Give Us Your Indigent
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 6:03 pm
Douglas Mercer
January 2 2023
Give us your poor and your needy, give us your poor and your wheezy; give us the indigent, the grub diggers, the bug eaters, give us those from the favelas, give us the destitute from the mud huts of Africa, give us the voodoo vendors of Haiti, the albino bone shamans of Gambia, give us your El Salvadoran chicken farmers, give us your refugees from the malarial swamps, give us your human trash, give us your poor Indians who don't have two nickels to rub together, give us your tubercular, your lice ridden, your diseased, give us your lepers, your vermin, your bacillus, give us those with no education, give us the outcasts from Guatemala, give us the down and out Venezuelans, give us the Cuban prisoners, give us the Congo Cannibals, give us those with no worldly prospects whatsoever, give us those illiterates who can't speak English, give us all the future welfare recipients of the world, let them come to America and queue up at the pig trough so they can stick in their snouts and snort up our hard earned wealth.
In the old days the Public Charge rule was so obviously a good one that it elicited no comment. But back then America was not a dense network of Welfare Offices like it is today. The Jews swear that we make money off of each immigrant, so much so that we cannot afford not to let them in. But when those migrants were dropped off in the liberal insect mecca of Martha's Vineyard one of the insects inadvertently gave the game away when she said the migrants can't stay amidst the multimillion dollars mansion because "we don't have services." Which means that had they stayed there the migrants would have had to have huddled on the outskirts of the estates with no access to the average White man's money. Of course in other jurisdictions where the migrants go the White man's money is fair game and is dispensed freely by other liberal insects working for the government. When someone says "services" grab your wallet because it's about to get raided by some green-eye shade maggots. They'll give you some eyewash about "justice" but it's really just revenge.
That awful poem at the base of the Statue Of Liberty has now become Holy Writ. Try to restrict immigration and they will appeal to it as if it was an actual law which cannot be abrogated. It turns out that plaque dwelled in deserved obscurity until the late 1930s when American Jews began to tout it in order to cow Americans into letting more Jews in. Thanks to this relentless Jewish propaganda after the war everyone assumed that that poem had always been knowns and esteemed highly and that it was a legal duty for Americans to take in the wretched trash of from all corners of the world.
Give us your tired and your poor and your wretched refuse.
Give us your indigent.
Don't be a bigot and get your head back in that noose.
"As an American rabbi, my life is informed by two aligned value systems. On the base of the Statue of Liberty are words from the poem penned by the 19th-century American Jewish poet Emma Lazarus: Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. And in the Torah we read, We know the heart of the stranger, because we were strangers in the land of Egypt. Both messages assert a common ethic: that we share a moral grounding in caring with empathy for the vulnerable, whose lives are at best tenuous due to conditions and violence in a faraway place."
Torah and trash. So says the Jew.
***
Of course America should keep out all immigrants--unless they are Whites from Europe or Australia or South Africa---but the idea that we could keep out immigrants based on the fact that they are dirt poor and would suck up our money as if they were sticking a blood funnel into our hearts---why, that's anathema to Jews. As window dressing they'll turn it into a morality play, but a poor negro or mestizo being dumped in our homeland is a twofer for Jews in their plan of White genocide--it impoverishes us while at the same time is a dagger in the hear of the purity of our race.
"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday (January 9 2023) rebuffed an effort by a group of Republican state officials to revive former President Donald Trump's hardline policy that barred certain immigrants deemed likely to require government benefits from gaining lawful permanent residency."
That wasn't really a "hardline" policy, Trump talked a tough game but at his best he made what can only be considered reasonable and moderate reforms, not half bad but not nearly enough and not nearly what the promised in that megilla anti-immigrant speech in Arizona in the summer of 2016, the one where he said that illegal aliens would no longer be able to just hunker down and remain. You know the one that caused John McCain to say that Trump was activating the "crazies." Fast forward to reality: under his Administration they hunkered down and remained. You think "Remain In Mexico" is bold policy? Ha! Get the fuck back to Mexico is more like it. Shout that one from the rooftops.
"The justices turned away an appeal by 14 Republican state attorneys general, led by Ken Paxton of Texas, of a lower court ruling against their request to mount a legal defense of Trump's public charge" rule after President Joe Biden's administration stopped defending the measure and later rescinded it."
This Ken Paxton fellow is getting warmer, he's on the right track, but just one look at him lets you know when the chips are down he won't have the ten-ton testicles to do what is needed. And when they say turned away the appeal they mean the Supreme Court refused to hear it, not that they said Paxton was wrong. The case was not "ripe" in obfuscatory parlance of the legal magicians. They say the constitution is not a suicide pact but it sure seems like one to me---if the time isn't ripe right now for using any and all measures to keep any and every illegal alien out when on earth would it be? It's more than ripe, the fruit has fallen from the tree and an illegal beaner is working for a mega corporation to pick it up.
"Trump's administration in a 2019 rule significantly widened the definition of public charges who were ineligible for legal U.S. permanent residency, or green cards. The expanded restriction applied to immigrants who receive a government benefit including the Medicaid health insurance program for the poor and food stamps for more than 12 months in any three-year period."
This of course is the very least we could do and we can't even do that. To do so would be racist because Hector and Owotumba can't read, have no discernible skills, and have no drive to better themselves, they came here not in search of the American Dream but in search of the kindness of gullible strangers and the largesse of that old softie known to the world as Uncle Sucker
"The Trump-era policy – an expansion of the so-called public charge – made it more difficult for immigrants to obtain legal status if they use certain public benefits, such as Medicaid, food stamps and housing vouchers."
Legal status? We're dicking around over the issue of legal status for these leeches and mooches? But that's just the thing, policies which are deemed draconian and harsh are really just Exhibit A evidence that we are have already backfooted ourselves by fighting a rearguard action, trying to clean up the mess when the house is flooded instead of stopping the flood at it source.
"Officers would make those determinations by evaluating applicants’ past usage of certain benefits programs, as well as their health, education level and other factors. Critics of the rule argued it discouraged immigrants from using needed social services for fear of immigration repercussions."
The soft-hearted insects are at it again here, aren't they? Assuming some special right of unknown provenance that the immigrants have to these services when in fact they have none. In fact discouraging immigrants from getting these services (needed or not) is the entire point of this policy. If you can't stand up straight on your own two feet why did we let you in? In fact whether you can stand up straight on your own two feet or not why did we let you in? Our enemy's answer is plain: to take our money and to take over our country
"A federal judge in Illinois vacated the rule nationwide. The judge later rejected the Republican bid to intervene, saying the request by the state officials came too late, and the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last June agreed."
Remember when the judge in Hawaii unilaterally overturned one of Trump's immigration rules and Jeff Session was incredulous that some guy sitting on an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean could dictate to America? That's about the long and the short of it.
Som judicial scum in the communist state of Illinois gets up on his legal high horse and says come one and come all to land of milk and honey and stick your snouts in our trough, stick your blood funnel in to our hearts until you suck the life blood dry. And then that judge leisurely retires to his upper class White and Jewish community, the one in which crime is at an all time low.
"A number of federal judges struck down the rule during the prior administration, including one judge who rebuked the policy as repugnant to the American Dream.”
This is the oldest Jewish trick in the book. Couch the subversion of America in the rhetoric of the American Dream, wrap the total transformation of America in the American Flag. The Jews spit on the American Dream but they know appealing words when they see them, and they steal the words and hijack the words and persuade morons that somehow or other importing poor and indigent race aliens who will outright steal our money is the same as the dream of a mother, father, two kids, a dog, and a White picket fence. When you see the transparency and venality of the lie it makes you want to puke.
"The Supreme Court last year heard arguments over a separate bid by Republican state officials to intervene in defense of Trump's public charge rule but ultimately dismissed the case without resolving the issue. The court’s move was not unexpected, and the case did not center on the legality of the rule but instead whether the Biden administration followed proper procedures when it set out to revoke the rule and dismiss pending legal challenges."
Again with the niceties, the rules, and the footnotes to the footnotes of some obscure legal case. It's death by minutiae and death by procedure from the wise men of the American Sanhedrin.
"Justice John Roberts wrote a concurrence back then which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, to explain their votes to dismiss the challenges. Roberts expressed frustration with the Biden administration for sidestepping certain procedures for reversing the Trump policy. He said the maneuvers raised a host of important questions for future disputes. Nevertheless, he said it had become clear that this mare’s nest could stand in the way of our reaching the question presented in the case, and therefore agreed that the challenge should be dismissed."
A mare's nest? Ha! He should just cut the gordian knot and do anything and everything he can to implement the policy, weak it is. But instead he and his "conservative" brethren will hem and haw and say "why, yes" and ponder and punt Is that the proper procedure? Who cares? When the constitution lies in tatters you don't get high minded about the details. They say that hard cases make bad law but the law is already bad. So just make it easy and as easy as possible to keep the aliens out and if god forbid they get in to keep them from becoming citizens. Otherwise it will be more than a mare's nest or a hornet's nest or a can of worms. It will be a country that is witch's brew, and one that you will pay for. For you see the way it's going now we lose money on every immigrant; but as for the immigrants they can no longer afford not to come.
January 2 2023
Give us your poor and your needy, give us your poor and your wheezy; give us the indigent, the grub diggers, the bug eaters, give us those from the favelas, give us the destitute from the mud huts of Africa, give us the voodoo vendors of Haiti, the albino bone shamans of Gambia, give us your El Salvadoran chicken farmers, give us your refugees from the malarial swamps, give us your human trash, give us your poor Indians who don't have two nickels to rub together, give us your tubercular, your lice ridden, your diseased, give us your lepers, your vermin, your bacillus, give us those with no education, give us the outcasts from Guatemala, give us the down and out Venezuelans, give us the Cuban prisoners, give us the Congo Cannibals, give us those with no worldly prospects whatsoever, give us those illiterates who can't speak English, give us all the future welfare recipients of the world, let them come to America and queue up at the pig trough so they can stick in their snouts and snort up our hard earned wealth.
In the old days the Public Charge rule was so obviously a good one that it elicited no comment. But back then America was not a dense network of Welfare Offices like it is today. The Jews swear that we make money off of each immigrant, so much so that we cannot afford not to let them in. But when those migrants were dropped off in the liberal insect mecca of Martha's Vineyard one of the insects inadvertently gave the game away when she said the migrants can't stay amidst the multimillion dollars mansion because "we don't have services." Which means that had they stayed there the migrants would have had to have huddled on the outskirts of the estates with no access to the average White man's money. Of course in other jurisdictions where the migrants go the White man's money is fair game and is dispensed freely by other liberal insects working for the government. When someone says "services" grab your wallet because it's about to get raided by some green-eye shade maggots. They'll give you some eyewash about "justice" but it's really just revenge.
That awful poem at the base of the Statue Of Liberty has now become Holy Writ. Try to restrict immigration and they will appeal to it as if it was an actual law which cannot be abrogated. It turns out that plaque dwelled in deserved obscurity until the late 1930s when American Jews began to tout it in order to cow Americans into letting more Jews in. Thanks to this relentless Jewish propaganda after the war everyone assumed that that poem had always been knowns and esteemed highly and that it was a legal duty for Americans to take in the wretched trash of from all corners of the world.
Give us your tired and your poor and your wretched refuse.
Give us your indigent.
Don't be a bigot and get your head back in that noose.
"As an American rabbi, my life is informed by two aligned value systems. On the base of the Statue of Liberty are words from the poem penned by the 19th-century American Jewish poet Emma Lazarus: Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. And in the Torah we read, We know the heart of the stranger, because we were strangers in the land of Egypt. Both messages assert a common ethic: that we share a moral grounding in caring with empathy for the vulnerable, whose lives are at best tenuous due to conditions and violence in a faraway place."
Torah and trash. So says the Jew.
***
Of course America should keep out all immigrants--unless they are Whites from Europe or Australia or South Africa---but the idea that we could keep out immigrants based on the fact that they are dirt poor and would suck up our money as if they were sticking a blood funnel into our hearts---why, that's anathema to Jews. As window dressing they'll turn it into a morality play, but a poor negro or mestizo being dumped in our homeland is a twofer for Jews in their plan of White genocide--it impoverishes us while at the same time is a dagger in the hear of the purity of our race.
"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday (January 9 2023) rebuffed an effort by a group of Republican state officials to revive former President Donald Trump's hardline policy that barred certain immigrants deemed likely to require government benefits from gaining lawful permanent residency."
That wasn't really a "hardline" policy, Trump talked a tough game but at his best he made what can only be considered reasonable and moderate reforms, not half bad but not nearly enough and not nearly what the promised in that megilla anti-immigrant speech in Arizona in the summer of 2016, the one where he said that illegal aliens would no longer be able to just hunker down and remain. You know the one that caused John McCain to say that Trump was activating the "crazies." Fast forward to reality: under his Administration they hunkered down and remained. You think "Remain In Mexico" is bold policy? Ha! Get the fuck back to Mexico is more like it. Shout that one from the rooftops.
"The justices turned away an appeal by 14 Republican state attorneys general, led by Ken Paxton of Texas, of a lower court ruling against their request to mount a legal defense of Trump's public charge" rule after President Joe Biden's administration stopped defending the measure and later rescinded it."
This Ken Paxton fellow is getting warmer, he's on the right track, but just one look at him lets you know when the chips are down he won't have the ten-ton testicles to do what is needed. And when they say turned away the appeal they mean the Supreme Court refused to hear it, not that they said Paxton was wrong. The case was not "ripe" in obfuscatory parlance of the legal magicians. They say the constitution is not a suicide pact but it sure seems like one to me---if the time isn't ripe right now for using any and all measures to keep any and every illegal alien out when on earth would it be? It's more than ripe, the fruit has fallen from the tree and an illegal beaner is working for a mega corporation to pick it up.
"Trump's administration in a 2019 rule significantly widened the definition of public charges who were ineligible for legal U.S. permanent residency, or green cards. The expanded restriction applied to immigrants who receive a government benefit including the Medicaid health insurance program for the poor and food stamps for more than 12 months in any three-year period."
This of course is the very least we could do and we can't even do that. To do so would be racist because Hector and Owotumba can't read, have no discernible skills, and have no drive to better themselves, they came here not in search of the American Dream but in search of the kindness of gullible strangers and the largesse of that old softie known to the world as Uncle Sucker
"The Trump-era policy – an expansion of the so-called public charge – made it more difficult for immigrants to obtain legal status if they use certain public benefits, such as Medicaid, food stamps and housing vouchers."
Legal status? We're dicking around over the issue of legal status for these leeches and mooches? But that's just the thing, policies which are deemed draconian and harsh are really just Exhibit A evidence that we are have already backfooted ourselves by fighting a rearguard action, trying to clean up the mess when the house is flooded instead of stopping the flood at it source.
"Officers would make those determinations by evaluating applicants’ past usage of certain benefits programs, as well as their health, education level and other factors. Critics of the rule argued it discouraged immigrants from using needed social services for fear of immigration repercussions."
The soft-hearted insects are at it again here, aren't they? Assuming some special right of unknown provenance that the immigrants have to these services when in fact they have none. In fact discouraging immigrants from getting these services (needed or not) is the entire point of this policy. If you can't stand up straight on your own two feet why did we let you in? In fact whether you can stand up straight on your own two feet or not why did we let you in? Our enemy's answer is plain: to take our money and to take over our country
"A federal judge in Illinois vacated the rule nationwide. The judge later rejected the Republican bid to intervene, saying the request by the state officials came too late, and the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last June agreed."
Remember when the judge in Hawaii unilaterally overturned one of Trump's immigration rules and Jeff Session was incredulous that some guy sitting on an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean could dictate to America? That's about the long and the short of it.
Som judicial scum in the communist state of Illinois gets up on his legal high horse and says come one and come all to land of milk and honey and stick your snouts in our trough, stick your blood funnel in to our hearts until you suck the life blood dry. And then that judge leisurely retires to his upper class White and Jewish community, the one in which crime is at an all time low.
"A number of federal judges struck down the rule during the prior administration, including one judge who rebuked the policy as repugnant to the American Dream.”
This is the oldest Jewish trick in the book. Couch the subversion of America in the rhetoric of the American Dream, wrap the total transformation of America in the American Flag. The Jews spit on the American Dream but they know appealing words when they see them, and they steal the words and hijack the words and persuade morons that somehow or other importing poor and indigent race aliens who will outright steal our money is the same as the dream of a mother, father, two kids, a dog, and a White picket fence. When you see the transparency and venality of the lie it makes you want to puke.
"The Supreme Court last year heard arguments over a separate bid by Republican state officials to intervene in defense of Trump's public charge rule but ultimately dismissed the case without resolving the issue. The court’s move was not unexpected, and the case did not center on the legality of the rule but instead whether the Biden administration followed proper procedures when it set out to revoke the rule and dismiss pending legal challenges."
Again with the niceties, the rules, and the footnotes to the footnotes of some obscure legal case. It's death by minutiae and death by procedure from the wise men of the American Sanhedrin.
"Justice John Roberts wrote a concurrence back then which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, to explain their votes to dismiss the challenges. Roberts expressed frustration with the Biden administration for sidestepping certain procedures for reversing the Trump policy. He said the maneuvers raised a host of important questions for future disputes. Nevertheless, he said it had become clear that this mare’s nest could stand in the way of our reaching the question presented in the case, and therefore agreed that the challenge should be dismissed."
A mare's nest? Ha! He should just cut the gordian knot and do anything and everything he can to implement the policy, weak it is. But instead he and his "conservative" brethren will hem and haw and say "why, yes" and ponder and punt Is that the proper procedure? Who cares? When the constitution lies in tatters you don't get high minded about the details. They say that hard cases make bad law but the law is already bad. So just make it easy and as easy as possible to keep the aliens out and if god forbid they get in to keep them from becoming citizens. Otherwise it will be more than a mare's nest or a hornet's nest or a can of worms. It will be a country that is witch's brew, and one that you will pay for. For you see the way it's going now we lose money on every immigrant; but as for the immigrants they can no longer afford not to come.
