Doing Nothing With Everything vs. Doing Everything With Nothing 09/10/22

[White Man 1]

In honor of the 89th anniversary of William Luther Pierce’s birth on 11 September 1933.

QUEEN ELIZABETH the Second died at the age of 96 this week of natural causes. During her reign — the longest in British history, from 1952 to 2022 — the British Empire, and Britain itself, died of unnatural causes, and she said and did nothing to stop it.

I don’t want to insult the people — almost all of them White people, by the way — who, in one of the most non-White cities in Europe — London, England — gathered to mourn her passing, and had gathered just months ago to celebrate her 70th year as Queen. A monarchy, a real monarchy in contrast to a mere nominal monarchy, is a vastly superior type of government compared to the mass democracies that have been imposed on Britons and on all the peoples of the West. Those massive crowds of Aryans in London displayed a sound instinct in their veneration of the at least nominally blood-based institution of rule. But, alas, this particular incarnation of that institution, as it so often is, was and is deeply, fatally flawed. No more blood-based rule — only ceremony and obscene wealth. No more blood-based anything — only implicit Whiteness and fawning to Jews and other non-Whites, a very few private statements to the contrary excepted.


Portraits of Queen Elizabeth II appeared on the currency of Britain and her dominions, often featuring the Latin motto meaning “Queen by the grace of God and defender of the faith.”
It is hard for me, and I imagine for any White man or woman with sound instincts, not to feel a certain emotion at the trappings of the great monarchies — the traditional garb, the magnificent ceremony, the inspiring architecture and music, the note of divine sanction, and in many cases the noble Aryan faces. But, like our “democracy,” and almost all of the republics that replaced the monarchies, there is a disconnect — as kings and queens alike are corrupted and dance like marionettes of death to the Jews’ “diversity” tune.

Queen Elizabeth II did nothing and said nothing to halt or even slow the dispossession of the White people of Britain or Europe. I do not know if any among her family or her court urged her to do so — it is hard to believe that no one did, as the Empire was dismantled and then Britain herself was flooded with aliens — but none that I am aware of chose to speak up without her support, which was not forthcoming. Despite her restricted status as a largely ceremonial monarch, she could have had tremendous influence, especially during the first decades of her reign, when the monarchy was an even more revered institution than it is today. Her position was essentially unassailable. Had she taken a position for the survival and progress of British people and Europeans generally, it would have made a gigantic difference in public opinion and the political direction taken by the country.

And she also had tremendous resources, which were valued last year at some $28 billion — small change, perhaps, compared to a mid-level Jew hedge fund operator, but still quite significant. With such wealth and such reputation and influence, she was in a position to change things. She had everything. She could have changed history by merely uttering a few good words for the race and standing behind them when the Jewish wailing and onslaught began. But she chose not to do so.

She had everything. But she did nothing.

Contrast that with Dr. William Pierce, an American with British roots who founded the National Alliance and the Cosmotheist Church, and whose adult life corresponded roughly to the years of Elizabeth’s reign. Dr. Pierce never had more than a middle class income and position — and, for most of his life, not even that. He quit his engineering and academic jobs to devote himself to the service of his race. There were years on end he lived on $50 a month and slept on the floor of his office, maintaining no home or apartment for himself. Even at the peak of National Alliance membership, after American Dissident Voices had spread his message far and wide across the Earth, he lived in a modified single-wide house trailer. He drove old, sometimes barely-functional vehicles that were gifted to him by supporters. He wore the same suit and tie for decades.

As far as influence was concerned, unlike British monarchs, he started with none. Teaching physics, and designing propulsion systems, he was known only to a handful of people. Even at the peak of his colleague George Lincoln Rockwell’s fame, after years of devoting his life to his people, his name remained in the background. All the influence, all the reputation, all the greatness he is now known for among a growing elite of White men and women, he created with his mind and his soul — and relentless struggle and labor that would have killed a lesser man. There were times, even in the middle of his ascent, when almost all of his co-workers had abandoned him. But in every case he vanquished despair and fear and hardship and carried on — and now his name will live forever among the names of the great thinkers and leaders of our race.

He had nothing. But he did everything.

Today, his life’s work continues twenty years after his death in the National Alliance and in the growing intentional White community we have built in Upper East Tennessee — an area once declared an independent state two centuries ago — and which, if we do right, can be so again — on an even greater scale; the nucleus, with your and your family’s support, of a whole new White nation and people. His life’s work continues in the revolutionary new religion, Cosmotheism, which has the potential to catch fire in the souls of the elite of our race around the word, and change the history not only of our people, but of all Life in the Universe.

He had nothing. But he did everything. Everything one man could do. Now we join him in his efforts, which still continue and will continue forever.

As we prepare to honor his life and his birth, let us recall his words of almost 50 years ago:

There was a time… in the past, when virtually all racially conscious, decent White Americans were “conservatives” or “right wingers,” and all “radicals” and “revolutionaries” were either Jews or degenerate Whites. Gradually, however, the realization has dawned on more and more White Americans that the situation in which our race has gotten itself admits to no “conservative” remedy….

A correct assessment of the implications of the biological time bomb which the Enemy has built in America is beginning to be made. Former “right wingers” are beginning to understand that the growing non-White army of occupation in America, now 40 millions strong, cannot be made to go away by writing any number of letters to their Congressmen or by passing any Constitutional amendment or by undertaking any other sort of reform. It is a biological problem, and it requires a biological solution. There is no other way.

Willingness to recognize the necessity of revolution, as opposed to reform, is only the first part of the change in attitude we have been working to bring about. It is far easier to tear down an old, decayed structure than it is to erect a new, sound one in its place. What we must do now is infuse our revolution-oriented minority with a new outlook, a new world-view which will not only sustain them on the long and difficult road ahead but will guide them in the building of a new society and a new world when victory has been won. Otherwise that victory will not be lasting.

This is an important point. One does not simply take a number of small businessmen, lawyers, housewives, students, farmers, and factory workers, convince them that the government in Washington is filled with traitors who need to be hanged, and then build a revolutionary army from these people who will proceed to do what needs doing. First, the task facing them is so difficult that extraordinary motivation is required. Second, they must have a unifying creed which serves as a guide to proper action in all matters.

We have until now concerned ourselves almost exclusively with various practical matters involved in building our army and in fighting the Enemy. We… have not devoted as much thought as we should to the spiritual side of our struggle. Now we must work harder than ever at the things we have worked at before, but we must also begin making sure that we all know the answers to certain fundamental questions.

Among these questions are: Why is it necessary that the White race maintain its biological integrity? What is God’s will in this matter? What is the proper relationship of the individual to his race, and of the White race to the rest of Creation? In what way do our lives have an absolute meaning and value? What is the purpose of man’s existence? How does the individual attain immortality? What are the basic values on which we want to build a new society?

It should be noted that these questions aren’t new. But our answers to them are, even though in some cases we may simply be looking at an old answer in a new way. And the integrated whole of which the answers to these questions are parts is the new creed which must sustain and guide us…. In the long run [this creed] will be more necessary for our victory than anything else.

To some the foregoing may seeman exaggeration. They may say: “We know who the Enemy is. The only other thing we need to know is how to destroy him. Tell us how, and let’s get on with it. We don’t need any fancy philosophical notions.” Such an attitude might be acceptable if we were faced only with a tactical problem having a reasonably quick and easy solution, but that is not the case.

The problem before us is one of enormous depth and complexity, and its ultimate solution will be anything but quick and easy. It is so difficult a problem that few will tackle it and fewer still continue to grapple with it for long years on end, unless they first have a completely convincing answer to the question: “is it necessary that we attain the goal we have set for ourselves?”

Is our effort necessary? Are all our sacrifices necessary? Is it necessary for us to prevail over the Enemy?

That question has been asked, in different forms, by men of our race through the ages. Previously it might have been, “Is it necessary for good to prevail over evil?” Or, even earlier, “Is it necessary for the forces of Light to prevail over the forces of Darkness?”

But for us the most general form of the question is: “Is it necessary that the world continue its evolution toward ever higher states of existence?” And, in view of the clearly demonstrated intentions of the Enemy, the specific form of the question which is pertinent to our present struggle becomes: “Is it necessary that the most highly evolved race of man, the pinnacle of Creation, maintain its integrity — that it protect and preserve its unique features and give free rein to its creative urges, rather than drown these things in the cesspool of miscegenation? Is it necessary that man continue his climb toward the superman, rather than plunge again toward sub-man?”

And if we understand the great, upward course of evolution of the Universe, the eternal process of Creation symbolized in our Rune, to be the self-manifestation of God — then it is clear that what we are doing is necessary. Our struggle is that part of God which is in us seeking its own self-realization. It is the struggle of the human toward the divine, of manhood toward Godhood.

In our race this divine spark, this upward urge, has always been too strong to be denied. In this age of the ascendancy of the powers of Darkness, however, the minds of many are confused. The urge is still there, but it has been misdirected. The Enemy has blinded most of us to the fact that the inchoate gases of the void; the silent, frozen mountain peaks; the rustling trees of the forests; the teeming jellyfish of the oceans, and man are parts of the Whole, which is God. God existed before man and will exist after man has surpassed himself, but man is now, for a period, a part of God, of the ever-changing, ever-evolving whole. All the parts of the Whole serve God’s purpose, but of those parts only man is capable of a consciousness of that purpose and a willful contribution to that purpose.

Once we have freed ourselves from the false teachings of the Enemy — once we understand the inequality of all things, the inequality of the races — then the consciousness of our purpose can be restored and the necessity of our struggle becomes apparent.

He had nothing. But he did everything.

* * *

[Sieg]

TOSIWR

[fluxmaster]

Queen Elizabeth II did nothing and said nothing to halt or even slow the dispossession of the White people of Britain or Europe.

Not only did she do nothing to stop or slow it, she actually supported it in South Africa and Rhodesia.

Monarchy, Nation-States, And The Failed Reign of "Elizabeth The Useless"

But so far as I can tell, the Queen has acted only twice in my lifetime to force changes of policy—typically, on behalf of the emerging Politically Correct consensus. In 1979, she bullied Margaret Thatcher to go back on her election promise not to hand Rhodesia over to a bunch of black Marxists. In 1987, she bullied Margaret Thatcher again to give in to calls for sanctions against South Africa.

[Jim Mathias]

It appears that even the billionaire Queen of the British Empire succumbed to the vast pressure to conform to the Jewish narrative applied over centuries. Is it not true that we Whites must develop and apply a superior will and our own message applied eternally to make even empires bend to it?

[RCavallius]

TOSIWR

What does that mean?

[Sieg]

The Only Solution Is White Revolution

[RCavallius]

TOSIWR

What does that mean?

The Only Solution Is White Revolution

Ah. Is that from Tom Metzger?

[Sieg]

TOSIWR

What does that mean?

The Only Solution Is White Revolution

Ah. Is that from Tom Metzger?

No, that's from me.

[Will Williams]

What does that mean?

The Only Solution Is White Revolution

Ah. Is that from Tom Metzger?

No, that's from me.

That truth has been around for a long time, but it's good to see it as our acronym.

I adapted one from what long time NA member once told me: TISSSOT.

[RCavallius]

That truth has been around for a long time, but it's good to see it as our acronym.

I adapted one from what long time NA member once told me: TISSSOT.

You've got me there, Chairman. What's it mean?