The Essence -- 4/4/2015

Post Reply
Cosmotheist

The Essence -- 4/4/2015

Post by Cosmotheist » Sat Apr 04, 2015 8:58 am

The Essence

Image
American Dissident Voices broadcast of April 4, 2015
by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast


IF WE are going to survive, that means that we have to decide who “we” are. That’s so basic, so obvious, so essential that it’s amazing how few people give much thought to it.

The Blacks have very little trouble deciding who they are. They know at a glance. They know by instinct. And, primitive as they may be, they are racially-minded to a degree that White folks would envy, if White folks had an ounce of sense. What do you think Ferguson was all about? What do you think bloc voting is all about? Race comes first for them — and they feel it in their bones.

Similarly, the Nation of Aztlan folks know who is one of their own, and who isn’t. They call all White folks “colonizers” — even Spanish-speaking Whites — and they say that North America is their continent, not ours. They demand territory — exclusive territory — so their race can have food and living space and self-government. They may differ on economics and on the ideal social structure they’d like to see in the new nation they intend to carve out of the United States. But they all agree that they need to carve out that nation — and they all agree that that nation will belong to their race and their race alone. That’s essential. Everything else is debatable. Racial identity is paramount. They are a race which intends to survive.

Similarly, East Asian peoples have a very strong sense of peoplehood. They maintain their racial integrity, and there is a vanishingly small percentage of non-Asian immigration to their homelands. They know who they are. With almost no exceptions, they define themselves in terms of ancestry — reverence for one’s ancestors is a powerful tradition among Asians — and the genetic integrity of their nations is secure.

But ask a few White Americans or Europeans to define their people — to define who “we” are — and you will get such a mass of contradictory answers that you’ll quickly give up on getting any consistent response to your question. You’ll probably get more rational answers from other races if you ask them to define who we are. Other races have long — and quite rationally — regarded the White West as a racial and cultural unity.

Part of White confusion about who we are is no doubt due to the omnipresent propaganda of the Jewish-controlled media and educational establishments, which says that “race does not exist,” that racial mixing is desirable, and that White identity is the sine qua non of all evil in the world. This propaganda undoubtedly does real damage to White psyches, and to innocent young White souls. And the promoters of such propaganda deserve whatever measures it takes to stop their hateful lies. But their propaganda does not fully explain the confusion of Whites about their identity.

Part of the confusion about our identity is religious in nature.

In the dying, decadent days of the majestic Classical civilization created by our race, the indigenous religion of that civilization was defeated, destroyed, and supplanted by Christianity — which had originally sprung from Jewish roots, and then spread among the slave population to the increasingly cosmopolitan and proletarian citizenry. In a couple of centuries, Christianity became the state religion of Rome. When healthier White tribes from the north invaded and eventually occupied Rome, many were undoubtedly awed by the culture, technology, architecture, and monumental art of the defeated Empire. They mistakenly associated these great achievements of our race with the recently-adopted religion of Christianity, and naturally the chief Christian priest, or Pope, of Rome, anxious to preserve the wealth and power of his institution, did not disabuse them of this misconception. Thus many of the relatively uncultured northern invaders, overawed by the remnants of Rome’s grandeur and greatness, were converted to a belief in what they thought was the god of the men who had built this astonishing city.

In addition to these sincere conversions, there were other sincere conversions based on a true belief in the Westernized Christian doctrines eventually preached all over Europe; or on the qualities of the Christians’ Bible, which, unlike the more poetic and fanciful Classical or related Nordic myths, claimed to be an accurate historical record of events that actually happened in the real world. (It is true, of course, that the Classical religion gave birth to some of the most profound philosophies that the world has ever seen, but these were of interest primarily to an elite minority of a ruling class that was already in steep decline when pure power politics allied itself with the rising Semitic cult and seized power. They had no power and probably close to zero visibility by the time Rome fell. All the remaining Roman philosophy schools had been ordered closed by the Christians in 529 AD, and most of their learning was lost forever.) And it is commonplace knowledge that many conversions were made by the sword, and that thousands were killed who would not submit.

Over a few centuries, Christianity achieved what no other religion had done before. It brought all Europe and almost all of our race under one religion — a remarkable achievement, which had many benefits, not the least of which was a realization of cultural unity and a doctrinal basis to unite all White tribes against common racial enemies, who naturally also had alien religions. It was under the banner of Christianity that Charles Martel defeated the Muslims at Tours and that the Moors were finally expelled from Europe by the troops of Ferdinand and Isabella.

With geographic Europe, and racial Europe, almost universally Christian, Europe became Christendom. And, for all practical purposes, the White race thought of itself as Christendom. And, although in a diminished sense, many of us still think that way today.

Even Lawrence Brown, author of the thought-provoking work The Might of the West, defined “us” as the descendants of those who were Catholic in 1492, with some additions, also Christian.

It’s hard not to be emotionally moved by the racially healthy aspects of Christian ritual and culture: the all-White children’s choir singing Mozart’s Requiem or the intensely spiritual works of Bach or Handel; the magnificent Gothic cathedral or the white country church at the foot of the mountain; the upright moral folk who peopled the vastness of the American plains and made the greatest Republic in history. I am moved by these things myself.

But these things are in their essence more White than they are Christian. Without the White race, they could never have existed, even if Christianity had taken root among other races. The source of Mozart’s music and the vast arches, lights, and spaces of Gothic temples was not in doctrine, not in scripture, but in our genes. That is one reason we must define ourselves in racial terms — in genetic terms — or we and everything we built and everything we love will die.

That is why White Christians must put race first, above even their beloved religion. They must agree with other White nationalists that what we are is White, what we are is the European race, what we are is defined in biological terms and that what we are fighting for is the survival of that racial heritage and the culture that our race created and that it alone can sustain and move forward to its destiny. Race comes first. Race is how we must define ourselves. Whites of other religions are still “us.” Non-Whites, even if they share our religious beliefs, can never be “us.” Any other approach is suicide.

Defining ourselves in religious terms would mean that 1) Koreans and Jews, et cetera, who convert to our religion are “us” too and 2) that most Mexicans, for example, are “us” now.

That’s giving up the game, lying down, and accepting racial death. If, a thousand years from now, some part-Whites survive and they practice Christianity, that’s defeat. Not victory. It would be no better than defining ourselves in civic-nationalist terms: If a few part-Whites survive and call themselves “Americans,” that’s defeat too. It’s death.

Our race not only existed before Christianity existed — making it impossible for that to be our defining characteristic — but we existed before any known religion came into being.

Before Darwin and Mendel and Crick and Watson, we may not have known our distant history or the physical mechanism behind our identity as Whites. Before the rise of Jewish power in the 20th century, we may not have seen clearly that the Jews are a profoundly alien intrusion into our nations.

But we did feel something in our souls — in our blood, if you will — that made us recognize our racial identity and racial unity. The United States Congress in 1790 did make being “a free White person” a requirement for becoming a citizen of the United States, a legal requirement which remained in force for 162 years. The founders of this nation saw what was essential, and acted on it. They had an implicit White racial consciousness that was made explicit in the laws of the land — though we can see clearly now that it was not explicit enough.

Unfortunately, the founders had little or no conception of the non-White nature of the Jew, and that was the one flaw that allowed the mass immigration of Jews in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. And that alien (and racially conscious) group proceeded to use all of its cleverness and all of its wealth to destroy the nascent racial consciousness of Whites, and to erase the laws of our forefathers which protected our race from non-White immigration and intermarriage.

Some have argued that identifying ourselves as Christians might have prevented the mistakes of considering Jews to be White and of allowing them free access to our society — but I do not agree with that position. As in Spain 500 years ago, Jews could just have had themselves sprinkled with ‘holy water’ and claimed to believe in the right doctrines, and the religious barrier could have been easily overcome. And furthermore, the Jewish connection to Christianity has most often worked in the Jews’ favor, making religious and secular Christian leaders alike view them with misplaced sympathy — or, as in the case of the insane Christian Zionists, with outright worship.

The exalted beauty (dare I say Whiteness?) of the religious services I talked about, or the lovely and moving Easter service at a New England church a respected lady told me about in a recent letter, could only exist in a White world. If our people had never taken up the cross and had remained true to the Eleusinian Mysteries and the pantheon of Hellas, if Pan or Freya were still invoked in the forest temples of our homelands — our cathedrals would be just as beautiful, our children’s choirs just as angelic, our Eostre rituals just as life-affirming, our love of Nature’s God just as pure — or purer.

But non-Whites, no matter what their creed, are incapable of these things: They do not possess our spiritual essence. One thinks of Black churches and their very different, if no less sincere, ambience and spirituality.

I do not advocate a return to the old religions — far from it. But the key to our spirituality — the key to what we are — is within ourselves, and is therefore within our genes. It is not found in any creed we inherited from other peoples, or one that can be adopted by anybody.

