Russian News [OLD POSTS]

Summaries and links to news items
User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Thu Nov 14, 2013 6:14 pm

Vladimir Putin calls on Russian families to have three children

President Vladimir Putin has urged Russians to have at least three children as he said a resurgent nation should be a confident and “influential” power on the world stage.

Russia's President Vladimir Putin Photo: AP
By Tom Parfitt, Moscow
12 Dec 2012

Vladimir Putin earlier this month rejected an offer from Barack Obama for landmark bilateral talks at the White House, the Kremlin has claimed.

In a bullish state-of-the-nation address in Moscow on Wednesday, Mr Putin promised to smite corruption, create millions of new jobs and boost Russia’s military might while warning that foreign meddling in the country’s internal affairs was unacceptable.

He claimed the country shared universal democratic values, adding: “Russian democracy is the power of the Russian people with their own traditions of national self-government, and not the realisation of standards foisted on us from outside.”

In characteristic rhetoric, Mr Putin also addressed internal as well as external enemies while suggesting a link between the two, saying that “chinovniki” (state officials) — often seen as corrupt caste bent on self-enrichment — should be prevented from keeping their money abroad.

“What trust can there be in a ‘chinovnik’ or a politician who says big things about the welfare of Russia while trying to take his means, his money abroad?” he asked MPs and senior officials. “I ask you to support legislation to limit the rights of state officials and politicians to foreign bank accounts and shares.”

He added: “Direct or indirect external interference in our internal political processes is unacceptable. Any person who receives money from abroad for his or her political activity and by doing so serves alien national interests, cannot be a politician in Russia.”

The president’s remarks came after a controversial law was recently introduced obliging non-governmental organisations (NGOs) involved in “political activity” to call themselves “foreign agents” if they receive funding from abroad. NGOs have said the rule makes them look like spies.

Also in his speech, Mr Putin lauded recent measures to give cash payments and other benefits to mothers having a second child. Current birth rates show an average of 1.7 children are born to each Russian woman, but the president urged a huge leap in family-building.

New payments for those having a third child would begin next year, he said. “Demographers affirm that choosing to have a second child is already a potential choice in favour of a third,” he added. “It’s important that families make that step... I am convinced that the norm in Russia should become a family with three children.”


To achieve that goal, he said, women needed to be provided with the opportunity to continue work, so that they “did not fear that having a second and third child would close the path to a career”.

Mr Putin has long equated Russia’s demographic decline over recent decades with a potential threat to security. On Wednesday, he added: “In order for Russia to be a strong and sovereign country, there must be more of us and we must be better in morality, in our competences, our work and our creativity.”

To applause, the president said there were already signs that Russia’s long term demographic decline was reversing, and the population had grown by 200,000 in the first nine months of this year. “The birth rate is at last above the mortality rate,” he said.

A 2010 census put the total population of Russia at 143,000,000.

Announcing a raft of other social and economic measures, Mr Putin said he hoped to create 25m jobs by 2020.

He made sweeping promises to develop industry, including aircraft and shipbuilding, and said the country’s military and space sectors must be modernised. “Our military might is the guarantor of Russia’s security and independence,” he said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ldren.html
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:18 pm

Shades of Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin...
---

http://rt.com/politics/communist-christ ... ganov-084/

Unorthodox Communists? 1/3 of Party members are Christians

November 01, 2013

The head of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) called the Soviet authorities’ opposition to religion a grave mistake, despite admitting that materialism remains the party’s official ideology.

“One of the principle mistakes of my predecessors was quarreling with the Russian Orthodox Church. This was categorically not a thing they should have done. They should have combined their efforts and moved forward,” Zyuganov told reporters between the sessions of the World Russian People’s Council – an international forum chaired by the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill.

The row Zyuganov referred to is most likely a decisively anti-clerical and anti-religious drive maintained by the Bolshevik government throughout the 1920s and ’30s. The measures were supported by a large share of population and ranged from state-run aggressive atheist magazines to confiscation of state property, demolition of churches and sometimes direct attacks and criminal prosecution of the clergy.

At the same time, Zyuganov described as positive the change of the Soviet authorities’ attitude towards the Church after the start of WWII.

