Decolonizing The Lexicon
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2023 8:38 pm
Douglas Mercer
August 1 2023
The niggling nabobs at “Reframing Race” are that vilest of things: the anti-racist intellectual. Not an intellectual who is anti-racist (which is bad enough) but intellectuals who specialize in theoretical anti-racism. These are the highbrow and lofty race alien egg heads who get their scratch from such monstrosities as the Barrow-Cadbury Trust, the John Elleman Foundation, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, and the Lankelly Chase and Paul Hamlyn Foundation. These are groups comprised of compromised old White money that has gone to seed, or Jewish money working in tandem or cahoots with old White money gone to seed. And they keep the Indian Guru running Reframing Race in spades—that is, they keep his lights on. Not the hurly burly of the newspaper op-eds or the TV talkshows for them, no, they keep above the fray and toss their puny and putrid pronunciamentos down to the populace like self-styled Popes of racial equality. They exist in the frictionless and ethereal world of leafy foundation money where the groves are airless and racial reality is forbidden from stepping foot—from whence they emit their supposed pearls of wisdom to a world they hope will live in the eternal harmony of the peoples. That they are mind bendingly ignorant, well, it goes without saying.
“A new report from the research initiative Reframing Race about building an anti-racist future claims certain phrases, including ‘dark times’ and ‘denigrated’, should be avoided because they reinforce the racist connotations attached to whiteness versus blackness. It is self-evidently not enough to be on the right side of the argument on racism, the report reads. This conversation needs to be unstuck in order to build collective understanding of racism, as an ideology, a practice and a source of harm, and to move towards real change and solutions.”
Any anti-racist future will be no future for White people, or not White people worthy of the name. That’s their unstated but obvious goal. You would think they would have better things to do with their lives, the Indian guru for instance could be peddling those three shades of diarrhea known as Indian food in a slimy hole in the wall somewhere in London, or explaining why people in his homeland openly defecate in the streets, or why it is they still speak a comic version of English when the met the English centuries ago. That would be worth a hundred dollars or so from a foundation. Instead he beleaguers us with his picayune prescriptions about the racism of certain words, words and phrases which stretch back into the hallowed mists of English time, long before anyone ever though it might be a good idea to let his kind darken our door. And as far as Whiteness vs. blackness goes, anyone with their eyes not shut can tell the vast canyon of eternal difference between them in no time flat. And as they say—never the twain will meet, unless it’s in a dark alley and the nigger is robbing you with a shiv.
“Dr. Sanjiv Lingayah and Nina Kelly of Reframing Race claim that a number of everyday terms are in need of revision to avoid marginalizing people of color or feeding the conspiracy theories of far-right white nationalists. The report specifically calls out language that links blackness with negativity and whiteness with positivity. Terms such as ‘denigrated’ and ‘dark times’ compare light and dark colors, the report says, and can result in pushing Black people to the bottom of our constructed racial hierarchy.”
Remember when that guy got in trouble for saying niggardly? And you can’t say niggling. No longer can you say nigger in the woodpile to say what surprises or spooks you. Remember just the other day when that guy got in trouble for saying colored people rather than people of color? The want to keep a tight leash on the words we use. It used to be just plain nigger and that was good enough for an honest White man for a long time running. Then people got “enlightened” and it was negro and that was good enough for a long time. Then it was black that was beautiful (though it never was). And then Jesse Jackson got in front of a bank of microphones around about 1987 and decreed like a self-styled nigger Pope that the correct term of art was African-American. Many decades passed when that was good enough but of course that became dated as well. In England they had their visible minorities, and their BAME, but don’t you know those went out of fashion as well. The preferred nomenclature now is Global Majority. But what’s in name? Not much really in this instance. A nigger by any other would pose as great a threat.
“The report also condemns concepts like blushing red, ashen faces or lips turning blue for the way they only apply to white people. These terms act as a universal standard for all humans and can make minorities feel excluded, the report claims. Further, race as a whole should be dropped from our vocabularies, the report says, as it is socially constructed and only meaningful in relation to racism. Phrases and words that link negativity with blackness and positivity with whiteness – such as ‘black mood’, ‘dark times’ or “whiter than white’ – reinforce racist connotations and should be avoided, an anti-racism initiative has recommended.”
Don’t forget blue blood! Indeed, it is White people’s diaphanous and translucent skin that has always fascinated the world. And the fact that we are the only people who blush was once to our credit for our honesty but has since become our Achilles heel and a liability. No other people feels embarrassed or mortified, the dark races are made of stone when it comes to fellow feeling for the other races—surely something the White man needs to take up with a vengeance. We need more of those blue blooded great White men to come to the fore—otherwise it’s dark times.
“Reframing Race has put together a report titled Contains Strong Language to equip anti-racism and racial inequality campaigners with the words that have proven most effective in persuading people of the harm and structural nature of racism. The guide says associating whiteness with purity, cleanliness and goodness, and blackness with evil and destruction serves to reinforce harmful tropes and the constructed racial hierarchy in which black and minoritized people are pushed to the bottom.”
Do they really think we pulled this out of thin air? Wove it out whole cloth? Constructed it from nothing? What nonsense and balderdash. The notion that Whites are clean and healthy and wholesome and hale and hearty—and that negros are depraved and degenerate and destructive, these are not fictions conjured out of the blue—they are patently obvious to anyone with two good eyes in his head they are willing to use. They want to make it seem like a vast White conspiracy, that the White man one day woke up (early you can be sure) and decided to lie through his teeth about the niggers. That is comforting notion to them and, more than that, it plays into their entire scheme. But reality will out, truth will out, and anyone not besotted with a Jew addled world view will see thought it if not in a quick minute then—eventually.
“Other recommendations include avoiding the phrase white working class and rather using multi-ethnic working class or working-class people of all ethnicities because the use of the former wrongly excludes black and minoritized people from the class group. It also suggests avoiding the use of the term wealthy elite and rather saying the powerful few as the former phrase can trigger antisemitism and feed the conspiracy theories of far-right white nationalists. Other recommendations including referring to ethnic minority people rather than ethnic minorities as the latter term is dehumanizing.”
It’s the White working class that they hate the most. What used to be the backbone of progressivism—the old fashioned hard working White man (Jack London comes to mind) was jettisoned when it was learned that the hard working White man earning his keep by the sweat of his brow wasn’t all that in to new fangled theories of race and “gender” and the like—that he had an innate tough-eyed blue collar conservatism which would never serve them well. So they severed their ties with their once core constituency and left us twisting slowly in the wind. Now it is a multiracial working class (didn’t the blacks build America after all?) and the Hottentots and Kickapoos are most definitely included. And of course the “wealthy elite” is the least of it when it comes to what the Jews object to. It’s globalists and bankers and internationalists, not to mention parasitical termites.
“Dr Sanjiv Lingayah, the director of Reframing Race, a non-profit research-based initiative, and co-author of the report, said: The conversation on racism is stuck. With our trailblazing research we have been able to show how different messages on race and racism affect a mainstream audience. The upside is that new ways of talking about racism can lead to new ways of listening. This guidance provides a foundation from which advocates can be confident they are contributing positively to discussion, avoiding pitfalls and tropes, and moving others towards an anti-racist positions.”
Trailblazing no less! It’s more likely to peter out in a deep fog of towering inconsequence. This is the kind of big “report” which will make its way into news articles, and perhaps some slavish lackeys will take it to heart and change their nomenclature. They’ll be trotted around to human resources confabs and click on the power point, but for most a black mood will still be a black mood. And the more enlightened of us will recognize that this offal laden effort is just one more way to denigrate the White race. The very good news however is it looks like there may be more of us than they supposed or, at least, than they hoped for.
“The report by Reframing Race published last year found one in five people in England think that some races are born less intelligent than others, four in 10 people in England think that some ethnic groups are naturally harder working than others and three in 10 people in England think that someone’s race tells you something about their character.”
Those are rookie numbers—we need to kick that up a notch. But you can see why they are so panicked to reframe race, the real frame of race is gaining adherents on the daily. If people aren’t yet ready to decry parasitical Jews—just yet—their seat of the pants bar room stool yeoman’s race consciousness is still a deep seated and deep well that has yet to be depleted. Because in the end the Jews can juggle with words, and mumbo the jumbo and gobbledygook the gibberish as much as they want. But in the end the philosopher’s stone known as reality is a Rosetta Stone: it deciphers all. And you can call anything what you wish, and try to obfuscate the truth with roving circumlocutions, you can call them visible minorities or the global majority until the cows come home but no matter: for the clear eyed will always call a spade a spade and know that a nigger never did anyone any good. Fact!
August 1 2023
The niggling nabobs at “Reframing Race” are that vilest of things: the anti-racist intellectual. Not an intellectual who is anti-racist (which is bad enough) but intellectuals who specialize in theoretical anti-racism. These are the highbrow and lofty race alien egg heads who get their scratch from such monstrosities as the Barrow-Cadbury Trust, the John Elleman Foundation, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, and the Lankelly Chase and Paul Hamlyn Foundation. These are groups comprised of compromised old White money that has gone to seed, or Jewish money working in tandem or cahoots with old White money gone to seed. And they keep the Indian Guru running Reframing Race in spades—that is, they keep his lights on. Not the hurly burly of the newspaper op-eds or the TV talkshows for them, no, they keep above the fray and toss their puny and putrid pronunciamentos down to the populace like self-styled Popes of racial equality. They exist in the frictionless and ethereal world of leafy foundation money where the groves are airless and racial reality is forbidden from stepping foot—from whence they emit their supposed pearls of wisdom to a world they hope will live in the eternal harmony of the peoples. That they are mind bendingly ignorant, well, it goes without saying.
“A new report from the research initiative Reframing Race about building an anti-racist future claims certain phrases, including ‘dark times’ and ‘denigrated’, should be avoided because they reinforce the racist connotations attached to whiteness versus blackness. It is self-evidently not enough to be on the right side of the argument on racism, the report reads. This conversation needs to be unstuck in order to build collective understanding of racism, as an ideology, a practice and a source of harm, and to move towards real change and solutions.”
Any anti-racist future will be no future for White people, or not White people worthy of the name. That’s their unstated but obvious goal. You would think they would have better things to do with their lives, the Indian guru for instance could be peddling those three shades of diarrhea known as Indian food in a slimy hole in the wall somewhere in London, or explaining why people in his homeland openly defecate in the streets, or why it is they still speak a comic version of English when the met the English centuries ago. That would be worth a hundred dollars or so from a foundation. Instead he beleaguers us with his picayune prescriptions about the racism of certain words, words and phrases which stretch back into the hallowed mists of English time, long before anyone ever though it might be a good idea to let his kind darken our door. And as far as Whiteness vs. blackness goes, anyone with their eyes not shut can tell the vast canyon of eternal difference between them in no time flat. And as they say—never the twain will meet, unless it’s in a dark alley and the nigger is robbing you with a shiv.
“Dr. Sanjiv Lingayah and Nina Kelly of Reframing Race claim that a number of everyday terms are in need of revision to avoid marginalizing people of color or feeding the conspiracy theories of far-right white nationalists. The report specifically calls out language that links blackness with negativity and whiteness with positivity. Terms such as ‘denigrated’ and ‘dark times’ compare light and dark colors, the report says, and can result in pushing Black people to the bottom of our constructed racial hierarchy.”
Remember when that guy got in trouble for saying niggardly? And you can’t say niggling. No longer can you say nigger in the woodpile to say what surprises or spooks you. Remember just the other day when that guy got in trouble for saying colored people rather than people of color? The want to keep a tight leash on the words we use. It used to be just plain nigger and that was good enough for an honest White man for a long time running. Then people got “enlightened” and it was negro and that was good enough for a long time. Then it was black that was beautiful (though it never was). And then Jesse Jackson got in front of a bank of microphones around about 1987 and decreed like a self-styled nigger Pope that the correct term of art was African-American. Many decades passed when that was good enough but of course that became dated as well. In England they had their visible minorities, and their BAME, but don’t you know those went out of fashion as well. The preferred nomenclature now is Global Majority. But what’s in name? Not much really in this instance. A nigger by any other would pose as great a threat.
“The report also condemns concepts like blushing red, ashen faces or lips turning blue for the way they only apply to white people. These terms act as a universal standard for all humans and can make minorities feel excluded, the report claims. Further, race as a whole should be dropped from our vocabularies, the report says, as it is socially constructed and only meaningful in relation to racism. Phrases and words that link negativity with blackness and positivity with whiteness – such as ‘black mood’, ‘dark times’ or “whiter than white’ – reinforce racist connotations and should be avoided, an anti-racism initiative has recommended.”
