Douglas Mercer
April 28 2023
Remember that iconic image of Charlottesville, the one with that crazed negro shooting that plume of fire like a blowtorch at that White guy holding a Confederate flag? The one that was beamed around the world and was decried by leaders far and wide? The one that so upset the bien pensants that they called for one of those National Conversations the like so much? The one that for the world epitomized the event, how some sad, lawless and fanatical dark skinned thugs overthrew a legal event by some responsible, upright citizens who had a permit? No, of course you don't, nor does anyone else, because that image of the negro and his fire (burning to intimidate!) was memory holed and deep sixed before it even had a chance to pierce the public's consciousness. But trust me, you could do a mock Frontline episode narrated by that guy with the stentorian voice who makes things everything sound so portentous and you could provide an alternate history that would remain compelling and convincing.
The thing to most remember about Charlottesville is that what the good guys did was legal and what the bad guys did was not, yet it was the good guys who got and get dragged through court every few years and probably will for the foreseeable future. First there was the travesty of the James Fields case, then two years back the rally goers were sued, a trial that no more of a person than Deborah Lipstadt testified--she said she was taken aback by the anti-semitism at that event and many in the media will be shocked to learn that an old war hose battle-ax harridan being take aback by something does not make it illegal. And now some of the White Nationalist there the fateful day are up on felony charges. The crime? Well, being White and being proud of it. But technically their crime is burning to intimidate. No, really that is what the indictment says. They say you can indict a ham sandwich, so how hard is it to indict people the public has been conditioned and brainwashed into believing are evil incarnate? Answer: not that hard.
"Nearly six years after marching across the Grounds of the University of Virginia carrying flaming torches and shouting phrases including Blood and Soil and Jews will not replace us, some of those marchers have been hit with felony indictments for violating Virginia law against burning to intimidate."
This is a reference to the Klan which supposedly would burn crosses on the lawns of negros to warn and scare them. Of course that begs the question if the spooks needed to be spooked, if they needed a warning. Of course the link from cross burnings to a bunch of (righteously) angry men who had the guts to say some taboo phrases is ridiculous. Despite the claims the White Nationalists didn't hurt a fly at that rally, though they did bewilder the few and appall the many as that weeks long National Conversation and ritual and never ending denunciations showed. But violence was never on the cards, teh point was to commit to the world some world class peak aesthetics (those winding processions of beautiful light) and going on the record that we will not submit to the Jews' nefarious plans. That alone was worth the price of admission. But burning to intimidate? That is more than a reach, that's a crock. Were those men intimidating? Sure, it stands to reason that the ruling elite and their handmaidens in the media would be scared (taken aback!) of what they saw: a group of unrepentant White men banding together to protect their own. That is the stuff of their nightmares.
"A grand jury in Virginia has indicted three individuals for allegedly burning an object with the intent to intimidate on the night of a 2017 White Nationalist demonstration at the University of Virginia, in which scores of people marched through the Charlottesville campus carrying flaming tiki torches and chanting White nationalist slogans."
The law requires that an object be burned (say, a cross) but no object was burned. It was that proud thing in a long American tradition: the torchlight parade. For what you need to remember most about Charlottesville (dread name!) was that the White Nationalists were well within the law and well within their rights. They had a permit and the police know well and good how to handle such situations. You create cordon sanitaires, keep the antagonists apart, and let the speakers speak. It was the anti-White authorities who deliberately let the two groups mingle, and it was antifa who initiated the melee. In this way it was the city who fomented the public disorder charge which allowed the event to broken up. It was most definitely not force majeure--it was the plan all along.
"These indictments were issued as part of a criminal investigation that is active and ongoing, Commonwealth’s Attorney Jim Hingeley said in a statement announcing the actions by an Albemarle County grand jury, which has jurisdiction over UVa’s Central Grounds. Ever since the Unite the Right rally-turned-riot on Aug. 12, 2017, which brought hordes of neo-Nazis and neo-Confederates onto the streets of Charlottesville and claimed the life of anti-racist counter-protester Heather Heyer, there have been efforts to punish the racists.
All the data suggests the Heather Heyer was a fat whale and race traitor who died of a heart attack (uncontrollably wolfing down cheeseburger after cheeseburger increases your risk for that). If James Fields was guilty of anything it was the mistake not to park far away and walk to the event; but that notwithstanding those wise to the Jews evil plans have every right to drive their car unimpeded anywhere it's legal; could he conceivably been hit with a vehicular manslaughter charge? Sure, conceivably. But that's a few years, so 416 out of the 419 years he got were purely anti-White and political. At the time no one in public had a good word for him. They hung him out to dry and let him twist in the wind. But we all remember Reginald Denny. And during the 2020 looting and pillaging fest by negros when images were constantly flashed on the screen of blacks surrounding cars and not letting them move and pounding on the car, even some conservatives had the grace to recall Fields and say maybe he was railroaded. He was. But in the end make no mistake about it: he was convicted of the regime's high crime: wrong think in the form of White Pride.
"Then-Commonwealth’s Attorney Robert Tracci asserted that Virginia’s law banning burning as intimidation — written to prevent the Ku Klux Klan from burning crosses to terrorize Black people — asserted that he couldn’t prosecute because the law asserts that an object must be burned."
That was from the previous DA but---mere technicalities. That would not stop the new DA James Hingeley who is one of the reasons why "Soros backed" is now part of the popular American vernacular. And no sooner in office then this race traitor paid back his Jews mega donor by putting the screws to some truly peacefully protesting White Nationalists. They got to pay the Jew piper if they want to prosper and flourish and their benefactors are hash task master who have been known to crack the whip on the recalcitrant.
"However, University of Virginia law professor Anne Coughlin noted that some of the torch-wielders surrounded and then struck some of the counter-protesters gathered at the statue of Thomas Jefferson in front of the Rotunda on Grounds on Aug. 11, 2017. Coughlin has long argued that failing to bring charges was dereliction of duty."
Unlike her great namesake this Coughlin lady is no lady and is a real beauty, not really of course she is ugly as hell, looks like a walking skeleton with the butch dyke short hair and the permanent scowl affixed to her face revealing her as a man hater. Unshockingly she is no fan of the White man speaking his mind, as part of a "Showing Up For Racial Justice" event (count me as a no show) she burbled about the "false notions" of free speech. She said that free speech can hinder anti-racist work (I'll say!) and that legally protected free speech is myth.
"We regulate speech all the time. Free speech gets thrown around as an absolute right, while the protections are much narrower that people believe."
Unbelievably this anti-White man hater is a fully fledged professor at the law school at Thomas Jefferson's once great university, and you can be sure she confers with Jews often on how to craft legal arguments to keep White people from their immemorial right to speak.
"There are so many people in our community who were there on August 11 who were terrorized by torch-wielding terrorists, Hingeley said in 2019 during the campaign. There's a law, a burning objects law, that says they can be prosecuted but our prosecutor's not doing that."
Sure, we're the bad guys. So this Soros backed prosecutor ran on a lock them all up the White man is the number one domestic terror threat--and he won! And now you can bet he'll have an infinite number of bites at this apple, it's been six years since those "monsters" burned to intimidate (six years those terrorist were on the loose) and now he's come after them. There is no statue of limitation on these felonies in Virginia so you can expect a decades long campaign of dredging up Rube Goldberg legal formulations to harass them again and again. The real reason of course is that Charlottesville struck a deep and raw nerve with them, it sent them in to the mad house with fret and worry. It was that khaki clad cohort and atavistic revival of all the old "demons" that they thought they had good and buried: unabashed and unashamed and uncowed White men willing to march with pride in their people. They were not diluting or trimming their message that day, the said it all and said it in glory: the Jews will not replace us. And for that supposedly unutterable but really immortal phrase the long arm of the regime's law is coming down on them like a ton of bricks; but given all their perfidy including but not limited to this latest outrage they should not be surprised that enough of us bear towards them a burning hate.