“They restored the patriarch, reopened many religious academies, the publishing activities and many more things. And they should have further strengthened these values,” Zyuganov noted.

He said the existing Communist Party of the Russian Federation had no official requirements for its members to be atheists or pursue atheist propaganda.

“About one third of the party are believers and the party treats believers with great respect. The freedom of conscience is guaranteed, even though we incline towards the materialist worldview and are actively preaching our ideas and goals,” Zyuganov announced.

The KPRF was formed in 1993 as an heir to the almighty Communist Party of the Soviet Union and maintains the transition to socialism and communism as its principal goal.

However, the latest version of the party’s program emphasizes the protection of workers’ rights and anti-globalism. In the mid-2000s the Communists also embraced religious ideas and in the 2010s long-time leader Gennady Zyuganov made several public announcements claiming that justice, equality and fraternity were Christian values that were very close to the Communist ideology.

Mass media also showed Zyuganov and other party leaders attending church services, especially on major holidays.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:32 pm

http://rt.com/politics/navalny-winner-u ... party-885/

Navalny elected chairman of unregistered party
Published time: November 18, 2013

Image

Anti-corruption activist Aleksey Navalny has won the poll by a landslide. Eighty-eight people voted for him, with the closest rival claiming just 12 votes.

The unregistered party People’s Alliance elected its chairman on Sunday. 103 participants of the convention voted and most of them supported the lawyer and popular anti-corruption blogger who inspired the party’s foundation about one year ago.

After the ballot, Navalny expressed hope that under his lead the party would get at least 10 percent of the vote at the regional municipal elections, and in future federal parliamentary polls. The activist said he planned to base his work on anti-corruption projects and on “fair distribution of power and budgets” between the federal center and regions.

The party was founded in December 2012 by several Navalny allies - the head of the Foundation for Fighting Corruption Vladimir Ashurkov, coordinator of the independent elections monitoring project Rosvybory, Georgy Alburov, and regional politician Leonid Volkov, who later worked as the head of Navalny’s HQ at September’s Moscow mayoral elections.

Navalny himself initially voiced support for the project, but refused to become the party’s leader or even to join it, claiming that his ultimate objective was to become the President of the Russian Federation and the law requires that the person on this post must be non-partisan.

After the Moscow mayoral elections, in which Navalny performed with unexpected success and lost only to the incumbent city head, he changed his mind.

“I will join it, there is no doubt about it. If they elect me I would lead the People’s Alliance and I think that this party is the closest to me,” the activist told the Echo of Moscow radio in September. Navalny also slightly changed his theory on why he had not joined the party earlier, claiming it was because he was sure that this step would make registration absolutely impossible.

The People’s Alliance is currently facing problems with registration as in May the already existing group ‘Alliance of the Greens – People’s Party’ complained that the People’s Alliance was using the words from their official name. Russian law forbids a political party from using other parties’ names, even in part, and the Greens threatened to sue the Justice Ministry if the registration procedure continued.

The ministry ordered to temporarily suspend registration of the People’s Alliance and the legal procedures linger to this moment. In his Sunday speech Navalny himself noted that it would be difficult for the authorities to refuse to register the party that received every third vote in the mayoral poll in the capital.

It should be noted that during the Moscow poll the activist ran on the ticket from a different party (Russian Republican Party – Party of People’s Freedom).

Also, shortly before the Moscow elections Navalny was sentenced to five years in prison for graft committed when he worked as an aide to the governor of the provincial city of Kirov. He was still allowed to run as the sentence could only come in force after hearings on appeals. After the elections the upper instance court ruled on the appeal and ordered that the sentence should be suspended.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:21 am

Russia backs Palestine

If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:35 am

Demands to disarm Israeli nukes to grow: George Galloway

Press TV has conducted an interview with George Galloway, a member of the British parliament, in London about the a recent initiative by British lawmakers demanding that Israel come clean on its nuclear weapons program.
Wed Nov 27, 2013

The following is an approximate transcript of the interview.

Press TV: I believe you were one of the MPs who raised the issue of Israel’s weapons and the concerns about them. What kind of response did you and those who were making similar calls get?

Galloway: As always there is a double standard employed. The whole regime of sanctions, which have caused so much pain in Iran, were imposed because of the fear that Iran might one day make a nuclear weapon.

Israel, as you’ve just said, has hundreds of nuclear weapons. Not only is it not sanctioned, it is endlessly rewarded with more arms and more money and more diplomatic and political support.

So although the British government has improved on its attitude towards the Islamic Republic, we are still some way off from forcing the British government to move on this relationship with the Zionist state.

Press TV: A lot of people were suggesting that this nuclear deal now between Iran and the six powers is going to bring Israel’s nuclear weapons program to the fore now and make it more visible that it is the party that hasn’t signed the NPT; it is the only entity with nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

Do you think these issues are going to come up now with concerns about Iran’s nuclear energy program being allayed?

Galloway: I do think so. Some of us have been making this point for more than 30 years since Mordecai Vanunu told us about Israel’s’ nuclear weapons - he, having worked in the nuclear weapons plant at Dimona in the Negev in occupied Palestine.

But you are right. Now that there has been all this hullabaloo about Iran nuclear questions, it unveils all over again the grotesque truth that the country, which talks most about Iran’s nuclear question, is the country which is illegally holding hundreds of nuclear weapons, which have never been inspected, which are subject to no treaty.

And Israel refuses even to confirm that which we all know to be true that it is a nuclear weapons power. So the demand will grow for a nuclear weapons-free Middle East and that requires the destruction of Israel’s nuclear weapons armory.

Press TV: How big of a threat do you see Israel’s nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons program because some people who are supporting Israel’s position are saying Israel shouldn’t be seen as a nuclear threat in the region and it hasn’t threatened anyone with the use of nuclear weapons?

Galloway: It hasn’t threatened anyone with the use of nuclear weapons because it lies about the fact that it has them. But its military power is underpinned by this nuclear weapons status.

However, I must tell you that nuclear weapons are useless against a people who refuse to be intimidated by them. If the Iranian people had been frightened or intimidated by Israel’s nuclear weapons, they would have surrendered all their rights. But they have refused to surrender their rights because they are not afraid of Israel however many nuclear weapons she has.

So, nuclear weapons are the nearest thing to a complete waste of money that is possible to imagine because you can never use them. If Israel were to use them for example against an Arab country or against Iran, God forbid of course, the winds would blow and people in all the surrounding countries would be affected for centuries to come.

So, you can’t use these weapons and all they are is an intimidator and bullying threat.

But if people like the Palestinians - and the Iranians for that matter - refuse to be intimidated; refuse to be bullied, well, these weapons are next to useless.

SC/HJL

View video of interview with MP George Galloway, here: http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/11/2 ... l-to-grow/
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:27 am

Elton John's tour of Russia on verge of collapse after singer makes 50 pages of demands and pledges to show solidarity with persecuted gay community
Promoting homosexuality is an offence in several Russian regions
Sir Elton is due to perform in Moscow and Kazan on Friday and Saturday
The singer has said in the past that he wants to perform in Russia and support the gay community
His list of requests - a rider - reportedly includes his hotel room being filled with decorative live birds and trees

By TED THORNHILL
2 December 2013

Elton John is due to perform in Russia this Friday and Saturday – but the concerts could be called off by local officials if they believe his performances will break their ‘gay propaganda’ laws.
Despite Sir Elton being one of the most famous performers in the world, having sold more than 250 million records worldwide, if officials suspect he’s going to use his appearances to rail against Russia’s new rulings, they will pull the plug, according to The Times.
Quoting Russian paper Your Day, it reports that preparations for the concerts – in Moscow's Crocus City Hall and Kazan - have already been a considerable expense.

Elton John is due to perform in Russia this Friday and Saturday – but the concerts could be called off by local officials if they believe his performances will break their ‘gay propaganda’ laws.
Despite Sir Elton being one of the most famous performers in the world, having sold more than 250 million records worldwide, if officials suspect he’s going to use his appearances to rail against Russia’s new rulings, they will pull the plug, according to The Times.
Quoting Russian paper Your Day, it reports that preparations for the concerts – in Moscow's Crocus City Hall and Kazan - have already been a considerable expense.

The rider – a list of requests – apparently runs to 50 pages and includes his hotel dressing room in Moscow being turned into a ‘paradise garden’ populated by ‘decorative birds’ and trees.

