Ohio: Sandusky police arrest man in connection to distributing flyers

[White_Vengeance]

This partial-post (directly below) is one that I recently published in a Thread on Stormfront to correct the irrational rantings of another prototypical "keyboard warrior" who had made ignorant, unsubstantiated commentary without a shred of evidence to support his moronic statements. Naturally, this "keyboard warrior" had NOT EVER conducted any pro-White activism in his entire miserable so-called White Nationalist "career," yet he was attempting to educate me as to the finer points of real-world, boots-on-the-ground pro-White activism. To reiterate: this is only a partial-post of a lengthy treatise that I recently published in a Thread on the Stormfront White Nationalist Site.

As follows:

As part of my/our National Alliance organization's guidelines and governance, I wisely carry a handy flier in both my vehicles and on my person. The flier to which I refer is available on the National Alliance Website and it is titled: "Our Right to Distribute."

Here is the link to the actual document, "Our Right to Distribute," which is available on our National Alliance Website:

https://www.natall.com/printable/Our...Distribute.pdf

Not surprisingly, I've had a number of encounters with law enforcement agents while out conducting pro-White activism and I've shown the law enforcement officers the "Our Right to Distribute" pamphlet/flier; after each officer has read it, each has stated: "Sir, you may carry on with your duties." One officer even stated--under his breath, of course--"I am 100-percent behind you and in support of you." The officer happened to be a White man--and, I presume, one with at least a partially-developed White race soul.

[White_Vengeance]

"...How can the Alliance avoid such an outcome when flyering?..."

I think it's very likely that the Jews will continue to use the legal system against activists who use their Constitutional rights.

There is no such thing as "Constitutional rights"; that is a complete and utter fallacy. Stating that an American has "Constitutional rights" will lead one down the path of legal and lawful destruction, and that is because if you argue that Americans have "Constitutional rights" you are, in effect, stating that our rights have been conferred upon us by a piece of paper--an old, yellow piece of parchment. That sets a very dangerous precedent.

The reality is that the rights of an American are his/her birthrights, conferred by natural law and evolution, and are thus "inalienable." The word "inalienable" may be used interchangeably with, "unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor." Hence, an American could not even surrender his/her rights if he/she so chose to give them away. They are biologically, spiritually, and genetically endowed to each person upon taking his/her first breath in the womb.

The Constitution of the United States of America PROTECTS and DEFENDS our inalienble birthrights; it does not "grant" rights. To claim that one has "Constitutional rights" is ludicrous and an outright falsehood.

[White_Vengeance]

I'm thinking that maybe there should be some type of organization outreach to criminal defense attorneys to try and recruit them into the organization or at least to try to get them to offer discounted legal services if services might be needed in the future.

It is possible to do direct mailings on a small scale to defense attorneys in specific cities, metro areas or counties. These types of mailings could be done in batches or groups of maybe 25, 50 or 100 at a time.

I do have some experience with this type of direct mail marketing and a version of the letter that we had used in the past could probably be changed a little bit and used again. I have a copy of the letter somewhere, I need to find it and post it here.

This was the letter we sent out to the attorneys:

Dear Sir or Madam:

As an attorney, you’re often privileged to see what’s really happening in our society, since you experience criminal and civil cases firsthand before they are edited, filtered, and spun by the media. I’m sure you’ve noticed that the version of events fed to the public often bears very little resemblance to reality. Not only are stories misrepresented, but it seems that no matter how many times you turn the dial, we — and our children — are inundated with self-destructive ideas and behaviors, from the promotion of ‘gangsta’ culture to White children to morally repugnant sitcoms. We’re doing something to change that. We at the National Alliance are working to develop new media for our people.

Sincerely,

In your letter, you state, "We at the National Alliance are working to develop new media for our people." Question: "Are you a member of the National Alliance?"

[JohnUbele]

I'm thinking that maybe there should be some type of organization outreach to criminal defense attorneys to try and recruit them into the organization or at least to try to get them to offer discounted legal services if services might be needed in the future.

It is possible to do direct mailings on a small scale to defense attorneys in specific cities, metro areas or counties. These types of mailings could be done in batches or groups of maybe 25, 50 or 100 at a time.

I do have some experience with this type of direct mail marketing and a version of the letter that we had used in the past could probably be changed a little bit and used again. I have a copy of the letter somewhere, I need to find it and post it here.

This was the letter we sent out to the attorneys:

Dear Sir or Madam:

As an attorney, you’re often privileged to see what’s really happening in our society, since you experience criminal and civil cases firsthand before they are edited, filtered, and spun by the media. I’m sure you’ve noticed that the version of events fed to the public often bears very little resemblance to reality. Not only are stories misrepresented, but it seems that no matter how many times you turn the dial, we — and our children — are inundated with self-destructive ideas and behaviors, from the promotion of ‘gangsta’ culture to White children to morally repugnant sitcoms. We’re doing something to change that. We at the National Alliance are working to develop new media for our people.

Sincerely,

In your letter, you state, "We at the National Alliance are working to develop new media for our people." Question: "Are you a member of the National Alliance?"

The text of the letter was created in the fall of 2003, almost a full 20 years ago.

[White_Vengeance]

I'm thinking that maybe there should be some type of organization outreach to criminal defense attorneys to try and recruit them into the organization or at least to try to get them to offer discounted legal services if services might be needed in the future.

It is possible to do direct mailings on a small scale to defense attorneys in specific cities, metro areas or counties. These types of mailings could be done in batches or groups of maybe 25, 50 or 100 at a time.

I do have some experience with this type of direct mail marketing and a version of the letter that we had used in the past could probably be changed a little bit and used again. I have a copy of the letter somewhere, I need to find it and post it here.

This was the letter we sent out to the attorneys:

Dear Sir or Madam:

As an attorney, you’re often privileged to see what’s really happening in our society, since you experience criminal and civil cases firsthand before they are edited, filtered, and spun by the media. I’m sure you’ve noticed that the version of events fed to the public often bears very little resemblance to reality. Not only are stories misrepresented, but it seems that no matter how many times you turn the dial, we — and our children — are inundated with self-destructive ideas and behaviors, from the promotion of ‘gangsta’ culture to White children to morally repugnant sitcoms. We’re doing something to change that. We at the National Alliance are working to develop new media for our people.

Sincerely,

In your letter, you state, "We at the National Alliance are working to develop new media for our people." Question: "Are you a member of the National Alliance?"

The text of the letter was created in the fall of 2003, almost a full 20 years ago.

But you did not answer my question, so I will ask it once again. "Are you a member of the National Alliance?"