It is currently Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:50 am


Whiteness, Blurring

Informal discussions
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Reinhard

  • Posts: 299
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:21 am

Whiteness, Blurring

PostTue Jan 20, 2015 7:57 am


Andrew Hamilton


Race denial is the official ideology of state and society. This dogma maintains that races are “social constructs” and that biological races do not exist.

I won’t waste time on this here. Race deniers as well as so-called “anti-racists” are in fact obsessed with race and, in particular, nurture a deep hatred for whites. They do not really believe races don’t exist in the biological sense. No one does. This claim is essentially an ideological screen, a party line, useful in promoting anti-white hatred, discrimination, and genocide.

Until recently, whites numbered among the major races of mankind. Presently they are being driven to extinction. As this process unfolds, the line between white and non-white is fading rapidly.

Importance of the Physical Stratum of Race

The purely physical stratum of race can be identified anthropologically, forensically, and genetically.

Here’s an example that should drive this point home.

Several years ago Louisiana police were searching for a serial killer. Due to incorrect witness reports or prejudice (e.g., racial profiling), or both, they were interrogating only white suspects. During the initial course of the investigation police impugned the integrity of numerous innocent men, causing great mortification and shame in the process.

Finally the authorities turned to a Florida testing lab, now defunct, whose work could specify with a high degree of accuracy the race of an individual based upon a single DNA sample. The police submitted such a sample, and the company informed them that the killer was almost certainly a Negro with a small amount of Amerindian ancestry.

Based upon this new information, the authorities altered their search techniques and apprehended a suspect. Using a different method, DNA fingerprinting (matching two separate DNA samples, one from a crime scene and the other from the suspect in custody), the killer was positively identified. As predicted, he was black with some Amerindian admixture.

Clearly, there is a physical basis to race.

The importance of the physical stratum from a racialist perspective has been neatly summarized by Jared Taylor. Until the 1960s, he noted:
    White Americans believed race was a fundamental aspect of individual and group identity. They believed people of different races differed in temperament, ability, and the kind of societies they built. They wanted America to be peopled by Europeans, and thought only people of European stock could maintain the civilization they valued. They therefore considered immigration of non-whites a threat to whites and to their civilization. It was common to regard the presence of non-whites as a burden, and to argue that if they could not be removed from the country they should be separated from whites socially and politically. Whites were strongly opposed to miscegenation, which they called “amal­gamation.”
In other words, different races (or “populations”) give rise to different behavioral, psychological, aesthetic, and normative traits. These traits, in turn, produce different cultures and civilizations. Indiscriminate mixing (“miscegenation”) will eradicate a race, and with it the cultural and physical attributes unique to it.

White by Inertia

Whites today exist because of historical inertia. They are products of the exclusionary rules and consciously evolved barriers to race-mixing their predecessors evolved in the past.

Whites are still around today because of men who were formerly prejudiced and actively discriminated, who, for example, periodically expelled Jewish populations (or, rather, parts of them) from European soil between 1290 and 1945 and the Moors and Moriscos from Spain and Portugal, established the Pale of Settlement in 1791, repatriated blacks to Liberia (1820–47), passed the Indian Removal Act (US, 1830), established Indian reservations (in Canada, Indian Reserves), formulated the Blood Quantum standard, stopped Chinese immigration to the US (1882) and Canada (1923), wrote America’s Jim Crow (segregation) and anti-miscegenation statutes, Germany’s Nuremberg Laws, South Africa’s Apartheid and Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act (1949), the Immigration Act of 1924 (effective 1924–1965), and repatriated Mexicans (1930–35; Operation Wetback, 1954).

But now, virtually all such natural barriers to interracial panmixia for whites have been systematically eradicated. At the same time, racial consciousness, in conjunction with anti-white racism and discrimination, is promoted for all other groups.

Therefore, whites are threatened with extinction. Even if all blacks, Mestizos, Muslims, and Asians now living in formerly white countries or being imported into them were racially mixed with whites, their core global populations would remain robust. Ours would not.

The Clear Case

Like Jared Taylor, William Pierce, Wilmot Robertson, and George Lincoln Rockwell, I believe that “white” is the appropriate identity to cultivate at this stage in history.