Image
Sir Elton John lives with his partner David Furnish (right)

Sir Elton, who reminisced in an interview in September about having sex on a Moscow rooftop with a translator during his 1979 Soviet Union tour, said he wanted to perform in Russia to support the gay community.
'As a gay man, I can't leave those people on their own without going over there and supporting them. I don't know what's going to happen, but I've got to go,' he said in the interview.
One of the world's most prominent gay celebrities, he lives with his partner David Furnish, with whom he is in a civil union, and they are bringing up two children together.
He has campaigned for gay rights in Britain and in Ukraine where he was denied the right in 2009 to adopt a child because of his age and marital status.
This summer, anti-gay campaigners warned Elton not to wear 'flamboyant' clothes at his planned concert in Krasnodar in July. The concert was later cancelled when the singer fell ill.

Image
Hard line on homosexuals: Russia's president Vladimir Putin is hoping to win over conservative voters

'Promoting homosexuality' is an offence in several Russian regions, including Krasnodar, St Petersburg, and Novosibirsk.
In September a Russian parents' committee asked President Vladimir Putin to cancel the planned concerts, saying he intended to violate a ban on 'homosexual propaganda'.
In an open letter to Putin, the local parents' group in central Ural region was reported by media as saying: 'The singer intends to come out in support of local sodomites and break the current Russian law, directed at protecting children.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2mc6E05hk
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Phantom4

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Phantom4 » Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:11 am

I'm not an expert on Russia, but if I ever need to move abroad it seems like Russia would be a good fit for a white nationalist.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:37 pm

Pat blames America's problems on the decline of Christianity's influence; he's a Catholic before he's a White man. But he knows at some level it's all about race and White America's descent from control of the nation.
---

Is Putin One of Us?
By Patrick Buchanan
December 17, 2013

Is Vladimir Putin a paleoconservative?

In the culture war for mankind’s future, is he one of us?

While such a question may be blasphemous in Western circles, consider the content of the Russian president’s state of the nation address.

With America clearly in mind, Putin declared, “In many countries today, moral and ethical norms are being reconsidered.”

“They’re now requiring not only the proper acknowledgment of freedom of conscience, political views and private life, but also the mandatory acknowledgment of the equality of good and evil.”

Translation: While privacy and freedom of thought, religion and speech are cherished rights, to equate traditional marriage and same-sex marriage is to equate good with evil.

No moral confusion here, this is moral clarity, agree or disagree.

President Reagan once called the old Soviet Empire “the focus of evil in the modern world.” President Putin is implying that Barack Obama’s America may deserve the title in the 21st century.

Nor is he without an argument when we reflect on America’s embrace of abortion on demand, homosexual marriage, pornography, promiscuity, and the whole panoply of Hollywood [read: Jewish] values.

Our grandparents would not recognize the America in which we live.

Moreover, Putin asserts, the new immorality has been imposed undemocratically.

The “destruction of traditional values” in these countries, he said, comes “from the top” and is “inherently undemocratic because it is based on abstract ideas and runs counter to the will of the majority of people.”

Does he not have a point?

Unelected justices declared abortion and homosexual acts to be constitutionally protected rights. Judges have been the driving force behind the imposition of same-sex marriage. Attorney General Eric Holder refused to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act.

America was de-Christianized in the second half of the 20th century by court orders, over the vehement objections of a huge majority of a country that was overwhelmingly Christian.

And same-sex marriage is indeed an “abstract” idea unrooted in the history or tradition of the West. Where did it come from?

Peoples all over the world, claims Putin, are supporting Russia’s “defense of traditional values” against a “so-called tolerance” that is “genderless and infertile.”

While his stance as a defender of traditional values has drawn the mockery of Western media and cultural elites, Putin is not wrong in saying that he can speak for much of mankind.

Same-sex marriage is supported by America’s young, but most states still resist it, with black pastors visible in the vanguard of the counterrevolution.

In France, a million people took to the streets of Paris to denounce the Socialists’ imposition of homosexual marriage.

Only 15 nations out of more than 190 have recognized it.

In India, the world’s largest democracy, the Supreme Court has struck down a lower court ruling that made same-sex marriage a right. And the parliament in this socially conservative nation of more than a billion people is unlikely soon to reverse the high court.

In the four dozen nations that are predominantly Muslim, which make up a fourth of the U.N. General Assembly and a fifth of mankind, same-sex marriage is not even on the table. And Pope Francis has reaffirmed Catholic doctrine on the issue for over a billion Catholics.

While much of American and Western media dismiss him as an authoritarian and reactionary, a throwback, Putin may be seeing the future with more clarity than Americans still caught up in a Cold War paradigm.

As the decisive struggle in the second half of the 20th century was vertical, East vs. West, the 21st century struggle may be horizontal, with conservatives and traditionalists in every country arrayed against the militant secularism of a multicultural and transnational elite.

And though America’s elite may be found at the epicenter of anti-conservatism and anti-traditionalism, the American people have never been more alienated or more divided culturally, socially and morally.

We are two countries now.

Putin says his mother had him secretly baptized as a baby and professes to be a Christian. And what he is talking about here is ambitious, even audacious.

He is seeking to redefine the “Us vs. Them” world conflict of the future as one in which conservatives, traditionalists and nationalists of all continents and countries stand up against the cultural and ideological imperialism of what he sees as a decadent west.

“We do not infringe on anyone’s interests,” said Putin, “or try to teach anyone how to live.” The adversary he has identified is not the America we grew up in, but the America we live in, which Putin sees as pagan and wildly progressive.

Without naming any country, Putin attacked “attempts to enforce more progressive development models” on other nations, which have led to “decline, barbarity and big blood,” a straight shot at the U.S. interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Egypt.

In his speech, Putin cited Russian philosopher Nicholas Berdyaev whom Solzhenitsyn had hailed for his courage in defying his Bolshevik inquisitors. Though no household word, Berdyaev is favorably known at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal.

Which raises this question: Who is writing Putin’s stuff?
http://buchanan.org/blog/Topics/vladimir-putin

The dissenting view from the Left:

======================================================================

Why Pat Buchanan Loves Vladimir Putin
By Caitlin DicksonDecember 19th 2013

Obama isn’t sending any senior officials to Sochi, but Buchanan’s got Putin’s back—and opposing gay rights and supporting organized religion aren’t even fringe views in today’s GOP.
Reading Pat Buchanan’s ode to Vladimir Putin this week, it’s hard to believe the man once served as a senior adviser to three American presidents and was considered relevant enough to grace the cover of Time magazine. Then again, the conservative pundit’s devolution from somewhat rational Republican mouthpiece to racially intolerant radical has been well-documented.

For those not yet up to speed, on Tuesday, the same day the Obama administration announced that none of its senior officials would join the U.S. delegation to the Winter Olympics in Sochi—a pointed stand against Russia’s anti-LGBT laws—Buchanan published a column on the conservative website Townhall.com praising the Russian president for those very policies.

“Is Vladimir Putin a paleoconservative?” Buchanan asked, referring to the conservative philosophy that promotes tradition, limited government, and religious and Western identity. “In the culture war for mankind’s future, is he one of us?”

Perhaps Buchanan’s ode to Putin isn’t proof of any shift to the fringe but of the true state of American conservatism today.

In a recent state of the nation address, Putin rejected “the mandatory acknowledgement of the equality of good and evil”—i.e., the increased acceptance of such amoral things as gay rights and access to abortion in the United States, among other countries. Buchanan applauded him. He also applauded India, whose Supreme Court recently upheld a Victorian British law criminalizing homosexuality. Not to mention the “four dozen nations that are predominantly Muslim, which make up a fourth of the U.N. General Assembly and a fifth of mankind, [where] same-sex marriage is not even on the table.” And don’t forget Pope Francis, who “has reaffirmed Catholic doctrine on the [gay marriage] for over a billion Catholics.” Never mind that Buchanan previously denounced the pope for saying he wouldn’t judge gay people and suggested Oslo bomber Anders Breivik “may have been right” about Muslim immigrants posing a threat to Western society. As long as they oppose the gays, they’re OK with Pat.

So what happened to Pat Buchanan? How did this Columbia journalism school graduate go from serving in presidential cabinets and hosting CNN’s Crossfire to here? The truth is it’s entirely possible that Buchanan has held these beliefs since before they became controversial. Increased tolerance and expansions in civil rights over the years have turned once mainstream attitudes into antiquated vitriol.

For Buchanan, it’s difficult to pinpoint when, exactly, the transition to fringe-dweller took place. But the shift started to become more visible around 2002, when after two failed attempts at the Republican presidential nomination and one unsuccessful White House bid on the Reform Party ticket, he founded The American Conservative, a magazine that caters to the more traditional and, at times, fringe elements of the conservative movement.

It was Buchanan’s dismissal from MSNBC in February 2012, however, that seemed to, if not mark the beginning of his decline, at least highlight for the public the direction in which he had been moving for a while. After 10 years as a regular political commentator, the network let him go following the publication of his book Suicide of a Superpower. With such chapter titles as “The End of White America” and “The Death of Christian America,” the book was criticized as anti-Semitic, homophobic, and racist, and MSNBC President Phil Griffin said it “shouldn’t be a part of the national dialogue, much less part of the dialogue on MSNBC.”

The executive vice president of the liberal watchdog Media Matters applauded MSNBC’s decision, saying Buchanan had been “been making the same racially insensitive, anti-Semitic, and homophobic statements for the past 50 years.”

Following the firing, ThinkProgress compiled a list of Buchanan’s “10 most outrageous statements.” Among them are the argument, made in his 2006 book State of Emergency, that “If we do not get control of our borders, by 2050 Americans of European descent will be a minority in the nation their ancestors created and built,” and his claims that minorities are to blame for low U.S. test scores and that gay marriage made Jerry Sandusky’s crimes possible.

In 2010, Buchanan opposed Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination on religious grounds. “If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats,” he wrote.

In the constantly liberalizing lineup of world leaders, Buchanan seems to have found a particularly soft spot for the Russian president. In September, Buchanan came to Putin’s defense against critics of Russia’s ban on “homosexual propaganda,” from President Obama to Jay Leno to The New York Times. In October he heralded Putin’s Times Op-Ed on why the U.S. shouldn’t strike Syria, calling it “outstanding” and much more compelling than Obama’s argument
Business Insider’s Adam Taylor points out that Buchanan isn’t wrong—Putin really does act and sound like a modern-day American conservative.

“On the social side, he supports organized religion (in particular the Orthodox Church) and doesn’t support Russia’s LGBT community, while fiscally he seeks a balanced budget and low taxes,” Taylor writes. “He is hard on terrorism but also steadfast in his opposition to military intervention in Syria, which places him far more in the Republican camp than the Democratic camp.”

So perhaps Buchanan’s ode to Putin isn’t proof of any shift to the fringe but of the true state of American conservatism today.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... putin.html
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:42 pm


Putin Rejects Socialism

26.12.2013

By Xavier Lerma

President Putin prefers a free market and capitalism over socialism. It must be true. Otherwise the Communist US government and western media would favor Putin. Instead they brand him as a tyrant or dictator. They try often in making him look like them when he is not a Communist. Khrushchev's 1959 prediction came true and now most US citizens do not know they are in the USSR on American soil. The universe has changed and the other side of the world is free as Putin prefers capitalism over socialism.

Yes, President Vladimir Putin has been weaning Russia from socialism to capitalism ever since he used oil revenues to pay off the debt owed to the IMF and others. He has been promoting fewer taxes for small businesses and a conservative approach to economics and society. Half the governors have been fired in Russia for corruption and he even threatened a governor to improve dental care. He has helped the largest country in the world out of darkness and there is still more to be done. Yet, he has found the time and energy to lead the world by its hand towards peace and economic prosperity which the US has helped to destroy.


"the task of the state doesn't consist in nationalizing those companies...
we should use the money which we get as taxes from them to develop the country"


Last December 19th at Putin's News conference, Maria from the Vladivostok newspaper, who longs for the old Soviet Union days, asked Putin to nationalize businesses so the country can have more money to solve cancer, health and other society issues. She says the country will love him and let him be president for life if he does that. I bet Obama wishes there were more like her in the US. If you notice in the video she seemed awkward and out of place just like a US news anchor does when they use their commanding voice to declare nothing.

President Putin tried not to laugh at her other requests like he has laughed at western journalists. He rejected president for life and stands firm on the Russian constitution and says it is not safe to nationalize companies. Putin would rather encourage private companies and use the taxes from them. He did promise to help those with cancer saying it was possible to get the equipment needed. Needless to say, there are more Communists in Vladivostok and in America then there are in Russia. I am sure the US mainstream media will support her if they don't already.

When President Putin announced recent consolidations on state media due to budget constraints the US media shouted, "Dictator!" and that there was no freedom in Russia. I even got emails from worried Americans asking what will happen to me now. I told them they had been brainwashed and not to watch the US news anymore.

President Putin said, "in 2014, we have reduced support for state media due to budgetary limitations. And none of our main channels, including the National Television and Radio Broadcasting Company, were thrilled to hear this, but it is a necessary measure, again, due to budgetary constraints." He's not a Communist so naturally the western media attacks him.

When Russia set laws to stop websites from pedophiles and sodomites the west went crazy and proclaimed once again that Putin was a dictator policing the internet. Their media is truly perverse when they attack Russia and promote their agenda of perversity under the guise of freedom. I hope people in the west are able to bypass the US propaganda machine. The internet can help them see the truth until their government restricts foreign news.

Xavier Lerma
Contact Xavier Lerma at [email protected]
---
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/column ... cialism-0/
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Good News From United Russia

Post by Will Williams » Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:18 pm

Not such good news from Russia, possibly:
---

Vladimir Putin’s Daughter Yekaterina Dating Young Man From Korea Who Works for Samsung Electronics
Friday, 29 October 2010
Image
There isn’t much photographic evidence of VVP’s family… this is about it… he’s kept them so well out of the limelight that they can walk unrecognized in the streets of Moscow… that’s real humility (unlike the phoney American Sectarian variety). After all, he said, “There are things, I believe, which should not, in my position, at least, be shared with the public at large for everybody’s consumption because that would look like self-advertising or a political striptease”. Now, THAT’S a REAL Orthodox Christian!

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s younger daughter Yekaterina Putina (Katya), 24, is confirmed to be dating an employee of Samsung Electronics. Samsung officials said that he is a 26-year-old named Yoon who has been working at a local subsidiary of the Korean electronics giant in Moscow since he finished his study at University of Illinois last August. The ethnic Korean community in Russia has known for years that Katya and Yoon were dating. The couple had been friends since middle school days and has developed to dating relations since several years ago. Domestic media reported their dating around 2006. However, their friends and relatives have been mum about their date in consideration of Yoon’s position. It’s too sensitive to predict the male and female relationship. Furthermore, the relationship could affect political life of Prime Minister Putin, Katya’s father. Putin has two daughters, the elder of whom has married a Dutch youth, not a Russian. If the second daughter marries a Korean, her father might suffer severe political pressure, according to Yoon’s relatives and friends. Actually, Yoon’s parents and friends of the younger Yoon are reported to have been seriously embarrassed with the reports in South Korea, although they have not even been engaged. Yoon, the youngest son of former Admiral Yoon Jong-gu, 64, whose mother is a college professor, has been praised as an honest figure in the Russian society. Yoon attended an international school in Moscow for eight years when his father served at the Korean Embassy in the Russian capital from 1999. Later, Yoon studied at the University of Urbana-Champaign, with a double major in international studies (including international laws and international security) and politics. Yoon got a job at the local subsidiary of Samsung Electronics in Moscow, after returning from studying in the USA in August. In particular, Yoon likes basketball and dances well enough to outshine “B-Boy”. Actually, Yoon is reported to have met Katya for the first time at the age of 15 around July 1999, when he was crowned the champion at a dance party at an international school in Moscow. Yoon and Katya, who is fluent in five languages, are reported to have dated in Russia, the USA and Korea. While studying in Illinois, Yoon went to Russia in an exchange visit program and Katya is reported to have studied in the USA. Katya is also reported to have dated Yoon in South Korea in 2002, when the Korea-Japan World Cup soccer championship was held.

The Korea Times
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/sp ... 75402.html
---

Image
Russian Prime Minister Putin's youngest daughter, Yekaterina "Katya" Putina Vladmirovna

Image
Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin holds daughters, Ekaterina (L) and Maria, when they were little girls.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Locked