We must regain a sense of racial consciousness, which is the heritage of the old America and the founders, and we must refine it with the lessons we have learned in the last century. We desperately need to regain that sense of identity again. Beliefs can change in a decade or even in a moment. We Whites must change our beliefs — that’s for sure. But they cannot define who we are. We cannot define ourselves in any way which allows the racial alien to claim to “convert” by reciting a few words and “become” one of us. We’ve been down that road and learned that lesson. Our identity must be based not on what we believe, as important as that may be. It must be based on what we actually are. Only then can what we are — our defining essence and the source of all that we create and love, and all that our descendants will create and love in the future — survive and achieve its destiny.
* * *
You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. You can join and support us by visiting natall.com — or write to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Cosmotheist

Re: The Essence

Post by Cosmotheist » Sat Apr 04, 2015 10:06 am

Hello Folks,

"Our identity must be based not on what we believe, as important as that may be.
It must be based on what we actually are. Only then can what we are — our defining
essence and the source of all that we create and love, and all that our descendants
will create and love in the future — survive and achieve its destiny."
--KAS

Actually, this question of our identity must not be based upon this false dichotomy of either/or
but only properly and correctly and realistically and far more effectively upon both/and, or upon
the Whole.

In other words, both what we are all physically, genetically, and racially,
must resonate within us all as Whites, with what we all believe, spiritually.
That is the essence of our Aryan Faustian Cosmotheism and it is the task of
the National Alliance
.


It is the Whole of a Unity, that really matters, both as individuals, and as being part of that Whole.
Our being a part of the White Race, or of the Whole, of which of being is of the White Race alone.

As it is above, so it is below, and from every cell in your own body, to every atom in the Cosmos,
it's all a unified Whole that strives all within itself towards self-realization and ever higher being
and consciousness. The Whole is always greater than is the sum of its individual parts, and both
as in your own self, as being within the Race, and as the Race, as being all within the Cosmos.

That is why that any true Cosmotheists do work for ALL HIGHER LIFE and thus for ALL of the
COSMOS, as a unified WHOLE, ever towards the Self-realization of the Creator, or Godhood.

Best regards,
Cosmotheist

Image

Thomas Dixon Jr

Re: The Essence

Post by Thomas Dixon Jr » Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:03 am

Another Great ADV today --- I look forward to Saturday's.

Hopefully, you are seeing an increase in internet traffic going into National Vanguard site and the National Alliance site. I re-blog ADV very often.

Are there plans to link in old ADVs or make the NATALL.COM a better experience?

For the "least sophisticated" or someone that is very very new to being awakened the NA website does have huge potential to keep people coming back and enhance them having a sense of home or belonging.

The style and look of NATALL.COM is great and very professional, it would be interesting to find out what attracts people to sites and encourage them to learn more and how make a commitment for their future. Just some thoughts.....

permela

WHY ARE THE RACES SO DIFFERENT FROM EACH OTHER?

Post by permela » Sun Apr 05, 2015 5:02 pm

I listen to Kevin's excellent broadcasts every week and wish that more Aryans had time to do so.

Kevin wrote:
IF WE are going to survive, that means that we have to decide who “we” are.
(as a race).
--

WHY ARE THE RACES SO DIFFERENT FROM EACH OTHER?

According to https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=race, a race is
an interbreeding, usually geographically isolated population of organisms differing from other populations of the same species in the frequency of hereditary traits


The Aryan race is physically, mentally and spiritually so different from the Negro and other races because of the different social, geographic, etc. environments in which it has evolved since the last common ancestor (y-LCA) of all races lived.
--

WHEN DID THE LAST COMMON ANCESTOR OF ALL MANKIND LIVE?

I read at http://www.cell.com/AJHG/abstract/S0002-9297(13)00073-6:
We report the discovery of an African American Y chromosome that carries the ancestral state of all SNPs that defined the basal portion of the Y chromosome phylogenetic tree. We sequenced ∼240 kb of this chromosome to identify private, derived mutations on this lineage, which we named A00. We then estimated the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for the Y tree as 338 thousand years ago (kya) (95% confidence interval = 237–581 kya). Remarkably, this exceeds current estimates of the mtDNA TMRCA, as well as those of the age of the oldest anatomically modern human fossils.
--

WHERE DID THE LAST COMMON ANCESTOR OF ALL MANKIND LIVE?

The ancestors of all mankind lived in Africa's equatorial rain forest and had body hair as long and dark as a Bonobo's for camouflage and warmth during the penultimate glacial period, and skin as fair as any Nordic, sheared mammal or plucked bird. All races evolved less body hair after the extremely hot Eemian (~130 KYA) began. Fair-skinned Africans who continued to live in dark forests compensated by evolving (irreversibly) dark skin for camouflage.

Some "scientists" claim that races that have always lived in forests, e.g., Pygmies, evolved dark skin for protection from cancer even though the rain forest canopy
cut off almost all the ultraviolet light and prevented it from reaching the forest floor
According to http://julianodea.blogspot.com/2009/12/ ... orest.html.

Pygmies are exposed to so little sunlight that they should be as fair as Nordics according to the vitamin D theory. That generations of Americans have been taught this nonsense shows how biased, conformist and mentally deficient some people have been.
--

WHERE DID THE LAST COMMON ANCESTOR OF ALL EURASIANS LIVE?

The Aryan and all other Eurasian races descend from the savage hunter-gatherers who emigrated from Africa's equatorial rain forest to the Sahel in order to obtain more protein after the penultimate glacial period ended ~150 KYA. They retained their fair skin because it is better camouflage in a savanna, and reflects the heat of the sun (see how skin color affects the performance of shirtless ditch diggers of various races when the sun suddenly appears from behind the clouds on a sweltering day). The Cro-Magnons of Europe and all of the other non-Aryan Eurasians have darker skin than Aryans because their ancestors evolved in a forest for tens of thousands of years after they left the Sahel.
--

WHERE DID THE CRO-MAGNON RACE EVOLVE AFTER IT LEFT THE SAHEL?

The Crô-Magnon race settled in the forests of Europe, and therefore evolved darker skin for tens of thousands of years after it left the Sahel (Mongoloids and other races had left the Sahel tens of thousands of years earlier than the
Crô-Magnon race, and occupied the other forested parts of Eurasia).

The Aryan farmers who immigrated from the Fertile Crescent to SOUTHERN Europe during the Neolithic took the land and women of the Crô-Magnon hunter-gatherers so their descendants have Crô-Magnon mitochondrial DNA and darker skin than northern European Aryans (miscegenation between Crô-Magnons and Aryans eventually caused southern European civilizations to collapse).
--

WHERE DID THE ARYAN RACE EVOLVE AFTER IT LEFT THE SAHEL?

That the Aryan race has fairer skin than any other race is proof that it did not evolve in a forest for tens of thousands of years after it left the Sahel. Aryans have tall, slender physiques, dolichocephalic heads, scant body hair and fair skin that blushes, etc. because they are a heat-adapted race that evolved in the sunny and devastatingly drought-prone:
1) Sahel after mankind lost the long body hair that provided camouflage, etc. in Africa's equatorial rain forest until the hot Eemian began.
2) Levant during the Late Pleistocene.
If the Aryan race had evolved in Central Asia for tens of thousands of years during the last glaciation it would have become cold-adapted.

According to http://www.cell.com/AJHG/abstract/S0002-9297(13)00073-6,
The relative contributions to modern European populations of Paleolithic hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers from the Near East have been intensely debated. Haplogroup R1b1b2 (R-M269) is the commonest European Y-chromosomal lineage, increasing in frequency from east to west, and carried by 110 million European men... The distribution of this lineage, the diversity within it, and estimates of its age all suggest that it spread with farming from the Near East. Taken with evidence on the origins of other lineages, this indicates that most European Y chromosomes descend from Near Eastern farmers... Previous studies suggested a Paleolithic origin, but here we show that the geographical distribution of its microsatellite diversity is best explained by spread from a single source in the Near East via Anatolia during the Neolithic ...
According to the Wikipedia article about HG R1b1a2 (a.k.a. R-M269) at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R1b_(Y-DNA),
the distribution of R1b STR variance in Europe forms a cline from east to west, which is more consistent with an entry into Europe from Western Asia with the spread of farming... "The frequency is about 71% in Scotland, 70% in Spain and 60% in France. In south-eastern England the frequency of this clade is about 70%; in parts of the rest of north and western England, Spain, Portugal, Wales and Ireland, it is as high as 90%; and in parts of north-western Ireland it reaches 98%.
Swiss scientists who work at iGENEA (Family Tree DNA's European affiliate) revealed that Hamitic Pharaoh Tutankhamun (~1333 BC) belongs to Celtic HG R1b1a2 (despite the Egyptian government's efforts to keep the results of his DNA tests secret). Censors removed this evidence (2011 DNA research) from Wikipedia's article about Tutankhamun's racial identity. See http://af.reuters.com/article/egyptNews ... 01?sp=true
--

WHY DID SO MANY ARYANS MIGRATE FROM THE FERTILE CRESCENT TO EURASIA?

Aryan farmers could not compete with the herdsmen and Crô-Magnon, etc. hunter-gatherers of Eurasia until after their population had increased and they had developed superior technologies, (e.g., iron weapons). Many Aryan farmers fled to southern Europe and India via Anatolia during the millennia in which genocidal Semitc herdsmen (e.g., Hyksos) plundered, dispossessed, conquered and enslaved them.

About 4 KYA Hyksos and other Bedouin herdsmen drove most Whites from the Fertile Crescent into Eurasia, where their nations and civilization became the most secure, prosperous and economically and militarily dominant worldwide for millennia despite the curse of the alien religion that was savagely imposed on them, and the insanity that has ensued ever since. See https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s ... on=NIV;OJB

Some Whites (e.g., the Kurds and Yazidis) never left the Fertile Crescent, are still being terrorized and holocausted, and could have a state of their own if it were recognized, e.g., as Israel was in 1948. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazidis#Pe ... .28ISIS.29

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_o ... #The_enemy:
Joshua "carries out a systematic campaign against the civilians of Canaan — men, women and children — that amounts to genocide." In doing this he is carrying out herem as commanded by Yahweh in Deuteronomy 20:17: "You shall not leave alive anything that breathes." The purpose is to drive out and dispossess the Canaanites, with the implication that there are to be no treaties with the enemy, no mercy, and no intermarriage. "The extermination of the nations glorifies Yahweh as a warrior and promotes Israel's claim to the land," while their continued survival "explores the themes of disobedience and penalty and looks forward to the story told in Judges and Kings." The divine call for massacre at Jericho and elsewhere can be explained in terms of cultural norms (Israel wasn't the only Iron Age state to practice herem) and theology (a measure to ensure Israel's purity as well as the fulfillment of God's promise), but Patrick D. Miller in his commentary on Deuteronomy remarks, "there is no real way to make such reports palatable to the hearts and minds of contemporary readers and believers.
According to https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s ... on=KJV;OJB:
1 Kings 9:20-22King James Version (KJV)
20 And all the people that were left of the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, which were not of the children of Israel,
21 Their children that were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel also were not able utterly to destroy, upon those did Solomon levy a tribute of bondservice unto this day.
Semitic terrorists deprived the farmers of the peace and security that they needed in order to produce and harvest their food. The farmers who immigrated from the Fertile Crescent to the un-forested parts of Asia could not compete with herdsmen unless they became herdsmen too.
--

WHY ARE ARYANS MORE CIVILIZED THAN THE DESCENDANTS OF HUNTER-GATHERERS AND HERDSMEN?

• 1) The Whites who remained in the arid Fertile Crescent quickly depleted its scarce game, survived by eating the seeds of grasses, and during the next tens of thousands of years evolved from savage hunter-gatherers into peaceful, respectful and law-abiding farmers from whom had been bred the survival instincts needed to compete with their less domesticated cousins. Acute periods of desiccation throughout the interglacial known as the Holocene caused famines and motivated some farmers to immigrate from the Fertile Crescent into the abandoned parts of Europe from which the LGM (Last Glacial Maximum) had driven Crô-Magnons.

• 2) Permanent settlements, law enforcement, insulation from gene pools with high crime rates, selective breeding and domestication of plants, animals and themselves, etc. for many hundreds of generations made these Indo-Hittite speaking nations prosperous, populous, powerful, peaceful, law-abiding, secure, beautiful, compassionate and human enough to:
◦ a) Create the first civilization over ten thousand years ago.
◦ b) Conquer and colonize Europe, Australia, part of South America before Columbus, etc.
◦ c) Feel guilty enough to become the slave of mankind, and to commit racial suicide (this self-hating race will soon be demographically extinct).
◦ d) Build and maintain the infrastructure that might stop an asteroid from destroying Life on this planet.
--

BRITISH ISRAELISM

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Is ... _standards:
British Israelism (also called Anglo-Israelism) is a doctrine based on the hypothesis that people of Western European descent, particularly those in Great Britain, are the direct lineal descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. . . The central tenets of British Israelism have been refuted by evidence from modern genetic, linguistic, archaeological and philological research. The doctrine continues, however, to have a significant number of adherents.
--

Image

A Partial tree of Indo-Hittite languages is shown in the image above from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages. Canaan was the father of "... Heth [ancestor of the Hittites ...]" according to https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s ... on=EXB;CJB. Branches are in order of first attestation; those to the left are Centum, those to the right are Satem. Languages in red are extinct. White labels indicate categories / un-attested proto-languages. Did this linguistic tree begin branching before or after R1b families settled in the forests of Palestine ~20 KYA?

Where did all Indo-European languages originate? "... southern Turkey, as the most plausible origin — a region that had also been proposed as the origin of Indo-European by the archaeologist Colin Renfrew, in 1987, because it was the source from which agriculture spread to Europe." See http://www.sciencemag.org/content/337/6097/957.abstract and http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/24/scien ... html?_r=2&
--

WHY HAVE OUR EXPLOITERS FALSIFIED THE HISTORY, PRE-HISTORY AND IDENTITY OF THE ARYAN RACE?

Listen to Kevin's broadcasts about this subject.

permela

DO ARYANS AND NEGROES BELONG TO THE SAME SPECIES?

Post by permela » Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:29 am

permela wrote:According to https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=race, a race is
an interbreeding, usually geographically isolated population of organisms differing from other populations of the same species in the FREQUENCY of hereditary traits
Are Negroes and Aryans completely different species according to this definition?

Which animal or plant populations have evolved independently from each other for 338 thousand years without becoming independent species? Name a few if you can.

Do Negroes have blond hair, blue eyes, and fair skin less frequently than Aryans? NO Negro has ever had any of these hereditary traits. Mulattoes, i.e., "african americans" rarely have any of these hereditary traits.

I doubt that any Aryan has ever had some of the:
1) Spiritual, mental and physical characteristics of Negroes, and vice versa.
2) Cranial and skeletal features that Negroes have, and vice versa.
3) Dental features that Negroes have, and vice versa.

It is true that Aryans and Negroes differ from each other in the frequency of some hereditary traits, e.g. Negro crime rates are far higher than Aryan crime rates. See http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=57c_1336487670. Negroes are also far more likely to have certain diseases than Aryans, and vice versa.

Please respond to this message if you can think of:
Any other hereditary traits that Negroes have more frequently than Aryans, and vice versa.
Any reason why anyone can in good conscience think of Aryans and Negroes as belonging to the same species.

User avatar
Kevin Alfred Strom
Site Admin
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:02 pm
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: The Essence

Post by Kevin Alfred Strom » Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:32 am

Good points, Permela. Clearly, Blacks (and Australoids, separately) are more different from the other races than the other races are from each other.

What is most interesting to me are two facts:

1) Australoids have similar primitive traits to Congoids, and can often even be mistaken for Congoids, yet they are very genetically different from them. This indicates to me that both are survivals of pre-human races, perhaps with just enough ancient gene flow from bordering advanced races to make language, tool use, and (unfortunately) interbreeding possible. Quite likely, all the human races, from proto-Blacks to proto-Europeans, were similarly primitive (even if already divergent) 300,000 years ago. But then something radical happened to non-Blacks -- and left the Blacks behind.

2) Blacks have far more genetic diversity than the other, more advanced races. This indicates to me that Asians, Whites, and Semites (or whatever common ancestor they had) all went through some unknown catastrophic event that selected for higher intelligence and other advanced features -- and which also greatly reduced their ancestral population, perhaps almost to zero.

So there is some merit in thinking of Blacks and Australoids as separate species, and Asians and Whites as subspecies of a larger species. But the main thing that should concern us is not where these somewhat arbitrary lines are drawn in anthropology textbooks. Instead, let us do what is necessary to take charge of our own future evolution: We must become a new people, a new kind of Man, and leave not only the Blacks, the Congoids, the Semites, and the Asians behind -- but put ourselves on the path which will place our consciousness as far above da Vinci's as da Vinci's is above a mouse's.

Cosmotheist

Re: The Essence

Post by Cosmotheist » Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:58 am

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

Quite likely, all the human races, from proto-Blacks to proto-Europeans, were similarly primitive (even if already divergent) 300,000 years ago. But then something radical happened to non-Blacks -- and left the Blacks behind.

Indeed. And that "something radical" that "happened to non-Blacks" was most likely the Ice Ages,
or of which covered much of N.Europe, N. North America, and N Asia but it left Sub-Sahara Africa
and Australia virtually untouched. Dr. Pierce once said this and I think others also have and I also
think that this is really the most likely and is the most plausible evolutionary cause for all this
lack of development of and by the Blacks.

"I believe that the groups that remained in the tropics simply did not evolve as rapidly as those that migrated to the northern hemisphere. The northern peoples had to deal with severe seasonal changes in climate, and the sorts of attitudes and behaviors that sufficed in the tropics simply wouldn’t keep you alive in northern Europe eons ago. There was a much more rigorous selection process in this kind of challenging environment.

The result was that whites evolved further. We developed certain faculties to a greater extent than blacks did. Evolutionary development, and particularly racial differences, is a basic idea behind Cosmotheism."

--Dr. William Luther Pierce
See:
http://nationalvanguard.org/2013/07/dis ... smotheism/

Best regards,
Cosmotheist

Image

PS--What we must do now is to act as the glaciers had done,
except with knowledge and wisdom aforethought to advance
our Race in both consciousness and being towards Godhood.

