White Biocentrism

As previously reported by WMR, not only has GOP presidential hopeful Jeb Bush seen his White House chances damaged by the Jeffrey Epstein underage sex slave scandal, but Democratic frontrunner for her party's presidential nomination, Hillary Clinton, is reportedly "furious" with her husband Bill Clinton for his involvement in the scandal.

Mrs. Clinton's early political life was dominated by her commitment to the rights of children. It will all but destroy Mrs. Clinton's presidential hopes if her husband's involvement in the Epstein sex slave ring are proven in court. Bill Clinton has been named as a materiel witness in a lawsuit brought by two of the women who were trafficked by Epstein when they were underage. The women claim that Epstein, a billionaire Wall Street financier, trafficked them domestically and internationally for sexual trysts. Clinton and Harvard celebrity attorney Alan Dershowitz, a vocal defender of Israel, have been named in the lawsuit as Epstein accomplices.

A number of email addresses for Mr. Clinton and 21 private phone numbers for the ex-president, his personal assistant Doug Band, and his schedulers were discovered in Epstein's personal phone directory. Mr. Clinton made a number of trips with Epstein on his private plane from 2002 to 2005. After Epstein, who is currently a registered sex offender, was charged in 2005 with soliciting a 14-year old girl for prostitution, Clinton's air jaunts with Epstein abruptly ceased.

Mrs. Clinton's frosty relationship with her husband since the revelations about the Epstein scandal first hit the headlines was on full display at the New York City funeral for former New York Governor Mario Cuomo. Mrs. Clinton quite visibly stormed past her husband who was already waiting for her at St. Ignatius Loyola Church before the service began. For Hillary Clinton, her husband's alleged involvement in an underage sex ring could not have come at a worst time. She is already facing the real possibility of challenges from the left and center. Former Virginia Senator Jim Webb has announced his candidacy for the Democratic nomination while Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is under pressure from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party to make a run for the Oval Office.

Meanwhile, Jeb Bush, who recently resigned from a number of corporate boards in preparation for a run for the presidency, has also been tainted by the Epstein scandal. Bush was Governor of Florida in 2005 when Epstein was first charged with having sex with a 14-year old girl. And it was Bush's administration and his Attorney General and successor, Charlie Crist, that first entered into negotiations with Epstein's lawyers, who included Dershowitz, Miami celebrity lawyer Roy Black, and Bill Clinton special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, to guarantee Epstein a 13-month house arrest sentence. Governor Bush and his brother's Justice Department also helped craft a "Non Prosecution Agreement" (NPA) with Epstein's legal team. The NPA ensured that there would be no future federal charges brought against Epstein or any of his "co-conspirators." It is now known, as a result of the lawsuit filed in federal court in West Palm Beach, Florida that those co-conspirators include Bill Clinton; Dershowitz; and the Duke of York and fifth-in-line for the British throne, Prince Andrew.

Accounts of the Monica Lewinsky scandal suggest that President Clinton promised his wife that there would be no repeat of his actions in order that they did not upset Mrs. Clinton's political ambitions. The recent revelations about Bill Clinton and Epstein have reportedly been the last straw for Mrs. Clinton. Mrs. Clinton can only distance herself from her husband through a divorce, something that her close political advisers are reportedly urging her to do, but such an eventuality would do little to help her presidential chances at this point in time.

The multiple deadly terrorist sieges in Paris only temporarily drove the Epstein sex scandal story off the front pages. However, the Epstein story, which involves a British royal, a former American president, and two presumptive presidential candidates, is not going to disappear anytime soon.

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20150109_1

L.G. Morgan wrote:...Jeb Bush, who recently resigned from a number of corporate boards in preparation for a run for the presidency, has also been tainted by the Epstein scandal. Bush was Governor of Florida in 2005 when Epstein was first charged with having sex with a 14-year old girl. And it was Bush's administration and his Attorney General and successor, Charlie Crist, that first entered into negotiations with Epstein's lawyers, who included Dershowitz, Miami celebrity lawyer Roy Black, and Bill Clinton special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, to guarantee Epstein a 13-month house arrest sentence. Governor Bush and his brother's Justice Department also helped craft a "Non Prosecution Agreement" (NPA) with Epstein's legal team. The NPA ensured that there would be no future federal charges brought against Epstein or any of his "co-conspirators." It is now known, as a result of the lawsuit filed in federal court in West Palm Beach, Florida that those co-conspirators include Bill Clinton; Dershowitz; and the Duke of York and fifth-in-line for the British throne, Prince Andrew...

I hardly even heard about this scandal, except for briefly hearing Allan Dershowitz denying any involvement on the news a few weeks ago. This is a major news story..I can see now why they are drowning everything else out with this Charlie Hebdo attack. I am a little pleased though to hear that this may keep Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton out of the race for president. Thank God for that. I can't stand the Bush and Clintons and would hate to see any member of those families in the White House ever again. I'm sure they will find some other pervert to replace them though, but I really can't stand the Clintons and Bushes.

My brother told me years ago how you can tell if Bill Clinton is lying: look for his telltale wrinkled brow.



Hillary has got that, too.



I wonder. Did anything ever come of those rumors that Hillary is a lesbian and has Jew relatives?

Jeb Bush, besides being a Zionist like Hill and Billary, is a race-mixer

Will Williams wrote:My brother told me years ago how you can tell if Bill Clinton is lying: look for his telltale wrinkled brow.



Hillary has got that, too.



I wonder. Did anything ever come of those rumors that Hillary is a lesbian and has Jew relatives?

Jeb Bush, besides being a Zionist like Hill and Billary, is a race-mixer

Man Jeb's family is pretty ugly. They look like Mongoloids (down syndrome types). No offense to anyone with Down Syndrome. Heh Bill Clinton is a piece of crap I hope this story gets out somehow, he should be in Jail along with Dershowitz and Jeb. Hillary would be the worse thing that could happen to America (I'm not sure who would be worse Hillary or Jeb, the are both disgusting Zionuts). All they have been talking about on the National news for the last few days is the Charlie Hebdo attack nonstop. What is so interesting about that? Is there no other news in the world?

DanielOlj79 wrote:They look like Mongoloids (down syndrome types). No offense to anyone with Down Syndrome.

None taken.

All they have been talking about on the National news for the last few days is the Charlie Hebdo attack nonstop. What is so interesting about that?

I don't know. Who is Charlie Hedbo?

When we get our own TV network we'll be telling our people what they need to hear about, not what the Jew wants them to consider being "the news."

Will Williams wrote:

DanielOlj79 wrote:They look like Mongoloids (down syndrome types). No offense to anyone with Down Syndrome.

None taken.

All they have been talking about on the National news for the last few days is the Charlie Hebdo attack nonstop. What is so interesting about that?

I don't know. Who is Charlie Hedbo?

When we get our own TV network we'll be telling our people what they need to hear about, not what the Jew wants them to consider being "the news."

Charlie Hebdo was a French news paper or magazine that was attacked by a couple of Muslims with Ak-47's last week. Allegedly because the newspaper printed some satirical cartoons of Muhammad. They managed to kill 12 staff members of the newspaper, including some of their top cartoonists.

They have been spending virtually 100% of their broadcasting on this story alone for the past 4 or 5 days. As if there isn't any other news out there that we should be hearing. I thought maybe some Islamophobia might at least come out of this event and the French might wake up and kick out the Muslims, but they instead took to the streets and held hands with Muslims and Jews singing we shall overcome. Pathetic. Sort of like the post 9/11 era in America.. The usual cliche's were spoken such as, "acts like this only make us stronger"," this was attack on Free Speech" ((which is a lie because the French don't have Free-Speech(no badmouthing Jews allowed), and then of course the best one, "let's not blame all Muslims for the actions of a few".

I was listening to a ADV broadcast recently that Dr. Pierce did post 9/11 where he was discussing the possible outcomes of terrorist attacks. He was talking about how the real terrorists that they worry about are domestic terrorists, and how they will use any terrorism to gradually take our rights away. That's what it looks like will come of this terrorist attack that happened in Paris. Some alternative news people are claiming that this was a false flag attack, but I'm not so sure, and either way the effect is the same. They will use it to increase their spying privileges. The downside for ZOG is potential Islamophobia at home, but it seems like the lemmings never take that route.

Foreign terrorist attacks also provide a pretext for suppressing domestic resistance, which as I
said is a matter of greater concern to the government anyway. A foreign attack gives the media
an opportunity to whip the lemmings into a flag-waving, we-all-must-support-our-President
mood, in which there is no tolerance for dissent, and it gives the government an opportunity to
enact repressive legislation that can be used to stifle domestic resistance to a certain degree. We
are seeing both these consequences of the September 1 1 attack now. The downside of the
September 1 1 attack for the government and the media is the rise in anti-foreigner and anti-
immigration sentiment among the public. It's a downside for the government and the media
because keeping America's borders open is an important element of the New World Order
scheme. William L. Pierce"Destroying Order" -11/24/2001

It's quite eerie how William Pierce's words are still relevant today. This scenario that happened in France was quite similar to the way Pierce depicted foreign terrorism in the above quote. Even though it happened in Paris, the media has been going on and on about how similar this was to the Boston Bombing in 2013, so they are making it look like we all are vulnerable and might need enhanced security.

The only positive thing about it now is that there are many more aware people who are not fooled anymore by what the Jews are up too. There is still a lot of confusion but I think with the internet and more independent news sources, people are getting wise to the strategies of the NWO, and there is only so many times the Jews can fool the people before they wake up. Unfortunately for the most part it seems like the lemmings in Paris have already been "whipped into the flag-waving, we-all must-support-our-President mood", or so it would appear. It would be nice to hear if there is some sort of nationalist movement going on in France that has the interests of the White race as their priority.

It would be indeed a great thing if we did have our own television and we were told things that were important to us, instead of this distracting drivel they shove down our throats.

DanielOlj79 wrote:Charlie Hebdo was a French news paper or magazine that was attacked by a couple of Muslims with Ak-47's last week. Allegedly because the newspaper printed some satirical cartoons of Muhammad. They managed to kill 12 staff members of the newspaper, including some of their top cartoonists.

They have been spending virtually 100% of their broadcasting on this story alone for the past 4 or 5 days. As if there isn't any other news out there that we should be hearing.

Yeah I tuned all that out after the first few reports -- another dog bites man story. I like the part where the Negro killed four Jews in a kosher grocery store, though. The Jew is smelling blood over that deed; unfortunately for him it is his own.

Why 'Jew' Is Rarely Spoken Word in France —
Even After Kosher Grocery Terror
French See Outrage But Shy Away From Jewishness of Victims
By Robert Zaretsky
Published January 13, 2015.


Jews in France are nervous Nellies these days.

Many observers, both French and foreign, have hailed Sunday’s march in Paris as a historic milestone. More than a million citizens, along with dozens of world leaders, joined together as a sign of resistance to last week’s acts of terrorism, and as the gauge for the persistence of democratic ideals. The event had all the trappings of an iconic event. Yet, the trappings may prove to be just that, trappings, while the truly historic event instead took place a few days earlier on the city’s periphery. It was there, at a kosher market near the Porte de Vincennes, that French Jews were taken hostage and murdered because they were Jews.

When the French government first learned of terrorist attack on the store, its response was strong and direct. President François Hollande condemned this “appalling act of anti-Semitism,” while Prime Minister Manuel Valls was no less lucid. Appearing at the store soon after the police ended the siege, with the deaths of Amedy Coulibaly and four of his hostages, Valls declared: “We are all French Jews.” He then repeated a claim he has made before: “France without Jews would not be France.”

France Must Reckon With Its Anti-Semitism Problem
Now, Sadly, France Knows How It Feels To Be Israeli

Yet, a glance at the French media’s treatment of the event leaves the impression that what took place was an anti-Semitic massacre without Jews. The press’s word of choice for the victims was “hostage,” while their Jewish identity was mentioned only rarely. There was a telling exchange published in the newspaper Libération between Daniel Cohn-Bendit and Annette Levy Willard. First heaved into fame by the student rebellion of 1968, the German-French Cohn-Bendit has since become one of the most respected and well-liked leaders of the European Left, while Levy-Willard has carved a long and impressive career as a journalist and documentary filmmaker. Oh, and while both hail from Jewish background, neither ever thought of themselves as such.

Until now, that is. As he listened to the news of the siege, Cohn-Bendit confessed: “My immediate reaction was not one I usually have: ‘I’m Jewish!’ Because these Jews were killed simply because they were Jews.” While acknowledging the horror that took place at the offices of Charlie Hebdo, and the imperative to fight for the liberty of thought and expression, Cohn-Bendit distinguished it from the horror at the supermarket. “I’ve the sentiment we’ve gone backward seventy years,” he told Levy-Willard. “When the sole reason one can kill you is because you are Jewish, an unspeakable barbarism has returned.”

If this wave of barbarism is unspeakable, so, too, is the word “Jew”—at least when it comes to identifying Coulibaly’s four victims. As Levy-Willard noted, everyone says the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists were killed because they were cartoonists, and that the police were killed because they were police. What does everyone say, however, about the people at Hyper-Cacher who had the poor timing to be perusing the produce aisle when Coulibaly burst into store? “No one dares to say: ‘He killed four Jews.’”...
---
Read more: http://forward.com/articles/212611/why- ... z3Olahc3kF

Revealing comments follow this article. The dead Jews were buried in Israel, not France.


Negro Jew killer Amedy Coulibaly -- he killed them because they were Jews

Will Williams wrote: Yeah I tuned all that out after the first few reports -- another dog bites man story. I like the part where the Negro killed four Jews in a kosher grocery store, though. The Jew is smelling blood over that deed; unfortunately for him it is his own.

Yeah that's why I don't see this as a false flag attack, because 4 Jews were killed. I'm sure if this was a false flag great care would be taken not to harm any Jews. I heard that 3,000 or so Jews who worked at the World Trade Center in 2001 all seemed to take a day off on September 11th. So there must be a Zio-memo passed around for false flags. Unless this was some kind of scheme by some ultra-nutty Jabotinsky-like -revisionist-Zionists trying to scare Jews into moving to Israel which I doubt.

Yes it seems like the focus of this story today and yesterday has been "Are the Jews safe in France?". The only thing that bothers me about that is that they are acting like it's the White people's fault that Jews aren't safe in France. I would say anywhere where there are a large number of Muslims, like in France, the Jews aren't safe for obvious reasons. But this press is neglecting to assign any blame to Muslims and they wouldn't even dare suggest that the solution would be to deport all Muslims from Europe. If they did that then the Jews would probably be next on the deportation list. The Jews won't be safe anywhere soon because the whole world knows what they are all about. It will be hard for them to pull off their Jew tricks anywhere in the world in the future.

Clinton Foundation Accepted $25,000 from Known Pedophile

On July 18, 2006, the Clinton Foundation received a $25,000 check from the C.O.U.Q. Foundation, whose president was known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a friend of Bill Clinton. The donation is revealed in the C.O.U.Q. Foundation's 990 tax form, filed with the IRS.

Others have previously reported that Epstein and Clinton parted ways in 2005, as the New York Post did, due to Epstein's legal problems:

Clinton apparently turned his back on Epstein in 2005 — the year the financier was first arrested for receiving an “erotic massage” from a minor, according to the 2011 court records, related to a suit brought by women who claimed the businessman abused them.

Before that, Clinton was a frequent flier on the moneyman’s private jet.

“The documents clearly show that Clinton flew with Epstein and then suddenly stopped, raising the suspicion that the friendship abruptly ended, perhaps because of events related to Epstein’s sexual abuse of children,” the documents state.

Yet this unrestricted donation to the Clinton Foundation is proof that Clinton did not cut all ties after Epstein was accused of pedophilia.

Indeed, Epstein's proclivities where well known even when the Clinton Foundation accepted his generous gift. "The legal drama began in 2005, when a young woman who gave Mr. Epstein massages at his Palm Beach mansion told the local police about the encounter. She was 14 at the time, and was paid $200," the New York Times has reported.

"The police submitted the results of their investigation to the state attorney, asking that Mr. Epstein be charged with sexual relations with minors. His lawyers say Mr. Epstein never knew the young women were under age, and point to depositions in which the masseuses — several of whom have filed civil suits — admitted to lying about their age. In July 2005, a Florida grand jury charged Mr. Epstein with a lesser offense, soliciting prostitution."

The Clinton-Epstein relationship has been in the news lately. "The filthy-rich sex felon has recently been in the spotlight again thanks to a federal lawsuit filed in Florida by Virginia Roberts, a woman who claims he kept her as a teen 'sex slave' and paid her a $15,000 bonus to bed the prince," the New York Post reports.

It was, at one point, believed to have been a very close relationship:

The billionaire sex offender accused of pimping out a teenage girl to Prince Andrew also kept former President Bill Clinton on speed dial — 21 of them, court documents show. Lawyers stumbled upon e-mail addresses and 21 phone numbers for the fun-loving ex-president and his personal aide, Doug Band, stashed away in Jeffrey Epstein’s electronic directory, according to court documents. ...

Clinton was also pals with Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the late disgraced British press baron Robert Maxwell. She has been accused of “acting as a madam” for Epstein in the lawsuit filed by Roberts last week. Maxwell was a guest at Chelsea Clinton’s wedding in 2010, according to the 2011 court documents, which are part of a civil lawsuit involving Epstein and two lawyers who represented some of his underage victims.

Those lawyers even considered subpoenaing Clinton since he “might well be a source of relevant information” — but Bubba was never deposed.

Clinton and his unseemly relationships will likely come up in his wife's 2016 presidential run. Including his ties to Epstein.

Asked for comment, the executive director of America Rising, a GOP opposition research firm, Tim Miller says, "Once again we see there is no amount of sleaze or corruption that will prevent the Clintons from taking a crony's cash. Bill and Hillary's network of corrupt friends and hangers-on will continue to dog her in a presidential campaign."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/cli ... 23330.html