Minnesota to Destroy Historic Fort Snelling

[Benjamin Bice]

Minnesota to Destroy Historic Fort Snelling, Building ‘Affordable Housing’ for Welfare Recipients
-
23
Jul, 2015
by Warner Todd Huston
-
The state of Minnesota has announced plans to destroy the historic buildings of Fort Snelling by re-modeling them into housing for welfare recipients at a massive cost of over $500,000 per housing unit!


The state has announced that it is sinking $100 million to rehab the buildings to create 190 section 8 housing units. That is well over $500,000 per housing unit. Since when is a half million dollar home “affordable”?

A massive $100 million redevelopment proposal is expected to transform Fort Snelling’s historic military buildings into 190 apartments for low-income families in the area near the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.

Lt. Gov. Tina Smith and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources officials announced the landmark proposal Wednesday, saying it will overhaul and preserve the Fort Snelling Upper Post.

Officials said it is exciting to see a place that holds great importance in Minnesota’s history be reborn as a place for Minnesota’s future.

“It’s going to preserve 26 of the most historic buildings in Minnesota,” said Larry G. Peterson, park manager and Upper Post project manager.

Of course, this claim that they are “preserving” anything is poppycock. Section 8 housing ALWAYS becomes a pit of destruction and ghetto living. So, these buildings will end up a mess.

This is no less the destruction of history to house welfare recipients–and it is likely that those who move in here will be more of the Muslim Somali immigrants that Obama keeps dumping in Minnesota despite that so many of them keep going back to Africa to join ISIS and al Qaeda.

Fort Snelling, originally known as Fort Saint Anthony, was a military fortification located at the confluence of the Minnesota River and Mississippi River in Hennepin County, Minnesota. It is a Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, a National Park Service unit, and includes historic Fort Snelling. The installation served as a main bulwark in US defenses of the west during the westward expansion era from before the Civil War to the end of the westward migration.

So, here we have the liberals trying to wipe out another military installation and erase its history.

[A White Nationalist]

So, here we have the liberals trying to wipe out another military installation and erase its history.

Lest we forget, liberals make up roughly 50% of the electorate - which makes this possible. The United States voting population itself is roughly 50% liberal. Keep in mind that when George W. Bush won his first election, he lost the popular vote. (Popular vote: Bush- 50,456,002 / Gore - 50,999,897) This fact must be considered when white nationalist strategy is considered. We are living in a nation where not only are we WN's a severe minority, but where more people than not prefer the path of "negro equality". So unless we come up with a strategy that promises short-term gains within one year (yes, one year) and long term gains within five, we will simply be repeating history by having another twenty years of failed activism. That's always been a problem with all white nationalist groups: the fact that we don't set objective long-term goals. We simply write articles, have meet, greet, and eat get-togethers, sell some books, and make a few speeches, and then sit back and wait. But for what? What?

How should it be, one may ask? A serious group should always set important and specific long-range goals - and then either attain them or...explain why they didn't. But no group ever does. No exceptions. And I do mean: no exceptions. If on rare occasion we have in the past, and we failed to meet our goal, we don't discuss why. We simply let the failed goal slip down the memory hole, as if it was never undertaken. That's why we're failing. That's why the National Alliance failed under Gliebe's control. Because no long-term goals were ever set by him, other than maybe publishing some pre-teen girls in skimpy skirts on Resistance Magazine, his tenure became the laughingstock of the Internet and the WN movement. Nor was his failure to set such goals ever spotlighted by his timorous membership. In fact, the same holds true for Pierce's leadership, painful (and anger-inflaming) as that may be to hear. Pierce never stated when he started out: where - no matter what - the National Alliance would be in five years, ten, fifteen, and twenty years down the road. It's nice to leave things vague, to leave it swathed in the mists of some nebulous future time. But after he died, some fresh jerks took over (Walker, Gliebe, and cohorts) and the NA never accomplished anything worthwhile.

This is the persistent problem that I see: with individuals like Jared Taylor, Don Black, David Duke, Billy Roper, Harold Covington, Alex Linder, etc, etc, etc: they've all been around at least twenty long, grueling years. Yet...what were their goals twenty years ago? Can even one of you name them? I do know this: no one today ever bothers to ask. Why not? Could it be that they never stated any? Could it be that by not stating them back then that twenty years later (meaning today) no one can point a finger and say: "Hey bub, you promised to do this, that, and the other thing and yet...you did nothing!" In other words, it's called throwing "accountability" into their faces and making them eat it. It's harsh, yes. But it's why non-WN groups are crushing us. The best of them set long-term goals - and meet them. And when they don't they ask BIG questions as to why - we don't.

So when I read articles like this, about the continued encroachment of our enemies, it makes me sick. We've squandered at least two decades, if not more, doing all kinds of short-term things: speeches, luncheons, awards ceremonies, more luncheons, more speeches, podcasts, articles, and so forth. But...no long-term goals. No stating: THIS will be accomplished in X amount of time and if it isn't we won't ignore it and brush it under the rug - we will ask WHY. Now, it's the year 2015 and in just 35 years (in the lifetime of your children, if not yourself) America will be HALF BROWN. So we haven't time for more of the same old same old. We need to shake the livin' sh*it out of this country. And no one - from Taylor to Duke to Covington - is doing it.

