Black Britain
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2023 11:59 pm
Douglas Mercer
March 20 2023
Hitler knew that all the great civilizational and cultural achievements on the earth came from the Nordic race and so he knew that the classical world, the Greeks and the Romans, were racially at one with the Germanics. Now of course they work on the alternate theory, that the Greeks and Romans knew nothing about race, cared nothing about race, and were more than likely black as your hat. In the future (which is very much like the present) historical truth that contradicts regime ideology will be considered a glitch and will be remedied with the flick of a switch. All the bad old things (and true things) will be erased in the batting of an eye and replaced with what is congenial to the rainbow world view. You see them doing it now to Dahl and Bond and you can be sure that this is just their tipping their toe in the water, just dipping their snouts into this trough, but soon their blood funnels will be attached to our hearts. Eventually the changes will be wholesale and given the low IQ propensities of the population it will not even be questioned. Was Henry VIII a negro? You bet he was, he shucked and jived in court all the time. Shuffling and lying was what made him Kang.
Now in Britain all the historical White characters are black, the Kings and Queens, the Feudal Lords, the strong Aristocrats. King Alfred The Great dug him some chicken and Elizabeth I twerked insatiably. That's why on all historical dramas they have characters who are black, it's Wakanda in the demi paradise, they don't want the poor negro child who is fresh off a boat to get the wrong idea. They don't want him to actually know that until fifty years ago the most successful country in all of history was totally White. They also don't want him to deduce that the fact that it was so successful because it was totally White. Why, they can't have a black kid who showed up five minutes ago know the truth. They have to cater to him all the way and rearrange their once proud history because that little black boy is the future of the once sceptered isle. And so the kings and the queens and the feudal lords and the aristocrats and the artists and the scientists, all of them have to be painted black. They have to insert the blacks where they never were and never could have been and where they don't belong. Because against all empirical evidence they claim that diversity built Britain. In fact White people not only built Britain, but they are the only people who could have built it. Blacks are not the ones who are building it, they are the ones tearing it down. But that's hate speech by now and decidedly out of fashion.
***
Now that the so-called visible minorities are being called the global majority and have the whip hand in England they have the dramatists at their beck and call and they are depicted on screen as the Kings and Queens, the aristocrats and the lords. But from time to time the powers that be need to put a little meat on those bones though, as we shall see, it's fictional meat no different from the period dramas where Shaneequa shows up at the landed estate for no rhyme nor reason. For history is fiction too, particularly the further back you go, and they are not going to neglect a golden opportunity to upbraid the racists for being racists, and to cow the average White man into obsequious compliance.
"Did you know that the Romans built Londinium – the city where London now stands? Roman skeletons prove that African people have been living in Britain for at least 2000 years."
Did you? Did you know that? Or are you racist? Did you have the obsolete and outdated (and racist) notion that when the Romans sailed the channel they did so in their White numbers? Well, the cultural authorities in England want you to know that nothing could be further from the truth. It was blackies on those ships and it was they who created the English juggernaut.
"The Museum of London is relocating to a new site in Smithfield. While it will not open for a year or two, its curators have already decided that a display about Roman London should feature a typical London household of the 2nd century AD. Of course, a young Black single mother will serve as the head of the display. There is only one slight difficulty with this: there is no evidence that a single Black individual resided in Britain during the 400-year period of the Roman occupation of this country."
History? Truth? A small matter! This misses the point. Assuming these people are not retarded (though you can't rule that out) they know full well that ancient Britain was not Wakanda in embryo. They know that the ancestors were not fried chicken eating tar monsters. They know that in the early days of England blacks were not wandering the countryside looking to rob and rape. That is they know it was a White country from the beginning, science has settled that matter. But they also know that Jew Barbara Roche wanted to import the dark 3rd Worlders to the formerly merry old England so to rub White people's faces in it; and that likewise they want to put black people front and center in England's history in dramas and museums so to upset the "wrong kind of people." You have to give them credit for one thing, however, and that is historical accuracy. The made the old-time black lady and Roman matron a single mother.
"The past decade or so, there has been a concerted effort to convince people that Britain has always been a diverse and multicultural country. This dubious enterprise is partly based on the idea that black children in school will feel better about themselves if they are told that there have always been black people living here. This sentiment was even printed on a 50p coin a few years ago, emblazoned with the inspiring, and untruthful slogan: Diversity built Britain."
They always rush in to the most preposterous lie that can come up with. It's been proven time and time again via DNA analysis that contemporary White Britons represent a remarkably homogenous racial group, that genetically speaking they have been the same people from time out of mind. The diversity built Britain canard is the equivalent of the blacks built America canard. The unfailing proof that this is untrue is that wherever these blacks or these "diversity populations" came from the only thing they built was a moral deficit, endless woe and misery, and homes that would blow over in a mild spring breeze surrounded by feces ridden streams. They should put that on a coin and see how it goes over.
"Given that the Roman period was so long ago and there are so few written records of the time, academics have felt safe enough to undertake this rewriting of British history. Children are taught that the country was teeming with black people at that time, with various specific examples routinely cited. This is despite the fact there is no archaeological evidence or other proof to suggest that black Africans lived in Britain 2000 years ago."
Safe to say that they have "liberated" themselves from reality and have gone all in on fiction writing. Facts may be stubborn things but that is no reason they should respect them. If the past is full of White people slowly but inexorably forming a great nation then history itself is racist, the truth is racist, and reality is racist. The very way things are and were are in the dock and the verdict is: guilty as hell. And as good anti-racists they need to cross it out and erase it and in its stead place a more pleasing representation of their fevered and fetid fantasy life.
"In modern Britain, the term African is almost universally synonymous with black person. If mention is made of an African community in some city, then we understand that these are sub-Saharan people; Nigerians, perhaps. So it is that when we are told that there was an African community living near Hadrian's Wall in the 3rd century AD, many of us automatically assume that this refers to a group of black people. In the same way, hearing of an African emperor of Rome conjures up the image of a black man in a toga."
Sadly many of us are idiots, or many of them are. Who would fall for this would fall for anything, would fall for the idea that a black as coal immigrant could be an Englishman, that a filthy Paki could be a German, or that a dark as a spade Haitian could be an American. The Jews have been juggling with words for so long that it's good to remind everyone from time to time that an Englishman is a White person whose ancestors have been there since time immemorial. To know this is so one only has to conjure up the risible image of a black man in a toga. The garment was worn by the noble Romans and its pure whiteness represented seriousness and gravitas. But a black man in a toga is a little like monkey in a tuxedo, for just as monkey can never be a man so can a negro never have been a Roman. The corollary to that axion is that the black man is more kin to the monkey than the man.
"Two typical examples of books promoting the idea of an African community in Roman Britain are Black and British by David Olusoga, and Places: Important Sites in Black British History by Melody Triumph. The former is aimed at adults and was adapted into a BBC series, while the latter is intended for children."
Conjuring a story out of nothing they tell the stories that the ruling elites want told; a reversionistic rewriting of English history, and a rewiring of the brain of White English. They will black out the White history of England and whitewash it into being actually black. It's hard to believe that anyone can fall for this simplistic tripe but, as the saying goes, no one ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the man on the street. You put up enough posters of a spook in plate or mail armor or a negress in a bonnet and an aristocratic gown and pretty soon enough people will see it as perfectly sane and normal. Half will actually believe it and the other half won't want to be racist by having bad thoughts.
This Olusoga fellow was born in Lagos as the wicked spawn of Nigerian father and an English (and coal burning) mother. The Triumph lady's site shows her as dark as a starless desert night and touts her "subject specialisms"; in other words: she be scholar.
"Olusoga discusses a detachment of Roman soldiers called the Aurelian Moors, who were stationed at Hadrian's Wall in the middle of the 3rd century AD. He says that they were Africans, and since they are featured in a book about black British history, we are naturally supposed to interpret this to mean that they were black Africans. The children's book goes further and suggests that Roman troops from Africa actually built Hadrian's Wall. This serves as a clear case of diversity building Britain."
Naturally! What did the negros not build? Why, if you believe the hype they are the secret sharers of architecture all over the globe. They built the seven wonders of the world by themselves, they built the cathedrals, they built all the great cities, they built the aqueducts, they built the White House, and the electrical grid, they laid the transatlantic cable, they built the semiconductors, they built everything we have. If you don't believe it you can see it all on the BBC. Of course, back in reality the Aurelian Moors were not black Africans, but rather Berbers from the Roman North Africa who had roughly the same complexion as the Romans. But White Africans don't sell books and don't get the Jews where they want to go. So they delete it.
"The same sleight of hand is used when referring to the Emperor Septimius Severus as African. The aim is to confuse people into believing he was black, which is why he is often mentioned during Black History Month and is sometimes even described as the black emperor. Though he was born in the Roman colony of Leptis Magna, located in North Africa, his mother was Roman and his father Carthaginian."
One could no more imagine a black emperor as a horse as a senator. The only leader of vast civilizations in the ancient world that were black were in Wakanda and that was made up. The only thing blacks ruled were mandingos in loin clothes gibbering nonsense, or small parties searching for albino bones to dig up so they can work some Lovecraftian Big Magic. They say the Egyptians were black but they were not. They had real technical know-how--that's how you know they were not black.
"In 2012, some old skeletons that had been discovered over the years near the seaside town of Eastbourne, on the south coast of England, were examined. A supposed facial reconstruction expert declared upon seeing one of the skulls that it belonged to a black person from sub-Saharan Africa. Her initial impression was confirmed when she measured it carefully and input the data into a computer program. Lo and behold, the skeleton was identified as that of a black woman."
Imagine that? Hoaxes in academia? It was Cheddar Man redux. And they flash the news that blacks were indigenous to those isles all around the Jew stations. And then when reality set in and the lie exposed they print it in small letters where no one can find it or even see it really. In the world of the lying Jewish Press the truth never does get its boot on, it is a barefoot homeless vagabond.
"Her findings were met with enthusiasm by those hoping to advance the idea of diversity in Roman Britain, and the news quickly spread across the country. David Olusoga, in the book mentioned earlier, wrote that the Beachy Head Lady, as she had been nicknamed due to the location where her skeleton had been found, was the first black Briton known to us. This claim, corroborated only by the measurements of an old skull, has appeared in countless texts and a plaque has even been erected near the site of the discovery to commemorate this important individual."
A plaque for the black! It must be true then. They would not put a memorial to black lady if it was a lie would they? Yes they did and yes they would. Especially if it's a lie.
"Seven years later, a DNA sample from the skull was tested at the Francis Crick Institute, revealing that the Beachy Head Lady was of European descent, likely from Cyprus. Despite this, fanciful representations of her with black skin are still widely circulated on the internet."
Oops! A swing and a miss. Who could have seen that one coming from a million miles away? White Science be racist!
"There is no evidence to suggest that any black person ever stepped foot in Britain during the Roman era, yet the fantasy continues to grow. Making black people, particularly children, feel welcome in this country may well be a praiseworthy and desirable aim, but it cannot be accomplished through lies and deception."
Evidence? Bosh! They don't need no stinking evidence. They got the backing of the elite and the arc of justice on their side. That's more than enough to pull the wool over the eyes of he public.
"Steve Moffat, the producer of the BBC television series Dr Who for some time, explained why he cast so many black people in the program, by saying, We’ve kind of got to tell a lie: we’ll go back into history and there will be black people where, historically, there wouldn’t have been, and we won’t dwell on that. We’ll say, To hell with it, this is the imaginary, better version of the world. By believing in it, we’ll summon it forth. This is precisely what is being done by those who promote the fake history of the black Romans in Britain."
This is the inner logic of course, they know it's a con game but they are doing it for the correct cause. And the cause of course is anti-racism and there is no amount of shameless posturing, no amount of fabrication, no amount of deception that would be unjustified in the White nation wrecking endeavor. John Updike once famously said that biographies are just novels with footnotes and bibliographies, and their black ridden period dramas or sci-fi extravaganzas are just historical dramas wit a Jew ideology. It's the ultimate in wish fulfillment, that is if you wish White people dead.
"Dr. Who was created by Sydney Newman, who was born in Toronto to Russian Jewish immigrants It’s not too difficult to spot traces of Newman’s own roots in his creation. His hero is wildly intelligent, intergalactically cosmopolitan, with a biting sense of humor and a commitment to quite literally repairing the world. He is constantly wandering, never at home."
Every. Single. Time.
A black Tudor? A black in Regent England? A black at Alfred's Court? The lie seems brazen but when it is saturated enough into the mental blood stream of the people it will catch and seem common sense. There was a black lady who's skull they found, not really, but that didn't stop them from memorializing her. There were black gallants at the Court of King William, not really, but you can see it on the Telly; there are blacks in the Bayeux tapestry, not really, but you can imagine it so. And if all of this seems mystifying and you don't believe a word of it, if you think it's all one big propaganda ploy and a crock of shit, you can always turn on the BBC and they'll be sure to tell you different.
March 20 2023
Hitler knew that all the great civilizational and cultural achievements on the earth came from the Nordic race and so he knew that the classical world, the Greeks and the Romans, were racially at one with the Germanics. Now of course they work on the alternate theory, that the Greeks and Romans knew nothing about race, cared nothing about race, and were more than likely black as your hat. In the future (which is very much like the present) historical truth that contradicts regime ideology will be considered a glitch and will be remedied with the flick of a switch. All the bad old things (and true things) will be erased in the batting of an eye and replaced with what is congenial to the rainbow world view. You see them doing it now to Dahl and Bond and you can be sure that this is just their tipping their toe in the water, just dipping their snouts into this trough, but soon their blood funnels will be attached to our hearts. Eventually the changes will be wholesale and given the low IQ propensities of the population it will not even be questioned. Was Henry VIII a negro? You bet he was, he shucked and jived in court all the time. Shuffling and lying was what made him Kang.
Now in Britain all the historical White characters are black, the Kings and Queens, the Feudal Lords, the strong Aristocrats. King Alfred The Great dug him some chicken and Elizabeth I twerked insatiably. That's why on all historical dramas they have characters who are black, it's Wakanda in the demi paradise, they don't want the poor negro child who is fresh off a boat to get the wrong idea. They don't want him to actually know that until fifty years ago the most successful country in all of history was totally White. They also don't want him to deduce that the fact that it was so successful because it was totally White. Why, they can't have a black kid who showed up five minutes ago know the truth. They have to cater to him all the way and rearrange their once proud history because that little black boy is the future of the once sceptered isle. And so the kings and the queens and the feudal lords and the aristocrats and the artists and the scientists, all of them have to be painted black. They have to insert the blacks where they never were and never could have been and where they don't belong. Because against all empirical evidence they claim that diversity built Britain. In fact White people not only built Britain, but they are the only people who could have built it. Blacks are not the ones who are building it, they are the ones tearing it down. But that's hate speech by now and decidedly out of fashion.
***
Now that the so-called visible minorities are being called the global majority and have the whip hand in England they have the dramatists at their beck and call and they are depicted on screen as the Kings and Queens, the aristocrats and the lords. But from time to time the powers that be need to put a little meat on those bones though, as we shall see, it's fictional meat no different from the period dramas where Shaneequa shows up at the landed estate for no rhyme nor reason. For history is fiction too, particularly the further back you go, and they are not going to neglect a golden opportunity to upbraid the racists for being racists, and to cow the average White man into obsequious compliance.
"Did you know that the Romans built Londinium – the city where London now stands? Roman skeletons prove that African people have been living in Britain for at least 2000 years."
Did you? Did you know that? Or are you racist? Did you have the obsolete and outdated (and racist) notion that when the Romans sailed the channel they did so in their White numbers? Well, the cultural authorities in England want you to know that nothing could be further from the truth. It was blackies on those ships and it was they who created the English juggernaut.
"The Museum of London is relocating to a new site in Smithfield. While it will not open for a year or two, its curators have already decided that a display about Roman London should feature a typical London household of the 2nd century AD. Of course, a young Black single mother will serve as the head of the display. There is only one slight difficulty with this: there is no evidence that a single Black individual resided in Britain during the 400-year period of the Roman occupation of this country."
History? Truth? A small matter! This misses the point. Assuming these people are not retarded (though you can't rule that out) they know full well that ancient Britain was not Wakanda in embryo. They know that the ancestors were not fried chicken eating tar monsters. They know that in the early days of England blacks were not wandering the countryside looking to rob and rape. That is they know it was a White country from the beginning, science has settled that matter. But they also know that Jew Barbara Roche wanted to import the dark 3rd Worlders to the formerly merry old England so to rub White people's faces in it; and that likewise they want to put black people front and center in England's history in dramas and museums so to upset the "wrong kind of people." You have to give them credit for one thing, however, and that is historical accuracy. The made the old-time black lady and Roman matron a single mother.
"The past decade or so, there has been a concerted effort to convince people that Britain has always been a diverse and multicultural country. This dubious enterprise is partly based on the idea that black children in school will feel better about themselves if they are told that there have always been black people living here. This sentiment was even printed on a 50p coin a few years ago, emblazoned with the inspiring, and untruthful slogan: Diversity built Britain."
They always rush in to the most preposterous lie that can come up with. It's been proven time and time again via DNA analysis that contemporary White Britons represent a remarkably homogenous racial group, that genetically speaking they have been the same people from time out of mind. The diversity built Britain canard is the equivalent of the blacks built America canard. The unfailing proof that this is untrue is that wherever these blacks or these "diversity populations" came from the only thing they built was a moral deficit, endless woe and misery, and homes that would blow over in a mild spring breeze surrounded by feces ridden streams. They should put that on a coin and see how it goes over.
"Given that the Roman period was so long ago and there are so few written records of the time, academics have felt safe enough to undertake this rewriting of British history. Children are taught that the country was teeming with black people at that time, with various specific examples routinely cited. This is despite the fact there is no archaeological evidence or other proof to suggest that black Africans lived in Britain 2000 years ago."
Safe to say that they have "liberated" themselves from reality and have gone all in on fiction writing. Facts may be stubborn things but that is no reason they should respect them. If the past is full of White people slowly but inexorably forming a great nation then history itself is racist, the truth is racist, and reality is racist. The very way things are and were are in the dock and the verdict is: guilty as hell. And as good anti-racists they need to cross it out and erase it and in its stead place a more pleasing representation of their fevered and fetid fantasy life.
"In modern Britain, the term African is almost universally synonymous with black person. If mention is made of an African community in some city, then we understand that these are sub-Saharan people; Nigerians, perhaps. So it is that when we are told that there was an African community living near Hadrian's Wall in the 3rd century AD, many of us automatically assume that this refers to a group of black people. In the same way, hearing of an African emperor of Rome conjures up the image of a black man in a toga."
Sadly many of us are idiots, or many of them are. Who would fall for this would fall for anything, would fall for the idea that a black as coal immigrant could be an Englishman, that a filthy Paki could be a German, or that a dark as a spade Haitian could be an American. The Jews have been juggling with words for so long that it's good to remind everyone from time to time that an Englishman is a White person whose ancestors have been there since time immemorial. To know this is so one only has to conjure up the risible image of a black man in a toga. The garment was worn by the noble Romans and its pure whiteness represented seriousness and gravitas. But a black man in a toga is a little like monkey in a tuxedo, for just as monkey can never be a man so can a negro never have been a Roman. The corollary to that axion is that the black man is more kin to the monkey than the man.
"Two typical examples of books promoting the idea of an African community in Roman Britain are Black and British by David Olusoga, and Places: Important Sites in Black British History by Melody Triumph. The former is aimed at adults and was adapted into a BBC series, while the latter is intended for children."
Conjuring a story out of nothing they tell the stories that the ruling elites want told; a reversionistic rewriting of English history, and a rewiring of the brain of White English. They will black out the White history of England and whitewash it into being actually black. It's hard to believe that anyone can fall for this simplistic tripe but, as the saying goes, no one ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the man on the street. You put up enough posters of a spook in plate or mail armor or a negress in a bonnet and an aristocratic gown and pretty soon enough people will see it as perfectly sane and normal. Half will actually believe it and the other half won't want to be racist by having bad thoughts.
This Olusoga fellow was born in Lagos as the wicked spawn of Nigerian father and an English (and coal burning) mother. The Triumph lady's site shows her as dark as a starless desert night and touts her "subject specialisms"; in other words: she be scholar.
"Olusoga discusses a detachment of Roman soldiers called the Aurelian Moors, who were stationed at Hadrian's Wall in the middle of the 3rd century AD. He says that they were Africans, and since they are featured in a book about black British history, we are naturally supposed to interpret this to mean that they were black Africans. The children's book goes further and suggests that Roman troops from Africa actually built Hadrian's Wall. This serves as a clear case of diversity building Britain."
Naturally! What did the negros not build? Why, if you believe the hype they are the secret sharers of architecture all over the globe. They built the seven wonders of the world by themselves, they built the cathedrals, they built all the great cities, they built the aqueducts, they built the White House, and the electrical grid, they laid the transatlantic cable, they built the semiconductors, they built everything we have. If you don't believe it you can see it all on the BBC. Of course, back in reality the Aurelian Moors were not black Africans, but rather Berbers from the Roman North Africa who had roughly the same complexion as the Romans. But White Africans don't sell books and don't get the Jews where they want to go. So they delete it.
