Russian News

Summaries and links to news items
User avatar
Wolf Stoner
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Wolf Stoner » Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:40 pm

I have read Thomas Dalton's article “America must die – so that the people can live”. It is amazingly clear and logical. Dalton's analysis of democracy should be put into text-books in the future. The very concept of democracy is flawed because it presupposes equality of various human beings. Yes, democratic principle could be used successfully on very local level, when people know personally all candidates participating in elections. Therefore, it can be practiced only among a community of a few hundred people. For example, a local police chief and a judge should be elected, because people should have the right to choose those who would be in charge of their own security. Here in Russia the whole judicial system and police are universally despised and mistrusted because people have no say in choosing them. The whole system is strictly centralized and the rulers disregard local interests when they choose the new heads of police or judges (or any other officials). Russians are supposed to accept any whims of the distant Kremlin rulers without complaints. It is akin to Asiatic despotism. It is opposite to democracy but it is equally unhealthy and harmful. The best option is to combine various models of government. As Dalton has clearly shown, democracy could be effective only among small communities, but not on the state level.
The question about the form of government that would best suit to the future ethnic-racial state is of key importance and should be studied in details. There is no magic bullet. It would be unwise to try to emulate any past systems as they were. I think that the future system should be a combination of various forms of government. It is wrong to think that an absolute dictatorship would solve all problems. Not at all. Yes, when you have a man like William Luther Pierce, there is no doubt that he could be safely entrusted with absolute power; it would be very beneficial to all our people. The problem is that such people happen to be a few for the whole century. There is very limited supply of such exceptional men. The stupid Stalinist idea that “there are no indispensable men; anyone can be replaced” doesn't work. There are such men who are exceptional; the men to whom you would never find a substitute. You can't find a second Bach or second Plato or second Schopenhauer or second William Luther Pierce. Yes, there will be other exceptional people (very few indeed) but they will be of their own unique kind, not the copies of the past geniuses. Taken into account this fact and the fact that there are plenty of those who only pretend to be geniuses, whose superficial greatness is nothing more than a fake decoration, we should be very cautious with an idea of dictatorship. If the reins of absolute power are given to a wrong man, it could easily lead the whole nation to disaster. And for the disaster to happen this ruler doesn't need to have evil motives or to be a traitor, not at all. Tsar Nicholas the Second had sincerely loved Russia and wanted good for Russian people, but he was not of the kind who are born to rule; he had no natural qualities to be the leader of a nation. The result is well known. The similar situation is with other past European rulers. They had absolute (or nearly absolute) power but despite of this they ruined their own nations.
Yes, if the historical circumstances would produce a natural leader, which would gain absolute power in the process of struggle against our enemies, such a leader should be accepted as God-given and obeyed without reservations. But any attempt to choose a king or dictator through some kind of elections or other artificial processes, most probably would produce bad result. The qualities of a tribal leader are difficult to define and yet more difficult to discern them in any particular man. Such qualities become apparent only in action. Therefore, I am against any artificial schemes of selecting leaders. Leaders couldn't be selected, they come from Nature as rightful owners and don't require anyone's permission to be who they are. Therefore, the best option is to adhere to some kind of aristocratic rule of a council of elders with a chairman whose opinion should be decisive, but whose decisions could be nullified by the council (if 2/3 or ¾ of the council members are against it). But such a council should not be too big to prevent it degenerating into mob gathering. A few tens, not more. Limiting the number of council members would allow each member to have his say in the deliberation processes, instead of being a mere voting hand.
This whole topic is of paramount importance. I would like if Thomas Dalton continue this theme about forms of social organization.