[Will Williams]

[T]he same holds true for Pierce's leadership, painful (and anger-inflaming) as that may be to hear. Pierce never stated when he started out: where - no matter what - the National Alliance would be in five years, ten, fifteen, and twenty years down the road. It's nice to leave things vague, to leave it swathed in the mists of some nebulous future time... [T]he NA never accomplished anything worthwhile.

So when I read articles like this, about the continued encroachment of our enemies, it makes me sick.

Sorry the informative "sign of the times" article set you off into another of your anonymous rants, Mr. White Nationalist.

Who are you and what is your own plan for reversing White losses? What is your own goal for one year out? Five? 10? 20? You seem to have the answers that no one else has given thought to, even Dr. Pierce, you say. Let's hear your plan.

Our plan is to build the National Alliance. That's what we work at every day. Our goals are spelled out here for those who will read and can comprehend: https://natall.com/about/what-is-the-national-alliance/

We seek out responsible kinsmen who have a positive, can-do attitude. Your negativism is a depressant -- poison -- and tends to demoralize those who hold hope we will make progress in spreading that same hope to many others with our outreach. You are not interested in joining with us in Alliance-building, so unless you can offer something positive, why don't you go elsewhere to complain and spread your defeatist attitude? Please.

[David York]

Minnesota to Destroy Historic Fort Snelling, Building ‘Affordable Housing’ for Welfare Recipients

The state has announced that it is sinking $100 million to rehab the buildings to create 190 section 8 housing units. That is well over $500,000 per housing unit. Since when is a half million dollar home “affordable”?

It will be most likely White People's tax dollars paying for this so the cost is irrelevant to these liberals. They would gladly waste half a billion dollars to show they are not racist. The problem with liberals is that they are self-hating whites. They have taken this racial agenda to such an extreme level to where they hate their own race and try to suck up to non-white races. It's a pretty disgusting sickness.

[David York]

How should it be, one may ask? A serious group should always set important and specific long-range goals - and then either attain them or...explain why they didn't. But no group ever does. No exceptions. And I do mean: no exceptions. If on rare occasion we have in the past, and we failed to meet our goal, we don't discuss why. We simply let the failed goal slip down the memory hole, as if it was never undertaken. That's why we're failing. That's why the National Alliance failed under Gliebe's control. Because no long-term goals were ever set by him, other than maybe publishing some pre-teen girls in skimpy skirts on Resistance Magazine, his tenure became the laughingstock of the Internet and the WN movement. Nor was his failure to set such goals ever spotlighted by his timorous membership. In fact, the same holds true for Pierce's leadership, painful (and anger-inflaming) as that may be to hear. Pierce never stated when he started out: where - no matter what - the National Alliance would be in five years, ten, fifteen, and twenty years down the road. It's nice to leave things vague, to leave it swathed in the mists of some nebulous future time. But after he died, some fresh jerks took over (Walker, Gliebe, and cohorts) and the NA never accomplished anything worthwhile.

It takes time. Like Will said you can't predict the future. The important thing is that we are here and that people can find us when they finally come around to seeing that we are right. Our success depends on the awakening of perceptive minority among us, and that is not an easy task, or one that we can pinpoint on a calendar with precise accuracy. It is a good thing that the National Alliance is back, even though our numbers are low right now, it is important that we are in place for when capable people decide to start listening.

[Will Williams]

It takes time. Like Will said you can't predict the future. The important thing is that we are here and that people can find us when they finally come around to seeing that we are right. Our success depends on the awakening of perceptive minority among us, and that is not an easy task, or one that we can pinpoint on a calendar with precise accuracy. It is a good thing that the National Alliance is back, even though our numbers are low right now, it is important that we are in place for when capable people decide to start listening.

Thanks, Daniel. You get it. I'd rather have 10 cheerful, optimistic associates like you to work with than a thousand AWNs, complaining about failures.

[Benjamin Bice]

How should it be, one may ask? A serious group should always set important and specific long-range goals - and then either attain them or...explain why they didn't. But no group ever does. No exceptions. And I do mean: no exceptions. If on rare occasion we have in the past, and we failed to meet our goal, we don't discuss why. We simply let the failed goal slip down the memory hole, as if it was never undertaken. That's why we're failing. That's why the National Alliance failed under Gliebe's control. Because no long-term goals were ever set by him, other than maybe publishing some pre-teen girls in skimpy skirts on Resistance Magazine, his tenure became the laughingstock of the Internet and the WN movement. Nor was his failure to set such goals ever spotlighted by his timorous membership. In fact, the same holds true for Pierce's leadership, painful (and anger-inflaming) as that may be to hear. Pierce never stated when he started out: where - no matter what - the National Alliance would be in five years, ten, fifteen, and twenty years down the road. It's nice to leave things vague, to leave it swathed in the mists of some nebulous future time. But after he died, some fresh jerks took over (Walker, Gliebe, and cohorts) and the NA never accomplished anything worthwhile.

It takes time. Like Will said you can't predict the future. The important thing is that we are here and that people can find us when they finally come around to seeing that we are right. Our success depends on the awakening of perceptive minority among us, and that is not an easy task, or one that we can pinpoint on a calendar with precise accuracy. It is a good thing that the National Alliance is back, even though our numbers are low right now, it is important that we are in place for when capable people decide to start listening.

What you said- bingo!

[David York]

Thanks, Daniel. You get it. I'd rather have 10 cheerful, optimistic associates like you to work with than a thousand AWNs, complaining about failures.

Thanks Will I appreciate the compliment, and thank you too Benjamin Bice!