Will Williams wrote: ↑Sun Sep 05, 2021 11:10 am
It is not just too many humans, but way too many humans of the wrong color.
Be sure and read Douglas Mercer's latest article that points out some of the alarming demographic statistics, here: https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/08/th ... f-america/
For example:
The most recent Census Bureau estimates by races shows a small decline of 16,612 in the nation’s white population over the 2010-to-2019 period. If this trend is confirmed with the full 2020 census, the 2010-to-2020 decade would be the only decade since the first census was taken in 1790 when the white population did not grow. This decline in the white population is a major driver of the nation’s demographic stagnation. White population gains in recent decades have grown smaller over time, from 11.2 million between 1970 and 1980 down to 2.8 million between 2000 and 2010. But a white population loss between 2010 and 2020 would be unprecedented.
It ain't global warming that is earth's biggest problem, it's too damned many non-White human subspecies replacing Whites, or habitat succession as the environmentalists like to call the process. WikiJews prefer to describe it like this:
The Great Replacement (French: Grand Remplacement), also known as replacement theory or great replacement theory, is a white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory disseminated by French author Renaud Camus. The original theory states that, with the complicity or cooperation of "replacist" elites, white European populations are being demographically and culturally replaced with non-white peoples...
Non race-thinking egalitarian academics frame the facts Mr. Mercer gives like this, as a White racist conspiracy
---
Overpopulation is a major cause of biodiversity
loss and smaller human populations are
necessary to preserve what is left
Global biodiversity decline is driven in large part by excessive human populations.
• Population decline opens up important opportunities for ecological restoration.
• Further research is needed into how human demographic changes help or hinder conservation efforts.
• Conservation biologists should advocate for smaller populations, in both less developed and more developed nations.
Abstract
Global biodiversity decline is best understood as
too many people consuming and producing too much and displacing other species. Wild landscapes and seascapes are replaced with people, our domestics and commensals, our economic support systems, and our trash. Conservation biologists have documented many of the ways that human activity drives global biodiversity loss, but they generally neglect the role of overpopulation. We summarize the evidence for how
excessive human numbers destroy and degrade habitats for other species, and how population decrease opens possibilities for ecological restoration. We discuss opportunities for further research into how human demographic changes help or hinder conservation efforts. Finally, we encourage conservation biologists to
advocate for smaller populations, through improved access to modern contraception and explicit promotion of small families. In the long term, smaller human populations are necessary to preserve biodiversity in both less developed and more developed parts of the world. Whether
the goal is to save threatened species, create more protected areas, restore degraded landscapes, limit climate disruption, or any of the other objectives key to preserving biodiversity, reducing the size of the human population is necessary to achieve it.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... d=coauthor