The Niggers Must Stay
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2023 12:25 am
Douglas Mercer
November 19 2023
If the worse really is the better our future is bright indeed. In the formerly White island kingdom of Great Britain a few traitorous “Lords” have struck down as “illegal” even a weak-kneed and halfhearted proposal to stop the never-ending invasion of the former demi paradise. Send them to Rwanda? Why not send them to Davey Jones Locker? That’ll show them refoulment. But just as Rule Britannia is out of bounds and England no longer rules the waves shooting the boats and sending the dark criminals beneath the waves is beyond the pale. Safe to say no visionary stalks the land who might once and for all put an end to the outrage. During the latest “shuffle” the Indian Home Secretary who only talks a good game was sacked. What looks to be a black man was installed as the Home Secretary though it’s no home you or I would ever acknowledge. And in a truly wicked move from out of the crypt they dredged toff in chief David Cameron and stood him up in the foreign policy post. Safe to say this is the Empire striking back and the Jews now are one hundred percent back in the saddle after some vague rumblings from Suella Braverman. But when a noxious street-shitter become the Great White Hope of England you know the situation is hopeless.
***
Jew courts have been known long and far for intervening to stop any attempt to stop the invasion. Back in the late 1990s a Jewish judge put the kibosh on California’s Save Our State initiative. And certainly any so called “Lord” who made it to England’s high court has the kosher seal of approval. And the so-called Rwanda Plan was no great shakes and most certainly nothing to write home about. You have to send the invaders by plane back to Africa at the taxpayer expense? Who came up with this cockamamie plan? Bullets are cheaper and more effective. But even this Rube Goldberg type plan was too much for the grave justices to stomach. No, they don’t want invaders being removed. They want the niggers to stay.
“The British government’s policy of relocating asylum seekers who don’t arrive in the U.K. via the proper channels to Rwanda is unlawful, the U.K. Supreme Court has ruled. In its highly anticipated judgment published on Wednesday (November 15 2023), the court dismissed an appeal from the governing Conservatives against the Court of Appeal’s decision that its removal of asylum seekers to the African nation is unlawful.”
Unlawful? What, is there some Jew international human rights treaty that pertains? Of course there is, there always is. Back in the day the Jews coerced once self-respecting White nations to sign their national life and sovereignty away and promise to be nice to the various niggers of the world by letting them run roughshod over our homelands. And sign their death warrant they all did. And so lo these many years later any attempt to extricate ourselves from the Jewish legal vise is impossible. Of course you could de-sign that Jewish document but in elite circles that would elicit screaming and banshee wails that you could hear from the Cliffs of Dover all the way to Calais. No, those suicidal human right documents are their vision of Utopia, are their version of Magna Carta: unimpeachable, sacrosanct, and holy. Those human rights documents are the pillars of the new world order. And so you have to work around them but they function as invader fly traps, the invaders come in but they never leave. And to suggest that you might leave the agreement is tantamount to suggesting that you might shoot the criminals who perpetually darken your door. And we all know that is crazy, right?
“The judgment, handed down by Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones, held that there were substantial grounds for believing that asylum seekers would face a real risk of ill-treatment by reason of refoulement in the event that they were removed to Rwanda. Refoulement relates to the forced return of asylum seekers to any country where they may be subjected to persecution. The court took the view that such a policy would be incompatible with the principles outlined in the numerous international treaties Britain is a signatory of, including the European Convention on Human Rights, which is enshrined in U.K. law through the Human Rights Act 1998.”
Refoulment is Yididish term of art meaning returning an invader back to the rock form under which he crawled. Non-refoulment is said to be a bedrock principle of international law. You can’t send them back because a hair on their head might get scratched. No mention is made of how they foul our nests, of the how their presence in our lands threaten us. From my admittedly rudimentary understanding of world history the Jew as refugee in the late 1930s is the model for all time and space. After the war the world vowed never again and any Hottentot, Kickapoo, Tijuana greaser or buck tribesman clicking out his “language” on the back of his epiglottis was deemed to be the most awe inspiring of things: a refugee, an asylum seeker. And any story at all would do, that they emanated from a hell hole, that black incompetence made diseases a rampant thing where they came from, that the warring of the brothers puts them at risk. And if they ticked off any one of those boxes (or any box at all, really) then by all means they had the law given right to traipse into our neighborhoods and proceed to turn it into a violent simulacrum of the places they came from. If you think this is patent nonsense you are not wrong. But to say that this is the hallmark sine qua non of the Jewish ruling class is the exact truth. By means of judicial mumbo jumbo they have managed to make a universal principle that the blacks and browns have a sacred right (right mind you!) to live by and leech off White people. Should this rule ever tumble their whole edifice would collapse like a mud hut in a light spring rain.
“While the court accepted that theoretically illegal migrants could be sent to a safe third country for processing, it stated that Rwanda’s complicated and controversial history could not be effectively ignored or sidelined. The judgment is a major blow for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and another thorn in the side of the government in its pursuit of delivering on a promise to stop the influx of illegal immigrants on England’s southern coast from the European mainland.”
It’s only ostensibly a blow for Sunak; in his heart of hearts he is smiling. This street shitting Goldman’s Sachs alum is not heartbroken that the law went down in flames. He has to talk a brave game in order to play his chosen role in the Jewish charade. But if anyone thinks that this immigrant child doesn’t want to see England overrun he is not paying attention. Sunak is from a family of Pakis and Indian who moved to Africa and then to the metropole which shows the weakness of the theory of Empire. He has a sister who works for something called a global fund at the United Nations. That is he is cosmopolitan scum who knows that the Jews are his piper whom he must always pay. He is one of those people from nowhere and everywhere, not a bloke from Coventry and certainly not a Shopshire lad. He is the image of reverse colonization sine qua non: an Indian at Ten Downing Street. Foreigners now rule England, the kinds of people who could not tell Vera Lynn from their backsides. They say once Winston Churchill suggested that Keep England White should be a party slogan but obviously it was never taken up. Enoch Powell said the black man would have the whip hand and he was right. They once said vote labor if you want a nigger for a neighbor but now you vote Tory and you have one for your Prime Minister. When that other English leader said the Winds of Change were descending on Africa no one yet knew that the hurricane would come home so soon.
“It means either a total rewrite of the government’s Illegal Migration Act, which formally gave the authorities the power to detain and deport those who arrive in Britain unlawfully, or more radical action to extricate the U.K. from the European Convention on Human Rights. The scheme was supposed to see people arriving in the UK illegally deported to the African nation where their asylum claims would be assessed. It cost the government £120 million (€138 million) and also tied it to housing some of Rwanda’s vulnerable asylum seekers. It has caused little other than embarrassment for ministers since its inception, with the very first flight in June 2022 cancelled due to legal action.”
Given the viable alternative of simply sinking the boats this plan was a loser from the beginning and was anyways dead in its tracks. The sad fact of the matter is the people who rule England (Jews) have no interest in stopping the invasion; in fact their interest is in seeing it invaded. They have an interest in elevating some “conservatives” to talk tough on migration to lull the masses into somnolence but that’s just pure preordained and scripted theater. Perhaps the spectacle of the unwashed Muslim masses chanting kill the Jews at the Cenotaph has given a Jew or two pause but so red fanged is the Jewish blood lust for White blood that that won’t stop a thing. And even if the Jews en masse really wanted to stop the invasion (they do not and will not) the fact is the machine of destruction they have created is so powerful that by now it it has taken on a life of its own. No, the pressure is actually going the other way. As Africa slides into its destined end the billions there and the millions form the always war town Middle East will be more and more on the hoof to our homes. And the people in power don’t want to stop it and won’t stop it. And even if they did a Court will tell them it’s not allowed. A Jewish treaty told them so.
