Lifers: Myth or silent?

Securing the existence of our people
Thomas S NJ
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2021 5:31 pm

Re: Lifers: Myth or silent?

Post by Thomas S NJ » Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:27 pm

RCavallius wrote:
Sun Oct 30, 2022 5:12 pm
In population statistics, there is a phenomenon called "regression to the mean." Basically, "regression to the mean" refers to the observation by statisticians that offspring of parents who are outliers, in any way, from the norm of the population tend to be closer to that norm than their parents. This is the case with anything. So, taking IQ as an example, high-IQ parents tend to have children whose IQs are somewhere between that of their parents and the average for their race. This is neither an environmental nor a genetic phenomenon, it's just a statistical probability. Most people are simply not capable of taking our side against the current cultural trends, whether their parents raised them right or not. I don't think regression to the mean gives us the whole answer to your question, but it does provide a good starting point for investigation.
This was the sort of discussion I was looking for here. You also mentioned how those that find the Alliance through self-selection make the best recruits. I am most familiar with that process; I came to race-consciousness later in life, having any spark of it suppressed by social programming during my youth. Because of the great groundwork that had been laid out online at the time, going from a run-of-the-mill Marvel-watching pie-in-the-sky libertarian to a racialist to joining the National Alliance was a natural course to follow.
I notice a two-tiered progression there: awakening suppressed racial consciousness and from there finding the NA.
I wonder how that can be applied on a larger scale. I cannot believe that the millions of our Race do not contain at least a few million who would make good recruits.
H0195

User avatar
RCavallius
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:52 am
Contact:

Re: Lifers: Myth or silent?

Post by RCavallius » Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:35 pm

Thomas S NJ wrote:
Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:27 pm
I notice a two-tiered progression there: awakening suppressed racial consciousness and from there finding the NA.
I wonder how that can be applied on a larger scale. I cannot believe that the millions of our Race do not contain at least a few million who would make good recruits.
Listen carefully to all of Dr. Pierce's talks. Listen, also, to the ADVs on NatVan. Pay attention to what is being said about strategy. Again, I repeat: first we build the necessary infrastructure, then we seek to expand.
H0216

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Lifers: Myth or silent?

Post by Will Williams » Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:59 pm

Thomas S NJ wrote:
Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:12 pm
As for question 1, what attracted me to the Alliance, I offer as my answer quite simply that the Alliance has its basis in the truth: the truth of history, the truth of race science and the truth of natural law.
What made me apply and continue here is that the Alliance’s program of total racial separation is the only one which will preserve our Race.
I came to recognize some time ago that democratic politics were a sham, even before I had been instructed on the Jewish question. I also understood that without prior organizational efforts any revolutionary action of a more direct nature would be utterly crushed, leaving victorious enemies to rewrite the truth. Only the Alliance has a clear understanding of the need to build a community, organize, educate and build those connections that would form the backbone of any sort of future victory.
I hope this lays to reach any doubts you have in me as a member.
It does, Thomas. Very good response to my pointed questions.

We can't expect our unpopular racial separatist position to be accepted by our parents, grandparents, siblings or extended family, former classmates or church members, neighbors, or current associates. Many of us broke with decades of "normal" expected beliefs and traditions, but that does not mean we are wrong. It means we are the trailblazers. We know we are right and we know some others will agree with us when properly approached with what we know and our solutions.

My own father, who was one of the smartest men I've ever known, and who taught me to always try to tell the truth was still a conformist is some respects and worried about what others thought of his middle boy's "fascination with the KKK," as he called it. I never had any fascination with the KKK, and after I'd joined our
Alliance I'll never forget when standing in the kitchen of his house, offering him an issue of our exceptional National Vanguard magazine. He slapped it away and said, "I'm not going to read that goddamned shit!!"

What to do? I picked the magazine up, gave him a big hug and didn't see him again for years. I continued my work Alliance-building. It turned out my father, Crawford, a successful multi-millionaire, didn't care as much for truth as I thought he did. He put conformity and "respectability" ahead of uncomfortable truths.

When his high-powered attorney, who was retained by North Carolina's Republican Party, told me, "Will, if you don't give up this fascination you have with the KKK, Crawford will cut you out of his will." My response was, "You tell the ol' man that if he leaves me any money, I'll be giving it to the National Alliance." That settled that.

Thomas, we know your dad has doubts about your association with NA, considering us a hate group, or whatever, but you have to follow your own convictions, expressed above so eloquently about our Alliance. You will be an excellent NA member.

Enough said. I'm locking this topic,
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Locked