"NOW WILL OUR FOLK BE FREE

Instauration... meditation... Aryan nation...
When will our folk be free?
Dragon boats sail... enemies pale... Victory hail... Dragon boats sail...
Soon will our Folk be free.
In the Northland... We will gather... evolution... near the glaciers...
Now will our Gods be free."---JP, Dresden, The Call of the Blood.

permela

TO LOVE OURSELVES WE HAVE TO KNOW OURSELVES & THE TRUTH

Post by permela » Wed Apr 08, 2015 6:13 am

I thank those who read and commented about what I wrote, and for the opportunity to address some of their issues and questions.
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:Good points, Permela. Clearly, Blacks (and Australoids, separately) are more different from the other races than the other races are from each other.
I agree that the Negro and Australoid races are more distantly related to Aryans than the Mongoloid, Semitic and Crô-Magnon races are related to Aryans. Each of these races is a separate species in my opinion.

When I refer to Aryans I am referring to the descendants of the heat adapted (fair-skinned, non-squat and far less hairy, etc.) Neolithic farmers who immigrated from the Fertile Crescent to Europe during the Holocene, i.e., AFTER the last glaciation. I am not referring to the cold-adapted (hairy, squat, darker-skinned, etc.) Crô-Magnon hunter gatherers and Neanderthals who inhabited Europe during its last glaciation (the Pleistocene), nor to their partly Aryan descendants.

The descendants of the heat adapted Aryan farmers who settled in northern Europe after the end of the last glaciation are so different in appearance from southern Europeans because they have less Crô-Magnon blood than southern Europeans. Southern European men can not shop in shoe and clothing stores in northern Europe (and Northern Europeans in southern Europe) because they have such different racial characteristics from Aryans (all of them the result of the different climatic, etc. environments in which they evolved, and many of them behavioral).
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:Blacks have far more genetic diversity
People who are euphemistically referred to as "black" and "african-americans" are actually mulattoes, not Negroes. There are many different races of African Negroes, some of them no more genetically related to each other than all Eurasian races are related to each other. If they practiced miscegenation, this would not be true. All races of Negroes have dark colored skin and kinky hair because all of them evolved in Africa's equatorial rain forest. Different tribes of Negroes can usually communicate with neighboring tribes via a common language, and each has its own distinct language. Each race is different from all of the other Negro races in appearance.

The most beautiful race of Negroes I ever saw was deep in the forest. All of the men had beautiful muscular bodies, were about seven feet tall, and seemed exceptionally intelligent and dignified. Their skin color was the deepest blue black color. All of them wore purple robes that hung loosely over their shoulders, but did not cover the large knife that was attached to the beautiful belt around their waists. The knife probably came in handy in case of an attack by the black leopards that live in the forest.

During a day long 40 K walk down a dirt road on which I saw no traffic, I saw a black leopard walking on a branch of a tree beside the road. It probably hunted animals that made use of that road. The leopard ignored me and disappeared after it gave me a careful look, so I felt safe. I built myself a flimsy cage nearby to sleep in that night in order to prevent a predator from touching my body without disturbing the walls. It was so completely black after the sun set that nothing could be seen.
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:This indicates to me that both are survivals of pre-human races
How human a race is depends on how human it behaves. The more civilized a race is the more human it is in my opinion. People who are no more domesticated, trustworthy and honorable than a wild bear are no more human than a wild bear according to my definition. See http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=57c_1336487670.

Neanderthals were not considered to be a human species (until recently?) even though they had 1600 cm3 brains, and might be brilliant scientists today if Crô-Magnons had not treated them as inhumanely as Negroes have treated Pygmies. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Pygm ... f_genocide.

There may be something to the idea that survival in a harsh climate fosters higher intelligence: Neanderthals evolved in Europe many times longer than any other race (species of mankind) did. The Mongoloid race evolved in glaciated Eurasia many times longer than the Aryan race did, and are said to be more intelligent. The Aryan race spent no more than 10,000 years in Eurasia (the part referred to as the Fertile Crescent) before the Holocene. The forests of the Fertile Crescent were so small that none of the other Eurasian races remained there very long.

The skin of any race that evolves for tens of thousands of years in a dark forest will darken for camouflage. Southern Europeans have darker skin because Crô-Magnons and their half-breed descendants have spent at least 40,000 years in the forests of Europe, much of it during the LGM.

Australoids have dark skin because their ancestors left Africa over 100,000 years ago, and settled in the best forests of Asia (European Neanderthals could not be displaced at that time). Mongoloids were able to displace Australoids about 70 KYA because the Toba volcano had killed so many Australoids.

