Ah, the moronic OATHKEEPERS. What a bunch of losers. But SPLC and JOG like to lump NA in with losers like them.leopold buncombe wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 7:26 pm... l stand corrected sir .. JOG it is and l see the reason for the change .. l admit lm a little behind the time ; hell , boys still kiss GIRLS round here where l live .. and as far as my areas hesitancy , some of it l would ascribe to the raids on some of the well-meaning but somewhat moronic OATHKEEPERS in west georgia 'bout 10 yrs ago under the monkey administration ...
https://forward.com/opinion/510506/why- ... sh-family/
https://nationalvanguard.org/2010/10/sp ... -security/
I can't understand why racially responsible Whites will not join the organization William Pierce founded, unless it is moral cowardice.
If they believe what he was telling us then, why not join with us instead of simply telling us to "keep up the good work." His serious calls to arms against SPLC vampires and those in SPLC's "hate Whitey" corner, including DHS, FBI and the rest of JOG's alphabet agencies sure motivated some of us 22 years ago with his courageous "Feasting on the Sheep" -- and is what set NA apart from the moronic, alleged "extreme right-wingers" like OATHKEEPERS.
You know, some people criticize me because I am not polite enough in talking about the Jews. They believe that it is very vulgar of me to refer to the Jews as vampires or bloodsuckers or parasites. They remind me that most Jews wear nice suits and drive nice cars and live in expensive condos — so they couldn’t really be as bad as I say. Many Jews are polite, well-educated people — lawyers and businessmen — and I really should just stick to the facts, they say, and not resort to name-calling. That’s not polite. That’s not gentlemanly.
Well, listen, I just wish that some of these gentlemen who think I’m not polite enough would talk about the Jews themselves. They can be as polite as they want. They can stick to the facts and avoid name-calling. I’d love to hear them do that. There are thousands of gentlemen out there who know the facts and also have access to the media. But they’re all keeping their mouths shut. They’re all afraid that they may be kicked out of the country club if they say anything the Jews don’t like, no matter how politely they say it. And since that leaves the burden on me, I’m obliged to try to get the message out as effectively as I can.
I deliberately use colorful language. I deliberately use provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my listeners. It may be offensive to the gentlemen when I refer to Jews collectively as deceivers and destroyers and bloodsuckers, the way the Great Reformer Martin Luther did, for example. But I believe that the language I use is appropriate and accurate, even if it is colorful sometimes. Anyway, I’ll just give you a few facts and let you decide whether or not “deceiver” or “destroyer” or “bloodsucker” is an accurate description of the Jews as a whole, as a race.
...[S]eeing that the shepherds had left their posts or fallen asleep, the vampires moved in to feast on blood. The Jews took over Hollywood, over Madison Avenue, over television, over our popular music industry, over our principal newspapers and magazines; and, using this media weapon to control the lemmings and corrupt our government, our courts, and our other institutions, they began feasting. We need to begin shooting vampires.
https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/05/fe ... the-sheep/
Have things improved for White American sheep now, 22 years after Pierce's admonitions in "Feasting?" What will it be like in 2045, 22 years from now if serious White separatists don't get off their duffs and resist the vampires.