Doing Right for the Right Reasons 8-7-21

Post Reply
User avatar
Grimork
Posts: 669
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2020 4:34 pm
Location: North Carolina

Doing Right for the Right Reasons 8-7-21

Post by Grimork » Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:38 am

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/08/do ... t-reasons/
American Dissident Voices broadcast of 7 August, 2021

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WHEN Alexander Kinyua immigrated as a child to the US along with his family in the 1990s from the African country of Kenya, his family’s story developed into what reads like a puff piece for open borders put out by AOC or the ADL. By 2012, Alexander Kinyua’s father Antony had become a professor at Baltimore’s Morgan State University, one of those so-called “HBCUs” or “historically Black colleges and universities.” Alexander Kinyua himself was an engineering student there. Clearly these are exceptionally bright Black people, the genetic and cultural cream of the crop.

But then again, there is regression to the mean, a very real genetic phenomenon I’ve talked about on this program before. Take two very exceptional geniuses of any race, a man and a woman. If they marry and have children, even though it is likely that their children will be above average for their race, it is also quite unlikely that their offspring will be as intelligent, as exceptional, as either parent. In other words, the qualities of the children of exceptional parents — on average, there are always exceptions — fall towards the mean level of their race for whatever quality is being measured. This is true of height, of personality traits, and of intelligence. It’s true of every heritable characteristic.

So, though we’d have to agree that Alexander Kinyua’s father showed above-average quality for a Black African (and it’s likely his mother did as well), Alexander Kinyua himself had qualities that fell toward the mean for Blacks.

Alexander Kinyua showed typical Black impulsiveness, violence, and hair-trigger rage. He was arrested for assaulting his roommate, Joshua Ceasar, in 2012 at the Morgan State University dormitory where he lived. It was a severe attack, as evidenced by the charges filed against him, which were “1st Degree Assault and Excessive Endangerment of Life” and later, attempted murder — in other words, he almost killed the student who lived with him. In fact, Kinyua wrapped a baseball bat in barbed wire, clearly showing premeditation and preparation since that’s something that can’t be done in two seconds on the spur of the moment, then struck Ceasar again and again with the improvised weapon, leaving him legally blind.

But Kinyua’s father was a respected professor and member of the local upper-crust of the Black community. He was an important figure at Morgan State. With the help of an appeal on Facebook, Kinyua’s family and supporters were able to raise the $220,000 to get him out on bail.

And, while he was out on bail, Kinyua killed and ate a family friend. Yes, you heard correctly. He murdered and then cannibalized a sometimes “African doctoral candidate” (he’d last attended classes in 2008) who was also an illegal immigrant, Kujoe Bonsafo Agyei-Kodie, who was staying at Kinyua’s home. Kinyua ate Agyei-Kodie’s heart and part of his brain, cutting up his remains and putting some of the parts he didn’t eat into tins in his basement, where they were found by his brother. The rest of Agyei-Kodie was found in a dumpster at a local church.

KInyua was to be charged with first degree murder, but that case fell apart when Kinyua’s attorneys used the “mental illness” defense used so often by violent Black defendants. They cited some wild rants Kinyua had put up on his Facebook account, in which he claimed that Blacks at HBCUs were victims of a genocidal racist conspiracy and that a “bloodbath” was coming, and some friends claimed he talked about aliens and reptilians, and all of this was enough to get Kinyua off. (Even though I would say that his rants aren’t much crazier than those of the “Pharaohs Were Black” and “Black Hebrew Israelite” crowds.) He’s in what is called a mental health facility and is required to take what are called anti-psychotic medications, and, if the psychiatric priesthood decide that these medications have “cured” him, he will eventually go completely free.

It’s easy to pull off the “mentally ill” defense for Blacks — or, really, I should say for clever Jewish attorneys working for Blacks. It’s easy because the common behavior of Congoids with an average IQ of around 85 — or around 70 for Africans without non-Black admixture — can be pretty irrational at times by White standards. Their simple consciousness is easily persuaded of conspiracy theories and superstitions that are just ludicrous, too. Their impulsiveness and volatility often makes no rational sense. And these are just normal conditions for them. So the mentally deficient/mentally ill route is a great way to evade punishment, as what are considered diagnosable mental defects affecting no more than one per cent. of our race are far, far more common in them.

Now, I know that most Blacks aren’t cannibals, but it’s a fact that Blacks have a cannibalism problem. Endemic cannibalism among Africans was widely reported by European explorers in the last several centuries. And even though Jews and multiracialists tried to deny cannibalism’s persistence in Africa (and in New Guinea, where an equally primitive race dwells) back in the 1980s before the wide availability of the Internet exposed their lies, cannibalism still very much exists there. It vaulted into the headlines during the Liberian civil war, and just a few months ago a Liberian warlord/cannibal was sentenced after being arrested and tried in Switzerland of all places, where he’d been hiding out for years after fleeing from the hellhole that his people created. Among other things, Alieu Kosia was convicted of cutting out his enemies’ hearts, slicing them into strips, and eating them. And Kosia is far from the only cannibal warlord of Liberia. Just check out the Vice video documentary on that country — if the Jews haven’t deep-sixed it yet — if you really want to pursue the subject. Believing that eating the body parts of their fellow Blacks gives them superhuman strength is a common belief among them. Just as in many parts of Africa, where AIDS is rampant, the belief that raping a virgin child can give you immunity from the disease is fairly widespread too. Or that eating the corpse of an albino Congoid can give you magical powers.

Consider regression to the mean, and then consider the wisdom of mixing with such creatures — and regressing as a society to that particular mean.

But regression to the mean is not my main point today.

Doing right for the right reasons is my main point.

It’s right, of course, for the rest of us to be protected from the Alieu Kosias and Alexander Kinyuas of this world. And therefore it’s right that they be behind a very strong and secure wall so that they can never come into contact with us or our families. So putting them behind bars was right.

But were the officials who put them behind bars doing so for the right reasons? No, they were not. The whole legal system and the beliefs behind it operate on a basis that might be appropriate for an all-White society, such as the one we used to have in the United States and they used to have in Switzerland — a system that carefully weighs and measures the choices and actions made by each individual, and, after carefully considering — sometimes for years — the rights and arguments of the accused, judges those choices and actions and, if appropriate, administers punishment (or, in Kinyua’s case, drug treatments).

Such a system is forbidden to consider the racial/genetic group to which the accused belongs. Such a system would be structurally unable to consider that an invasion of a dangerous, hostile, and alien group has occurred, and that the “crimes” being dealt with are consequences of that invasion. And not only does the structure of the system forbid a recognition of the real state of affairs, so also the administrators of the system — and many of the public called upon to serve as jurors and who in some cases elect the judges and prosecutors and administrators — have been inculcated with the idea that it is “morally wrong” to admit that an invasion has taken place, “morally wrong” for Whites to even think of themselves as having their own society or even having their own interests.

This kind of thinking even infects almost all “conservatives” and Trump-types who oppose the open borders policies that allow the likes of Kinyua to come to America. They’ll insist that we need “vetting” to “keep out illegal alien criminals.” That’s why we need a wall, they’ll say, so we can “vet” the new arrivals properly before letting the best of them in through — to quote Trump himself — the “big beautiful door” they’ll build into the wall. And they’re so proud and happy, almost in ecstasy, to judge by their faces, when they can tell us of the “success stories” of Blacks or other non-Whites who “achieved the American dream” after legally immigrating and being properly “vetted.” They are so eager to tell us that their opposition to open borders is not based on race.

But “vetting” wouldn’t have stopped electrical engineering student Alexander Kinyua from coming to the US. “Vetting” can’t stop non-Whites, even the most cultured and intelligent ones, from serving their own interests and working against ours. And individual prosecutions of violent non-White criminals, both invaders and those who are descendants of freed slaves, is not able to keep up with their crimes. The US already has nearly, or actually, the highest incarceration rate in the world, and still the streets of our center cities are not safe for White women and children — or even for the non-Whites themselves. What is happening in America is not a “crime wave.” It is an invasion. It is a hostile takeover through higher birthrates. It is a capitulation to the invasion and takeover of our country by a corrupt leadership — and a malevolent Jewish elite, bent on genocide, that buys them. It calls for a military response, not a legal one. But our military, like our wealth and our cities and our freedom, has been taken from us.

Yes, we need Alexander Kinyua and his ilk on the other side of a wall. Not just a prison wall. Not just a border wall, though we need that too. The wall of a thousand miles of ocean is the absolute minimum that we need to keep Kinyua and his kind, and the other even more dangerous kind that opened the borders to him in the first place, the Jews, away from ourselves, our wives, our sons and daughters, forevermore — so that we can have a society of our own again, under a government that serves us and us alone with no pretense of “serving everyone” in a multiracial cesspool.

Doing that would be doing right. And, unlike the pathetic weak responses of the I’m-not-a-racist conservatives, it is doing right for the right reasons. That’s what the National Alliance stands for. It’s about time you joined us.

Post Reply