Patrick Grimm
They tried to warn us, tell us the danger of giving up our heritage, our destiny, everything our fathers built. But no, the Jew pressure was too great, our fathers hadn’t done the footwork and the political work and taken the initiative of tossing them down from their financial control over us. And the Jews used their pinch, their dollars, their loud mouths and their lawyerly will to make it all change. They debauched us, despoiled us, defecated on our culture, and we let them do it. Brave men tried to sound the alarm, tried to scream into increasingly deaf and distracted ears. We didn’t listen then, and we aren’t listening now.
Only a small cadre of individuals, risking livelihood, reputation and ruin have stepped forward to stand in the gap, to take away the dearth of info, the joyful delight in ignorance that fat, bloated, overweight and overindulged Americans take for granted as their birthright living in “the best country on earth” though most of them have never taken the time to visit any other country. Yes, we once were the greatest nation, maybe even the “essential nation” in many ways. But that window is closing fast.
Who was warning us? Henry Ford, for one, spoke through the bullhorn loudly and from the bully pulpit of his influence as one of our greatest American entrepreneurs, to make us see, help us to connect the dots of Jewish criminality. The Jews were busy as hell bringing it all down as fast as they could. Ford thought that perhaps someone should try to stop them before it was too late, should publicly address their negative behavior patterns that have become an infamous Jewish tradition after eons of replication which were always followed by reprisal, of course translated as “victimization” once the events reached the history books of Jewish publishers. It’s funny how Jewish victimhood always looks so much like the genocide of white people, isn’t it?
Henry Ford in his newspaper The Dearborn Independent did something that today would be unthinkable, inconceivable to the typical gutless American. He pulled away the false front of Jewish piety and showed us the horrid face of Judeo-vulgarity. In a book he authored called My Life and Work, Ford bluntly commented on the volume The International Jew. Here are a few pointed points he made:
- “Readers of our articles will see at once that we are not actuated by any kind of prejudice, except it may be a prejudice in favor of the principles which have made our civilization.”
“There had been observed in this country certain streams of influence which were causing a marked deterioration in our literature, amusements, and social conduct; business was departing from its old-time substantial soundness; a general letting-down of standards were felt everywhere. It was not the robust coarseness of the white man, the rude indelicacy, say, of Shakespeare’s characters, but a nasty Orientalism which has insidiously affected every channel of expression — and to such an extent that it was time to challenge it.
The fact that these influences are all traceable to one racial source is a fact to be reckoned with . . . Our work does not pretend to say the last word on the Jew in America. It says only the word which describes his present impress on this country. When that impress is changed, the report can be changed . . . Our opposition is only to ideas, false ideas, which are sapping the moral stamina of the people. These ideas proceed from easily identified sources, they are promulgated by easily discoverable methods and they are controlled by mere exposure.”
“When people learn to identify the source and nature of the influence swirling around them, it is sufficient. Let the American people once understand that it is not natural degeneracy but calculated subversion that afflicts us, and they are safe.”
“The explanation is the cure. This work was taken up without personal motives. When it reached a stage where we believed the American people could grasp the key, we let it rest for the time. Our enemies say that we began it for revenge and that we laid it down in fear. Time will show that our critics (the Jews) are merely dealing in evasion because they dare not tackle the main question.” [1]
Business standards, rules of law and order and the quality of entertainment and theatre had also begun to shift downward as Jewish influence was on the rise. The zero-sum Jew-Gentile playing field was arcing towards the Hebrew side of things, guaranteeing demise for the Goyim’s house, his heritage and his folkways, which were quietly smarting from the tiny cuts being inflicted by activism from the Chosen.
It was hardly hatred that motivated Henry Ford, Sr. to point out the obvious and he makes clear that his own truth-telling newspaper and his uncovering of Jew chicanery had nothing to do with bigotry. Of course, this didn’t stop Jews from mounting a media assault, as they have always done to any critics in the past and continue to do to this day. “For fear of the Jews” and all that jazz.
Ford was right then and he is still correct today. He said “The explanation is the cure.” I would say that “the truth is the salve” or “the cure is disclosure” or “truth is all you need” or a Dragnetian “Just the facts, ma’am.” It really is no more convoluted than that, or it doesn’t need to be. The only problem we face today is that it is both harder and simpler to disseminate and publicize the message. In Henry Ford’s day, Jews were not as taboo a topic and untouchable as they are presently. In that sense, it was easier to say the dreaded J-word in a public venue.
On the other hand, Ford had the Model T, but lacked the technology of the mighty internet to diffuse the dastardly unspotted byplays of Jews working the media and flexing their muscles. We see only too well that the taboo is lifting, the “anti-Semitism” swipe is losing its sting, but the public square still broaches the issue with some trepidation, with a trembling not experienced in the 1920s.
Ford had it easier in that sense, but the medium for the message was not as immediate as it is contemporaneously. Click a button, send an e-mail, write an article or work a blog or website and the truth gets scatter-shot very efficaciously. The father of the American automotive industry would have been grateful to have the tools we have at our fingertips and now take for granted.
Henry Ford, Sr. tried to warn us and his words will forever stand as a “code red” for any Americans still remaining who doubt the danger of letting the Jews have their way with our culture. The USA of his day looks downright Mayberryesque when compared with the sick, rotting infrastructure that is modern Americana. Ford saw religious symbols challenged and eradicated in a few isolated places and theatre grow more bawdy and risqué and PG-13.
He never could have imagined turning on a Jewish idiot box called television and watching filthy Jew comedienne Sarah Silverman on a Comedy Central commercial simulating licking a dog’s testicles for laughs. He couldn’t have envisioned seeing movies where people fornicate with horses and where serial killers are portrayed as chic and voguish and with-it.
But he did see the plague of the Judaic mind, the canker sore infecting and imbuing everything with its disease after a long and humiliating Jewish rogering. Whatever you might say of Henry Ford, he did all he could. He didn’t want the “essential nation” to become the “dysfunctional devalued nation.” But we have ceased to exist as the former and embody the latter to a tee. In this sense, America is the most Jewish of nations. It is to our detriment that this is so.
Here is a parting shot from the automobile giant of all automobile giants, a man who in his day hovered over his contemporaries like a colossus. Ford writes:
- “The Jews are propagandists. This was originally their mission. But they were to propagate the central tenet of their religion. This they failed to do. By failing in this they, according to their own Scriptures, failed everywhere. They are now without a mission of blessing. Few of their leaders even claim a spiritual mission. But the mission idea is still with them in a degenerate form; it represents the grossest materialism of the day; it has become a means of sordid acquisition instead of a channel of service.”
[1] http://www.jrbooksonline.com/intro_by_gerald_smith.htm
http://patrick-grimm-archive.blogspot.c ... -cure.html