The Aryan race is the most heat-adapted and fair-skinned, and looks so different from other races, because it evolved in the relatively dry, hot, sunny and treeless Sahel far longer than any other race, and did not enter Europe until after the LGM. Aryans have relatively non-flat noses because they needed to humidify the dry air of the Sahel before it reached their lungs. The Semitic race has larger noses too because it evolved for so many tens of thousands of years in the hot, dry Arabian peninsula before Semites were able to conquer and dispossess the Aryans of the Fertile Crescent.

The Negro and Pygmy races are the least intelligent on earth because the ancestors of all of the other (e.g., Eurasian) races were intelligent enough and could communicate well enough to leave the safety of the equatorial rain forest in order secure a better source of protein (e.g., grass-eating ungulates). Having to compete with predators, e.g., lions, in the Sahel required superior intelligence and communications skills, and affected the evolution of all of the Eurasian races, especially that of the Aryan race, since the ancestors of the Aryan race did not leave the Sahel until the Last Glacial Maximum forced it to do so (the colder the global climate becomes, the less rainfall there is in the Sahel).

The Negro race would eventually become the most intelligent race on earth if only the most intelligent half of its population were allowed to reproduce itself each generation. That would not make the Negro race more civilized. Parasitic savages can never create or sustain a civilization no matter how intelligent and prosperous they become. No race loses its savage behavioral characteristics unless it is domesticated like any other animal that was bred to benefit people. Negroes would be no more civilized than Jews if they were as intelligent. They would not behave like Whites.
--

SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST

Natural selection ALWAYS makes people as savage as any animal. Everyone feels like stealing, raping or killing someone at least once during his life time. The more savage a person is the more likely he will do so. Only hundreds of generations of selective genetic breeding biologically domesticates or civilizes any species, i.e., reduces its intelligence and curtails the competitive survival instincts that make it more dangerous and less: trustworthy, honorable, trusting, easily exploited, and useful to people.

Some domesticated breeds and races:

1) Have therefore lost the intelligence and vital survival instincts that they need in order to compete with their wilder and faster procreating cousins). In multi-ethnic cities, races that are more intelligent and civilized are no match for those that have higher rates of birth and crime (religious beliefs compound this problem).

2) Can no longer live, work, etc. in their own secure neighborhoods, schools, etc. because of anti-White laws that are based on the insane assumption and religious conviction that the particular survival instincts that each individual and race inherits are not directly responsible for many of their antisocial behaviors, e.g., those of racially motivated rapists who are as entertaining, wealthy and widely known as ITOTKO Bill Cosby (and appear to be as lovable, intelligent and reasonable).
--

The Aryan race became the most powerful in the world because it is more civilized and honorable than any other race (it was domesticated for over 15 thousand years in the Fertile Crescent), not because it is the most intelligent or superior in any other way. Domestication reduces the intelligence of any animal.
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:Australoids have similar primitive traits to Congoids, and can often even be mistaken for Congoids, yet they are very genetically different from them.
The Australoid race is no more closely related to the Negro race than the Aryan race is. The longer Eurasian races evolved in a tropical rain forest the more they resemble the Negro race (kinky hair and dark skin).

The Aryan race is more heat adapted and looks so different from all of the other Eurasian races because it was the LAST to leave the Sahel, and never lived anywhere in Eurasia but the Fertile Crescent during the last glaciation. Survival in the drought prone Sahel during the last glaciation was far more difficult than survival anywhere in Eurasia. Otherwise the other Eurasian races would not have left the Sahel before the Aryans.

The reason that the Aryan race has the fairest skin is that the other races evolved in forests far longer, and needed darker skin for camouflage after they left the Sahel. The Australoid races evolved in the forests of Eurasia until the eruption of the Toba volcano decimated them. This gave the Mongoloid race the opportunity it needed to drive the Australoids into the fringes of Asia and off-shore.
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:But the main thing that should concern us is not where these somewhat arbitrary lines are drawn in anthropology textbooks. Instead, let us do what is necessary to take charge of our own future evolution: We must become a new people, a new kind of Man, and leave not only the Blacks, the Congoids, the Semites, and the Asians behind -- but put ourselves on the path which will place our consciousness as far above da Vinci's as da Vinci's is above a mouse's.
--

TO LOVE OURSELVES WE HAVE TO KNOW OURSELVES & THE TRUTH

The more the Aryan race understands:
A) The truth about its own glorious history and prehistory despite the deliberate lies of most of the owners of the media, and the authors of most its religious and text books, etc.
B) How different it is from all of the other races:
1) The less likely it will destroy itself and its civilization via miscegenation.
2) The more likely it will continue to evolve as it has since the common ancestor of all mankind lived.
3) Be able to prosper and survive in competition with its exploiters and the other races.

I thank Kevin for his wonderful broadcasts and look forward to them every week more than anything else.

Image

Post Reply