It is currently Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:53 pm


Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Summaries and links to news items
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Benjamin Bice

  • Posts: 1144
  • Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

PostWed Nov 16, 2016 2:27 am

Now Merkel Offers Turks Asylum

NOVEMBER 10, 2016 BY TNO STAFF— IN EUROPE

Not satisfied with last year’s massive “asylum” invasion, the Angela Merkel regime has now made an unconditional offer of asylum to all Turks who claim that they have been “persecuted” by Turkey’s government following the failed coup in that country.

The offer is likely to spark off a new wave of hundreds of thousands of nonwhites claiming to be Turks flooding into Germany, just as the “asylum” offer to “Syrians” sparked off a similar invasion in 2015.

Image
Turkish soldiers who took part in the failed coup after their arrest.

According to the Bayern Depesche newspaper in Germany, the government has “announced a generous asylum-grant for Turks who have been exposed to repressive measures by the Turkish authorities since the failed coup of July 15.”

The newspaper added that according to official figures, around 35,000 people were arrested on the orders of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan following the failed coup, and “tens of thousands” of others were released from the state service.

The Federal Foreign Office has now recommended the granting of “political asylum” to all “politicians, journalists, artists, and academics” affected by Erdogan’s crackdown.

It means that anybody who can buy a Turkish passport—and that country has been named as an epicenter of the fake passport manufacturing industry, especially for those claiming to be “Syrians”—can now claim asylum in Germany by saying that they “feel persecuted.”

According to Michael Roth, the Socialist Party of Germany (SPD) Minister of State for Europe at the German Federal Foreign Office, “All critical spirits in Turkey should know that the federal government is in solidarity with them.”

The SPD politician—who is part of Merkel’s ruling coalition—said that “Germany is a cosmopolitan country and is open to all politically persecuted persons. You can apply for asylum in Germany. This is true not only for journalists.

“What is currently happening in Turkey has nothing to do with our understanding of European values, the rule of law, democracy, and media freedom,” Roth said.

His opinion was repeated by Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party chairman of the Bundestag’s Committee on Human Rights and Humanitarian Aid, Michael Brand, who told the media that “As a matter of course political asylum seeks to be granted asylum. This basic right is anchored in our Basic Law for good reason. It would not be responsible to offer up courageous people like Dündar to Erdogan’s guillotine.”

Dündar is editor in chief of the Cumhuriyet newspaper, arrested after his newspaper published footage showing the Turkish state intelligence agency, MIT, sending weapons to ISIS in Syria. He has been sentenced to jail for “leaking secret information of the state.”

The move is likely to further exacerbate tensions between Germany and Turkey, and as a result, hasten the collapse of Merkel’s “EU-Turkey Deal” which was supposed to make Turkey halt the invasion of Europe from its shores.

Merkel’s latest move is therefore likely to reignite the 2015 invasion from Turkey, and add a further dimension to the matter by giving any “Turks” the opportunity to invade Europe as well.

http://newobserveronline.com/now-merkel ... ks-asylum/
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy
Offline

Benjamin Bice

  • Posts: 1144
  • Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

PostWed May 24, 2017 2:32 pm

University Refuses To Recognize ‘Students For Free Thought’

Image


Share it Tweet itDonate
University Refuses To Recognize ‘Students For Free Thought’
Ashley Rae Goldenberg | May 23, 2017 1:32pm ET
23
Shares
FacebookTwitterMore


(Image source: Facebook)
Lawrence University has denied official recognition to the Students for Free Thought student group following reports that a student, who called her peers “white terrorists on training wheels," had been kicked out of an event for being disruptive. While the school won't specify who filed the "bias reports," university officials said they are investigating the incident.
The Lawrentian, Lawrence University’s student publication, reports the Students for Free Thought group on campus hosted a showing of the 2015 film “Can We Take a Joke” on May 17. The day before the event, Kimberly Barrett, the school’s vice president for Diversity and Inclusion and associate dean of the faculty, sent an email encouraging students and community members to view the film and have an “authentic discussion” over the content.
Despite the call for rational discussion, during the screening, a “heated dispute” reportedly took place among the audience members. According to the Lawrentian, one student was asked to leave for being disruptive. Barrett intervened, saying, “We have people with opposing views, let’s talk about what those views might have been, and let’s do it in a way that we’re talking one at a time.”
Attendees at the discussion after the film decried free speech.

University Refuses To Recognize ‘Students For Free Thought’
Ashley Rae Goldenberg | May 23, 2017 1:32pm ET
23
Shares
FacebookTwitterMore


(Image source: Facebook)
Lawrence University has denied official recognition to the Students for Free Thought student group following reports that a student, who called her peers “white terrorists on training wheels," had been kicked out of an event for being disruptive. While the school won't specify who filed the "bias reports," university officials said they are investigating the incident.
The Lawrentian, Lawrence University’s student publication, reports the Students for Free Thought group on campus hosted a showing of the 2015 film “Can We Take a Joke” on May 17. The day before the event, Kimberly Barrett, the school’s vice president for Diversity and Inclusion and associate dean of the faculty, sent an email encouraging students and community members to view the film and have an “authentic discussion” over the content.
Despite the call for rational discussion, during the screening, a “heated dispute” reportedly took place among the audience members. According to the Lawrentian, one student was asked to leave for being disruptive. Barrett intervened, saying, “We have people with opposing views, let’s talk about what those views might have been, and let’s do it in a way that we’re talking one at a time.”
Attendees at the discussion after the film decried free speech.

One student claimed minorities in the United States are not afforded free speech and that it is only a “privilege” for some.
The student was reported as saying, “The idea of the culture of free speech is an incredibly privileged one. The reality of our society and the systemic oppression is that people of color and women of this country aren’t allowed free speech because if they talk a certain way, bad things happen to them.”
Another student, identified as “they,” said, “Free speech exists, yes, however you have to recognize that there has been systematic oppression against certain groups of people. If you want to have these events in the future, you should talk to the people who were being attacked in the movie.”
In a letter to the editor, Sabrina Conteh, the student who was allegedly asked to leave, decried event attendees as white nationalists, white supremacists, and “white terrorists on training wheels.”
According to Conteh, the “sloppy white supremacist propaganda screening” was actually a “hotbed for rape jokes, racial and gender slurs” and propagated by “white terrorists on training wheels.” She accused free speech of supporting “white nationalist rhetoric” and said the head of the organization putting on the talk was a “head white nationalist in charge.”
A day after Conteh’s piece, Lawrence University issued a statement addressing the matter.
According to the statement by Barrett, the school received “several bias incident reports” about the incident between Conteh and the other member of the audience. The statement claims, “Each of these reports will be reviewed and acted upon,” and that the Lawrence University Community Council will take these reports into consideration when determining whether to officially recognize the Students for Free Thought.


Share it Tweet itDonate
University Refuses To Recognize ‘Students For Free Thought’
Ashley Rae Goldenberg | May 23, 2017 1:32pm ET
23
Shares
FacebookTwitterMore


(Image source: Facebook)
Lawrence University has denied official recognition to the Students for Free Thought student group following reports that a student, who called her peers “white terrorists on training wheels," had been kicked out of an event for being disruptive. While the school won't specify who filed the "bias reports," university officials said they are investigating the incident.
The Lawrentian, Lawrence University’s student publication, reports the Students for Free Thought group on campus hosted a showing of the 2015 film “Can We Take a Joke” on May 17. The day before the event, Kimberly Barrett, the school’s vice president for Diversity and Inclusion and associate dean of the faculty, sent an email encouraging students and community members to view the film and have an “authentic discussion” over the content.
Despite the call for rational discussion, during the screening, a “heated dispute” reportedly took place among the audience members. According to the Lawrentian, one student was asked to leave for being disruptive. Barrett intervened, saying, “We have people with opposing views, let’s talk about what those views might have been, and let’s do it in a way that we’re talking one at a time.”
Attendees at the discussion after the film decried free speech.

One student claimed minorities in the United States are not afforded free speech and that it is only a “privilege” for some.
The student was reported as saying, “The idea of the culture of free speech is an incredibly privileged one. The reality of our society and the systemic oppression is that people of color and women of this country aren’t allowed free speech because if they talk a certain way, bad things happen to them.”
Another student, identified as “they,” said, “Free speech exists, yes, however you have to recognize that there has been systematic oppression against certain groups of people. If you want to have these events in the future, you should talk to the people who were being attacked in the movie.”
In a letter to the editor, Sabrina Conteh, the student who was allegedly asked to leave, decried event attendees as white nationalists, white supremacists, and “white terrorists on training wheels.”
According to Conteh, the “sloppy white supremacist propaganda screening” was actually a “hotbed for rape jokes, racial and gender slurs” and propagated by “white terrorists on training wheels.” She accused free speech of supporting “white nationalist rhetoric” and said the head of the organization putting on the talk was a “head white nationalist in charge.”
A day after Conteh’s piece, Lawrence University issued a statement addressing the matter.
According to the statement by Barrett, the school received “several bias incident reports” about the incident between Conteh and the other member of the audience. The statement claims, “Each of these reports will be reviewed and acted upon,” and that the Lawrence University Community Council will take these reports into consideration when determining whether to officially recognize the Students for Free Thought.


WBAY reports the LUCC ultimately decided, shortly after the letter from Barrett, to deny recognition to the Students for Free Thought.
An email from LUCC President Lewis Berger said the group was ultimately denied recognition because the LUCC did not believe it would have a “positive impact on the Lawrence University campus” and would jeopardize the “well-being of our campus at large.”
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2001
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

PostMon Apr 15, 2019 8:29 pm

Wade Hampton III wrote:UN: Whites Owe Negroes $$.$$

UNITED NATIONS, Oct 31 (IPS) - Stressing the enduring relationship between
injuries inflicted by slavery and contemporary injustices, a UN committee
has recently issued a strongly-worded call for reparations for black U.S.
American(s) [Negroes].

http://www.globalissues.org/news/2016/10/31/22605

:roll:

A correspondent asks: I Wonder if they would take confederate dollars. After all I imagine they were bought with confederate money at that time. :lol:

Image
Offline

Jim Mathias

  • Posts: 1030
  • Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:48 pm

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

PostTue Apr 16, 2019 2:16 am

Will Williams wrote:
Wade Hampton III wrote:UN: Whites Owe Negroes $$.$$

UNITED NATIONS, Oct 31 (IPS) - Stressing the enduring relationship between
injuries inflicted by slavery and contemporary injustices, a UN committee
has recently issued a strongly-worded call for reparations for black U.S.
American(s) [Negroes].

http://www.globalissues.org/news/2016/10/31/22605

:roll:

A correspondent asks: I Wonder if they would take confederate dollars. After all I imagine they were bought with confederate money at that time. :lol:

Image
A one-way boat ride to any African country of their choice is the only 'reparation' for those who want to claim injury due to slavery. With the way Jews are ramping up the racial hatred and tearing down all standards and institutions here in an attempt to incite a hot race war, getting out of America now might be a generous deal for Blacks.
Previous

Return to News Items

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron