Page 1 of 1

Decentralized resistance

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:54 pm
by adolf512
I have noticed a lot or problems with large organizations, even the national alliance failed when the big tent approach was tried.
A “big tent” approach was tried, and the sections of the Membership Handbook listing Christianity as an opposed ideology were gutted. The qualities that had set the National Alliance apart from other pro-White groups—its spiritual basis, its high standards, its uncompromising ideology—were discarded. The Alliance was converted into just another competing “White rights” organization, something for which there was essentially no need or demand. The quality of Alliance publications began to suffer, as less competent staff were hired. As time passed, the radio program, print publications, and Web publications ceased. Membership and supporter numbers—and quality—plummeted.

https://natall.com/about/what-is-the-national-alliance/
Another problem i am sure Will Williams has noticed it that an organisation that does a good job will get a lot of enemies, they will try to destroy it with mudslinging, infiltration, legal action, violence, etc. In the future a leaderless resistance might be the only viable alternative http://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm i prefer to write decentralized resistance since their will be a lot of different leaders if the movement isn't united.

You pay a high price for working openly for our race, it is a lot safer to remain anonymous and working in secret. I was recently contacted by a person claiming to be recruiting for a secret organisation that in turn controlled several activist organisation(none of them did much good), i am not sure if these claims where true but i understood that we need effective propaganda and that we cant just run and hide.

Only a fraction of the people that the alliance reaches will actually apply for membership, a lot of people will choice to do their own thing. The system might succeed in crushing the new national alliance but it can't crush their ideas.

The program of the national alliance is the best i have ever read(of any organisation) https://natall.com/about/what-is-the-national-alliance/ it is something that will appeal the best of our race and hence these ideas is very dangerous for our enemies. The longer the National Alliance survives the better, i frequently link to http://nationalvanguard.org/ when posting on Swedish sites, however i have never seen naarg or splc write anything of value.

Re: Decentralized resistance

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 5:35 pm
by John Calhoun
My opinion on this is that individuals don't do much good on their own. It really takes an organization.

A good example is that of the Fasces. A single rod is weak and easily broken. Many rods bound together are unbreakable. If you add an axe to the bundle as a the sharpened head, you are undefeatable.

We have to get beyond the individualistic impulse and strive to work together for the common good of the Race. Only then will we see good results.

This is our Alliance under the leadership of Chairman Williams. If we hold true through the storm, there won't be anything that we can't accomplish going forward.

Re: Decentralized resistance

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 9:53 pm
by Will Williams
Thanks, John! Note the large fasces that flank the speakers podium in the U.S. House of Representatives, and this Murcury dime, from healthier times in White America (first minted in 1916). The fasces represented unity and strength and the olive branch represented peace.:
Image
Fasces, symbol of power for good or for bad:
adolf512 wrote:I have noticed a lot or problems with large organizations, even the national alliance failed when the big tent approach was tried.
A “big tent” approach was tried, and the sections of the Membership Handbook listing Christianity as an opposed ideology were gutted. The qualities that had set the National Alliance apart from other pro-White groups—its spiritual basis, its high standards, its uncompromising ideology—were discarded. The Alliance was converted into just another competing “White rights” organization, something for which there was essentially no need or demand. The quality of Alliance publications began to suffer, as less competent staff were hired. As time passed, the radio program, print publications, and Web publications ceased. Membership and supporter numbers—and quality—plummeted.

https://natall.com/about/what-is-the-national-alliance/
The point of what you quote from natall.com is that our Alliance has reverted back to Dr. Pierce's sound Alliance ideology and program, jettisoning the compromised version that took over for a decade or so after his death.
Another problem i am sure Will Williams has noticed it that an organisation that does a good job will get a lot of enemies, they will try to destroy it with mudslinging, infiltration, legal action, violence, etc. In the future a leaderless resistance might be the only viable alternative http://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm i prefer to write decentralized resistance since their will be a lot of different leaders if the movement isn't united.

You pay a high price for working openly for our race, it is a lot safer to remain anonymous and working in secret. I was recently contacted by a person claiming to be recruiting for a secret organisation that in turn controlled several activist organisation(none of them did much good), i am not sure if these claims where true but i understood that we need effective propaganda and that we cant just run and hide.

Only a fraction of the people that the alliance reaches will actually apply for membership, a lot of people will choice to do their own thing. The system might succeed in crushing the new national alliance but it can't crush their ideas.

The program of the national alliance is the best i have ever read(of any organisation) https://natall.com/about/what-is-the-national-alliance/ it is something that will appeal the best of our race and hence these ideas is very dangerous for our enemies. The longer the National Alliance survives the better, i frequently link to http://nationalvanguard.org/ when posting on Swedish sites, however i have never seen naarg or splc write anything of value.
Thank you for linking to nv.org. That is our most effective outreach currently. We reach thousands of people daily.

We can't run and hide, and that's exactly what working in secret rather than openly is. Yes, it is safer, but for how long can we hide and remain safe, cowering in secret, using aliases on the Internet? Our people outnumber the Jew 30:1 so why should we hide from him while saying the vital message our kinsmen must hear? That's the definition of moral cowardice.

“To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men”
– Ella Wheeler Wilcox


When there are enough morally courageous Whites openly saying what we say, the war is half won. I always liked this Twain quote. It fits Our Cause:
Image

Re: Decentralized resistance

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 3:37 am
by adolf512
Will Williams wrote: We can't run and hide, and that's exactly what working in secret rather than openly is. Yes, it is safer, but for how long can we hide and remain safe, cowering in secret, using aliases on the Internet? Our people outnumber the Jew 30:1 so why should we hide from him while saying the vital message our kinsmen must hear? That's the definition of moral cowardice.
In some situation "cowardice" and "running and hiding" is the right thing to do, in other situations bravery is needed. In many situations hardly nothing is gained from working openly for our race, in other situations(leading a party) it is unavoidable. I plan to start up a business in the future and i do not want to be sent to jail or getting problems with my business because of my racial views but for me the future for our race is more important than me and my family.

I rarely use my real name but i am still not completely anonymous, i was outed(not completely only picture of me) be a person that liked an organisations i have been very critical of(the Nordic resistance movement). I did not even create a new alias after i was outed(it was this year), in the future i would like to start up a new Swedish party that will have the same goals as national alliance(or at least very similar).

In Sweden you can be sent to jail for saying/writing something illegal, we do not have much freedom of speech here, this is the reason i no longer use my real name online.

The only way to to stop me from stating the truth is to kill me(then i will be reincarnated and continue from early age). I also be leave it is necessary to point out faults with organisations claiming to work for our race, in the case of the new national alliance i have not found anything to criticise(my views is slightly different in some arias only).
John Calhoun wrote: This is our Alliance under the leadership of Chairman Williams. If we hold true through the storm, there won't be anything that we can't accomplish going forward.
The only way to stop the new national alliance is dirty legal action(jailing williams, strom, etc for a crime they didn't commit), they might also sue the alliance for large sums of money and bankrupting them. If the new national alliance survives it proves that larger organisations is feasible in the united states, if they don't then a more decentralized approach will be needed.

Re: Decentralized resistance

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 12:07 pm
by Will Williams
adolf512 wrote:...The only way to stop the new national alliance is dirty legal action(jailing williams, strom, etc for a crime they didn't commit), they might also sue the alliance for large sums of money and bankrupting them. If the new national alliance survives it proves that larger organisations is feasible in the united states, if they don't then a more decentralized approach will be needed.
Our Alliance and its leaders face legal actions now for crimes not committed and with civil suits meant to bankrupt us. Without attorneys we cannot effectively defend, much less mount a legal offense. Good attorneys are expensive.

The time for good Whites to support the Alliance is now, not after we are weakened or destroyed by court actions. We finally started a Legal Defense Fund last month to help fight off legal assaults: https://natall.com/legal/

I remember years ago a leader remarked to a supporter who was withholding financial support until a legal action by his enemies was settled. He told the fellow, "So, you want to make sure we can swim before you throw us a life preserver?" His point being: once drowned, who needs a life preserver? Supporters of our cause can donate to our LDF secretly, or mail money orders secretly, without risking their safety.