And, like the last three, I am convinced that Jews must be excluded from the “white” category. For the genocidal assault upon our race is primarily the consequence of post-WWII Jewish fanaticism, racism, ideology, and social power.

In many cases we have no difficulty determining who is white.

For example, although race deniers assert that humans and chimpanzees are genetically 98.9% the same, and different human races 99.9% the same (anthropologist Peter Frost calls this ploy the “small percentage fallacy”), imagine “a random assortment of fifty humans and fifty chimpanzees. No one . . . would have any difficulty in reconstituting the original fifty-member sets by simple inspection . . .” Likewise, applied to 150 humans selected 1/3 each from Japan, Malawi [Africa], and Norway, “[a]gain, by simple inspection, we would achieve the same 100 percent sorting accuracy.” (Vincent Sarich and Frank Miele, Race: The Reality of Human Differences, 2004, p. 208)

Famed population geneticist Sewall Wright made the same point: “It does not require a trained anthropologist to classify an array of Englishmen, West Africans, and Chinese with 100% accuracy by features, skin color, and type of hair in spite of so much variability within each of these groups that every individual can easily be distinguished from every other.” (Chapter 10, “Racial Differentiation in Mankind” in Evolution and the Genetics of Populations Vol. 4: Variability Within and Among Natural Populations, 1984, p. 439)

These sorting exercises, or though experiments, are implicitly designed, I think, to “flatten” cultural differences, including signals such as language and attire, in order to focus solely upon differences in racial morphology and demonstrate anthropologically the same fact shown genetically in the Louisiana case described above. Wright is clearest on this point, specifying “features, skin color, and type of hair.”

But in their examples the authors use northern Europeans to represent the core white population. Moreover, they implicitly employ historical populations (“Norway” and “Englishmen”) as their benchmark. But, if you randomly selected actual residents from those countries, you would end up with representatives of virtually every non-white population on the planet, not to mention hybrids of every imaginable variety.

Whiteness, Blurring

Because the idea of whiteness historically originated within primarily black-white social settings, terminological and conceptual confusion can result. For example, aren’t Jews “white”? They obviously aren’t black. The same could be said of several other non-black races.

Compounding the problem is the difficulty of morphologically distinguishing many brown or near-white-skinned races from our own, especially after obvious cultural cues have been “flattened” or eliminated by cultural homogenization, assimilation, or deception. We rely heavily upon cultural markers (language, proper names, apparel, religion, etc.) to differentiate non-Europeans. Once such pointers have been removed, physiological race presents more of a dilemma.

The confusion is greatly exacerbated by widespread, indiscriminate white hybridization with non-whites.

While it would be nice to know for sure whether a person was white or not simply by looking at or interacting with them—and often, of course, one does know—I’m certain whites can’t consistently discriminate accurately on this basis alone, especially as the racial situation continues to deteriorate. Walking down the street, strolling through a store, or watching movies or television, I often can’t tell the difference.

Following are excerpts of impressions of Washington, D.C. written as long ago as 1978 by a racially conscious, perceptive, discerning man who was very knowledgeable about race. They serve to illustrate my point. Of course, things are much worse everywhere today, and race mixture far more advanced. Yet the author was clearly perplexed by the provenance of many of the individuals he saw around him even then, including whether or not they were European.
    A hundred faces in each block, and perhaps thirty of them kindred to mine. The rest ugly and alien, swart and frizzy, with flat noses and muddy eyes. Ugliest of all, the almost-Whites, these mongrel spawn of East and South and North outnumber the rest. What a transformation has been wrought in a few decades! Where have these swarming masses been breeding, to spew forth their dark millions upon our streets?

    Behind the streaked, dirty window [of a restaurant] are dark faces: not Black faces, nor White either, but the faces one sees nowadays in every restaurant, faces from the Mediterranean, from the Far East, from Persia, from God knows where.

    If only it were a simple problem of Black and White, of my kinsmen against theirs! But the filth of the city spreads over all in it, pulls all into a common tangle, blurs distinctions. Some Blacks learn to act like whites; some Whites begin acting like Blacks. And everywhere the almost-Whites, the not-really-Blacks, the raceless ones! And yet I can remember when the mongrels were seen as seldom as the Blacks, when the Whites all acted like Whites and owned the sidewalks.

    Ahead, a street vendor and her trays of trinkets. Jewess? Gypsy? At the intersection, a small convertible with three swarthy young men, shirts open to the navel, hairy chests, flashing teeth, tight black ringlets, animated conversation. Teheran? Tel Aviv? Naples? (William L. Pierce, “Street Impressions, Washington, D.C.,” 1978)
Even within American white nationalism, mulattos, Amerindians, and Jews have all been mistaken for, or accepted as, whites. At least two Jews have led such groups.

Definition Needed

Ultimately, whites with a sense of racial identity must establish clear tests or specifications as to who’s white and who’s not. Such tests require an explicit, rational, articulable basis. Society—law, culture, even individual or group consciousness—no longer supplies this. They must be created.

Because we lack effective access to genetic tests of the type used (one time only) in Louisiana, we are forced to rely upon inconclusive evidence such as phenotype (does a person “look white”?), self-attestation (“I am white”), cultural cues, and recent self-reported genealogy.

Small groups, organizations, a movement, chronologically precede the establishment of a white polity, whether it be micro-nationalist, mini-nationalist, pan-national, or the result of total reconquest. The question Who belongs?, initially applicable at the small group and movement level, therefore ultimately applies to the envisioned state as well.

Because whites long ago lost their collective social and political voice as whites, and have had their racial identity erased, the creation of the necessary standards can only occur voluntarily at the individual, family, organizational, and movement level. There is no place else for it to happen. Even so, governments and racist organizations stand ready to prosecute such behavior in many instances (housing, employment, private associational activity, etc.).

At the moment, everything depends entirely upon the mandates and policy trajectory of the existing system: individual mating choices, population movements, state policy, and the universal absence of a positive, explicit, deep-rooted white racial identity—all of which, individually and in combination, are deeply opposed to collective survival.
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 1853
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

White parents: Do not send your children to UMN

PostWed Mar 04, 2015 12:04 pm

Reinhard wrote:
Andrew Hamilton


Race denial is the official ideology of state and society. This dogma maintains that races are “social constructs” and that biological races do not exist.

I won’t waste time on this here. Race deniers as well as so-called “anti-racists” are in fact obsessed with race and, in particular, nurture a deep hatred for whites. They do not really believe races don’t exist in the biological sense. No one does. This claim is essentially an ideological screen, a party line, useful in promoting anti-white hatred, discrimination, and genocide.

Until recently, whites numbered among the major races of mankind. Presently they are being driven to extinction. As this process unfolds, the line between white and non-white is fading rapidly.

Importance of the Physical Stratum of Race

The purely physical stratum of race can be identified anthropologically, forensically, and genetically.

Here’s an example that should drive this point home.

Several years ago Louisiana police were searching for a serial killer. Due to incorrect witness reports or prejudice (e.g., racial profiling), or both, they were interrogating only white suspects. During the initial course of the investigation police impugned the integrity of numerous innocent men, causing great mortification and shame in the process.

Finally the authorities turned to a Florida testing lab, now defunct, whose work could specify with a high degree of accuracy the race of an individual based upon a single DNA sample. The police submitted such a sample, and the company informed them that the killer was almost certainly a Negro with a small amount of Amerindian ancestry...

*****


University Police Will No Longer Provide Race Of Suspect In Crime Alerts

By Robert Gehl, February 25, 2015.

Image
The alleged home invasion suspect, caught on security camera, is described as wearing a white shirt

Caving into the race-hustlers, the University of Minnesota will no longer include a suspect’s race when sending crime alerts to the public.

Facing increased backlash for harming minorities who are “stigmatized” by alerts that indicate the race of a person, the school’s police department will stop listing the suspect’s race.

Amazingly, the school acknowledged that even though some students and university employees might want as much description as possible of a crime suspect, that the “cost of reinforcing stereotypes” was too great.

For some, knowing they have all the information available about a crime, including the complete suspect description, makes them feel better informed and increases how safe they feel. But others – particularly Black men – have shared that suspect descriptions that include race reinforce stereotypes of Black men, create a hostile campus climate, and negatively affect their sense of safety.

What this means is: The University of Minnesota is willing to jeopardize student safety for the delicate sensibilities of stigmatized minorities.

Administration released a letter to the university community that “explained” how much it hurts black people when they tell the public that a black man is the suspect in a crime.

We have heard from many in our community that the use of race in suspect descriptions in our Crime Alerts may unintentionally reinforce racist stereotypes of Black men, and other people of color, as criminals and threats. That in turn can create an oppressive climate for some members of our community, a climate of suspicion and hostility.

http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/univers ... ime-alerts

Image
University of Minnesota Association of Multicultural Scientists (AMS)
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 1853
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: White parents: Do not send your children to UMN

PostSun Aug 19, 2018 8:37 am

Here we are three years later and White Minnesotan parents are still spending tens of thousands of dollars, still sending their precious children to the left-wing nuthouse known as the University of Minnesota.

Will Williams wrote: [...]Caving into the race-hustlers, the University of Minnesota will no longer include a suspect’s race when sending crime alerts to the public.

University of Minnesota Considers
Mandating “Preferred Pronouns”

By: Alex Newman
July 18, 2018

Policymakers at the radical left-wing nuthouse known as the University of Minnesota are considering a new policy that would force everyone — professors and students — to use the “preferred pronouns” of individuals claiming to be confused about their gender. Casting First Amendment free speech concerns aside, the policy would result in non-conforming students being expelled and professors being fired.


The proposed policy, first reported by the far-left Minneapolis Star-Tribune, is known as “Equity and Access: Gender Identity, Gender Expression, Names and Pronouns.” Under the scheme, everybody involved in the UMN community is “expected to use the names, gender identities, and pronouns specified to them by University members.” Whether that includes “Your Royal Highness” was not immediately clear.

Nor was it clear why the policy was needed. But according to the university, the proposed crackdown will help make “transgender and gender nonconforming” individuals feel better. It is also aimed at maintaining an environment for University members that is “free from discrimination, harassment, and retaliation based on gender identity and gender expression,” the school said.

Discrimination based on refusing to compromise with reality is perfectly acceptable, though. In fact, discrimination against such stubborn people is mandated by the proposed policy, as those who refuse to play along with others' delusions may be fired or expelled by the university under the scheme. Whether there will be a conscientious objection exclusion for Muslims and others was not clear.

For whatever reason, insensitive university officials did not see fit to mandate that people cater to the delusions and confusions of other categories of individuals, including bulimics and anorexics who falsely believe themselves to be fat. Also unprotected by the policy: those confused about their race or species, as well as individuals suffering from body integrity dysphoria.

“The intent is to be able to create more access and an inclusive environment for all of our community members regardless of their gender identity,” Gabrielle Mead, assistant director of UMN’s “Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Office,” was quoted as saying by the Star-Tribune. And yes, that is a real job title, and yes, Mead's tax-funded salary is probably bigger than yours.

The policy would also allow men claiming to “identify” as transgender to use women's locker rooms and bathrooms, as well as participate in activities for men or women. And UMN's website already pushes the insanity, allowing students to register as “male, female, agender, gender nonconforming, genderqueer, nonbinary, two spirit, or nothing at all. Among the “pronoun options” are he, she, ze, the singular “they,” none and “prefer not to specify.” Your Royal Highness was not on the list.

Even “conservative” critics quoted in the press appear to have been successfully indoctrinated. “There’s a difference between creating a healthy environment and trying to legislate insensitivity out of the U,” complained Michael Geiger of Students for a Conservative Voice, who apparently believes that refusing to ignore reality and play along with delusions is somehow “insensitive.” He did object to being forced to say something, at least.

Unfortunately, though, none of this is surprising. After all, this is the same university that earlier this year hosted a blatantly racist lecture on the alleged “Violence of Whiteness.” The nutty speaker, a PhD in “Feminist Studies” (yes, really), told students about how "whiteness poses an existential threat to social, political, and economic life in the U.S."

There is no excuse for taxpayer dollars to continue funding this criminal insanity. It is worse than a waste of money — it is destroying minds. All sensible parents should avoid this university like the plague, and all taxpayers should demand that not one more cent be used to indoctrinate impressionable young people like this.
---
http://freedomproject.com/the-newman-re ... d-pronouns
Offline
User avatar

Wade Hampton III

  • Posts: 1631
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Whiteness, Blurring

PostSun Aug 19, 2018 8:59 pm

Reinhard wrote:Race denial is the official ideology of state and society. This dogma maintains that races are “social constructs” and that biological races do not exist.


An excellent item. Thanks very much!

:!:
Offline
User avatar

PhuBai68

  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:23 pm
  • Location: Pickens County, SC

Re: Whiteness, Blurring

PostWed Aug 22, 2018 1:56 pm

Blurring it is!
by Jared Taylor. Until the 1960s, he noted:
White Americans believed race was a fundamental aspect of individual and group identity. They believed people of different races differed in temperament, ability, and the kind of societies they built. They wanted America to be peopled by Europeans, and thought only people of European stock could maintain the civilization they valued. They therefore considered immigration of non-whites a threat to whites and to their civilization. It was common to regard the presence of non-whites as a burden, and to argue that if they could not be removed from the country they should be separated from whites socially and politically. Whites were strongly opposed to miscegenation, which they called “amal­gamation.”

My good friend's son went to Virginia Tech.
The son (tall, strawberry blond, blue eyed -German/Norwegian heritage) ended up dating a student from Japan.
They were an item for years, all through school and afterwards got an apartment together. Honestly she is pretty, polite, intelligent, not hard on the eyes.
Her visa ran out, they got married.
My friend who absolutely is a proud white man said, "Well at least he didn't marry a shine."
They now have a son - there goes two genetic blood lines - and now my friend is proud of his first grandchild.
Where I'm going with this is blurring.

Take NASCAR driver Kyle Larson.
I was thinking, "He's kind of dark complected and fairly short." and one day on a pre-race show his parents were interviewed.
His mother is Japanese.

Kyle Miyata Larson is an American professional stock car racing driver. He currently competes full-time in the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, driving the No. 42 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 for Chip Ganassi ..
Now when you see Kyle's son you will get what I'm saying about whiteness is getting blurred.

Image

Image
It's not diversity, it's displacement.
Offline
User avatar

PhuBai68

  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:23 pm
  • Location: Pickens County, SC

Re: Whiteness, Blurring

PostMon Aug 27, 2018 3:16 pm

More "blurring" noticed today.
I stopped at the post office to mail some stuff, hold the door open for a woman exiting with two small children.
One was a good looking white child but the little one a niglet.
She was a fat and sloppy looking woman, I didn't expect to see this crap in the deep south, decades of brainwashing plus dad on the couch cheering on his favorite football team has taken it's toll it seems.
It's not diversity, it's displacement.
Offline
User avatar

PhuBai68

  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:23 pm
  • Location: Pickens County, SC

Re: Whiteness, Blurring

PostThu Sep 20, 2018 4:18 pm

The wife and I went to WallyWorld in Easley today.
While in the checkout line, a fairly attractive young white woman buying tons of stuff - I noticed a bit of junk food - who was having trouble with getting the credit card approved.
I didn't notice right away since I was paying attention to her with the card machine (like I said, not too bad to look at, was getting a rather large "muffin top" though for a young woman) then noticed, the kid in the carriage was a nignet.
That ruined the whole trip to town.

Afterwards I mentioned to my wife, "What was the problem with her debit/credit card?"
She said it wasn't a credit card but an EBT card.
Another white woman goes mudsharking and gets stuck with a nignet bastard child for the taxpayers to support.
It's not diversity, it's displacement.
Offline

Jim Mathias

  • Posts: 691
  • Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:48 pm

Re: Whiteness, Blurring

PostFri Sep 21, 2018 12:39 am

PhuBai68 wrote:The wife and I went to WallyWorld in Easley today.
While in the checkout line, a fairly attractive young white woman buying tons of stuff - I noticed a bit of junk food - who was having trouble with getting the credit card approved.
I didn't notice right away since I was paying attention to her with the card machine (like I said, not too bad to look at, was getting a rather large "muffin top" though for a young woman) then noticed, the kid in the carriage was a nignet.
That ruined the whole trip to town.

Afterwards I mentioned to my wife, "What was the problem with her debit/credit card?"
She said it wasn't a credit card but an EBT card.
Another white woman goes mudsharking and gets stuck with a nignet bastard child for the taxpayers to support.
Without that government teat to feed the pickaninnies those White women have with their pet...negroes, the hard questions of survival would kick in those female heads and make them think twice about with whom they breed. This is why we need governmental authority and responsibility, those who have it now use their authority irresponsibly.

Return to Team House

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron