It is currently Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:12 am


Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

Summaries and links to news items
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 1529
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

PostWed Oct 11, 2017 6:44 pm

Wade Hampton III wrote:UKs American colonies were on the wrong
track from the start. Newly independent
UK Colony constitution declared livestock
(slaves) one-fifth of a person. How absurd!
...

3/5th, Wade, but they certainly were't entitled to vote or sit on juries.

"Thanks to a compromise between Southern slaveholders who wanted enslaved blacks counted in the population, for the sake of boosting Southern congressional representation, and Northern whites who didn’t, the framers enshrined the three-fifths clause in the Constitution. This agreement set the census value of a slave as 60 percent of the value of a free person." -Washington Post 21 August, 2015
Offline
User avatar

Wade Hampton III

  • Posts: 1061
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

PostWed Oct 11, 2017 7:49 pm

White Man 1 wrote:"DeAndre Harris" the negro whose skull was famously split open after assaulting a League of the South officer has had a warrant put out for his arrest. The following article elaborates, along with some other good details about what REALLY happened in Charlottesville.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2017/1 ... x-exposed/


ARRGH!!! Rolls and rolls and rolls of FAT! Disgusting beyond words!

49983.JPG
Pig
49983.JPG (53.13 KiB) Viewed 89 times
Offline
User avatar

C.E. Whiteoak

  • Posts: 193
  • Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 7:45 pm

Re: Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

PostThu Oct 12, 2017 10:12 am

And where are the tire tracks, the bruises, the lacerations? Even her mama said she died of a heart attack.
Offline
User avatar

PhuBai68

  • Posts: 57
  • Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:23 pm
  • Location: Greenbrier County, WV

Re: Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

PostThu Oct 12, 2017 3:55 pm

Will Williams wrote: 3/5th, Wade, but they certainly were't entitled to vote or sit on juries.

"Thanks to a compromise between Southern slaveholders who wanted enslaved blacks counted in the population, for the sake of boosting Southern congressional representation, and Northern whites who didn’t, the framers enshrined the three-fifths clause in the Constitution. This agreement set the census value of a slave as 60 percent of the value of a free person." -Washington Post 21 August, 2015[/size]


Something that seems to have been left at the curb was Lincoln's true sentiments about blacks, from the forth Lincoln-Douglas debates ---
While I was at the hotel to—day, an elderly gentleman called upon me to know whether I was really in favor of producing a perfect equality between the negroes and white people. [Great Laughter.] While I had not proposed to myself on this occasion to say much on that subject, yet as the question was asked me I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in saying something in regard to it. I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied every thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. [Cheers and laughter.] My understanding is that I can just let her alone. I am now in my fiftieth year, and I certainly never have had a black woman for either a slave or a wife. So it seems to me quite possible for us to get along without making either slaves or wives of negroes. I will add to this that I have never seen, to my knowledge, a man, woman or child who was in favor of producing a perfect equality, social and political, between negroes and white men. I recollect of but one distinguished instance that I ever heard of so frequently as to be entirely satisfied of its correctness—and that is the case of Judge Douglas’s old friend Col. Richard M. Johnson. [Laughter.] I will also add to the remarks I have made (for I am not going to enter at large upon this subject), that I have never had the least apprehension that I or my friends would marry negroes if there was no law to keep them from it, [laughter] but as Judge Douglas and his friends seem to be in great apprehension that they might, if there were no law to keep them from it, [roars of laughter] I give him the most solemn pledge that I will to the very last stand by the law of this State, which forbids the marrying of white people with negroes. [Continued laughter and applause.] I will add one further word, which is this: that I do not understand that there is any place where an alteration of the social and political relations of the negro and the white man can be made except in the State Legislature—not in the Congress of the United States—and as I do not really apprehend the approach of any such thing myself, and as Judge Douglas seems to be in constant horror that some such danger is rapidly approaching, I propose as the best means to prevent it that the Judge be kept at home and placed in the State Legislature to fight the measure. [Uproarious laughter and applause.] I do not propose dwelling longer at this time on this subject.
It's not diversity, it's replacement.
Offline

Waffen

  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:44 pm
  • Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

PostSun Oct 15, 2017 12:35 pm

Apparently the City is suing even the "neutral" militia groups that were there.
These are some locals from my parts. They were really just grandstanding and are going to learn a harsh lesson.
This is off one of their Face Book pages.
Attachments
Screenshot-2017-10-15 (1) Christian Yingling.png
Screenshot-2017-10-15 (1) Christian Yingling.png (55.36 KiB) Viewed 34 times
Offline

Waffen

  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:44 pm
  • Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

PostSun Oct 15, 2017 12:52 pm

Offline
User avatar

White Man 1

  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 2:35 pm
  • Location: Knoxville

Re: Charlottesville, Stormfront & craziness

PostSun Oct 15, 2017 1:09 pm

The Beast is using their tried and true tactic in taking down well-meaning Nationalists - that is, Lawfare. Each of the defendants in the suit will have to use considerable time and financial resources to fight off the bogus charges and keep afloat at the same time. Good luck to them!
Previous

Return to News Items

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests