It is currently Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:14 am


GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2215
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostMon Aug 04, 2014 6:47 pm

GOP Congressman Accuses Democrats Of Waging A 'War On Whites'
The Huffington Post | By Sam Levine
08/04/2014

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) doesn't think that the hardline stance Republicans have taken on immigration could hurt the party’s standing with Hispanic voters. Instead, he thinks Democrats are hurting their prospects with white voters.

Image
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) accused Democrats
of waging a "war on whites" Monday.

(Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

“This is a part of the war on whites that’s being launched by the Democratic Party. And the way in which they’re launching this war is by claiming that whites hate everybody else,” he said during an interview Monday with conservative radio host Laura Ingraham. "It's part of the strategy that Barack Obama implemented in 2008, continued in 2012, where he divides us all on race, on sex, greed, envy, class warfare, all those kinds of things. Well that’s not true.”

Brooks was responding to comments made by National Journal's Ron Fournier, who told Fox News host Chris Wallace on Sunday that "the fastest growing voting bloc in this country thinks the Republican Party hates them. This party, your party, cannot be the party of the future beyond November if you’re seen as the party of white people.”

Brooks responded by saying that all demographic groups in America support securing the nation’s border and a wide range of Americans would be affected by an influx of undocumented immigration.

“It doesn't make any difference if you're a white American, a black American, a Hispanic American, an Asian American or if you're a woman or a man. Every single demographic group is hurt by falling wages and lost jobs,” he said.

“Democrats, they have to demagogue on this and try and turn it into a racial issue, which is an emotional issue, rather than a thoughtful issue," he added. "If it becomes a thoughtful issue, then we win and we win big. And they lose and they lose big.”

Ingraham didn't seem to be on board with Brooks' "war on whites" remark, telling him it was "a little out there."

Image
Christian neoconservative, anti-racist,
talk show celebrity, Laura Ingraham


UPDATE: 3:36 p.m. -- During a Twitter Q&A Monday, Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) called Brooks' comments "asinine."

In a statement to AL.com, Brooks responded to the controversy around his remarks:

"As best I can in the time limitations I have, I try to make sure people understand what the Democrats are doing by raising race as an issue every chance they get," he said. "It's much like the congressmen during the (immigration) debate on Friday: Democrat after Democrat was talking racism and race. And the motivation for their doing so was to try to cause bloc voters of race to vote solely on skin color.

"I'm one of those who does not believe in racism and I believe everyone should be treated equally as American citizens. It's high time folks started calling out the Democrats for their racial appeals. Certainly if you were to flip the coin and a white person were to say vote for me because I'm white, it would be an uproar and deservedly so. So why do we allow blacks to say vote for me because I'm black or Hispanics vote for me because I'm Hispanic? Race is immaterial and everybody ought to be treated the same."

Image
Anti-racist Congressman Mo Brooks with some toothy Negro

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/0 ... lp00000592
Offline
User avatar

C.E. Whiteoak

  • Posts: 255
  • Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 7:45 pm

Re: GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostMon Aug 04, 2014 10:41 pm

GOP can't be seen as the White man's party


Man, that's the truth, but all too many Whites are too slow to catch on, even when somebody like Rand Paul stabs them in the back. :roll:
Offline
User avatar

Wade Hampton III

  • Posts: 2002
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostMon Aug 04, 2014 11:23 pm

C.E. Whiteoak wrote:
GOP can't be seen as the White man's party


Man, that's the truth, but all too many Whites are too slow to catch on, even when somebody like Rand Paul stabs them in the back. :roll:


Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't there a recent photo of Paul
circulating on the 'Net standing at that Yid "wailing wall" with one
of those silly Jew dunce caps on?


:?
Offline
User avatar

C.E. Whiteoak

  • Posts: 255
  • Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 7:45 pm

Re: GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostMon Aug 04, 2014 11:39 pm

Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't there a recent photo of Paul
circulating on the 'Net standing at that Yid "wailing wall" with one
of those silly Jew dunce caps on?


Yep, I saw it too. He has learned how a hack gets re-elected. :x
Offline
User avatar

Wade Hampton III

  • Posts: 2002
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostTue Aug 05, 2014 12:39 am

C.E. Whiteoak wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't there a recent photo of Paul
circulating on the 'Net standing at that Yid "wailing wall" with one
of those silly Jew dunce caps on?


Yep, I saw it too. He has learned how a hack gets re-elected. :x


No doubt he was under the tutelage of Senator Lindsay "Wargasm" Graham & his AIPAC baggage....
I am sure I have said it many times before....it is all about the money...


:lol:
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2215
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostWed Sep 10, 2014 2:31 pm

Republicans are bought-and-paid-for wimps on the most important issues, but at least they aren't Democrats. It's not unusual for only Democrats to vote in a bloc for Bills that are anti-personal liberty. That no Republicans voted for the following gun-grabbin' Bill makes Whites think the GOP represents their interests in elections. A handful of Democrat senators did, however, break ranks and voted with the Republicans to defeat the Bill. Received the following from Dr. Virginia Abernethy:
---

Hi,
A short comment:
Harry Reid supported the UN Resolution that would have mandated taking Americans’ guns.

Why did the NRA support Harry Reid in 2010??????

Reid was almost beaten in 2010 by a Tea Party candidate running as a Republican. Unfortunately, the GOP didn’t give her much support – the GOP thinks that the Tea Party is the enemy, so Reid won. But narrowly.
V.

……………………………………….

>>> HOORAY a 53-46 vote.
>>>
>>> The U.N. Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11.
It: "CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN countries".
>>>
>>> By a 53-46 vote - The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution. HOORAY.
>>>
>>> This is that brief, glorious moment in history
>>> when everyone stands around...reloading.
>>>
>>> Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us? Well, let their names become known ! See below ..
If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 "legislators" vote against them.
>>>
>>> In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
The Statement of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads:
"To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty,
which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.
The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry, now get this,
on all private guns and ammo.
>>>
>>> Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.
>>>
>>> Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.
>>> Baldwin (D-WI)
>>> Baucus (D-MT)
>>> Bennett (D-CO)
>>> Blumenthal (D-CT)
>>> Boxer (D-CA)
>>> Brown (D-OH)
>>> Cantwell (D-WA)
>>> Cardin (D-MD)
>>> Carper (D-DE)
>>> Casey (D-PA)
>>> Coons (D-DE)
>>> Cowan (D-MA)
>>> Durbin (D-IL)
>>> Feinstein (D-CA)
>>> Franken (D-MN)
>>> Gillibrand (D-NY)
>>> Harkin (D-IA)
>>> Hirono (D-HI)
>>> Johnson (D-SD)
>>> Kaine (D-VA)
>>> King (I-ME)
>>> Klobuchar (D-MN)
>>> Landrieu (D-LA)
>>> Leahy (D-VT)
>>> Levin (D-MI)
>>> McCaskill (D-MO)
>>> Menendez (D-NJ)
>>> Merkley (D-OR)
>>> Mikulski (D-MD)
>>> Murphy (D-CT)
>>> Murray (D-WA)
>>> Nelson (D-FL)
>>> Reed (D-RI)
>>> Reid (D-NV)
>>> Rockefeller (D-WV)
>>> Sanders (I-VT)
>>> Schatz (D-HI)
>>> Schumer (D-NY)
>>> Shaheen (D-NH)
>>> Stabenow (D-MI)
>>> Udall (D-CO)
>>> Udall (D-NM)
>>> Warner (D-VA)
>>> Warren (D-MA)
>>> Whitehouse (D-RI)
>>> Wyden (D-OR)
>>> What? No Republicans????
>>>
>>> Folks: This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.
>>> 46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.
>>>
>>> Please send this to SOMEONE!
Offline
User avatar

Wade Hampton III

  • Posts: 2002
  • Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Location: Pontiac, SC

Lindsay Graham & White Men

PostFri Oct 31, 2014 2:37 am

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham's remark at
a private, all-male dinner about mainly helping white men
if he became president was a joke taken out of context,
his campaign said Thursday.

http://news.yahoo.com/graham-remark-hel ... ction.html

Wade says, "I wonder if by 'White' men, he is referring to
multi-billionaire-Jew Sheldon Adelson who funnels thru AIPAC
millions of US dollars to his 'candidates of choice' such as
Graham and Romney. Attending another 'American Renaissance'
seminar may reveal some answers, as some of the billed speakers
are also Jews - being presented as 'White'."

http://www.forbes.com/profile/sheldon-adelson/


:evil:
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2215
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

...and from the Democrat Party leadership:

PostMon Dec 08, 2014 11:05 am

Biden boasts end of Caucasian majority in U.S.
'Diversity is the reason for our incredible strength'

Image
Professional political hack Joe Boy Biden, before and after getting his vanity hair plugs.

U.S. taxpayers shelled out nearly a quarter-million dollars in November, so Vice President Joe Biden could trumpet “diversity” to world business leaders in Morocco and boast that in 2017, “for the first time, Caucasians of European descent like me will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America.”...

Biden continued. “The secret that people don’t know is our diversity is the reason for our incredible strength.”...“Diversity is the reason for our incredible strength because the brightest, the most innovative, the most adventuresome, the greatest risk takers, they’re the ones who leave when they cannot flourish and seek other places,” he said. “We in America are proud to welcome them” [even though they are quickly transforming the U.S. into a Third World nation]

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/biden-boasts ... yOMSyyw.99

http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/biden-boasts ... ty-in-u-s/

Uh oh, the "secret" is out.
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2215
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostMon Dec 08, 2014 2:39 pm

Sometimes Shabbos goy Joe "I am a Zionist" Biden slips up and actually blurts out the truth.
---

Vice President Biden Acknowledges 'Immense' Jewish
Role in American Mass Media and Cultural Life


By Mark Weber
July 2013

In a remarkable but under-reported address, Vice President Joe Biden recently acknowledged that the “immense” and “outsized” Jewish role in the US mass media and cultural life has been the single most important factor in shaping American attitudes over the past century, and in driving major cultural- political changes.

“Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us – as much or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that's a fact," Biden told a gathering of Jewish leaders on May 21, 2013, in Washington, DC. “The truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are such an essential part of who we are that it's fair to say that Jewish heritage is American heritage,” he added. /1

“Think - behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those [social-political] changes, whether it's in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said. “We talk about it in terms of the incredible accomplishments and contributions” of individual Jews, Biden went on, but it's more profound than that “because the values, the values are so deep and so engrained in American culture, in our Constitution.”...

More here: http://ihr.org/other/biden_jewish_role
Offline
User avatar

Will Williams

  • Posts: 2215
  • Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: GOP can't be seen as the White man's party

PostTue May 19, 2015 7:07 pm

Buchanan To WSJ: It Wasn’t Patriots Who Led GOP, America To Disaster–It Was You!
By Patrick J. Buchanan on May 18, 2015, 6:51 pm

As Middle America rises in rage against “fast track” and the mammoth Obamatrade deal known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Wall Street Journal has located the source of the malady.

Last Monday’s lead editorial began:

“Here we go again. In the 1990s Pat Buchanan launched a civil war within the Republican Party on a platform targeting immigration and trade. Some claimed Pitchfork Pat was the future of the GOP, though in the end he mainly contributed to its presidential defeats.”

But, woe is us, “the GOP’s Buchanan wing is making a comeback.”

Image
Patrick Buchanan

Now it is true that, while Nixon and Reagan won 49-state landslides and gave the GOP five victories in six presidential contests, the party has fallen upon hard times. Only once since 1988 has a Republican presidential nominee won the popular vote.

But was this caused by following this writer’s counsel? Or by the GOP listening to the deceptions of its Davos–Doha–WSJ wing?

In the 1990s, this writer and allies in both parties fought NAFTA, GATT and MFN for China. The WSJ and GOP establishment ran with Bill and Hillary and globalization. And the fruits of their victory?

Between 2000 and 2010, 55,000 U.S. factories closed and 5 million to 6 million manufacturing jobs disappeared. Columnist Terry Jeffrey writes that, since 1979, the year of maximum U.S. manufacturing employment, “The number of jobs in manufacturing has declined by 7,231,000—or 37 percent.”

Does the Journal regard this gutting of the greatest industrial base the world had ever seen, which gave America an independence no republic had ever known, an acceptable price of its New World Order?

Beginning in 1991, traveling the country and visiting plant after plant that was shutting down or moving to Asia or Mexico, some of us warned that this economic treason against America’s workers would bring about political retribution. And so it came to pass.

Since 1988, a free-trade Republican Party has not once won Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois or Wisconsin in a presidential election. Ohio, the other great Midwest industrial state, is tipping. The Reagan Democrats are gone. Who cast them aside? You or us?

Since the early 1990s, we have run $3 billion to $4 billion in trade deficits with China. Last year’s was $325 billion, or twice China’s defense budget. Are not all those factories, jobs, investment capital and consumer dollars pouring into China a reason why Beijing has been able to build mighty air and naval fleets, claim sovereignty over the South and East China seas, fortify reefs 1,000 miles south of Hainan Island, and tell the U.S. Navy to back off?

The WSJ accuses us of being anti-growth. But as trade surpluses add to a nation’s GDP, trade deficits subtract from it. Does the WSJ think our $11 trillion in trade deficits since 1992 represents a pro-growth policy?

On immigration, this writer did campaign on securing the border in 1991-92, when there were 3 million illegal immigrants in the United States.

But the Bush Republicans refused to seal the border.

Now there are 11 million to 12 million illegal immigrants and the issue is tearing the party apart. Now everybody is for “secure borders.”

We did urge a “moratorium” on legal immigration, such as America had from 1924 to 1965, to assimilate and Americanize the millions who had come. The WSJ Republicans called that xenophobia.

Since then, tens of millions of immigrants, here legally and illegally, mostly from the Third World, have arrived. Economically, they consume more in tax dollars than they contribute.

Politically, most belong to ethnic groups that vote between 70 and 90 percent Democratic. Their children will bury the GOP.

Consider California, which voted for Nixon all five times he was on a national ticket and for Reagan in landslides all four times he ran.

Since 1988, California has not gone Republican in a single presidential election. No Republican holds statewide office. Both U.S. Senators are Democrats. Democrats have 39 of 53 U.S. House seats. Republican state legislators are outnumbered 2-to-1.

Americans of European descent, who provide the GOP with 90 percent of its presidential vote, are down to 63 percent of the nation and falling.

By 2042, they will be a minority. And there goes the GOP.


Lest we forget, the “Buchanan wing” also opposed the invasion of Iraq while the WSJ-War Party wing howled, “Onto Baghdad!”

“Unpatriotic Conservatives,” we were called in a cover story by a neocon National Review for saying the war was unnecessary and unwise.

Now, a dozen years after the “cakewalk” war, GOP candidates like Marco Rubio and Bush III are trying to figure out what it was all about, Alfie, and what they would have done, had they only known.

Our agenda in that decade was—stay out of wars that are not our business, economic patriotism, secure borders, and America first.

The foreign debt and de-industrialization of America, the trillion-dollar wars and the chaos of the Middle East, the shortened life span of the Party of Reagan, that’s your doing, fellas, not ours.
---
http://www.vdare.com/articles/buchanan- ... it-was-you
Next

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest