Wolf Stoner On Truth
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 9:14 pm
This comment appeared at Counter Currents on December 16 2024
Thank you very much for accentuating the main ideas. Being certified “extremists” in our respective countries, we have a luxury of speaking our minds openly. We are not bound by any social constraints of being shunned by friends or lose a job and harm career prospects. All those trifling considerations are totally alien to us. But the absolute majority of other people can’t disregard those considerations; they are too strongly bound to existing society, therefore, they perceive any harm to their public reputation as the worst tribulation that could ever happen.
I fully agree that there is no need to try to reasoning with mainstream people about WW2. I ceased to do it long ago. They will believe any nonsense that was imposed on them by the state. Although serfdom was abolished long ago the majority of people continue to remain mental slaves. It is normal. Only few can rule; the rest must obey. Even the whole western democracy circus functions according to the same eternal principle but carefully camouflaged into the “rule of law” and “government of the people”. All this nonsense is for stupid masses in order to conceal from them the real rulers.
Hitler in his book elaborates on all vital questions; much more than any other politician or philosopher. In contrast to others Hitler does it with clarity and precision that lack in many other theoretical works on similar subjects.
There are people in the White identity movement who vilify Hitler and Third Reich. In most cases their rationale for this is to evade the opprobrium connected with those topics. They want to separate their activity from this historical legacy.
This trend has become especially disgusting and laughable in modern Russia in the last few years. People who were known to be local “Nazis” now joined the system, wear communist paraphernalia, praise comrade Stalin and demand extermination of all “Ukrainian Nazis” or even nuclear annihilation of Europe. These buffoons are the testimony of successful Soviet experiment of transforming society into a crowd of contemptible slaves; some kind of Dr Moreau Island.
In the West the nationalist activists aspiring for participation in public politics, try their best to distance themselves from any ideological connections with Hitler, Third Reich or anything even remotely related to those subjects.
It is funny to observe such “respectable” nationalists whose fixed idea is to “not to be called a Nazi”. The media play with these simpletons like a cat with a mouse, one time allowing them to express their views but on another occasion striking them with a paw for “espousing Nazi ideas”.
Even Thomas Rousseau, this marginal young activist, when faced with the question about his attitude toward Hitler, behaved like a scared rabbit, trying to assert that he has nothing in common with Nazism and that he didn’t even read “Mein Kampf”. If so, bad for you, Thomas. How dare you, then, claim any leadership position in the White identity movement? It is the same as being a Catholic priest without having read a Bible or to teach Astronomy without knowing where Polaris is located in the sky.
I have no negative feelings toward Thomas, he is a good fellow, but, definitely, he isn’t suited to be a leader. It is better to be a good follower than a bad leader. I would advise Thomas to join some existing nationalist organization instead of making a fool of himself.
All those people who try to create a viable White racial organization but in the same time reject Hitler’s legacy, will inevitably fail. Hitler was the first and the only major politician who put race at the center of his ideology and state project. Everything proceeded from understanding of racial reality. Therefore, there is no other way except of following in Hitler’s footsteps. It doesn’t mean to copy political patterns of 1920-30es; but to acknowledge and accept the rightful place of Hitler as the founder of racial politics. To deny this place to Hitler is the same as to study geometry but to reject Euclid.
Certainly, the main cause of this “rational” behavior is elementary cowardice. But those who are cowards don’t deserve to claim any leading role in their tribes.
The mortal existential struggle requires many sacrifices. Sacrifice of comfort, social stature, career prospects and social acceptability is only the first step on this arduous path. And if those supposed leaders fear to make this first step, how could they lead their people in combat?
The real leaders don’t care what others think about them. They follow the path of truth regardless of consequences.
Thank you very much for accentuating the main ideas. Being certified “extremists” in our respective countries, we have a luxury of speaking our minds openly. We are not bound by any social constraints of being shunned by friends or lose a job and harm career prospects. All those trifling considerations are totally alien to us. But the absolute majority of other people can’t disregard those considerations; they are too strongly bound to existing society, therefore, they perceive any harm to their public reputation as the worst tribulation that could ever happen.
I fully agree that there is no need to try to reasoning with mainstream people about WW2. I ceased to do it long ago. They will believe any nonsense that was imposed on them by the state. Although serfdom was abolished long ago the majority of people continue to remain mental slaves. It is normal. Only few can rule; the rest must obey. Even the whole western democracy circus functions according to the same eternal principle but carefully camouflaged into the “rule of law” and “government of the people”. All this nonsense is for stupid masses in order to conceal from them the real rulers.
Hitler in his book elaborates on all vital questions; much more than any other politician or philosopher. In contrast to others Hitler does it with clarity and precision that lack in many other theoretical works on similar subjects.
There are people in the White identity movement who vilify Hitler and Third Reich. In most cases their rationale for this is to evade the opprobrium connected with those topics. They want to separate their activity from this historical legacy.
This trend has become especially disgusting and laughable in modern Russia in the last few years. People who were known to be local “Nazis” now joined the system, wear communist paraphernalia, praise comrade Stalin and demand extermination of all “Ukrainian Nazis” or even nuclear annihilation of Europe. These buffoons are the testimony of successful Soviet experiment of transforming society into a crowd of contemptible slaves; some kind of Dr Moreau Island.
In the West the nationalist activists aspiring for participation in public politics, try their best to distance themselves from any ideological connections with Hitler, Third Reich or anything even remotely related to those subjects.
It is funny to observe such “respectable” nationalists whose fixed idea is to “not to be called a Nazi”. The media play with these simpletons like a cat with a mouse, one time allowing them to express their views but on another occasion striking them with a paw for “espousing Nazi ideas”.
Even Thomas Rousseau, this marginal young activist, when faced with the question about his attitude toward Hitler, behaved like a scared rabbit, trying to assert that he has nothing in common with Nazism and that he didn’t even read “Mein Kampf”. If so, bad for you, Thomas. How dare you, then, claim any leadership position in the White identity movement? It is the same as being a Catholic priest without having read a Bible or to teach Astronomy without knowing where Polaris is located in the sky.
I have no negative feelings toward Thomas, he is a good fellow, but, definitely, he isn’t suited to be a leader. It is better to be a good follower than a bad leader. I would advise Thomas to join some existing nationalist organization instead of making a fool of himself.
All those people who try to create a viable White racial organization but in the same time reject Hitler’s legacy, will inevitably fail. Hitler was the first and the only major politician who put race at the center of his ideology and state project. Everything proceeded from understanding of racial reality. Therefore, there is no other way except of following in Hitler’s footsteps. It doesn’t mean to copy political patterns of 1920-30es; but to acknowledge and accept the rightful place of Hitler as the founder of racial politics. To deny this place to Hitler is the same as to study geometry but to reject Euclid.
Certainly, the main cause of this “rational” behavior is elementary cowardice. But those who are cowards don’t deserve to claim any leading role in their tribes.
The mortal existential struggle requires many sacrifices. Sacrifice of comfort, social stature, career prospects and social acceptability is only the first step on this arduous path. And if those supposed leaders fear to make this first step, how could they lead their people in combat?
The real leaders don’t care what others think about them. They follow the path of truth regardless of consequences.