Fertile Crescent Origins of Aryans Scientifically Confirmed

Post Reply
permela

Fertile Crescent Origins of Aryans Scientifically Confirmed

Post by permela » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:38 pm

Why has it taken scientists so long to admit that Aryan farmers originated in the Fertile Crescent? Have they been afraid to do so for the same reason that historians are afraid to admit the truth about Jewish history during World War II, i.e, what David Irving has been telling them via the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxVq7JjjFMk?

Once Aryans realize that they worship a god who ordered Semites to enslave and to exterminate their race (as they are still trying to do ASAP), and that their ancestors were holocausted and driven out of the Fertile Crescent by Semites, will they be less likely to worship a Jew, and to vote for the governments that have been sending their soldiers and billions of dollars to help Israel to racially cleanse once again the territory that Israel claims was given to it by its genocidal god?

According to Genesis 10, there were only three branches of mankind.
10 Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth . . . These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.
1) The sons of Japheth inhabited "the isles of the Gentiles". They were the Cro-Magnon hunter-gatherers who inhabited Europe before the Last Glacial Maximum. After Semitic shepherds drove the Hamitic farmers who created the first civilization on earth out of the Fertile Crescent these Hamites took the land and women of the Cro-Magnons in order to create the first civilizations in southern Europe, e.g., Greek and Roman, in the same way that Europeans created their civilization in America a few generations ago by taking the land and women of American hunter-gatherers.

2) The "sons of Ham". HAMITES were the tribes of Mesopotamian, Canaanite, Hittite, Egyptian, etc. farmers who were enslaved, exterminated and driven out of the Fertile Crescent, i.e., the Indo-European speaking nations "who were spread abroad" (migrated from the Fertile Crescent to Eurasia via Anatolia). Farmers had a permanent food supply, homes and farms so they were an easily attacked, robbed and enslaved, especially after the highly mobile herdsmen acquired horses.

3) The sons of Shem, i.e., Semites were nomadic shepherds who brutally enslaved the Hamitic farmers of the Fertile Crescent, and now exploit their Aryan descendants in Europe, America, Australia, etc.

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Joshua#The_enemy
Joshua "carries out a systematic campaign against the civilians of Canaan — men, women and children — that amounts to genocide." In doing this he is carrying out herem as commanded by Yahweh in Deuteronomy 20:17: "You shall not leave alive anything that breathes". The purpose is to drive out and dispossess the Canaanites, with the implication that there are to be no treaties with the enemy, no mercy, and no intermarriage. "The extermination of the nations glorifies Yahweh as a warrior and promotes Israel's claim to the land," while their continued survival "explores the themes of disobedience and penalty and looks forward to the story told in Judges and Kings." The divine call for massacre at Jericho and elsewhere can be explained in terms of cultural norms (Israel wasn't the only Iron Age state to practice herem) and theology (a measure to ensure Israel's purity as well as the fulfillment of God's promise), but Patrick D. Miller in his commentary on Deuteronomy remarks, "there is no real way to make such reports palatable to the hearts and minds of contemporary readers and believers."
---------------
Our Exploiters' Propaganda
All of us probably remember how frequently the media once used stooges like Spencer Wells https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Wells to brainwash the public into believing that the common ancestor of all of the races of mankind lived only 50,000 years ago, i.e., that Whites and Negroes were really only "kissing cousins", even though no evidence for this conclusion ever existed.

According to http://www.cell.com/AJHG/abstract/S0002-9297(13)00073-6
We then estimated the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for the Y tree as 338 thousand years ago (kya) (95% confidence interval = 237–581 kya). Remarkably, this exceeds current estimates of the mtDNA TMRCA, as well as those of the age of the oldest anatomically modern human fossils.
The Jewish liars at Wikipedia are still trying to downplay (to only 270,000 years) the TMRCA between Negroes and the rest of humanity according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogrou ... omosome.29

Up-playing the TMRCA between Negroes and the rest of humanity to 581,000 years would be just as accurate. That would make Eurasians about as distantly related to Negroes as they are to Neanderthals.

If Negroes are no more closely related to Aryans than Neanderthals, will "scientists" have to start telling us that Neanderthals were human after all? My definition of "human" includes only civilized branches of mankind. If most of the members of a race behave like savages, how human can it be?
The Colonization of Europe
Heat-adapted Cro-Magnons migrated to the forests of Europe from the Sahel because of a stadial that occurred 40 to 50 KYA. They began to starve because game is less plentiful in the forests of Europe than in the African savanna. I suspect that Neanderthals would still inhabit northern Europe if Cro-Magnons had not eaten them.

All Aryans have a little Neanderthal DNA because a small percentage of Cro-Magnons mated with Neanderthals, and so many Aryan men and Cro-Magnon women had children.

The last stadial, a.k.a., the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), was the coldest and driest. It occurred between 26,500 and 19,000 years ago. The Sahara was hyper-arid about 23–14.5 kya. This drought nearly exterminated the part of the Hamitic race (Hg R1b and I) that remained in the Sahel, and forced part of it to migrate from the vicinity of Lake Chad to the Fertile Crescent about 18 KYA.

Global temperatures were so cold during the LGM that Cro-Magnons had to become cold adapted, and survived only in southern Europe. That is why southern Europeans are darker and more hairy and squat compared to heat-adapted (dolichocephalic, tall, slender, pink skinned, fair haired, etc.) northern European Aryans.

The Hamitic ancestors of Aryans were forced by the LGM to migrate from the Sahel to the Fertile Crescent, and from the Fertile Crescent to Anatolia by Semitic herdsmen during the Holocene.

Almost 100% of Celtic Aryans belong to haplogroup R1b. One branch of the Celtic patriline migrated from Anatolia to the Pyrenees by boat and from there to Brittany and Britain.

Savage Mongoloid herdsmen, e.g., Genghis Khan, forced many of the Celtic, etc. Aryan farmers who migrated from Anatolia to Central Asia to seek refuge in the forests of northern Europe (cattle starve in a forest). Members of this second branch of Celts who ended up in Britain were reunited with Celts who had migrated from the Pyrenees to Britain many centuries earlier.

According to the article at https://www.theguardian.com/science/201 ... a-confirms
The ancestors of the Stone Age farmers began their journey in the Bible lands, where agriculture first began, and arrived in Ireland perhaps via the southern Mediterranean. They brought with them cattle, cereals, ceramics and a tendency to black hair and brown eyes.
The natives of southern Ireland have bright blue eyes, sharp noses, skin that is as white as snow, and black hair. Those that have Anglo-Saxon ancestry have red hair. Most Scots and Scots-Irish are blue-eyed, blondish and fair-skinned.
These settlers were followed by people (Celts), initially from the Pontic steppe of southern Russia, who knew how to mine for copper and work with gold.
Small numbers of Aryan farmers may have immigrated to Europe and become hunter gatherers (and mated with Cro-Magnon women) because of droughts in the Fertile Crescent before Semites had begun to conquer, enslave and exterminate them. According to the web page at https://www.theguardian.com/science/201 ... -dna-tooth
DNA taken from the wisdom tooth of a European hunter-gatherer has given scientists an unprecedented glimpse of modern humans before the rise of farming. The Mesolithic man, who lived in Spain around 7,000 years ago, had an unusual mix of blue eyes, black or brown hair, and dark skin, according to analyses of his genetic make-up.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8467623.stm
Most European males descend from farmers
By Paul Rincon, Science reporter, BBC News

Most men in Europe can trace a line of descent to early farmers who migrated from the Near East, a study says.

The research, which looked at the most common genetic lineage in European males, appears in Plos Biology.

However, other scientists subscribe to a different interpretation - that this common lineage arrived in Europe during or before the last Ice Age.

The invention of farming was one of the most important cultural changes in the history of modern humans.

There has been much debate about whether the westerly spread of agriculture from the Near East involved the large-scale migration of farmers into Europe or whether it occurred through the take-up of ideas and new technology by indigenous hunter-gatherers.

If the latter was the more important process, one would expect the large part of European male and female lineages to trace back to Palaeolithic times (between 40,000 and 10,000 years ago).

Leicester University scientists Patricia Balaresque (who is now based with the French National Centre for Scientific Research in France), Mark Jobling, Turi King and their colleagues examined the genetic diversity of the Y chromosome - a package of DNA which is passed down more or less unchanged from father to son.

Y chromosomes can be classified into different lineages (haplogroups) which, to some extent, reflect a person's geographical ancestry.

Dr Jobling, who led the research, said: "We focused on the commonest Y-chromosome lineage in Europe, carried by about 110 million men - it follows a gradient from south-east to north-west, reaching almost 100% frequency in Ireland.

"We looked at how the lineage is distributed, how diverse it is in different parts of Europe, and how old it is."
Go west
The male lineage in question, known as R1b1b2, is most common in western Europe, reaching frequencies of 90% or more in Ireland, Wales and Spain.

But while this lineage reaches its highest frequencies on the Atlantic fringe, the researchers found that the genetic diversity within it increases as one moves east - reaching a peak in Anatolia (modern Turkey).

Genetic diversity is used as a measure of age; populations or lineages that have been around for a long time tend to accumulate a lot of diversity. This principle can be used to estimate the ages of populations.

When the researchers estimated how old the R1b1b2 lineage was in different populations across Europe, the age ranges suggested it had expanded in the Neolithic (between 5,000 and 10,000 years ago). Editor's Note: haplogroup
"R1b1b2" may be an older name or printing error.

Previous studies suggested an origin in the Palaeolithic (40,000 - 10,000 years ago). And controversies remain over how exactly to estimate the ages of Y chromosome lineages.
Crest of a wave
Studies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is inherited maternally, tell a different story. The majority of European mtDNA haplogroups appear to have arrived on the continent during the Palaeolithic.

Dr Patricia Balaresque, first author of the study, said: "In total, this means that more than 80% of European Y chromosomes descend from incoming farmers. In contrast, most maternal genetic lineages seem to descend from hunter-gatherers.

"To us, this suggests a reproductive advantage for farming males over indigenous hunter-gatherer males during the switch from hunting and gathering, to farming - maybe, back then, it was just sexier to be a farmer."

Studies of mtDNA have uncovered the signal of a migration undertaken by hunters from northern Iberia (Spain and Portugal) into northern Europe as the ice caps thawed some 10,000 years ago.

However, the latest study found no clear evidence of such a signal in its analysis of Europe's most common male lineage.

Dr Balaresque told BBC News: "The variance of reproductive success between males and females is completely different. If you look at a population, even now, most of the females have children, which is absolutely not the case for males.

"We estimate that about 40% of males do not leave any descendants. This means that each generation, you are losing the traces of 40% of males in that generation. The turnover for males is much higher than it is for females."

While R1b1b2 is most common in western Europe, some other lineages thought to have been brought into Europe by Neolithic farmers tend to be most frequent in the Near East, where the farmers started their journey. Their frequency in populations drops as one moves from the south-east to the north-west of the continent, the route taken by the agriculturalists.

But in their Plos Biology paper, the researchers write: "Mutations arising at the front of a wave of expansion have a high probability of surviving and being propagated, and can reach high frequencies far from their source."

The researchers from the University of Leicester collaborated with scientists from the Faculty of Medicine in Nantes, France, the Peninsula Medical School in Plymouth, UK, the universities of Ferrara and Pavia in Italy, Newcastle University and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, UK.

Post Reply