November 19 2023
If the worse really is the better our future is bright indeed. In the formerly White island kingdom of Great Britain a few traitorous “Lords” have struck down as “illegal” even a weak-kneed and halfhearted proposal to stop the never-ending invasion of the former demi paradise. Send them to Rwanda? Why not send them to Davey Jones Locker? That’ll show them refoulment. But just as Rule Britannia is out of bounds and England no longer rules the waves shooting the boats and sending the dark criminals beneath the waves is beyond the pale. Safe to say no visionary stalks the land who might once and for all put an end to the outrage. During the latest “shuffle” the Indian Home Secretary who only talks a good game was sacked. What looks to be a black man was installed as the Home Secretary though it’s no home you or I would ever acknowledge. And in a truly wicked move from out of the crypt they dredged toff in chief David Cameron and stood him up in the foreign policy post. Safe to say this is the Empire striking back and the Jews now are one hundred percent back in the saddle after some vague rumblings from Suella Braverman. But when a noxious street-shitter become the Great White Hope of England you know the situation is hopeless.
***
Jew courts have been known long and far for intervening to stop any attempt to stop the invasion. Back in the late 1990s a Jewish judge put the kibosh on California’s Save Our State initiative. And certainly any so called “Lord” who made it to England’s high court has the kosher seal of approval. And the so-called Rwanda Plan was no great shakes and most certainly nothing to write home about. You have to send the invaders by plane back to Africa at the taxpayer expense? Who came up with this cockamamie plan? Bullets are cheaper and more effective. But even this Rube Goldberg type plan was too much for the grave justices to stomach. No, they don’t want invaders being removed. They want the niggers to stay.
“The British government’s policy of relocating asylum seekers who don’t arrive in the U.K. via the proper channels to Rwanda is unlawful, the U.K. Supreme Court has ruled. In its highly anticipated judgment published on Wednesday (November 15 2023), the court dismissed an appeal from the governing Conservatives against the Court of Appeal’s decision that its removal of asylum seekers to the African nation is unlawful.”
Unlawful? What, is there some Jew international human rights treaty that pertains? Of course there is, there always is. Back in the day the Jews coerced once self-respecting White nations to sign their national life and sovereignty away and promise to be nice to the various niggers of the world by letting them run roughshod over our homelands. And sign their death warrant they all did. And so lo these many years later any attempt to extricate ourselves from the Jewish legal vise is impossible. Of course you could de-sign that Jewish document but in elite circles that would elicit screaming and banshee wails that you could hear from the Cliffs of Dover all the way to Calais. No, those suicidal human right documents are their vision of Utopia, are their version of Magna Carta: unimpeachable, sacrosanct, and holy. Those human rights documents are the pillars of the new world order. And so you have to work around them but they function as invader fly traps, the invaders come in but they never leave. And to suggest that you might leave the agreement is tantamount to suggesting that you might shoot the criminals who perpetually darken your door. And we all know that is crazy, right?
“The judgment, handed down by Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones, held that there were substantial grounds for believing that asylum seekers would face a real risk of ill-treatment by reason of refoulement in the event that they were removed to Rwanda. Refoulement relates to the forced return of asylum seekers to any country where they may be subjected to persecution. The court took the view that such a policy would be incompatible with the principles outlined in the numerous international treaties Britain is a signatory of, including the European Convention on Human Rights, which is enshrined in U.K. law through the Human Rights Act 1998.”
Refoulment is Yididish term of art meaning returning an invader back to the rock form under which he crawled. Non-refoulment is said to be a bedrock principle of international law. You can’t send them back because a hair on their head might get scratched. No mention is made of how they foul our nests, of the how their presence in our lands threaten us. From my admittedly rudimentary understanding of world history the Jew as refugee in the late 1930s is the model for all time and space. After the war the world vowed never again and any Hottentot, Kickapoo, Tijuana greaser or buck tribesman clicking out his “language” on the back of his epiglottis was deemed to be the most awe inspiring of things: a refugee, an asylum seeker. And any story at all would do, that they emanated from a hell hole, that black incompetence made diseases a rampant thing where they came from, that the warring of the brothers puts them at risk. And if they ticked off any one of those boxes (or any box at all, really) then by all means they had the law given right to traipse into our neighborhoods and proceed to turn it into a violent simulacrum of the places they came from. If you think this is patent nonsense you are not wrong. But to say that this is the hallmark sine qua non of the Jewish ruling class is the exact truth. By means of judicial mumbo jumbo they have managed to make a universal principle that the blacks and browns have a sacred right (right mind you!) to live by and leech off White people. Should this rule ever tumble their whole edifice would collapse like a mud hut in a light spring rain.
“While the court accepted that theoretically illegal migrants could be sent to a safe third country for processing, it stated that Rwanda’s complicated and controversial history could not be effectively ignored or sidelined. The judgment is a major blow for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and another thorn in the side of the government in its pursuit of delivering on a promise to stop the influx of illegal immigrants on England’s southern coast from the European mainland.”
It’s only ostensibly a blow for Sunak; in his heart of hearts he is smiling. This street shitting Goldman’s Sachs alum is not heartbroken that the law went down in flames. He has to talk a brave game in order to play his chosen role in the Jewish charade. But if anyone thinks that this immigrant child doesn’t want to see England overrun he is not paying attention. Sunak is from a family of Pakis and Indian who moved to Africa and then to the metropole which shows the weakness of the theory of Empire. He has a sister who works for something called a global fund at the United Nations. That is he is cosmopolitan scum who knows that the Jews are his piper whom he must always pay. He is one of those people from nowhere and everywhere, not a bloke from Coventry and certainly not a Shopshire lad. He is the image of reverse colonization sine qua non: an Indian at Ten Downing Street. Foreigners now rule England, the kinds of people who could not tell Vera Lynn from their backsides. They say once Winston Churchill suggested that Keep England White should be a party slogan but obviously it was never taken up. Enoch Powell said the black man would have the whip hand and he was right. They once said vote labor if you want a nigger for a neighbor but now you vote Tory and you have one for your Prime Minister. When that other English leader said the Winds of Change were descending on Africa no one yet knew that the hurricane would come home so soon.
“It means either a total rewrite of the government’s Illegal Migration Act, which formally gave the authorities the power to detain and deport those who arrive in Britain unlawfully, or more radical action to extricate the U.K. from the European Convention on Human Rights. The scheme was supposed to see people arriving in the UK illegally deported to the African nation where their asylum claims would be assessed. It cost the government £120 million (€138 million) and also tied it to housing some of Rwanda’s vulnerable asylum seekers. It has caused little other than embarrassment for ministers since its inception, with the very first flight in June 2022 cancelled due to legal action.”
Given the viable alternative of simply sinking the boats this plan was a loser from the beginning and was anyways dead in its tracks. The sad fact of the matter is the people who rule England (Jews) have no interest in stopping the invasion; in fact their interest is in seeing it invaded. They have an interest in elevating some “conservatives” to talk tough on migration to lull the masses into somnolence but that’s just pure preordained and scripted theater. Perhaps the spectacle of the unwashed Muslim masses chanting kill the Jews at the Cenotaph has given a Jew or two pause but so red fanged is the Jewish blood lust for White blood that that won’t stop a thing. And even if the Jews en masse really wanted to stop the invasion (they do not and will not) the fact is the machine of destruction they have created is so powerful that by now it it has taken on a life of its own. No, the pressure is actually going the other way. As Africa slides into its destined end the billions there and the millions form the always war town Middle East will be more and more on the hoof to our homes. And the people in power don’t want to stop it and won’t stop it. And even if they did a Court will tell them it’s not allowed. A Jewish treaty told them so.
