is obviously next question asked is going to be "with what?" and there is only one sane answer there too: WITH A GUN. [Which authorities don’t want you to have.]


5) The shots inside the vehicle: In the video, as he’s driving allegedly to the next target, he fires his shotgun at his front window, but nothing much happens to the window (some cracking is barely visible), and there’s no ricochet back at him. Then he fires at someone walking along the street and blows out the passenger side window, indicating there was some kind of projectile in the weapon.


One commentator uses the above example of no round penetrating the windshield as evidence of blanks in the second shotgun which he was using. He dropped the first shotgun he used in the entryway after he switched to his assault style rifle. I guess it’s possible a blank discharge in this second shotgun could blow out the side window, which is only tempered glass, not safety glass, but other than that, I can’t explain it.


Crisis Actor Claims Again. There are several on the web that are trying to say all this was just crisis actors and that the attack was faked. These claims surface every time there is a mass shooting or bombing. I believe the attacks always really happen and government involvement is covered-up later. The above anomaly about the shooting inside the car adds to this belief.


Another claims that because the shell casings being ejected seem to disappear as he is firing, that this video was photo shopped and wasn’t real shooting. However, this is because of low resolution of the camera. You can actually see several casings bounce around and give off a slight glint if you look closely. Besides, while he’s firing, you can clearly see the spare magazine next to the inserted magazine and the visible rounds have bullets in them. Blanks only have a crimped brass tip, and no bullet.


Several skeptics point to the story of a “hero” father who they claim covered his son’s body to protect him and was shot several times and killed. A picture is shown, supposedly after the shooting of the “son crying over his dead father’s body,” according to a caption. But in another picture, found by the same website, we see father in the same pose, obviously alive, texting on his phone with his son in the same position over him. Obviously, the father isn’t dead.


It could be the news showed pictures (by others) of the father and son before the shooting and took liberties with the caption, claiming it was after. In any case the picture of the son over the top of the father is illogical. If the father was shot while on top of the son protecting him, how would the young son get out from underneath?


Dr. Bennett, who I quoted earlier, thinks there were crisis actors because of lack of blood splatter, lack of screams and writhing bodies, or even exploding sheet rock as bullet’s miss people in the video. Plaster makes little explosive puffs when hit, but sheetrock doesn’t at all. I watched the video closely and felt there was enough blood pooling the second time he went in to finish them off to be credible. I also saw body movement and impact explosions on several people as he shot some people again, which can’t be easily faked.


I also listened for other shots going off during the recording when his gun wasn’t firing, and heard none, indicating lack of other shooters shooting at least at the same time. I also counted bodies and came up close to 39 or 40 in the video—close enough to the 50 they say were killed, including the 7 at the other Muslim Center. However, this does not account for the media claim of 50 additional wounded—that makes 100, and Tarrant does not fire 100 times at different individuals to account for this many dead and wounded. All of the people in the first mosque appeared dead and were not moving and all had been shot numerous times—they number less than 40, and you don’t hardly see any shot at that escape.


So, here’s the problem: where do the 50 wounded come from? The media and Wiki say by all accounts there were 50 killed and 50 more or less wounded. All of those 50 wounded could not have occurred at the second shooting because he never got into the building (he shot through the window) and was hampered by a courageous Muslim so he had to break off early, and was apprehended shortly thereafter while driving. Since more than 40 total weren’t seen in the video of the first shooting, including those he shot at outside on the street, there must have been other shooters shooting somewhere to account for 50 wounded. This is a serious dilemma. It’s possible the other shooters kept shooting people after Tarrant drove away.


Then there’s the hypocrisy of it all: The media always makes a drumbeat of a mass shooting by some alleged westerner killing Muslims, but never covers the story when the opposite happens—all too often crimes of Muslims slaughtering Christians. As one Christian pastor noted, “120 Christians Slaughtered By Muslims In Nigeria In Feb - Media And White Christmas Silent.”


And then China gets a pass in the media for persecuting its Muslim population in the Uighur province, as the Wall Street Journal documents: “First Detention, Now Demolition: China Remakes Its Muslim Region” [video in above link]



After locking up as many as a million people in camps in Xinjiang, Chinese authorities are destroying Uighur neighborhoods and purging the region's culture. They say they’re fighting terrorism. Their aim: to engineer a society loyal to Beijing.


On this note, I’ll let Rush Limbaugh have the last word on media hypocrisy:



The idea that there is far more crazed right-wing terrorism in America than there is any other kind is nothing more than a media narrative manufactured out of whole cloth, and it's just waiting for events like this to take place, and this is what happens, folks. I don't know, you probably get up and you see this news story and you just -- in addition to all of the emotion you have over the sheer shock, terror, and horror of it all, then you realize you're going to face a whole day of the politicization of it. You realize you're going to face a whole day of Donald Trump being blamed for it, or you being blamed for it, or things you believe in being blamed for it.



Yes, and that’s just how it is playing out.
Offline

Jim Mathias

  • Posts: 1180
  • Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:48 pm

Re: New Zealander strikes in righteous indignation at Muslim

PostSun Mar 24, 2019 6:42 pm

Jim Mathias wrote:The video at the link provided below is allegedly what the shooter himself uploaded using his bodycam. Warning! Graphic violence.

https://www.crazyshit.com/cnt/medias/65 ... d-massacre

Video provided for educational and any other 'fair use' purposes, and for no other.

New Zealand has threatened any citizen who simply possesses this video with prison time. Free speech doesn't exist there.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03- ... sts-warned
crazyshit.com has pulled the video, you can now view it here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fXWr00E70K50/

Thanks to those who updated me on this.
Previous

Return to News Items

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests