Russian News

Summaries and links to news items
Old Aardvark
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:23 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Old Aardvark » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:58 am

Thank-you, Wolf, for your thoughts on Belarus and other places in that region to relocate to. I have learned from you that things are not as rosy in Russia as I had thought; even so, the problems there are insignificant compared to the ones that confront whites in the USA. Also, there is a great deal of land in Russia with immense wealth in natural resources. The big problem facing the entire developed world will be depleting energy resources and also depleting mineral resources. Russia would be wise to wall itself off from the rest of the world, with the exception of encouraging white immigrants who can help Russians hold onto their immense territory. I think Russia can be totally self-sufficient for the rest of this century and beyond. During this same period famine and civilizational collapse threatens much of the rest of the world.

Regarding the US, I can understand white people wanting to hold onto as much of it as they can; however, at this time I don't believe average American whites are anywhere near tough enough and ruthless enough to wage such a struggle. Young whites especially are not prepared for what lies ahead. Jews and liberals are importing hundreds of thousands of the lowest grades of non-whites into areas that had until 20 years ago been almost entirely white. These aliens will have to be removed from these areas one way or another. There are few places left in the US for whites to flee to that are still overwhelmingly white. 25 years ago racially aware white Americans debated whether to fight for the entire continent or to relocate to the American Northwest. Now perhaps the better long-term strategy would be to move to the Russian Northwest. I would even consider the far eastern parts of Siberia. Kamchatka is two-thirds the size of California and has only about 350,000 people, according to Wikipedia almost entirely Russian. California has 40 million people, majority non-white. Kamachatka looks to be as beautiful as California. Temperatures in the southern part of the peninsula are not that cold. If one looks at how rapidly whites developed California in just one hundred years, from 1850 to 1950, the same thing could be done to Kamchatka in less time with modern technology.

Why waste trillions of dollars trying to send white people to Mars when there are places like Kamchatka that are virtually empty?

Oh, and you mention Ukrainians being more violent than Belarussians. Ukraine has produced a number of world-champion boxers in recent years, especially in the heavyweight division. You also see them well represented in mixed martial arts.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Will Williams » Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:13 pm

Old Aardvark wrote:
Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:58 am
I think Russia can be totally self-sufficient for the rest of this century and beyond. During this same period famine and civilizational collapse threatens much of the rest of the world.

Regarding the US, I can understand white people wanting to hold onto as much of it as they can; however, at this time I don't believe average American whites are anywhere near tough enough and ruthless enough to wage such a struggle. Young whites especially are not prepared for what lies ahead. Jews and liberals are importing hundreds of thousands of the lowest grades of non-whites into areas that had until 20 years ago been almost entirely white. These aliens will have to be removed from these areas one way or another. There are few places left in the US for whites to flee to that are still overwhelmingly white. 25 years ago racially aware white Americans debated whether to fight for the entire continent or to relocate to the American Northwest. Now perhaps the better long-term strategy would be to move to the Russian Northwest. I would even consider the far eastern parts of Siberia. Kamchatka is two-thirds the size of California and has only about 350,000 people, according to Wikipedia almost entirely Russian. California has 40 million people, majority non-white. Kamachatka looks to be as beautiful as California. Temperatures in the southern part of the peninsula are not that cold. If one looks at how rapidly whites developed California in just one hundred years, from 1850 to 1950, the same thing could be done to Kamchatka in less time with modern technology.

Why waste trillions of dollars trying to send white people to Mars when there are places like Kamchatka that are virtually empty?..
I've enjoyed this dialog. Wolf has educated us otherwise ignorant Americans about true history and racial realities on his side of planet Earth -- the only place White people have ever lived and where we, along with Russians and other Whites, must make our stand against exploding, and ever intrusive non-White populations.

I'll make my stand here in nearly all-White Upper East Tennessee, not in remote, cold Kamachatka. Read more about Kamchats here: https://kamchatkaland.com/note/native-peoples-kamchatka

Image
Brrrr!

Don't lose sight of alarming exploding population facts and the implications for our race that I just posted here at WB. This is arguably our planet's most pressing problem, properly formatted here, in Overpopulation: Too Damned Many Humans: viewtopic.php?f=60&t=1099&p=20175#p20175


Facts About Overpopulation in Africa:

The population of Africa was 177 million in 1950, and it grew 7.6 times to more than 1.341 billion in 2020.

The current population of Africa is 1,375,155,748 as of Sunday, August 1, 2021, based on the latest United Nations estimates. Source: https://www.worldometers.info/world-pop ... opulation/

The increase in Africa's population is explosive, with a population under the age of 14 in the exponential growth phase

By 2050 Africa’s population is predicted to double. With so many countries having such a high birth rate, the populations of African countries are rising very quickly.

Africa’s current population of more than 1.1 billion is expected to exceed 2 billion in the next 30 years. The population is growing at a rate faster than any other continent.

By 2100, five of the top 10 most populous countries will be in Africa. Currently, Nigeria is the only country in Africa with a population in the top 10. Its population is expected to grow by another 527 million people by that time. With African countries growing at such fast rates, it is estimated that by 2100 the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Tanzania and Egypt will join Nigeria in the top 10.

Africa holds 27 out of 30 of the countries with the highest birth rates. An overwhelming majority of the countries with the highest birth rates reside in Africa. Niger, Angola and Mali all have an average of around six births per woman. These rates are much higher than in developed nations. To compare, the U.S. has a birth rate of 1.88. Other developing countries such as Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have birth rates around 2.1.

Seventy percent of Africans are under 30 years old. The African population is the youngest in the world.
---

Flash! Considering the current insane open borders policies of the U.S., some European nations and other traditionally White nations, the exploding expansion of this Black population into new habitats will naturally supplant and replace the Whites in their own homelands unless the trend is reversed.

It's Nature's way. Mother Nature cares not how smart, how pretty, how inventive Her various subspecies are -- only which are still standing in the end after struggles among them for territory, resources and survival!

User avatar
Wolf Stoner
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Wolf Stoner » Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:49 am

Reply to Old Aardvark

I concur with your line of thought.
But I have some reservations about territories east of Ural Mountains. Siberia and Far East are very good places in terms of mineral resources, fresh water and forests. The southern parts of Siberia are very fertile for agriculture. But the main problem is the Chinese factor. Chinese are sure to invade those lands at some point in history. It is not a question of malicious intents but of sheer necessity. The Chinese 1.5 billion needs to be supplied with food and mineral resources and the only way to provide them is to acquire new lands where those resources are still available. In 1941 when Japanese General Staff considered two options of the war (invading Soviet Russia or striking USA), Siberia was considered too wild and inhospitable and the southern option seemed much more attractive. But now, when China is placed in similar circumstances, the southern option is all too difficult. The countries to the south of China are too overpopulated and can render too much resistance in case of Chinese invasion. On the contrary, the northern option (invading Siberia) presents perfect solution. The only obstacle at present is the nuclear potential of Russian Federation. But in case of any internal troubles in Russia, when the state cease to function properly, China is sure to take opportunity and to occupy substantial parts of Siberia (as much as they possibly can) like Russia did with Crimea in 2014. Russian military (except of nuclear arsenal) is too weak to resist Chinese invasion.

Proceeding from this assumption, I discard Siberia as a place for long-term settlement for White People. But things could change unexpectedly overnight. If China loses its might due to some events and ceases to be the major factor in the region and Siberia remains unclaimed, then, it is really the best option for White Race to settle there.

We need to focus on places that are unattractive to non-white crowds. The White People are able to survive almost in any climatic conditions. The main prerequisite is that they should be isolated from outside interference. In this regard I would like to note a very interesting fact from history. The Soviet power liked to solve its problems by resettling undesirable groups of people into the most inhospitable areas of the country. In the period of enforced collectivization of peasantry in 1927-1933, great numbers of the so called “kulaks” (the most able and thrifty peasants) were resettled into northern territories (sometimes close to Polar circle). These people (mainly Russians and Ukrainians) were loaded into train cargo cars, driven to the river ports of the rivers flowing to the north (Ob, Yenisei, Pechora, Lena), reloaded onto barges and transported northward along those rivers. After reaching some uninhabited areas, those people were taken ashore without giving them any means to live there. Most of them died but some were able to survive. They created settlements from nothing and after only few years were able not only to sustain themselves but to produce in excess of their own needs. The Soviet power, certainly, took notice of this success and exploited those “enemies of the people” to the most, taking away from them most of their products. But even this didn’t impede those peasants to become relatively well-off and again to fall under this obnoxious designation of “kulaks”. Many of those people had been again persecuted for being “kulaks” and confiscated their property.

Almost all well-known Soviet northernmost settlements, towns and even cities were created by those hapless “enemies of the people”, who happened to be the most productive members of society. Norilsk, Dudinka, Igarka, Tiksi are the most well-known of those settlements. Norilsk is the city of 200 thousand people and located at 69⁰ Northern Latitude. It is an absolute record; there is no other city on the planet that is located so far north (except of Murmansk, which is too on this latitude but there is milder climate). And all this had become possible only due to the work of White People who were exiled in there by the Soviet system.

These examples show us that White People can survive almost in any adverse circumstances. The main condition being is to be left alone.

Alaska and northern Canada could become the main refuge for White People in case of their wholesale genocide in USA. At present this genocide seems unlikely, but taken into account current demographic trends, it is not only possible but inevitable after 2050.

Therefore, considering those long-term trends, we should identify the best places for eventual resettlement and to do some preparatory work in this regard. And the most important part of this work is not even the actually resettling in there but to become accustomed to living in isolated conditions and with least reliance on the outside world. In this regard I like approach of the survivalist pastor Joe Fox (vikingpreparednes youtube channel). The only negative thing about him is his Christianity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1f9gbL8aBM&pp=sAQA

Having adopted to independent living, we can easily move into more inhospitable places if need arises. The key factor is to be self-sustainable. Therefore, at present it is not especially important where to settle. It can be any place answering the main condition of being detached from decadent society.

User avatar
Wolf Stoner
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Wolf Stoner » Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:25 am

Reply to Will Williams

Yes, the overpopulation is the key problem. Actually, it was the underlying cause of both World Wars. Even back then there were not enough resources to provide European population with. Britain and Germany were too dependent on external sources, which was the main objective cause of their conflict. And those were the times when world population was about 1.5 billion before WW1 and 2.5 before WW2.

But now, when we rapidly approach the 8 billion mark, all those problems increased manyfold. It is not a four-time increase (from 2 to 8 billion), because such matters are non-linear. The doubling of population increases all sorts of problems, maybe four times or sixteen times. Therefore, quadrupling of world population in 80 years’ time had increased global problems to the extent of their insolvability. It is impossible to sustain such a great number for a long-term period. It is insolvable even without considering the factor of ever-increasing expectations for living standards (each generation hopes to live materially better than their parents). Our planet is on the path of assured self-destruction.

Everyone understands this dire situation (except of mainstream pop-corn munching cattle). The globalist rulers too understand this problem and want to solve it according to their insane vision. The whole global vaccination campaign is probably the part of their solution. But whatever they attempt is destined to failure, because based on false assumptions. They try to deny the obvious reality of fundamental differences between races and all implications of this key civilizational factor. They try to build a society where majority would be the non-whites. But this is misnomer. Either there is an organized civilized society or non-white majority; it is impossible to have both at the same time. Driving the modern world toward the “multicultural” and multiracial global society, the insane rulers by their own hands destroy their main source of power, which is the White homogeneous society. The only possible long-term outcome of these policies is a downfall of White society and slide into global chaos.

There are two ways to solve overpopulation: 1) the organized way of birthrates reduction among non-white peoples; 2) the natural way, when the ensuing chaos itself reduces global population to the normal level.

The first way would be preferable and would be accomplished in case NS Germany won. It would preserve civilization and assure its long-term survival and development. But this way is impossible in the current circumstances. The non-white masses would never voluntarily reduce their birth levels. They wouldn’t be able even if wanted; their beast-like mentality excludes any conscious self-control above instinctive impulses.

Therefore, the only remaining option is the Natural Solution, which will be much harsher than anything a man could conceive. After inevitable collapse of the modern society, the whole overcomplicated system of food production and delivery would collapse too, plunging billions of people into hunger. The ensuing social chaos would even more reduce sources of food; cannibalism would become the new normal, especially in places where Africans are numerous.

Under such circumstances all traditional moral restraints would be lost and the most atrocious wars would start all over the globe. All centuries-long grievances would surface and find the most bloody expressions.

We can even surmise the Natural level to which global population would decrease. The number of people that lived on the planet before industrial revolution is the quantity that could be supported through natural way, without resort to various artificial means, such as chemical fertilizers and GMO. The 1 billion mark was passed at the beginning of 19th century. Probably, it is the maximum that this planet can sustain indefinitely. Everything above this number is sure to undermine this sustainability.

But I doubt that the fall in global population number would stop at this point. This number made sense for the planet as it was back then. Now, it is much more depleted and polluted. And humans are much weaker, both in physical and mental terms. Therefore, when civilization collapses, in a few decades time the global population is going to decrease to something between 0.5 and 1 billion. And I suppose that it is an acceptable level. And the structure of this number should be such as to prevent any future demographic explosions, threatening the very existence of intelligent life on this planet. Therefore, all bipedal creatures whose genetic composition excludes the ability of self-control, should be removed from any future society.

The possibility to have a posterity isn’t a right for everyone but an honorable privilege given to worthy members of community. An organized community must have the final say about who is to have this right and who is not. There is no other way to safeguard civilization. Those who are not able to live according to high standards of White Civilization should be resettled into wilderness where their existence will be governed exclusively by natural laws of survival. There, the levels of any animal populations are balanced by natural factors, which prevent any long-term explosion of numbers of any species.

Therefore, the eventual separation of humans with high mentality from those of lowly mentality is inevitable. And the coming chaos would accomplish this separation in the most uncompromising way and in shortest time (on historical scale).

There was an alternative presented by NS Germany. The same goal could be reached through much milder ways, but this offer was rejected by majority of other countries. Therefore, the toughest and bloodiest path to this final goal is to be imposed by Nature itself.

Old Aardvark
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:23 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Old Aardvark » Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:55 am

This is a reply to Wolf and to Will. I believe I saw in some population projections by 2050 (you may have posted them, Will) that China is projected to have slightly fewer people in 2050 than they now have. India will move from second place behind China to well ahead of it by mid-century. With this in mind there may not need to be a Chinese invasion of Siberia. Russia is happily supplying China with energy and minerals now, and food, too. I guess the Chinese trade consumer goods to Russia in exchange for raw materials and commodities.

Also, there are only two civilized peoples on the planet: whites and East Asians. These are the only two races who have ever created advanced civilizations. Also, these are the only two races who have a sense about limiting their own populations. I believe all of the East Asian nations have declining birthrates, certainly Japan and Korea. Perhaps China, too. I don't see why two civilized races cannot work out a plan to share the planet. And btw, the problem is not the East Asians. It is the brainwashed whites -- especially the Christians -- who want to win "crowns in heaven" by bringing Jesus and all the white man's wealth and technology to uncivilized peoples who could never create these things themselves. East Asians revere their ancestors and are highly race conscious. They do not try to "save" niggers and Mexicans and other sub-humans. For that reason I believe East Asians are a lock on holding onto all territory they now occupy. But I believe that once things begin falling apart and the killing begins, white people will wake up or perish. I think whites will explode into racial radicalism.

Here is another prediction. Life in the US, Canada, Britain and Australia as well as Western Europe is becoming so bad that I believe intelligent and sensitive whites will be drawn to National Socialism. When you look at the existing video clips of life in NS Germany before the war, you see strength, order and security -- all the vital things that are disappearing in the West. There is also purpose in the NS way of life. Every white person alive right now sees NO PURPOSE in life as it now is in the United States. This is why white birthrates are cratering.

Old Aardvark
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:23 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Old Aardvark » Thu Aug 05, 2021 3:11 am

Reply to Wolf Stoner: Thank-you for taking the time to write another informative post about Russian/Soviet history. I learned a lot, and I appreciate the time you spend on these replies. The history you offer about political undesirables being dumped in the wilderness of the far north was amazing. This is much how the American continent was slowly conquered from the natives and turned into a great nation. But American settlers usually did have firearms, an axe or two and a few other basic hand tools.

I believe Alaska is colder than Kamtchatka. A lot of whites live in Alaska now. The natives do not fare well once civilization arrives. They get soft. Just as there was going to be no giving Native Americans vast expanses of the best lands in North America, I think the same thing will eventually happen in Kamchatka.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Will Williams » Fri Aug 06, 2021 10:28 am

Old Aardvark wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:55 am
This is a reply to Wolf and to Will. I believe I saw in some population projections by 2050 (you may have posted them, Will) that China is projected to have slightly fewer people in 2050 than they now have. India will move from second place behind China to well ahead of it by mid-century...
Yes, OA, China's population is projected to slow somewhat. I don't know about India. What I posted were alarming statistics about projected African fecundity in the 21st century, and the effect that will have on traditional White habitats on this planet if not checked and reversed. I posted that to NV, here: https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/07/spiritual-race/ What I posted there a couple of days ago got no further commentary and will soon scroll off and be buried, so I'll repost that here, off topic under "Russian News," then cross post to where it is a better fit, under "Overpopulation: too damned many humans.":
---

Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman

Reply to Jim
4 August, 2021 11:09 am
Jim: The Orange Sticker only tells the result, but not the CAUSE of the problem. The sticker should read something like ABOLISH JEWISH GENOCIDE OF THE WHITE RACE or it must contain just W H O and W H A T is the cause of white Genocide...


TMI, Jim (Too Much Information).

The Orange Sticker is meant to quickly grab the attention of Whites who see it with that alarming truth, not try to explain how it happened. Those who then go to our Websites, or who send the $3 for more information, will not only get an understanding of what’s behind that simply stated truth but the solution in the booklet we’ll send them, or they can read it for free, here: https://natall.com/about/what-is-the-national-alliance/

Image

Do those lying enemies of the endangered White race (subspecies) explain their lie in that billboard? South African author Dan Roodt counters their lie with facts in his essay “The African Planet”:

“Thanks to Western healthcare, food, aid and technology, infant death rates have declined dramatically in Africa. The result is that Africans are proliferating. A population that was 200 million in 1950 is already over a billion. It is expected to be over 4 billion by 2100. Almost half of the population of the world will be African by the end of this century.

“Already unable to sustain a billion people, Africans will be increasingly desperate to make it to White and other non-Black nations. This could mean a Camp of the Saints scenario for the end of the White world. In other words, a declining White population simply overwhelmed by masses of poor Africans. This is what is happening in his own nation of South Africa.” Source: the July/August 2021 issue of Heritage and Destiny magazine, in its review of New Century Books’ 2020 A Dissident’s Guide to Blacks And Africa (that contains Roodt’s essay).

Knowing the facts, ask yourself which race is most endangered, Black or White? Then ask yourself how can the White race guard against its extinction? The Orange Sticker leads one to the answer of that second question. https://natall.com/join-us/
---

You would think Whites would see the urgent implications and be joining our Alliance in droves once they see we are the one organization working hardest to preserve and advance their race. Unfortunately, that is not the case. They accept what the environmentalists call habitat succession: that our race will be replaced in its habitats WIHOUT A FIGHT, by competing subspecies (races).

Mother Nature is not impressed with those of her creatures who violate Her Highest Law and will not fight for their continued existence and advancement. Let them be replaced by those who will, She says.

---

User avatar
Wolf Stoner
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Wolf Stoner » Mon Aug 16, 2021 9:35 am

Commentary under the NV article "Afghanistan: The Greater of Two Evils Has Fallen" by Thomas Cole
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/08/af ... as-fallen/

In the last month I was somewhat detached from world events having too many small things to do. Therefore, the events in Afghanistan have somehow slipped my attention. But today in the morning I have occasionally heard from other people that Taliban have entered Kabul. This news struck me as something very special and significant. Afghanistan was some kind of a showcase of the “war on terror” (the globalist attempt to impose its will on the whole world). It means that failure to hold on in Afghanistan signifies the unraveling of the whole globalist scheme. And this fact is very inspiring.

The following thought struck me: “we need our own Russian Taliban-like nationalist movement”. The main truth is that it is impossible to succeed in the existential struggle if you don’t adopt the most radical and uncompromising ideas. Some kind of unconcerned, all-accepting soft-flesh liberal can’t succeed. Nitzsche had caught perfectly the essence of this truth in his parable about coal and diamond.

“For all creators are hard. And it must seem blessedness to you to impress your hand on millennia as on wax.
Blessedness to write on the will of millennia as on bronze - harder than bronze, nobler than bronze. Only the noblest is altogether hard.
This new tablet, O my brothers, I place over you: Become hard!”

Later in this day I have read this wonderful article on NV. It is amazing to what extent it resonates with my vision of these events. It proves that politics and history are subject to precise mathematical logic and, having the same input data, you come to the same answer (provided that you are equipped with the right mental program), even if expressed in different forms.

The main conclusion is that we can wait out any enemy. But the main condition for success of this long-term struggle is to preserve our own identity, our set of fundamental values and to create our own ethnic/racial space. The primary factor is not the size of this community but its quality. Even if at present there are very few from among mainstream people who accept our vision, in the time of social collapse there will be no alternative except of following ethnic/racial groups. When everything comes down, the only thing that remains is one’s own biological identity. It is the most powerful and decisive factor in Universe.

Thomas Cole has found the best way to express the essence of the events happening in Afghanistan. Usually, there are shortcomings in any article (even in the best ones); but in this case I agree with all turns of his thoughts. It is the best analysis from among all analytical papers that were written by multiple thinktanks and in media on this topic. I have followed the events in Afghanistan since 1995, when Taliban tried to take Kabul for the first time, and I have read countless number of magazine and newspaper articles about those events. The invasion of 2001 I monitored too, emotionally being always on the Taliban side (not because I like them, but because they fought forces of globalism). And each military setback of American-led coalition I perceived as my own victory. The worse for US military machine the better for all of us. I am especially glad that there are wise people in America who understand the deep essence of these events, instead of following the stupid conservative “support of our flag” fashion. We, the White People, have nothing to do with all those insane wars of US administrations. The same is applicable to all other White countries. Currently, we have anti-White state structures in all White countries (with different degrees of hostility); therefore, it is not in our interests to support any of their efforts, especially military ones. Everything that they do goes against our interests; therefore, it is natural for us to wish their failure.

As I said, politics is the science that is subject to precise mathematical interrelations. These laws can’t be “bad” or “good”. They are objective and applicable for all. You either follow them or fail.

The idea of wishing military defeat of your own country belongs primarily for Lenin. He was the one who expressed it absolutely openly and unambiguously. And this mindset proved to be very effective. In present circumstances we are in the situation when the existing state structure is so hostile to us that we can’t wish for it nothing except of total destruction. And in this existential struggle we should not be averse to use practical experience of either Islamists or Bolsheviks. What matters is the final result; an excessive squeamishness about employed methods would be very unproductive. Good methods are those which are effective. Effectiveness is the only measuring scale of “good” and “bad”.

Two books about Soviet-Afghan war that I advise everyone interested in this matter to read:
https://www.amazon.com/Other-Side-Mount ... 41-4121204
https://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Afghan-Wa ... 121204-937

ZNULL
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 12:42 am

Russian and USA the same problems

Post by ZNULL » Wed Sep 29, 2021 4:15 am

Who wants to know about the situation with migration in Russia There is a website https://etnocrime.info/ you can use a translator to read it. lately, nomadic animals literally kill Russia. Caucasians Asians arrange the second great yoke in Russia. The situation is no better What is happening now in America. Migrants are aggressive stupid do not spare anyone, neither small nor old. The population is passive and supports Putin who brings tons of mobs.

User avatar
Wolf Stoner
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Russian and USA the same problems

Post by Wolf Stoner » Thu Sep 30, 2021 2:37 am

ZNULL wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 4:15 am
Who wants to know about the situation with migration in Russia There is a website https://etnocrime.info/ you can use a translator to read it. lately, nomadic animals literally kill Russia. Caucasians Asians arrange the second great yoke in Russia. The situation is no better What is happening now in America. Migrants are aggressive stupid do not spare anyone, neither small nor old. The population is passive and supports Putin who brings tons of mobs.
Yes, you are absolutely right. In the period of 8 months of this year the Russian citizenship was granted to 486 thousand migrants (mainly Asians). Kremlin continues its anti-Russian ethnic replacement policy inherited from Soviet past. But it is a mistake to think that all Russians love Putin and United Russia ruling party. Far from it. The level of hatred toward the system is constantly growing. The last Parliamentary elections were fraudulent more than ever before. The level of actual support of United Russia party is far less than the official results of almost 50% of the votes. Actually, there are not more than 20% who could have really voted for Putin’s party. These are mainly people who immediately benefit from the system (law-enforcement agencies, military, state officials and members of their families). All other categories of people in Russia have no reason to support Kremlin’s political line. But the discontent is harshly suppressed by the system. People are jailed for saying or writing something that the system dislikes. The silent majority is fearful to express any discontent. But despite of this seeming social tranquility and political apathy, tension is growing. At some point this kettle is bound to explode.

Post Reply