User avatar
PhuBai68
Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:23 pm
Location: South Carolina upstate

Re: Russian News

Post by PhuBai68 » Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:11 pm

I'm somewhat concerned about this saber rattling towards Russia because of Ukraine.
Sadly it looks like another whites against whites war may be on the horizon, in fact a proxy war with Ukrainians of Russian heritage has already taken over 14,000 white lives.
I honestly believe NATO should be disbanded as it was formed originally to protect Europe from Soviet aggression and now seems to be a feral cat just looking for a songbird to kill.
Putin is upset - as he should be - over the rumblings of having Ukraine join NATO just as we (the United States) were upset when the Soviets started parking nuclear capable missiles ninety miles off our coast in Cuba.
That
almost started WWIII which would've possibly destroyed the earth.
I'm wondering if these idiotic war hawks (senator from Mississippi) stating that "nothing is off the table. A nuclear first strike even." even realize "what" they're implying?
Ukraine and Russia are none of our damned business and we should keep our nose out if theirs.
Old demento Joe has rea$on$ to to support Ukraine since his corrupt dealings with their leaders made his son (and himself) a bit more wealthier.


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-ukr ... d-to-know/

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw0ypSr1SGY[/youtube]
It's not diversity, it's displacement.

User avatar
Wolf Stoner
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Wolf Stoner » Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:04 pm

Yes, I agree with most of what you think. First of all, I should note that Israel-USA-NATO is the global axis of evil, which alone is the greatest threat to civilization as such; actually, to the very existence of mankind. Therefore, any defeat of this coalition of Evil is welcome, regardless of who inflicts this blow. In this regard I fully agree with Patrick Slattery from RBN.

But in the same time, I need to note, that the war between Ukraine and Russia is not wholly orchestrated by NATO and other malicious players. Yes, they use this real Ukrainian-Russian conflict to advance their nefarious agenda but it would be unjust to assert that this conflict was artificially orchestrated. The Ukrainian hatred toward Russia goes back to collectivization, artificial famine and WW2, when millions of Ukrainians were annihilated. NKVD thugs combed western Ukraine for many years after the end of WW2 to kill anyone who had any connection to independence movement. Sporadic skirmishes happened up to 1954. Yes, the Soviet terror system was essentially non-Russian but ethnic Russians were willing executioners for Communist rulers. It means that the hatred toward the Soviet system was inevitably transferred to ethnic Russians as such. And it is understandable.

Since Putin came to power, Kremlin started making surreptitious moves toward eventual incorporation of Ukraine into a new imperial project. Actually, Ukraine was considered as an indispensable part of this project, because any attempt of recreation of USSR would be a dead project without Ukraine being a part of it. And this political encroachment into Ukraine since early 2000es was the primary cause of the whole conflict. The first confrontation flared up yet in 2004 (the first Maidan) but was resolved peacefully, because Moscow backed down. But in 2013-14 Kremlin felt strong enough to continue its pressure and to make real military move. And this was the main cause of the whole conflict. Everything else followed later.

But this conflict has two levels. The first level is the immediate Ukrainian-Russian hostility, which is real and understandable; but the second level is the strategic one. NATO and globalists used this conflict to advance their malicious agenda. Yes, Putin's quasi-empire stands in their path. Kremlin rulers have a globalist project of their own, which is called Eurasianism. Here is the main bone of contention. It is a repetition of USSR versus NATO stand-off. I doubt that it would turn into hot war. Neither Russia nor NATO have the nerve to do it.

Russia is much weaker than it appears. Kremlin rulers were always excellent masters of bluff. Remember Khrushchev, who threatened to rain hundreds of ICBM on USA when he actually had only 7 of them. But now the situation in Russia even worse. Enough is to say that Russian military personnel is 50% non-Russian. The moral cohesion in military units worsens from year to year. The intellectual abilities and moral qualities of new conscripts are going down with each new conscription. Kremlin rulers know all of this. They understand that any major military conflict would, most probably, push in motion the process of disintegration of Russian Federation. The cohesion of RF is even weaker than this of Austro-Hungary in 1914. It is worth to remember that even local war in Chechnya in 1999-2001 had strained state's resources to the near breaking point. The war against Georgia too have shown obvious weaknesses of Russian army. The surreptitious intervention into Ukraine in 2014-15 too wasn't successful to the extent that Russian generals hoped for. They supposed that a few battalions of Russian paratroopers and special forces units would inflict mortal blow to the weak Ukrainian military, but it didn't happen. Ukrainian army, and especially nationalist militia, happened to be much tougher than it was expected. This factor had spoiled all Kremlin's arrangements. Instead of rapid disintegration of Ukrainian military and restoration of pro-Russian regime in Kiev, Russian army has found itself bogged down in First World War-style fighting near the border.

Certainly, if now Russia would attack with all its ground forces, the Ukrainian army would collapse in a few days, but what would it give? If Russia takes Kiev, Poles are sure to move into western Ukraine, which they rightfully consider as their sphere of vital interests. And Polish army is strong enough to hold Russian advance (if Russia don't use tactical nuclear weapons). Therefore, the war yet again would come to stalemate somewhere in between Kiev and Lviv.

Yes, in that case Russia would control most of Ukraine, but it would be more of a burdensome liability than a useful addition. What it would do with additional 30-40 million of population? They would need to be provided with food and social payments of some kind, at least on the level that current Ukrainian government provides them. Otherwise, the massive social discontent could easily turn into guerilla warfare with sparks of war going inside Russia, particularly into its restive North Caucasus region.

Therefore, we can see that even a successful military invasion of Ukraine would bring more problems than advantages; it would destroy internal Russian social equilibrium with very unpredictable consequences. I suppose that all these factors are understood in Kremlin; it is why they didn’t invade the whole of Ukraine back in 2014, when it was ripe for taking. And if they didn’t do it then, they are surely would not dare to do it now. Provided that they are sane.

NATO and USA are in a similar situation. They have too many internal problems to start some new foreign adventures for trifling reasons. Therefore, if they are sane too, they would not make any reckless moves. Proceeding from these assumptions, I suppose that probability of a major war between Russia and NATO is very slim, almost non-existent. But, certainly, we should not discount some unexpected events that could change the whole international balance. Yes, any tension has a potential to grow into hot war, even if at the beginning it was only bluff and posturing.

The conflict between China and USA is much more real and has much greater potential to turn hot. China is really strong and continues to gain force in all respects. It is poised to become the dominant power in the world, which would render NATO and USA irrelevant, which would automatically cancel American position as global dictator. And what is yet more important is the fact that America can not allow itself to become a second player, because in this case it would lose its special privilege of being the main global money-printer. If America lose its absolute military superiority, other countries, one after another, would stop to acquiesce with this whole scheme of unlimited dollar flow from USA. Everyone would demand a fair play on American part, which would be an economical death sentence for it. America would never be able to pay back its debt.

Therefore, it has no other option except of clinging to its supreme military status. Otherwise, it would lose everything. Washington rulers understand this fact as well as all other global players. Therefore, the war between USA and China is not simply possible but inevitable at some point. The question remains whether it would happen in the coming months or in a few years’ time. But the longer America procrastinates, the stronger China becomes. The situation is similar to the one between Britain and Germany in 1930es. It is why Churchill hurried to start war as soon as possible, before Germany becomes too strong.

China doesn’t need war; it can take everything quietly, because the whole Western civilization goes down and it is a matter of few decades before China could simply take the ripe fruit of global dominance.

It is very probable that Zionists decided to start war with China in the immediate future. Obama had proclaimed the “pivot to the Pacific” yet in 2011. USA started to strengthen its presence around China. It was a start of preparation to this war. Most probably it would happen in the coming years.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Will Williams » Fri Dec 10, 2021 11:55 pm

Wolf Stoner wrote:
Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:04 pm
Yes, I agree with most of what you think. First of all, I should note that Israel-USA-NATO is the global axis of evil, which alone is the greatest threat to civilization as such; actually, to the very existence of mankind. Therefore, any defeat of this coalition of Evil is welcome, regardless of who inflicts this blow. In this regard I fully agree with Patrick Slattery from RBN.
Thanks so much for this explanation of the global chess match, since Ukraine is so much in the news today -- and for the likely prospects of war with China. You'll appreciate this picture of me back in 1999 when that ill-advised conflict with Serbia was ongoing:

Image
But in the same time, I need to note, that the war between Ukraine and Russia is not wholly orchestrated by NATO and other malicious players. Yes, they use this real Ukrainian-Russian conflict to advance their nefarious agenda but it would be unjust to assert that this conflict was artificially orchestrated. The Ukrainian hatred toward Russia goes back to collectivization, artificial famine and WW2, when millions of Ukrainians were annihilated. NKVD thugs combed western Ukraine for many years after the end of WW2 to kill anyone who had any connection to independence movement. Sporadic skirmishes happened up to 1954. Yes, the Soviet terror system was essentially non-Russian but ethnic Russians were willing executioners for Communist rulers. It means that the hatred toward the Soviet system was inevitably transferred to ethnic Russians as such. And it is understandable.

Since Putin came to power, Kremlin started making surreptitious moves toward eventual incorporation of Ukraine into a new imperial project. Actually, Ukraine was considered as an indispensable part of this project, because any attempt of recreation of USSR would be a dead project without Ukraine being a part of it. And this political encroachment into Ukraine since early 2000es was the primary cause of the whole conflict. The first confrontation flared up yet in 2004 (the first Maidan) but was resolved peacefully, because Moscow backed down. But in 2013-14 Kremlin felt strong enough to continue its pressure and to make real military move. And this was the main cause of the whole conflict. Everything else followed later.

But this conflict has two levels. The first level is the immediate Ukrainian-Russian hostility, which is real and understandable; but the second level is the strategic one. NATO and globalists used this conflict to advance their malicious agenda. Yes, Putin's quasi-empire stands in their path. Kremlin rulers have a globalist project of their own, which is called Eurasianism. Here is the main bone of contention. It is a repetition of USSR versus NATO stand-off. I doubt that it would turn into hot war. Neither Russia nor NATO have the nerve to do it.

Russia is much weaker than it appears. Kremlin rulers were always excellent masters of bluff. Remember Khrushchev, who threatened to rain hundreds of ICBM on USA when he actually had only 7 of them. But now the situation in Russia even worse. Enough is to say that Russian military personnel is 50% non-Russian. The moral cohesion in military units worsens from year to year. The intellectual abilities and moral qualities of new conscripts are going down with each new conscription. Kremlin rulers know all of this. They understand that any major military conflict would, most probably, push in motion the process of disintegration of Russian Federation. The cohesion of RF is even weaker than this of Austro-Hungary in 1914. It is worth to remember that even local war in Chechnya in 1999-2001 had strained state's resources to the near breaking point. The war against Georgia too have shown obvious weaknesses of Russian army. The surreptitious intervention into Ukraine in 2014-15 too wasn't successful to the extent that Russian generals hoped for. They supposed that a few battalions of Russian paratroopers and special forces units would inflict mortal blow to the weak Ukrainian military, but it didn't happen. Ukrainian army, and especially nationalist militia, happened to be much tougher than it was expected. This factor had spoiled all Kremlin's arrangements. Instead of rapid disintegration of Ukrainian military and restoration of pro-Russian regime in Kiev, Russian army has found itself bogged down in First World War-style fighting near the border.

Certainly, if now Russia would attack with all its ground forces, the Ukrainian army would collapse in a few days, but what would it give? If Russia takes Kiev, Poles are sure to move into western Ukraine, which they rightfully consider as their sphere of vital interests. And Polish army is strong enough to hold Russian advance (if Russia don't use tactical nuclear weapons). Therefore, the war yet again would come to stalemate somewhere in between Kiev and Lviv.

Yes, in that case Russia would control most of Ukraine, but it would be more of a burdensome liability than a useful addition. What it would do with additional 30-40 million of population? They would need to be provided with food and social payments of some kind, at least on the level that current Ukrainian government provides them. Otherwise, the massive social discontent could easily turn into guerilla warfare with sparks of war going inside Russia, particularly into its restive North Caucasus region.

Therefore, we can see that even a successful military invasion of Ukraine would bring more problems than advantages; it would destroy internal Russian social equilibrium with very unpredictable consequences. I suppose that all these factors are understood in Kremlin; it is why they didn’t invade the whole of Ukraine back in 2014, when it was ripe for taking. And if they didn’t do it then, they are surely would not dare to do it now. Provided that they are sane.

NATO and USA are in a similar situation. They have too many internal problems to start some new foreign adventures for trifling reasons. Therefore, if they are sane too, they would not make any reckless moves. Proceeding from these assumptions, I suppose that probability of a major war between Russia and NATO is very slim, almost non-existent. But, certainly, we should not discount some unexpected events that could change the whole international balance. Yes, any tension has a potential to grow into hot war, even if at the beginning it was only bluff and posturing.

The conflict between China and USA is much more real and has much greater potential to turn hot. China is really strong and continues to gain force in all respects. It is poised to become the dominant power in the world, which would render NATO and USA irrelevant, which would automatically cancel American position as global dictator. And what is yet more important is the fact that America can not allow itself to become a second player, because in this case it would lose its special privilege of being the main global money-printer. If America lose its absolute military superiority, other countries, one after another, would stop to acquiesce with this whole scheme of unlimited dollar flow from USA. Everyone would demand a fair play on American part, which would be an economical death sentence for it. America would never be able to pay back its debt.

Therefore, it has no other option except of clinging to its supreme military status. Otherwise, it would lose everything. Washington rulers understand this fact as well as all other global players. Therefore, the war between USA and China is not simply possible but inevitable at some point. The question remains whether it would happen in the coming months or in a few years’ time.
But the longer America procrastinates, the stronger China becomes. The situation is similar to the one between Britain and Germany in 1930es. It is why Churchill hurried to start war as soon as possible, before Germany becomes too strong.

China doesn’t need war; it can take everything quietly, because the whole Western civilization goes down and it is a matter of few decades before China could simply take the ripe fruit of global dominance.

It is very probable that Zionists decided to start war with China in the immediate future. Obama had proclaimed the “pivot to the Pacific” yet in 2011. USA started to strengthen its presence around China. It was a start of preparation to this war. Most probably it would happen in the coming years.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Wolf Stoner
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Wolf Stoner » Sun Dec 12, 2021 5:41 am

Thank you for quoting my letter. I am glad to share my perspective on world events. I like your photo very much. It has historic significance. Back then the absolute majority of Americans had supported Clinton's insane policy, therefore, the fact that there were people who opposed those NATO criminal actions, has great significance. In 1990es American public had still lived in illusions about supposed American greatness and believed in bright future for their country. William Pierce had warned them but very few listened and understood what was to come. The last two decades have fully vindicated everything that he said. More is to come. I have published your photo with this NATO placard on my vkontakte page.

By the way, I have completed translation of two of Mark Weber's videos about WW2. I have published them last week on my vkontakte channel (because my youtube channel was purged in August). Mark Weber does great job in uncovering this truth. It is very important to spread it among people.

Thomas S NJ
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 5:31 pm

Re: Russian News

Post by Thomas S NJ » Mon Dec 13, 2021 11:42 am

I'm very concerned that said saber-rattling has now placed nuclear first strike on the table. That this was even considered by the American congress is appalling. I don't know the state of these discussions as of yet; my hope is that the liberals that currently dominate the legislative bodies exercise some consistency for once and shut down that sort of talk, but hoping for consistency from liberals is a vain hope indeed. Has anyone heard any further information on this? I have only a brief snippet from a conversation with my brother about it and haven't yet been able to confirm it.

I am also curious about the Alliance's position on Russia and Russians. I have a number of Russian acquaintances (I have recently begun to train in Systema) and while they have some amusing ideas about Hitler and National-Socialism, they seem to otherwise have their heads on straight especially about the state of America today. As I see it unless corrected on this view, I cannot help but believe that this present bellicosity towards Russia is a case of the Jews goading us into yet another suicidal brother war, using the United States military to once more slaughter millions of White folk. That the target of this hate is a White nation that has regained a sense of blood-and-soil nationalism (I suggest reading a translation of the Russian Federation's national anthem if you get a chance; I find it positively beautiful!) is a fact I cannot ignore in this. The echoes to the past here are chilling indeed.
H0195

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Will Williams » Mon Dec 13, 2021 9:18 pm

Thomas S NJ wrote:
Mon Dec 13, 2021 11:42 am
...
I am also curious about the Alliance's position on Russia and Russians...
I see them as our cousins like Germans and am appalled that these people who can make precious White babies were ever considered America's "enemies. My wife of 18 years, Lana, who runs our Business Office, is Russian, if that tells you anything about what NA thinks of Russians.

Follow NA member Wolf Stoner's views on Russia if you want the truth and reality. He is an experienced Russian nationalist who knows of what he writes. I value his writing so much that two pieces by him are in the latest members BULLETIN that I just picked up from the printer this afternoon. It will be mailed shortly. I believe a nice letter from you to our National Office is also featured in this issue. :)
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Russian News

Post by Will Williams » Mon Dec 13, 2021 9:45 pm

Wolf Stoner wrote:
Sun Dec 12, 2021 5:41 am
Thank you for quoting my letter. I am glad to share my perspective on world events. I like your photo very much. It has historic significance. Back then the absolute majority of Americans had supported Clinton's insane policy, therefore, the fact that there were people who opposed those NATO criminal actions, has great significance....
Our Alliance Local Units used to do activities like that several times a month all over the country. We're trying to get back into that, but our people seem to be too busy wasting their time on social media instead.

A few of us NA members "piggy-backed" on a leftist pro-Clinton demonstration that day that we'd learned ahead of time was planned at that busy intersection (on our turf!). Every time the traffic light turned red we would approach the cars with our handouts. The leftists were pissed but so what?

My placard got the most attention, and one lady I handed one of our anti-war fliers to happened to work for PBS radio network. She called me the next day and arranged to meet me for an interview to get he Alliance's unique position on Clinton's fratricidal war. We met and portions of our interview were broadcast nationally on PBS, which reached a listening audience much larger than we were able to reach -- a force multiplier.

That just shows that one never knows what good can come from a simple act like I and three or four other Alliiance members did that day, crashing the opposition's pro-war demonstration on that street corner. By Dr. Pierce putting that photo on the front of our members BULLETIN mottivated other Local Units to do the same in their areas.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Thomas S NJ
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 5:31 pm

Re: Russian News

Post by Thomas S NJ » Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:08 am

Will Williams wrote:
Mon Dec 13, 2021 9:18 pm
Thomas S NJ wrote:
Mon Dec 13, 2021 11:42 am
...
I am also curious about the Alliance's position on Russia and Russians...
I see them as our cousins like Germans and am appalled that these people who can make precious White babies were ever considered America's "enemies. My wife of 18 years, Lana, who runs our Business Office, is Russian, if that tells you anything about what NA thinks of Russians.

Follow NA member Wolf Stoner's views on Russia if you want the truth and reality. He is an experienced Russian nationalist who knows of what he writes. I value his writing so much that two pieces by him are in the latest members BULLETIN that I just picked up from the printer this afternoon. It will be mailed shortly. I believe a nice letter from you to our National Office is also featured in this issue. :)
Yes, that clears it up, thank you. I've seen a lot of White Racialists in the past accuse Russians of having a lot of Asiatic admixture but that hasn't made much sense to me looking at the average Russian.

So yes, it appears America is being driven into another brother war. I'll do what I can to encourage an anti-war sentiment among those I can both online and in real life. The similarities between today and the 1930s are astounding; I suppose Putin will become the Hitler of the next iteration of the Cult of Equality...
H0195

User avatar
Grimork
Posts: 669
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2020 4:34 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Russian News

Post by Grimork » Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:48 am

Thomas S NJ wrote:
Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:08 am

Yes, that clears it up, thank you. I've seen a lot of White Racialists in the past accuse Russians of having a lot of Asiatic admixture but that hasn't made much sense to me looking at the average Russian.
Sounds like coldwar propaganda to me. There are asiatic types in Russia, but that's like saying because there are Blacks in the south and the cities all Americans have black admixture. I never understood the Anti Russian mentality. I understand Anti-communism, but those are not the same things.

Post Reply