On Bended Knees? 11/5/22

Post Reply
User avatar
White Man 1
Posts: 837
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 2:35 pm
Location: East TN
Contact:

On Bended Knees? 11/5/22

Post by White Man 1 » Sun Nov 13, 2022 1:13 pm

WITH THE JEWS, “What have you done for me?” isn’t really the question — it’s “What have you done for me lately?”

Their endless demands continue.

South-African-born billionaire Elon Musk bought Twitter on 27 October with $44 billion and then took it private — all in the name of “free speech.” Within a week, on 2 November, he was meeting with Jewish leaders and other non-White racial advocates, and promised them that Twitter’s censorship of things — and people — they don’t want to hear will continue, at least to some degree, on the platform. Let’s take a look at what Musk tweeted on Wednesday:

Talked to civil society leaders @JGreenblattADL [Jonathan Greenblatt, boss of the ADL], @YaelEisenstat [Yael Eisenstat, vice president of the ADL]], @rashadrobinson [Rashad Robinson, head of “Color of Change” and spokesman for “Voting While Black”], @JGo4Justice [Jessica Gonzalez, leader of several leftist pro-censorship groups], @normanlschen [Norman Chen, head of the Asian-American Foundation], @DerrickNAACP [Derrick Johnson, president of the NAACP], @TheBushCenter Ken Hersch [of the George W. Bush Presidential Center] & @SindyBenavides [Sindy Benavides, head of the League of United Latin American Citizens] about how Twitter will continue to combat hate & harassment & enforce its election integrity policies

Twitter will not allow anyone who was de-platformed for violating Twitter rules back on platform until we have a clear process for doing so, which will take at least a few more weeks

Twitter’s content moderation council will include representatives with widely divergent views, which will certainly include the civil rights community and groups who face hate-fueled violence

I suggest a National Alliance representative on their Content Moderation Council.

Most interesting indeed that these anti-Whites were characterized by Musk as “civil society leaders,” as if that were some kind of formal term or title; and it’s also interesting that the real moving force behind the meeting — the ADL’s gangster-like Greenblatt — said immediately afterwards that he was “cautiously optimistic” and “would be monitoring” to make sure the world’s richest man does the things “we expect” — all while at the same time openly advocating for advertisers to pull their ads from Twitter. In one of the few truthful statements to pass out of Greenblatt’s mouth, he added, “We will continue to monitor.” You bet they will. That’s what Jews do — among other negative things, like undermining non-Jewish societies in every way possible. The Jews are the only race on planet Earth to devote multiple billions and innumerable organizations, councils, leagues, intelligence-gathering agencies, pollsters, and umbrella groups to finding out just how much they are liked or hated by everyone else on the planet.

It remains to be seen what exactly Musk will do. Even though he’s supposedly the richest man on Earth (perhaps the Rothschilds don’t count as being “on Earth”), the Jewish campaign against newly-independent Twitter is causing a rapid decline in revenue and I’m sure that Musk’s imagination is picturing that $44 billion melting like an ice cube. He has a lot to lose, and the Jews have a lot of power to make him lose it.

A man with the very Jewish-sounding name of Yoel Roth is the “Global Head of Safety and Integrity” at Twitter — both before and after Musk. When numerous people stated publicly that, as main architect of Twitter’s censorship regime, Roth should be “the first one fired,” Musk shot back that Roth had “high integrity” and would be kept on the job. Roth had called members of the Trump administration “nazis” and called Trump himself a “racist tangerine.” Roth now says that Musk’s massive layoffs at Twitter did not affect “most of the 2,000-plus front-line content moderation team” that he heads:

“While we said goodbye to incredibly talented friends and colleagues yesterday, our core moderation capabilities remain in place,” Yoel Roth said. He added that while Twitter slashed 15% of the trust and safety workforce — compared to approximately 50% of employee cuts company-wide — the 2,000 front-line moderation staff were among the least impacted. “More than 80% of our incoming content moderation volume was completely unaffected by this access change. The daily volume of moderation actions we take stayed steady through this period,” Roth said.

He added that the company was dedicated to maintaining its integrity heading into the midterm elections. “With early voting underway in the US, our efforts on election integrity — including harmful misinformation that can suppress the vote and combatting state-backed information operations — remain a top priority,” he said.

Roth noted that the layoffs have mostly impacted account access issues, such as aiding with lost password requests and reviewing appeals for suspended accounts. “We’re working to get these back online in the days to come,” he said, closing the thread with an appeal to recruiters to reach out with job openings. “I have recommendations for incredibly smart and compassionate talent that is now available.”

Musk added in a separate tweet, “Again, to be crystal clear, Twitter’s strong commitment to content moderation remains absolutely unchanged. In fact, we have actually seen hateful speech at times this week decline below our prior norms, contrary to what you may read in the press.”

According to the New York Post,

Roth […] the man in charge of the team responsible for developing and enforcing the social media site’s rules, had referred to former President Donald Trump’s advisors as “ACTUAL NAZIS IN THE WHITE HOUSE” and likened counselor to the 45th president Kellyanne Conway to Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels.

Roth …snidely remarked of the middle of the country: “I’m just saying, we fly over those states that voted for a racist tangerine for a reason.”

Seven months ago on this program, when Musk was still in purchase negotiations for Twitter, I highlighted what the Jewish position was on Musk’s purchase — and what they expected from him then:

The Jewish point of view on Musk’s takeover bid — a twisted, contradictory, Talmudic point of view — was expressed in an article posted at Israel Today, a publication intended mainly for Jews. The title and subtitle alone tell the story: “Israel Congratulates Elon Musk on Acquiring Twitter, Defending Free Speech; But Jewish state hopes the tech visionary and world’s richest man can help stifle the growing antisemitism and incitement against Jews on social media.” What? How can you “stifle” people and at the same time “defend free speech”? Only a Jew could originate such a thought or have the effrontery to parade it in public.

Is Musk on bended knees before the Jews? Or, as a student of their ways, as all leaders of all persuasions must be, has he merely learned to dissimulate? Only time will tell.


Musk has waffled a lot in his political and social positions, though his friends say he’s just “hard to categorize.” He voted for Biden and Hillary Clinton, supported non-White presidential candidates Kanye West (before Kanye’s exposure of Jewish power) and Andrew Yang, and has recently declared that he won’t support the Democratic party anymore because it is the “party of division and hate”; has said he supports the idea of government-funded “Universal Basic Income”; and he has repeatedly criticized Big Tech’s and the left’s censorship regimes, though never mentioning their Jewish nature — yet at the same time he recently wrote an article for a publication called China Cyberspace, a government publication put out by the same agency that censors the Internet in that country. He’s also said that Taiwan should become just an administrative region of China, and proposed a peace plan for Ukraine that enraged the Washington establishment and the Jewish media. This year, Musk gave away millions in Starlink satellite Internet terminals and ongoing access for free to the government of Ukraine. Last month, he said the company was losing too much money and the Ukrainians would have to start paying again like everyone else. But, after the controlled media exploded in fury at the idea, he reversed his position two days later.

Most interestingly, though, Musk has gone completely against the Establishment narrative when it comes to population numbers, stating not only that we have a “birth dearth” — not enough babies being born — but that the problem is centered in regions, East Asia and the White West, where there are the most intelligent and accomplished people. Here are a few relevant quotes by Musk from an interview he gave to the World Post:

I think demographics is a real issue. People are not having kids in a lot of countries. And very often people will say, “We’ll solve it with immigration.” But immigration from where? Many parts of Europe have an average birthrate of only 50 or 60 per cent. of what’s needed for replacement. Or China for that matter — they’re at 50 per cent. of the replacement rate. Where, exactly, are we going to find 600 million people to replace the ones that were never born?

The birthrate is strongly inversely correlated to wealth, inversely correlated to education, and positively correlated to religion. So the more religious you are — the less educated — and the poorer you are, the more kids you will have. This is true between countries, and within countries….

I think if you were to state the threats to civilization, the lack of people is obviously a threat to civilization. We are going to face, in the mid part of this century, and particularly in the latter part of this century, a demographic implosion the likes of which we have never seen — including the Black Plague. The math is obvious. When did China ever experience a 50 per cent. reduction in its population? The answer is never. Basically, [if it ever did happen, it happened] pre-writing — because no one’s ever written of such a thing. Even when the Black Plague came through Europe, they might have lost a quarter — but never a half — of the population. And yet, we have modern Spain with a birthrate that is 50 per cent. of replacement. It’s as if someone went through and killed half the population — the future population.

Something better happen to turn this around. Because otherwise, you have an inverted demographic pyramid. And it’s going to collapse. At this rate, the only thing that’ll be left will be robots.

…for me you’d want to have a future where there is a space-spanning civilization where our species is out there exploring the stars…. From an evolutionary standpoint, human consciousness has not been around very long. A little light just went on after four and a half billion years. How often does that happen? Maybe it is quite rare. In fact, it would appear to be quite rare. Or, others out there with a consciousness are very good at hiding. If it is such a rare thing, then we should do whatever we can to ensure its long-term survival.

These statements from Elon Musk were hopeful enough, and positive enough for the possible future of our race, that they prompted me to write an open letter to Musk in 2015, asking for support — anonymous if necessary (we have a Monero address) — for the people, the members and leaders of the National Alliance — who really are on the front lines for an interplanetary humanity of high quality. We have received no response so far.

Was that just a vain dream? Perhaps. But dreams must be dreamt, and spoken out loud, if great advances are to be made.

Given his weakness when under social pressure, and his certain degree of unpredicability, and (despite his huge wealth) his vulnerability to massive losses if kept under Jewish media and establishment fire — we’re not holding our breaths for a billion-dollar donation from the White African-American Musk. We’ll continue our Alliance-building no matter what. But, if he really wants to change the course of human history for the better, that’s exactly what he should do.

* * *

Post Reply