"The same sleight of hand is used when referring to the Emperor Septimius Severus as African. The aim is to confuse people into believing he was black, which is why he is often mentioned during Black History Month and is sometimes even described as the black emperor. Though he was born in the Roman colony of Leptis Magna, located in North Africa, his mother was Roman and his father Carthaginian."
One could no more imagine a black emperor as a horse as a senator. The only leader of vast civilizations in the ancient world that were black were in Wakanda and that was made up. The only thing blacks ruled were mandingos in loin clothes gibbering nonsense, or small parties searching for albino bones to dig up so they can work some Lovecraftian Big Magic. They say the Egyptians were black but they were not. They had real technical know-how--that's how you know they were not black.
"In 2012, some old skeletons that had been discovered over the years near the seaside town of Eastbourne, on the south coast of England, were examined. A supposed facial reconstruction expert declared upon seeing one of the skulls that it belonged to a black person from sub-Saharan Africa. Her initial impression was confirmed when she measured it carefully and input the data into a computer program. Lo and behold, the skeleton was identified as that of a black woman."
Imagine that? Hoaxes in academia? It was Cheddar Man redux. And they flash the news that blacks were indigenous to those isles all around the Jew stations. And then when reality set in and the lie exposed they print it in small letters where no one can find it or even see it really. In the world of the lying Jewish Press the truth never does get its boot on, it is a barefoot homeless vagabond.
"Her findings were met with enthusiasm by those hoping to advance the idea of diversity in Roman Britain, and the news quickly spread across the country. David Olusoga, in the book mentioned earlier, wrote that the Beachy Head Lady, as she had been nicknamed due to the location where her skeleton had been found, was the first black Briton known to us. This claim, corroborated only by the measurements of an old skull, has appeared in countless texts and a plaque has even been erected near the site of the discovery to commemorate this important individual."
A plaque for the black! It must be true then. They would not put a memorial to black lady if it was a lie would they? Yes they did and yes they would. Especially if it's a lie.
"Seven years later, a DNA sample from the skull was tested at the Francis Crick Institute, revealing that the Beachy Head Lady was of European descent, likely from Cyprus. Despite this, fanciful representations of her with black skin are still widely circulated on the internet."
Oops! A swing and a miss. Who could have seen that one coming from a million miles away? White Science be racist!
"There is no evidence to suggest that any black person ever stepped foot in Britain during the Roman era, yet the fantasy continues to grow. Making black people, particularly children, feel welcome in this country may well be a praiseworthy and desirable aim, but it cannot be accomplished through lies and deception."
Evidence? Bosh! They don't need no stinking evidence. They got the backing of the elite and the arc of justice on their side. That's more than enough to pull the wool over the eyes of he public.
"Steve Moffat, the producer of the BBC television series Dr Who for some time, explained why he cast so many black people in the program, by saying, We’ve kind of got to tell a lie: we’ll go back into history and there will be black people where, historically, there wouldn’t have been, and we won’t dwell on that. We’ll say, To hell with it, this is the imaginary, better version of the world. By believing in it, we’ll summon it forth. This is precisely what is being done by those who promote the fake history of the black Romans in Britain."
This is the inner logic of course, they know it's a con game but they are doing it for the correct cause. And the cause of course is anti-racism and there is no amount of shameless posturing, no amount of fabrication, no amount of deception that would be unjustified in the White nation wrecking endeavor. John Updike once famously said that biographies are just novels with footnotes and bibliographies, and their black ridden period dramas or sci-fi extravaganzas are just historical dramas wit a Jew ideology. It's the ultimate in wish fulfillment, that is if you wish White people dead.
"Dr. Who was created by Sydney Newman, who was born in Toronto to Russian Jewish immigrants It’s not too difficult to spot traces of Newman’s own roots in his creation. His hero is wildly intelligent, intergalactically cosmopolitan, with a biting sense of humor and a commitment to quite literally repairing the world. He is constantly wandering, never at home."
Every. Single. Time.
A black Tudor? A black in Regent England? A black at Alfred's Court? The lie seems brazen but when it is saturated enough into the mental blood stream of the people it will catch and seem common sense. There was a black lady who's skull they found, not really, but that didn't stop them from memorializing her. There were black gallants at the Court of King William, not really, but you can see it on the Telly; there are blacks in the Bayeux tapestry, not really, but you can imagine it so. And if all of this seems mystifying and you don't believe a word of it, if you think it's all one big propaganda ploy and a crock of shit, you can always turn on the BBC and they'll be sure to tell you different.
