Rescinding The Doctrine
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2023 4:24 am
Douglas Mercer
April 5 2023
Sovereignty was never ceded.
Squawk squawk pretty bird.
Sovereignty was never ceded.
The intellectual underpinnings of Amerindian and Aboriginal ideology (such as they are) are not more sophisticated than that. It's pretty sad really. They got a world class historical thumping in the quest for global domination and (for all anyone knew at the time) they were left for dead. But recently given the wholesale abdication on the part of the White race they have caught their second historical wind and are up there in the catbird seat calling the shots. And what do they have to say for themselves?
Sovereignty was never ceded.
Thanks.
The land belongs to them. Let's give it back.
That such rot could not only be prevalent and relevant today but ascendant is a massive indicator to the stupefaction of the times. Sovereignty was never ceded? Who would have guessed. In point of fact sovereignty has only been ceded one time in the history of this planet, when one people in power of their own accord gave the land to another. And that was in 1994 when the Afrikaners gave the land to the blacks (and we all know how that worked out). But that was when the same people who say the land belongs to the Amerindians were forcing the Afrikaners to cede the land; it was an outlier event. In all other historical circumstances when one people have replaced another it is because they have taken the land. It stands to reason. So when they say that sovereignty was never ceded they are saying more than they know---it is never ceded.
Any questions?
***
The Pope is hard off his sniveling and groveling White man crawl apology tour of Canada. You know the one, the one where he kissed the hands of the Amerindians like they were some kind of Mafia Dons and profusely said he was sorry for all of those non-existent dead brown kids in those "unmarked graves." It was a sickening sight and one we hope never to see again. But here he is a few months later making "amends" when nothing wrong was done. In fact something glorious was done, the White race conquered the New World, but then in these disgusting times that is the greatest sin of all.
Why on earth would they need a doctrine of discovery? Just take a look at that guy with the musket over there--it's his land. The Amerindian had no doctrines, only war whoops. But in this case the anti-White cretins cannot even get their history straight. When you read the fine print you see that the Church had no such doctrine though that didn't stop them from apologizing for it. The doctrine in question actually comes from a 1823 US Supreme Court case:
"This principle was that discovery gave title to the government by whose subjects or by whose authority it was made against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession. The exclusion of all other Europeans necessarily gave to the nation making the discovery the sole right of acquiring the soil from the natives and establishing settlements upon it."
So it was a doctrine among White people who had law and a notion of property. Makes sense. But that just means that now they will go after Canada and America and Australia and New Zeeland to abjure the principle as well. Alexandria Cortez once stood on the capitol steps and said she stood on occupied land, so that day will not be far off.
***
Following up on his abasement journey in Canada the communist Pope laid on this doozy, essentially saying that the White man has no home in the former colonial offshoots. Also, given that the Europe does not belong to the White man either, we have no home at all.
"The Vatican on Thursday (March 30 2023) responded to Indigenous demands and formally repudiated the Doctrine of Discovery, the theories backed by 15th-century papal bulls that legitimized the colonial-era seizure of Native lands and form the basis of some property laws today. A Vatican statement said the papal bulls, or decrees, did not adequately reflect the equal dignity and rights of Indigenous peoples and have never been considered expressions of the Catholic faith."
Dignity? Really? That's not the first thing that comes to mind when I conjure up the images of wandering nomads living from hand to mouth. But make no mistake about it, although the Pope has no divisions and this is purely symbolic it is also highly significant. The Pope was once after all the Defender Of Europe but has obviously fallen on hard times. In this statement he is doing nothing less than saying that the entire colonial enterprise is illegitimate. The spread of White World Supremacy into the New World? Illegitimate. That first Englishmen who set foot in Virginia? He should have turned back. In essence he is calling into question (and found wanting) all the glories of the White race. That's exactly what he's doing. Not the Defender of Europe but the Defamer of Europe.
"The statement, from the Vatican’s development and education offices, marked a historic recognition of the Vatican’s own complicity in colonial-era abuses committed by European powers. It was issued under history’s first Latin American pontiff."
As has been said the world is a nasty and brutish place. Abuses? I presume they are talking about the Trail Of Tears and the like. Which only goes to show the child like nature of their intellects. Only from the oases of the vast wealth built upon these "abuses" could people be so criminally simple minded and vacuous. They are provincials in time, assuming that the morality pulled out of their backside five minutes ago (and which serves their efforts to defeat the White race) is universal.
"Indigenous leaders welcomed the statement as a first good step, even though it didn’t address the rescinding of the bulls themselves and continued to take distance from acknowledging actual Vatican culpability in abuses. The statement said the papal documents had been manipulated for political purposes by competing colonial powers to justify immoral acts against Indigenous peoples that were carried out, at times, without opposition from ecclesial authority."
Holy manure--what are they talking about? Our people should be fast facing forward into the future, and these moral green eye shade idiots are scouring moldy documents from half a millennia ago, and contesting the greatest triumph the world has ever known--the great Western migrations of the White race. If you call that into question you call everything into question--which is exactly their point. This is Zinnism run amok, when not just some flak historians, and some protestors in canoes, say the conquest fo the New World was wrong, but Popes and Presidents---it's an ill wind which blows White people no good. This is the end of the line when our leaders repudiate our accomplishments and seek to undermine us.
"They said it was right to recognize these errors, acknowledge the terrible effects of colonial-era assimilation policies on Indigenous peoples and ask for their forgiveness. The statement was a response to decades of Indigenous demands for the Vatican to formally rescind the papal bulls that provided the Portuguese and Spanish kingdoms the religious backing to expand their territories in Africa and the Americas for the sake of spreading Christianity."
Demands! This is an awful pushy lot for people who had once been consigned forever to the discard bin of history. Try to conjure up the image of any of the great explorers learning that one day their descendants would be seeking the forgiveness of the people they were conquering. Of course it would have boggled their minds so much that they would have laughed it out of court. The idea that they were doing something morally wrong would never have occurred to them in the first instance. And the idea that these brave an intrepid men somehow needed religious backing is ludicrous. All the church's imprimatur for what they did was an ex post facto justification for what would have been done anyway and was the work of moral nail biters who wanted to overlay a Christian sheen on what was simply human nature--the drive to explore, conquer, and dominate.
"Those decrees underpin the Doctrine of Discovery, a legal concept coined in a 1823 U.S. Supreme Court decision that has come to be understood as meaning that ownership and sovereignty over land passed to Europeans because they discovered it. It was cited as recently as a 2005 Supreme Court decision involving the Oneida Indian Nation written by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg."
The land was ours the moment we could secure it. Everyone knows it but it suits their interests to quote that old White man John Marshal (whose name was recently removed from a law school in Ohio because he was one of those Dead White males they hate so much) to make it seem like it was a doctrine or a legal theory which mattered. No, it was simply what the people were doing, whatever came later was just bookkeeping and the squaring of accounts. Which only goes to show that you should not defend the explorers, and the pioneers of your people on theoretical grounds, when you present the world with facts on the ground they will have no choice but to accept it.
"Two Indigenous women unfurled a banner at the altar of the National Shrine of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré on hat read: Rescind the Doctrine in bright red and black letters. Before that, Michelle Schenandoah of the Oneida Nation had called for the Vatican to rescind the papal bulls when she delivered the closing remarks of the First Nations delegation that met with Francis during a weeklong visit last year by Native groups from Canada. On Thursday, she called the Vatican statement another step in the right direction, but noted that it didn’t mention the rescinding of the bulls themselves."
Lesson learned: nothing will ever be enough for these vultures. You give them an inch and they will take your life. They will push and push until at the very top official level the entire project of the White man on the continent is repudiated. And once you've said you are wrong, and you've said you have been wrong in no uncertain terms, they will use this as moral leverage to bleed you dry.
"What this does is it really puts the responsibility on nation states such as the United States, to look at its use of the Doctrine of Discovery, she said in a interview from Syracuse, New York, where she is a professor of Indigenous law at Syracuse University’s College of Law. This goes beyond land. It really has created generation upon generation of genocidal policies directed towards Indigenous peoples. And I think that it’s time for these governments to take full accountability for their actions."
Here it comes. The want the leaders of all White nations to stand on those capitol steps and say that they stand on occupied land. They want every event, every time the President gives a speech, every time he gives the state the Union, every time he does anything, they want him to make one of those mealy-mouthed land acknowledgments, to say that he stands on stolen land. We're almost there already, and we'll see in even more torrents more money go to Amerindian Studies course in colleges, more professorships given. Why, Bard College just got a twenty-five million dollar grant from the Gocham Family Foundation to set up an Indigenous Studies Program. Expect more of this in the near future. If they have such things as Indigenous Law you know more outrages are in store.
"The church has done one thing, as it said it would do, for the Holy Father. Now the ball is in the court of governments, the United States and in Canada, but particularly in the United States where the doctrine is embedded in the law."
The won't be content until a once great Anglo-Saxon Nation is on its knees before the very people it once conquered.
"He stressed that the statement wasn’t just about setting the historical record straight, but to discover, identify, analyze and try to overcome what we can only call the enduring effects of colonialism today. The most that any papal repudiation of the doctrine (or the bulls, for that matter) can do in relation to Canadian law is to apply pressure on the Supreme Court of Canada to renounce the doctrine as part of Canadian law."
Canada is where not that long ago they fell all over themselves to reorder their entire society because some non-existent brown kids were found in so-called unmarked graves. If you remember right you'll remember the screeching and cries to heaven came fast and hard on an industrial scale. The fact that the entire thing was a total hoax got considerably less attention, that means none at all. But that didn't sober them up, no, now they want White Canada also to announce its illegitimacy, and to go the way of the world.
"So now for the church to not only acknowledge the damage, but also to repudiate the whole mindset of cultural superiority, of racial superiority to, in a sense, renounce that whole way of thinking and say that forever forward the church wants to be an active ally in protecting Indigenous human rights along with all human rights, I think it’s a big statement."
This is it, it's a whole mindset and a whole way of life that needs be "reckoned" with and renounced. Back in 1948 when the White South African government was instituting Apartheid they were going against the grain. That very same year the United Nations pulled its Declaration Of Universal Human Rights out of its collective backside, pronouncing by fiat and against all empirical evidence that all men were equal. With nearly the entire world ganging up behind this provably false notion White Supremacy was on the run; first it buckled in the American South and then finally in its last redoubt, South Africa. For this is the doctrine they want to rescind, the doctrine of the greatness of the White race; this is the mindset they want to destroy in its last remaining hold outs. That's what the statement from the Catholic Church was really all about. And don't look now but those war whoops are drawing nearer and the Sioux are circling our country. Because sovereignty was never ceded don't you know.
April 5 2023
Sovereignty was never ceded.
Squawk squawk pretty bird.
Sovereignty was never ceded.
The intellectual underpinnings of Amerindian and Aboriginal ideology (such as they are) are not more sophisticated than that. It's pretty sad really. They got a world class historical thumping in the quest for global domination and (for all anyone knew at the time) they were left for dead. But recently given the wholesale abdication on the part of the White race they have caught their second historical wind and are up there in the catbird seat calling the shots. And what do they have to say for themselves?
Sovereignty was never ceded.
Thanks.
The land belongs to them. Let's give it back.
That such rot could not only be prevalent and relevant today but ascendant is a massive indicator to the stupefaction of the times. Sovereignty was never ceded? Who would have guessed. In point of fact sovereignty has only been ceded one time in the history of this planet, when one people in power of their own accord gave the land to another. And that was in 1994 when the Afrikaners gave the land to the blacks (and we all know how that worked out). But that was when the same people who say the land belongs to the Amerindians were forcing the Afrikaners to cede the land; it was an outlier event. In all other historical circumstances when one people have replaced another it is because they have taken the land. It stands to reason. So when they say that sovereignty was never ceded they are saying more than they know---it is never ceded.
Any questions?
***
The Pope is hard off his sniveling and groveling White man crawl apology tour of Canada. You know the one, the one where he kissed the hands of the Amerindians like they were some kind of Mafia Dons and profusely said he was sorry for all of those non-existent dead brown kids in those "unmarked graves." It was a sickening sight and one we hope never to see again. But here he is a few months later making "amends" when nothing wrong was done. In fact something glorious was done, the White race conquered the New World, but then in these disgusting times that is the greatest sin of all.
Why on earth would they need a doctrine of discovery? Just take a look at that guy with the musket over there--it's his land. The Amerindian had no doctrines, only war whoops. But in this case the anti-White cretins cannot even get their history straight. When you read the fine print you see that the Church had no such doctrine though that didn't stop them from apologizing for it. The doctrine in question actually comes from a 1823 US Supreme Court case:
"This principle was that discovery gave title to the government by whose subjects or by whose authority it was made against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession. The exclusion of all other Europeans necessarily gave to the nation making the discovery the sole right of acquiring the soil from the natives and establishing settlements upon it."
So it was a doctrine among White people who had law and a notion of property. Makes sense. But that just means that now they will go after Canada and America and Australia and New Zeeland to abjure the principle as well. Alexandria Cortez once stood on the capitol steps and said she stood on occupied land, so that day will not be far off.
***
Following up on his abasement journey in Canada the communist Pope laid on this doozy, essentially saying that the White man has no home in the former colonial offshoots. Also, given that the Europe does not belong to the White man either, we have no home at all.
"The Vatican on Thursday (March 30 2023) responded to Indigenous demands and formally repudiated the Doctrine of Discovery, the theories backed by 15th-century papal bulls that legitimized the colonial-era seizure of Native lands and form the basis of some property laws today. A Vatican statement said the papal bulls, or decrees, did not adequately reflect the equal dignity and rights of Indigenous peoples and have never been considered expressions of the Catholic faith."
Dignity? Really? That's not the first thing that comes to mind when I conjure up the images of wandering nomads living from hand to mouth. But make no mistake about it, although the Pope has no divisions and this is purely symbolic it is also highly significant. The Pope was once after all the Defender Of Europe but has obviously fallen on hard times. In this statement he is doing nothing less than saying that the entire colonial enterprise is illegitimate. The spread of White World Supremacy into the New World? Illegitimate. That first Englishmen who set foot in Virginia? He should have turned back. In essence he is calling into question (and found wanting) all the glories of the White race. That's exactly what he's doing. Not the Defender of Europe but the Defamer of Europe.
"The statement, from the Vatican’s development and education offices, marked a historic recognition of the Vatican’s own complicity in colonial-era abuses committed by European powers. It was issued under history’s first Latin American pontiff."
As has been said the world is a nasty and brutish place. Abuses? I presume they are talking about the Trail Of Tears and the like. Which only goes to show the child like nature of their intellects. Only from the oases of the vast wealth built upon these "abuses" could people be so criminally simple minded and vacuous. They are provincials in time, assuming that the morality pulled out of their backside five minutes ago (and which serves their efforts to defeat the White race) is universal.
"Indigenous leaders welcomed the statement as a first good step, even though it didn’t address the rescinding of the bulls themselves and continued to take distance from acknowledging actual Vatican culpability in abuses. The statement said the papal documents had been manipulated for political purposes by competing colonial powers to justify immoral acts against Indigenous peoples that were carried out, at times, without opposition from ecclesial authority."
Holy manure--what are they talking about? Our people should be fast facing forward into the future, and these moral green eye shade idiots are scouring moldy documents from half a millennia ago, and contesting the greatest triumph the world has ever known--the great Western migrations of the White race. If you call that into question you call everything into question--which is exactly their point. This is Zinnism run amok, when not just some flak historians, and some protestors in canoes, say the conquest fo the New World was wrong, but Popes and Presidents---it's an ill wind which blows White people no good. This is the end of the line when our leaders repudiate our accomplishments and seek to undermine us.
"They said it was right to recognize these errors, acknowledge the terrible effects of colonial-era assimilation policies on Indigenous peoples and ask for their forgiveness. The statement was a response to decades of Indigenous demands for the Vatican to formally rescind the papal bulls that provided the Portuguese and Spanish kingdoms the religious backing to expand their territories in Africa and the Americas for the sake of spreading Christianity."
Demands! This is an awful pushy lot for people who had once been consigned forever to the discard bin of history. Try to conjure up the image of any of the great explorers learning that one day their descendants would be seeking the forgiveness of the people they were conquering. Of course it would have boggled their minds so much that they would have laughed it out of court. The idea that they were doing something morally wrong would never have occurred to them in the first instance. And the idea that these brave an intrepid men somehow needed religious backing is ludicrous. All the church's imprimatur for what they did was an ex post facto justification for what would have been done anyway and was the work of moral nail biters who wanted to overlay a Christian sheen on what was simply human nature--the drive to explore, conquer, and dominate.
"Those decrees underpin the Doctrine of Discovery, a legal concept coined in a 1823 U.S. Supreme Court decision that has come to be understood as meaning that ownership and sovereignty over land passed to Europeans because they discovered it. It was cited as recently as a 2005 Supreme Court decision involving the Oneida Indian Nation written by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg."
The land was ours the moment we could secure it. Everyone knows it but it suits their interests to quote that old White man John Marshal (whose name was recently removed from a law school in Ohio because he was one of those Dead White males they hate so much) to make it seem like it was a doctrine or a legal theory which mattered. No, it was simply what the people were doing, whatever came later was just bookkeeping and the squaring of accounts. Which only goes to show that you should not defend the explorers, and the pioneers of your people on theoretical grounds, when you present the world with facts on the ground they will have no choice but to accept it.
"Two Indigenous women unfurled a banner at the altar of the National Shrine of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré on hat read: Rescind the Doctrine in bright red and black letters. Before that, Michelle Schenandoah of the Oneida Nation had called for the Vatican to rescind the papal bulls when she delivered the closing remarks of the First Nations delegation that met with Francis during a weeklong visit last year by Native groups from Canada. On Thursday, she called the Vatican statement another step in the right direction, but noted that it didn’t mention the rescinding of the bulls themselves."
Lesson learned: nothing will ever be enough for these vultures. You give them an inch and they will take your life. They will push and push until at the very top official level the entire project of the White man on the continent is repudiated. And once you've said you are wrong, and you've said you have been wrong in no uncertain terms, they will use this as moral leverage to bleed you dry.
"What this does is it really puts the responsibility on nation states such as the United States, to look at its use of the Doctrine of Discovery, she said in a interview from Syracuse, New York, where she is a professor of Indigenous law at Syracuse University’s College of Law. This goes beyond land. It really has created generation upon generation of genocidal policies directed towards Indigenous peoples. And I think that it’s time for these governments to take full accountability for their actions."
Here it comes. The want the leaders of all White nations to stand on those capitol steps and say that they stand on occupied land. They want every event, every time the President gives a speech, every time he gives the state the Union, every time he does anything, they want him to make one of those mealy-mouthed land acknowledgments, to say that he stands on stolen land. We're almost there already, and we'll see in even more torrents more money go to Amerindian Studies course in colleges, more professorships given. Why, Bard College just got a twenty-five million dollar grant from the Gocham Family Foundation to set up an Indigenous Studies Program. Expect more of this in the near future. If they have such things as Indigenous Law you know more outrages are in store.
"The church has done one thing, as it said it would do, for the Holy Father. Now the ball is in the court of governments, the United States and in Canada, but particularly in the United States where the doctrine is embedded in the law."
The won't be content until a once great Anglo-Saxon Nation is on its knees before the very people it once conquered.
"He stressed that the statement wasn’t just about setting the historical record straight, but to discover, identify, analyze and try to overcome what we can only call the enduring effects of colonialism today. The most that any papal repudiation of the doctrine (or the bulls, for that matter) can do in relation to Canadian law is to apply pressure on the Supreme Court of Canada to renounce the doctrine as part of Canadian law."
Canada is where not that long ago they fell all over themselves to reorder their entire society because some non-existent brown kids were found in so-called unmarked graves. If you remember right you'll remember the screeching and cries to heaven came fast and hard on an industrial scale. The fact that the entire thing was a total hoax got considerably less attention, that means none at all. But that didn't sober them up, no, now they want White Canada also to announce its illegitimacy, and to go the way of the world.
"So now for the church to not only acknowledge the damage, but also to repudiate the whole mindset of cultural superiority, of racial superiority to, in a sense, renounce that whole way of thinking and say that forever forward the church wants to be an active ally in protecting Indigenous human rights along with all human rights, I think it’s a big statement."
This is it, it's a whole mindset and a whole way of life that needs be "reckoned" with and renounced. Back in 1948 when the White South African government was instituting Apartheid they were going against the grain. That very same year the United Nations pulled its Declaration Of Universal Human Rights out of its collective backside, pronouncing by fiat and against all empirical evidence that all men were equal. With nearly the entire world ganging up behind this provably false notion White Supremacy was on the run; first it buckled in the American South and then finally in its last redoubt, South Africa. For this is the doctrine they want to rescind, the doctrine of the greatness of the White race; this is the mindset they want to destroy in its last remaining hold outs. That's what the statement from the Catholic Church was really all about. And don't look now but those war whoops are drawing nearer and the Sioux are circling our country. Because sovereignty was never ceded don't you know.
