White Guilt
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 1:45 pm
Douglas Mercer
March 3 2024
In February 2024 Sadia Khatri took the pages of The Butler Collegian and served us up some sick slop for our anti-edification. This nigger (and I assume she’s a nigger and if not she’s a nigger anyway) gave us the standard tropes about White Guilt. It used to be they liked White Guilt and they still do really, it’s just no longer their official position they having moved on from personal White Guilt to Universal White Guilt. What they don’t want, apparently, is just Whites blubbering about how bad they feel about being White. They want Whites to take a step back, realize they are guilty for being White, realize that the system Whites created makes all Whites guilty for being White, that all Whites will always be guilty for being White for all time, and then in a serious mood, give the entire store away to the niggers. Call it White Guilt 2.0, or simply total and abject surrender.
“Whiteness has always been weaponized against populations of color. When the white people who manipulate their privilege are called out, they often become highly defensive. The phenomenon of white guilt and white tears encapsulates how white people often display their discomfort surrounding tough conversations about race through guilt or becoming defensive. When engaging in dialogue about their privilege and the deeply disturbing and harsh reality of racism and slavery in America, there are white people who feel so deeply uncomfortable that guilt and tears are all they can offer.”
When you think about it of course White Guilt is their mother lode and meal ticket, always has been. With some rare exceptions prior to the Second World War there was no such thing as White Guilt and even those exceptions were not really fully fledged White Guilt as we have come to know it, but rather some pontificating egg heads bemoaning the eternal hard luck of the nigger. No, White Guilt is a post war phenomenon and coupled with White abdication (which it occasioned) it is the most important event of our era. Safe to say that never in history before had a group that was victorious felt bad about their victory, never before had such a group said they were sorry for winning and started whining for the losers. So prevalent and “natural” does it seem today that it is hard to get one’s head around how puzzling it really is. The explanation of course is simple of course: Jews. It was the Jews who taught the White Man that we were supposedly bad for having had a country of our own, and of course they got enough of us to believe it and it’s been downhill ever since then.
“Dr. Teigha VanHester, assistant professor of race, gender and sexuality studies, provided a framework for understanding white guilt and privilege. White guilt is an inability to separate the self from structures within which the notion of whiteness in race perpetuates those privileges VanHester said. White people are guilty about having privilege. They don’t want to acknowledge the privilege, but they benefit from it and thus that is what is leading to guilt. White privilege is nocuous. White supremacy and anti-Blackness are so deeply embedded into our society that white privilege, guilt and tears are weaponized to seem like normal racial dynamics, where people of color are constantly gaslit about their experiences.”
It of course goes without saying that anyone who teachers race and gender is a serious enemy of our people, they will use both as a cudgel to beat us about our heads. And of course this VanHester creature is not only no exception to this rule she is a Exhibit A. She is one of those hulking tattooed Samoans who have grunted their way through world history and just because she now speaks English the meanings of her sounds is no better than those grunts. Witness the title of her dissertation: From Violent Inceptions To Unapologetic Existence: Theorizing the Griot Of Defiant Black, Queer, Femme Counter Storytelling And The Implications for Epistemic Liberation Using Pleasure Activism and Defiant Rhetorical Performance. As they used to say there is a lot to unpack here. First off the most amazing thing is that this trash garnered her an actual PhD, and not out of the bottom of a cracker jack box but from what one presumes was once a decent university: Illinois State. And of course this degree permits her to run rampant on the rest of us and blather and bloviate on non-subjects and toss her mass of fat around like she is a pipe smoking professor in tweeds. You have to give her credit though, if credit is the right word, in that she has perfected the art of Defiant Rhetoric if by that one counts saying Blame Whitey over and over again as a prime example.
“As a professor, VanHester shared that weaponizing white privilege is never allowed in her classroom. I make it very clear, VanHester said. I write in my syllabus, You cannot weaponize tears in my classes. We don’t center whiteness or cisgenderhood or ableism. My classes are spaces for people in the margins, built by people of the margins. White tears put racially marginalized individuals in a deeply uncomfortable situation. It now becomes our responsibility to console you for the guilt that you are experiencing because of what your ancestors may have done. It is ludicrous to hold the racially marginalized responsible for making sure that white people do not feel threatened by our experiences and histories.”
Why on earth would any would any White person take this class? Why for all intents and purposes they should have a target on their backs or be put in the corner in a dunce cap with their eyes cast down, or be put in the stocks to have eggs tossed at you or be forced to have a Scarlet W stitched on to the front of the clothing, and that is barely metaphorically speaking. In this class they don’t want White tears, they want the White man on his knees in servility and in worship. The want the White man to be pilloried from pillar to post and they want him to take it stone faced. And just so you know the idea that the coloreds would in any way be moved to guilt themselves should the White man start the waterworks is ludicrous on its face, so schooled have they been in their innate moral superiority and so celebrated and feted for it that they are long past the stage of having any lingering doubts about it. No, they are now simply a vindictive lot who wield their total control and power at American universities and shame on their own part is not in anywise on their cards.
“The tears of white people — white women in particular — can have detrimental impacts. White women are often inherently perceived as virtuous damsels in distress who need to be sheltered. Their womanhood is honored as something innocent, precious and in need of protection. We know that these white tears led to the death of Emmett Till, VanHester said. The woman ended up recanting. However, a 14-year-old boy was murdered and lynched beyond recognition. When white tears are shed, bodies of color pay the price.”
It’s an old Anglo-Saxon saying that you can’t defend yourself with tears. No, no sympathy was ever due to the coloreds, no fellow feeling, and no solicitousness. It’s not that that day is past, that day never was. Indeed, this reprehensible essay shows that the coloreds know what we all should know, that it’s a world of power out there and you get and it and you wield it without remorse or you suffer. Indeed, you can see that this is the next step in their bid to exclude us totally. First they played the victim and said they wanted us to feel for them, the more tears the better. This was classic White Guilt, the tugging at the heartstrings and the tiny violins coming out to serenade the spooks. But that was in retrospect an age of innocence and of naiveté. Now they don’t want sympathy they want our full abasement and the rapt attention, they don’t need any tears now, they want surrender front and center. This is the next step in the ploy to box the White man out finally, get him all raw with his bleeding heart and then slap him around for being a sap. Of course any sane White man knew this from the beginning, that blubbering, whining and whimpering would lead us to no good. For if you try to defend yourself with tears you will end up drowning in them, that the only way to defend yourself is with complete and total victory. We men of the White race knew it once, and we can learn it again if we want.
March 3 2024
In February 2024 Sadia Khatri took the pages of The Butler Collegian and served us up some sick slop for our anti-edification. This nigger (and I assume she’s a nigger and if not she’s a nigger anyway) gave us the standard tropes about White Guilt. It used to be they liked White Guilt and they still do really, it’s just no longer their official position they having moved on from personal White Guilt to Universal White Guilt. What they don’t want, apparently, is just Whites blubbering about how bad they feel about being White. They want Whites to take a step back, realize they are guilty for being White, realize that the system Whites created makes all Whites guilty for being White, that all Whites will always be guilty for being White for all time, and then in a serious mood, give the entire store away to the niggers. Call it White Guilt 2.0, or simply total and abject surrender.
“Whiteness has always been weaponized against populations of color. When the white people who manipulate their privilege are called out, they often become highly defensive. The phenomenon of white guilt and white tears encapsulates how white people often display their discomfort surrounding tough conversations about race through guilt or becoming defensive. When engaging in dialogue about their privilege and the deeply disturbing and harsh reality of racism and slavery in America, there are white people who feel so deeply uncomfortable that guilt and tears are all they can offer.”
When you think about it of course White Guilt is their mother lode and meal ticket, always has been. With some rare exceptions prior to the Second World War there was no such thing as White Guilt and even those exceptions were not really fully fledged White Guilt as we have come to know it, but rather some pontificating egg heads bemoaning the eternal hard luck of the nigger. No, White Guilt is a post war phenomenon and coupled with White abdication (which it occasioned) it is the most important event of our era. Safe to say that never in history before had a group that was victorious felt bad about their victory, never before had such a group said they were sorry for winning and started whining for the losers. So prevalent and “natural” does it seem today that it is hard to get one’s head around how puzzling it really is. The explanation of course is simple of course: Jews. It was the Jews who taught the White Man that we were supposedly bad for having had a country of our own, and of course they got enough of us to believe it and it’s been downhill ever since then.
“Dr. Teigha VanHester, assistant professor of race, gender and sexuality studies, provided a framework for understanding white guilt and privilege. White guilt is an inability to separate the self from structures within which the notion of whiteness in race perpetuates those privileges VanHester said. White people are guilty about having privilege. They don’t want to acknowledge the privilege, but they benefit from it and thus that is what is leading to guilt. White privilege is nocuous. White supremacy and anti-Blackness are so deeply embedded into our society that white privilege, guilt and tears are weaponized to seem like normal racial dynamics, where people of color are constantly gaslit about their experiences.”
It of course goes without saying that anyone who teachers race and gender is a serious enemy of our people, they will use both as a cudgel to beat us about our heads. And of course this VanHester creature is not only no exception to this rule she is a Exhibit A. She is one of those hulking tattooed Samoans who have grunted their way through world history and just because she now speaks English the meanings of her sounds is no better than those grunts. Witness the title of her dissertation: From Violent Inceptions To Unapologetic Existence: Theorizing the Griot Of Defiant Black, Queer, Femme Counter Storytelling And The Implications for Epistemic Liberation Using Pleasure Activism and Defiant Rhetorical Performance. As they used to say there is a lot to unpack here. First off the most amazing thing is that this trash garnered her an actual PhD, and not out of the bottom of a cracker jack box but from what one presumes was once a decent university: Illinois State. And of course this degree permits her to run rampant on the rest of us and blather and bloviate on non-subjects and toss her mass of fat around like she is a pipe smoking professor in tweeds. You have to give her credit though, if credit is the right word, in that she has perfected the art of Defiant Rhetoric if by that one counts saying Blame Whitey over and over again as a prime example.
“As a professor, VanHester shared that weaponizing white privilege is never allowed in her classroom. I make it very clear, VanHester said. I write in my syllabus, You cannot weaponize tears in my classes. We don’t center whiteness or cisgenderhood or ableism. My classes are spaces for people in the margins, built by people of the margins. White tears put racially marginalized individuals in a deeply uncomfortable situation. It now becomes our responsibility to console you for the guilt that you are experiencing because of what your ancestors may have done. It is ludicrous to hold the racially marginalized responsible for making sure that white people do not feel threatened by our experiences and histories.”
Why on earth would any would any White person take this class? Why for all intents and purposes they should have a target on their backs or be put in the corner in a dunce cap with their eyes cast down, or be put in the stocks to have eggs tossed at you or be forced to have a Scarlet W stitched on to the front of the clothing, and that is barely metaphorically speaking. In this class they don’t want White tears, they want the White man on his knees in servility and in worship. The want the White man to be pilloried from pillar to post and they want him to take it stone faced. And just so you know the idea that the coloreds would in any way be moved to guilt themselves should the White man start the waterworks is ludicrous on its face, so schooled have they been in their innate moral superiority and so celebrated and feted for it that they are long past the stage of having any lingering doubts about it. No, they are now simply a vindictive lot who wield their total control and power at American universities and shame on their own part is not in anywise on their cards.
“The tears of white people — white women in particular — can have detrimental impacts. White women are often inherently perceived as virtuous damsels in distress who need to be sheltered. Their womanhood is honored as something innocent, precious and in need of protection. We know that these white tears led to the death of Emmett Till, VanHester said. The woman ended up recanting. However, a 14-year-old boy was murdered and lynched beyond recognition. When white tears are shed, bodies of color pay the price.”
It’s an old Anglo-Saxon saying that you can’t defend yourself with tears. No, no sympathy was ever due to the coloreds, no fellow feeling, and no solicitousness. It’s not that that day is past, that day never was. Indeed, this reprehensible essay shows that the coloreds know what we all should know, that it’s a world of power out there and you get and it and you wield it without remorse or you suffer. Indeed, you can see that this is the next step in their bid to exclude us totally. First they played the victim and said they wanted us to feel for them, the more tears the better. This was classic White Guilt, the tugging at the heartstrings and the tiny violins coming out to serenade the spooks. But that was in retrospect an age of innocence and of naiveté. Now they don’t want sympathy they want our full abasement and the rapt attention, they don’t need any tears now, they want surrender front and center. This is the next step in the ploy to box the White man out finally, get him all raw with his bleeding heart and then slap him around for being a sap. Of course any sane White man knew this from the beginning, that blubbering, whining and whimpering would lead us to no good. For if you try to defend yourself with tears you will end up drowning in them, that the only way to defend yourself is with complete and total victory. We men of the White race knew it once, and we can learn it again if we want.
