Page 1 of 1

Leaderless Resistance Vs. Organization buliding

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:28 am
by David York
Dear Friends and Fellow Patriots,

It has come to my attention that certain other pro-white "movements" are preaching a strategy of "leaderless Resistance" instead of organization building. Instead of referring action oriented people to existing organizations such as ours, or even starting their own organization, these pro-white "movements' are telling people that there are no existing pro-white organizations worth joining in America and that "leaderless Resistance" is the strategy they should adopt.

When examining the concept of "leadership resistance", the end result of this strategy essentially amounts to null or less than zero. This concept effectually leads to no activity at all or to lone-wolf activism. In most cases lone-wolf activism tends to be in the form of violent outbursts which will damage any pro-white movement and undoubtedly lead to enactment of new laws that will repress the rights of all Americans.

Without leaders or organizations, people that are concerned with the survival of our race will be left with no outlets for their anger and will be forced to come up with their own solutions for the problems facing our race. These solutions will undoubtedly be poorly planned and poorly executed, and at best will leave only a small mark on the face of the enemy before completely fading into obscurity. The saddest part of it all is that when a lone-wolf finally does lash out, the people responsible for filling them with their rage without offering them solutions to work on our problems will denounce their action and deny any responsibility for helping foster their anger and hostility.

The answer to our problem is not leaderless resistance, it is organizing and alliance building. We cannot achieve anything of significance on our own on an individual basis. The only way to solve any of the problems facing our race is for our people to come together, develop a group mentality and act like a unit. In order to accomplish that we have to build organizations. Right now our organization, the National Alliance, is the strongest organization our people can join to begin working on solutions for our problems. The National Alliance was created by one of the brightest minds of the 20th century and our goals and ideology are the only ones that can save our race in the long run. Anyone out there who is concerned with the survival of the White race and is interested in working on solutions to our problems should go to http://www.natall.com and join our organization. Organizing is the only way for us to survive in the long run. Leaderless resistance is intrinsically a defeatist mentality that will lead to non-action and our doom,

Sincerely,
Danielolj79

Re: Leaderless Resistance Vs. Organization buliding

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 10:29 pm
by Will Williams
Very good, Dan. This should probably be moved to Alliance-Building. Dr. Pierce addressed the leaderless resistance "strategy" a few time along the line that you just did. Here's one that particularly relevant for an Internet discussion board like ours that is connected to the National Alliance:
---

"...The Internet has given many inadequate people the ability to pretend to be more than they are. Any troubled teenager or unemployed alcoholic can get a web site, set himself up as a phone-booth Fuhrer, and begin collecting “followers,” and many do. They are the ones to whom the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Southern Poverty Law Center are referring when they announce that “the number of ‘hate groups’ on the Internet is now 457, up 23 per cent since 1999.” Two outstanding examples are a teenaged Jew named Andy Greenbaum, who used the name “Bo Decker” and set up an “organization” he called “Knights of Freedom”; and a professional disseminator of disinformation named Harold Covington (a.k.a. “Winston Smith”). Greenbaum self-destructed last year, when he announced a giant march in Washington and only two of his “followers” showed up for the march. Covington occasionally still makes Internet attacks on the Alliance, but he is far less prolific than he was a year or so ago.

"There are dozens of others who are still active, however. One is a TV repairman in California named Tom Metzger, who publishes a tabloid addressed primarily to skinheads and prisoners called “White Aryan Resistance’ (“WAR”). Metzger promotes an ideology that is a blend of racial nationalism and class resentment, commonly called “national bolshevism.” Another, also in California, publishes a newsletter called “The Nationalist Observer.” Both are proponents of an “strategy” known as “leaderless resistance,” according to which, at the appropriate time, hundreds or even thousands of revolutionary cells, consisting of one to five patriots each, will materialize spontaneously and will overthrow the government by sabotaging or bombing government and media facilities and assassinating politicians, leading Jews, collaborators, and other enemies of our people. All of these cells will operate independently, without centralized organization or direction or infrastructure, so that it will be nearly impossible for the government to infiltrate them or spy on them, and the government never will know where or when they will strike next.

"Actually, Metzger and other “leaderless resistance” advocates are not so much in favor of “leaderless resistance” as they are against any sort of organized activity. Their thesis is that any organized activity is certain to fail because it will be infiltrated by government informants and provocateurs, and that any racial patriot who joins an organization is a fool who is allowing the government to get his name on the blacklist for unspecified, but presumably severe, reprisals.

"All of this theorizing takes place in the make-believe world of revolutionary hobbyism. In the real world, “leaderless resistance” is simply an excuse for losers, cowards, and shirkers to do nothing except talk to each other. Building an effective organization of any sort is difficult work, and those who don’t like work or who have tried to build an organization and failed often are resentful of any effort that shows signs of success. Their reasoning is, “I tried it and wasn’t successful; therefore, it can’t be done.” And the reason that nearly every organizational effort has failed has not been government spies or provocateurs; it has been the low quality of the human material in the organization. Certainly, the Alliance has never had any damage done to it by government agents. Every major difficulty we have had has been the consequence of bad judgment or bad behavior on the part of a member.

"It’s always difficult working with people. It must be a real nightmare trying to run an organization that has no quality standards for membership and that maintains a flamboyant and sensationalist public image attractive to hooligans, drunken brawlers, criminals, sociopaths, and other losers..."
---
http://williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com ... orial.html