A Denationalized Gallery
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:28 pm
Douglas Mercer
October 19 2023
The head maggot and faggot of Canada Justin Trudeau infamously yet clearly laid out the enemy predicate by saying that the very notion of a nation founded by settlers is offensive to him, that old stock White Canadians are an unpleasant relic who will be replaced; that there is no Canadian identity, and no mainstream Canada and it is this which make it the first postnational state. Now most of our rotten elites will not be so direct and forthright and frank about it but be sure that is exactly their thinking. Occasionally a Jew on the outskirts will pop off and say something similar or a politician will get caught mistakenly on the record and say they want to rub our noses in diversity. But for the most part the leaders like to frame the invasion in a “positive” light, saying it’s moral and just and is welcoming the stranger. But once you get down into the institutions the language might be high minded but the intent could not be more obvious. They find settler ideology offensive and think the White race is a relic; and they assiduously are going about replacing us, one noxious artifact at a time. Anyone who does not believe it should just read the blurbs in the museums guides and the messages they put on the exhibits, and the blared ballyhoo in the lying Jewish Press.
“Museums across the West are having an identity crisis, wrestling with their roles in society and their colonial heritage. But as Canada has begun reckoning intensely in recent years with the ugly chapters of its history with Indigenous people, its museums have pushed further than most in transforming themselves — scrapping galleries, rethinking their exhibitions, refashioning the stories they tell and who has the power to tell them, in a process called decolonization.”
Have you ever wrestled with our colonial heritage? I doubt it. Instead you have celebrated it and cherished it and held it out to your children as a shining example for the future. But the cuck canucks of Canada are on the cutting edge of anti-Whiteness, they are wrestling and reckoning and grappling with the past that they call pure hate. They have their faux unmarked graves in which they found a whole lot of nothing but no mortification stalks the land. Instead they step over the grand embarrassment of claiming hundreds (an untold number really!) of murdered little brown kids and coming up empty handed and they give the green light for the curators and the art crowd to plow onward with their pulverizing of the White past. Gone are the galleries of White art, junked are the White exhibits, and they take a noble story of Whites fanning out across the land and refashion it into what they call “fascism.” They know that we no longer have the power to tell our stories in large public forms. We are consigned to the niches where the truth can be told. But in the current crop of powerful institutions (which we created but abandoned) we are verboten. Were we to walk in and give them a piece of our minds they’d call in whatever the Canadian equivalent of the FBI is faster than you can say faked unmarked graves. And we’d have to stand there with security amidst the big display of Indigenous pottery shards which they have titled Tears for the Red Man before we were ushered into an undisclosed location where we were grilled about the extent of our wrong think.
“Jean-Francois Belisle who was recently appointed the National Gallery’s new director by the Canadian government said we’re one of the few countries that have gone that far into that thought process. In an interview at the museum, Mr. Bélisle tended to avoid the word decolonization, a term he described as very loaded, but said confronting museums’ roots was necessary. To a certain extent, all museums are colonial constructions, and some people have argued that true decolonization would require shutting down every single museum because they’re born out of a colonial approach to the other, added Mr. Bélisle. He argues, instead, that change can come from questioning assumptions, acknowledging biases and engaging in true dialogue.”
Yes indeed the museum itself is another creation of the White man. Of course it was you say, none of the dog races would have come up with such a concept. First off the notion of such a marvel is beyond their comprehension, and even had they dreamed it up by sheer chance they would have been stymied right off the bat. You see they would have realized straightaway they had nothing to put it in it. The Chinese might have put in that decorative nonsense they poured out in droves, if the Jews ever made any art worth knowing about I for one never heard tell, the Africans had those hideous masks and spears that had a doodle on it, the Indians had those shards they make so much of, the abos had a didgeridoo which makes that awful sound, and the Arabs, who knows really, but nothing worth memorializing. The White man as you know on the other hand had a veritable embarrassment of riches unlike the other races which just had embarrassments. There’s a reason the word museum comes from the Latin denoting a place dedicated to the muses. From the very beginning the White man was creating works of art which they soon realized the vast worth of and decided to house them in a temple to our race. The other races were wide-eyed when they saw the treasures we had and, being jealous, wanted immediately to destroy them.
“All the values of museums are now being called into question, said Yves Bergeron, an expert on museums at the University of Quebec in Montreal. In Europe, museum decolonization has mostly meant starting to repatriate artwork looted from former colonies. But in Canada, whose colonial history consisted of taking land from the Indigenous and suppressing their cultures, museums are changing from the inside, Mr. Bergeron said.”
Boy it sure make you rest easy knowing that they have an “expert” in museums on the case. No way he could get anything wrong. Clearly the very fact that he’s being quoted as a big wig in the art world means he’s not on the side of the White man. He’s one of those defectors who calls all into question; and what he really means is he calls into question everything that is of value to the White man. We had beautiful statues? And they were White? That’s got to go. Some of the pictures showed the White man conquering? And worse showed the red or black or brown man in a subordinate position? That really has to go. In fact lurid demons like this guy are presiding over a veritable clearance of fire sale of the White world. In fact the fact is they really should shut down the whole operation, because the very interstitial essence of the museum reeks of Whiteness, does it not? Those displays and plaques and guides: the whole thing was dreamt up by the White race, and it will always be imbued with it. But then of course these moral midgets and cretins would have to get real jobs and actually do an honest day’s work for a change. And then where would the find a platform so geared toward deconstructing or dismantling or disabling Whiteness? No they will bask in the after glow of our greatness and use the means and conceptions we created even as they try to take it all down.
“The trouble was that the national identity it fostered had a glaring omission: It excluded the Indigenous inhabitants whom successive Canadian governments tried to marginalize from both the land and history. For most of its history, the National Gallery — the only museum whose mandate is to showcase the best of Canadian art to the country and the world — exhibited works by English-Canadian, French-Canadian and European artists, but not by Indigenous ones. Until a couple of decades ago, Indigenous art was not considered fine art but ethnography — and relegated to the nearby Canadian Museum Of History. Then a series of crises triggered the start of Canada’s coming to terms with its colonial past, a process that spilled over into the art world.”
Actually it was not fine art but---garbage. And it’s clear as a bell that it was not a glaring omission, that implies that something was missed, but nothing was. When they used to say White Canada Forever and they commissioned these great buildings to house their precious heirlooms the notion that they would “include” those tee pees and arrow flints and baskets and pottery shards would have elicited howls and gales of laughter. You see they were not forging a national identity, they were reflecting it. And the nation and the identity belonged to them, was their own possession, and belonged to them and included no one else. They did all this unselfconsciously, never dreaming of a day when anything so basic to the inheritance of their people would be called into question. The alleged “crisis” that happened was no crisis, it was a self conscious assault, and didn’t so much as trigger but fomented a revolution. Turn on any screen and read about how California is giving in state tuition to residents of Mexico or how the American government is smoothing the way of Ecuadoran “immigrants” and you can see the residue of the fall out.
“In Canada, the decolonization of museums took off with the growing awareness surrounding the First Nations, said Michele Rivet, the vice chairwoman of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights’ board of trustee. The National Gallery’s collection of Indigenous art two decades ago was willfully inadequate. I think that to represent the history fairly of art-making in Canada you have to start with the original people of the land. The inclusion of Indigenous art at the heart of the National Gallery was an important step, Mr. Loft said. But Indigenous individuals must become decision makers at the National Gallery and other museums to complete the process of decolonization, he said. Now reconciliation and decolonization have to be at the heart of fundamental, foundational change, said Mr. Loft, who is of Mohawk-Jewish heritage.”
Who ever heard tell of that? A Jew asking for fundamental and foundational change? Story of our lives, right? He was born to a Jew mother and his father was the proverbial drunk Indian who flew the coop; as the birth was in 1960 you can be sure his slattern Yid mother was one of those “progressive Jews” but couldn’t find a nigger to knock her up so settled on a red man; he was raised by his mother’s side of the family which was rife and lousy with “survivors” and those who did miraculously find their way up the chimney. As he grew into his teens and spurred on no doubt by his now “liberated” mother he immersed himself in Indian lore which amounts to drinking whiskey and living off the government and lazing about the reservation; and lo and behold he learned that the Indians in Canada were assigned status numbers—they were not branded on them but still: just like the Jews! How about that, eh? It was a real find and more than enough for him to cut his teeth on and help him make his bones. Coming of age in a rotten age he found his bailiwick in “curation” and now he gets to pontificate about the evil White ones, those White settlers and how there is no White culture, or what White culture there is needs to be strangled in its old age like a euthanasia patient. And of course all the laurels that the Jews hand out are his for the grasping, he’s something ridiculously called a “Trudeau National Visiting Professor” and he specializes in, of all things, Indigenous aesthetics which heretofore no one suspected of being extant. That is he’s parlayed the Jew-Indian thing for all that it’s worth, he’s a victim’s stakes twofer, and in the not so grand tradition of that maggot and faggot he’s knocking those settlers off their perches and shaking Whiteness to it roots. No more the sweet hymn to the muses but the malediction of demons. From a dirty Jews it’s everything you would expect.
October 19 2023
The head maggot and faggot of Canada Justin Trudeau infamously yet clearly laid out the enemy predicate by saying that the very notion of a nation founded by settlers is offensive to him, that old stock White Canadians are an unpleasant relic who will be replaced; that there is no Canadian identity, and no mainstream Canada and it is this which make it the first postnational state. Now most of our rotten elites will not be so direct and forthright and frank about it but be sure that is exactly their thinking. Occasionally a Jew on the outskirts will pop off and say something similar or a politician will get caught mistakenly on the record and say they want to rub our noses in diversity. But for the most part the leaders like to frame the invasion in a “positive” light, saying it’s moral and just and is welcoming the stranger. But once you get down into the institutions the language might be high minded but the intent could not be more obvious. They find settler ideology offensive and think the White race is a relic; and they assiduously are going about replacing us, one noxious artifact at a time. Anyone who does not believe it should just read the blurbs in the museums guides and the messages they put on the exhibits, and the blared ballyhoo in the lying Jewish Press.
“Museums across the West are having an identity crisis, wrestling with their roles in society and their colonial heritage. But as Canada has begun reckoning intensely in recent years with the ugly chapters of its history with Indigenous people, its museums have pushed further than most in transforming themselves — scrapping galleries, rethinking their exhibitions, refashioning the stories they tell and who has the power to tell them, in a process called decolonization.”
Have you ever wrestled with our colonial heritage? I doubt it. Instead you have celebrated it and cherished it and held it out to your children as a shining example for the future. But the cuck canucks of Canada are on the cutting edge of anti-Whiteness, they are wrestling and reckoning and grappling with the past that they call pure hate. They have their faux unmarked graves in which they found a whole lot of nothing but no mortification stalks the land. Instead they step over the grand embarrassment of claiming hundreds (an untold number really!) of murdered little brown kids and coming up empty handed and they give the green light for the curators and the art crowd to plow onward with their pulverizing of the White past. Gone are the galleries of White art, junked are the White exhibits, and they take a noble story of Whites fanning out across the land and refashion it into what they call “fascism.” They know that we no longer have the power to tell our stories in large public forms. We are consigned to the niches where the truth can be told. But in the current crop of powerful institutions (which we created but abandoned) we are verboten. Were we to walk in and give them a piece of our minds they’d call in whatever the Canadian equivalent of the FBI is faster than you can say faked unmarked graves. And we’d have to stand there with security amidst the big display of Indigenous pottery shards which they have titled Tears for the Red Man before we were ushered into an undisclosed location where we were grilled about the extent of our wrong think.
“Jean-Francois Belisle who was recently appointed the National Gallery’s new director by the Canadian government said we’re one of the few countries that have gone that far into that thought process. In an interview at the museum, Mr. Bélisle tended to avoid the word decolonization, a term he described as very loaded, but said confronting museums’ roots was necessary. To a certain extent, all museums are colonial constructions, and some people have argued that true decolonization would require shutting down every single museum because they’re born out of a colonial approach to the other, added Mr. Bélisle. He argues, instead, that change can come from questioning assumptions, acknowledging biases and engaging in true dialogue.”
Yes indeed the museum itself is another creation of the White man. Of course it was you say, none of the dog races would have come up with such a concept. First off the notion of such a marvel is beyond their comprehension, and even had they dreamed it up by sheer chance they would have been stymied right off the bat. You see they would have realized straightaway they had nothing to put it in it. The Chinese might have put in that decorative nonsense they poured out in droves, if the Jews ever made any art worth knowing about I for one never heard tell, the Africans had those hideous masks and spears that had a doodle on it, the Indians had those shards they make so much of, the abos had a didgeridoo which makes that awful sound, and the Arabs, who knows really, but nothing worth memorializing. The White man as you know on the other hand had a veritable embarrassment of riches unlike the other races which just had embarrassments. There’s a reason the word museum comes from the Latin denoting a place dedicated to the muses. From the very beginning the White man was creating works of art which they soon realized the vast worth of and decided to house them in a temple to our race. The other races were wide-eyed when they saw the treasures we had and, being jealous, wanted immediately to destroy them.
“All the values of museums are now being called into question, said Yves Bergeron, an expert on museums at the University of Quebec in Montreal. In Europe, museum decolonization has mostly meant starting to repatriate artwork looted from former colonies. But in Canada, whose colonial history consisted of taking land from the Indigenous and suppressing their cultures, museums are changing from the inside, Mr. Bergeron said.”
Boy it sure make you rest easy knowing that they have an “expert” in museums on the case. No way he could get anything wrong. Clearly the very fact that he’s being quoted as a big wig in the art world means he’s not on the side of the White man. He’s one of those defectors who calls all into question; and what he really means is he calls into question everything that is of value to the White man. We had beautiful statues? And they were White? That’s got to go. Some of the pictures showed the White man conquering? And worse showed the red or black or brown man in a subordinate position? That really has to go. In fact lurid demons like this guy are presiding over a veritable clearance of fire sale of the White world. In fact the fact is they really should shut down the whole operation, because the very interstitial essence of the museum reeks of Whiteness, does it not? Those displays and plaques and guides: the whole thing was dreamt up by the White race, and it will always be imbued with it. But then of course these moral midgets and cretins would have to get real jobs and actually do an honest day’s work for a change. And then where would the find a platform so geared toward deconstructing or dismantling or disabling Whiteness? No they will bask in the after glow of our greatness and use the means and conceptions we created even as they try to take it all down.
“The trouble was that the national identity it fostered had a glaring omission: It excluded the Indigenous inhabitants whom successive Canadian governments tried to marginalize from both the land and history. For most of its history, the National Gallery — the only museum whose mandate is to showcase the best of Canadian art to the country and the world — exhibited works by English-Canadian, French-Canadian and European artists, but not by Indigenous ones. Until a couple of decades ago, Indigenous art was not considered fine art but ethnography — and relegated to the nearby Canadian Museum Of History. Then a series of crises triggered the start of Canada’s coming to terms with its colonial past, a process that spilled over into the art world.”
Actually it was not fine art but---garbage. And it’s clear as a bell that it was not a glaring omission, that implies that something was missed, but nothing was. When they used to say White Canada Forever and they commissioned these great buildings to house their precious heirlooms the notion that they would “include” those tee pees and arrow flints and baskets and pottery shards would have elicited howls and gales of laughter. You see they were not forging a national identity, they were reflecting it. And the nation and the identity belonged to them, was their own possession, and belonged to them and included no one else. They did all this unselfconsciously, never dreaming of a day when anything so basic to the inheritance of their people would be called into question. The alleged “crisis” that happened was no crisis, it was a self conscious assault, and didn’t so much as trigger but fomented a revolution. Turn on any screen and read about how California is giving in state tuition to residents of Mexico or how the American government is smoothing the way of Ecuadoran “immigrants” and you can see the residue of the fall out.
“In Canada, the decolonization of museums took off with the growing awareness surrounding the First Nations, said Michele Rivet, the vice chairwoman of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights’ board of trustee. The National Gallery’s collection of Indigenous art two decades ago was willfully inadequate. I think that to represent the history fairly of art-making in Canada you have to start with the original people of the land. The inclusion of Indigenous art at the heart of the National Gallery was an important step, Mr. Loft said. But Indigenous individuals must become decision makers at the National Gallery and other museums to complete the process of decolonization, he said. Now reconciliation and decolonization have to be at the heart of fundamental, foundational change, said Mr. Loft, who is of Mohawk-Jewish heritage.”
Who ever heard tell of that? A Jew asking for fundamental and foundational change? Story of our lives, right? He was born to a Jew mother and his father was the proverbial drunk Indian who flew the coop; as the birth was in 1960 you can be sure his slattern Yid mother was one of those “progressive Jews” but couldn’t find a nigger to knock her up so settled on a red man; he was raised by his mother’s side of the family which was rife and lousy with “survivors” and those who did miraculously find their way up the chimney. As he grew into his teens and spurred on no doubt by his now “liberated” mother he immersed himself in Indian lore which amounts to drinking whiskey and living off the government and lazing about the reservation; and lo and behold he learned that the Indians in Canada were assigned status numbers—they were not branded on them but still: just like the Jews! How about that, eh? It was a real find and more than enough for him to cut his teeth on and help him make his bones. Coming of age in a rotten age he found his bailiwick in “curation” and now he gets to pontificate about the evil White ones, those White settlers and how there is no White culture, or what White culture there is needs to be strangled in its old age like a euthanasia patient. And of course all the laurels that the Jews hand out are his for the grasping, he’s something ridiculously called a “Trudeau National Visiting Professor” and he specializes in, of all things, Indigenous aesthetics which heretofore no one suspected of being extant. That is he’s parlayed the Jew-Indian thing for all that it’s worth, he’s a victim’s stakes twofer, and in the not so grand tradition of that maggot and faggot he’s knocking those settlers off their perches and shaking Whiteness to it roots. No more the sweet hymn to the muses but the malediction of demons. From a dirty Jews it’s everything you would expect.