Don’t forget blue blood! Indeed, it is White people’s diaphanous and translucent skin that has always fascinated the world. And the fact that we are the only people who blush was once to our credit for our honesty but has since become our Achilles heel and a liability. No other people feels embarrassed or mortified, the dark races are made of stone when it comes to fellow feeling for the other races—surely something the White man needs to take up with a vengeance. We need more of those blue blooded great White men to come to the fore—otherwise it’s dark times.
“Reframing Race has put together a report titled Contains Strong Language to equip anti-racism and racial inequality campaigners with the words that have proven most effective in persuading people of the harm and structural nature of racism. The guide says associating whiteness with purity, cleanliness and goodness, and blackness with evil and destruction serves to reinforce harmful tropes and the constructed racial hierarchy in which black and minoritized people are pushed to the bottom.”
Do they really think we pulled this out of thin air? Wove it out whole cloth? Constructed it from nothing? What nonsense and balderdash. The notion that Whites are clean and healthy and wholesome and hale and hearty—and that negros are depraved and degenerate and destructive, these are not fictions conjured out of the blue—they are patently obvious to anyone with two good eyes in his head they are willing to use. They want to make it seem like a vast White conspiracy, that the White man one day woke up (early you can be sure) and decided to lie through his teeth about the niggers. That is comforting notion to them and, more than that, it plays into their entire scheme. But reality will out, truth will out, and anyone not besotted with a Jew addled world view will see thought it if not in a quick minute then—eventually.
“Other recommendations include avoiding the phrase white working class and rather using multi-ethnic working class or working-class people of all ethnicities because the use of the former wrongly excludes black and minoritized people from the class group. It also suggests avoiding the use of the term wealthy elite and rather saying the powerful few as the former phrase can trigger antisemitism and feed the conspiracy theories of far-right white nationalists. Other recommendations including referring to ethnic minority people rather than ethnic minorities as the latter term is dehumanizing.”
It’s the White working class that they hate the most. What used to be the backbone of progressivism—the old fashioned hard working White man (Jack London comes to mind) was jettisoned when it was learned that the hard working White man earning his keep by the sweat of his brow wasn’t all that in to new fangled theories of race and “gender” and the like—that he had an innate tough-eyed blue collar conservatism which would never serve them well. So they severed their ties with their once core constituency and left us twisting slowly in the wind. Now it is a multiracial working class (didn’t the blacks build America after all?) and the Hottentots and Kickapoos are most definitely included. And of course the “wealthy elite” is the least of it when it comes to what the Jews object to. It’s globalists and bankers and internationalists, not to mention parasitical termites.
“Dr Sanjiv Lingayah, the director of Reframing Race, a non-profit research-based initiative, and co-author of the report, said: The conversation on racism is stuck. With our trailblazing research we have been able to show how different messages on race and racism affect a mainstream audience. The upside is that new ways of talking about racism can lead to new ways of listening. This guidance provides a foundation from which advocates can be confident they are contributing positively to discussion, avoiding pitfalls and tropes, and moving others towards an anti-racist positions.”
Trailblazing no less! It’s more likely to peter out in a deep fog of towering inconsequence. This is the kind of big “report” which will make its way into news articles, and perhaps some slavish lackeys will take it to heart and change their nomenclature. They’ll be trotted around to human resources confabs and click on the power point, but for most a black mood will still be a black mood. And the more enlightened of us will recognize that this offal laden effort is just one more way to denigrate the White race. The very good news however is it looks like there may be more of us than they supposed or, at least, than they hoped for.
“The report by Reframing Race published last year found one in five people in England think that some races are born less intelligent than others, four in 10 people in England think that some ethnic groups are naturally harder working than others and three in 10 people in England think that someone’s race tells you something about their character.”
Those are rookie numbers—we need to kick that up a notch. But you can see why they are so panicked to reframe race, the real frame of race is gaining adherents on the daily. If people aren’t yet ready to decry parasitical Jews—just yet—their seat of the pants bar room stool yeoman’s race consciousness is still a deep seated and deep well that has yet to be depleted. Because in the end the Jews can juggle with words, and mumbo the jumbo and gobbledygook the gibberish as much as they want. But in the end the philosopher’s stone known as reality is a Rosetta Stone: it deciphers all. And you can call anything what you wish, and try to obfuscate the truth with roving circumlocutions, you can call them visible minorities or the global majority until the cows come home but no matter: for the clear eyed will always call a spade a spade and know that a nigger never did anyone any good. Fact!
